Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments to Create 21st Century Skills

Throughout this module, we explored different technology-enhanced learning environments, including the Jasper series, WISE (Web-Based Inquiry Science Program), My World and Chemland. All of these programs have both benefits and drawbacks, and the individual teacher would need to figure out if these programs would meet the needs of their students. I’ve included the benefits and limitations (in my personal opinion) of each program in the table below. I think the main limitation is that these programs only apply to middle school grade levels and above. I need to spend some time researching and finding programs that would work well with our younger learners as I think technology-enhanced learning environments have the potential of getting these students interested and excited about learning math and science. Does anyone know any that they have already used with a younger group of students (K-5)?

 

When choosing which (if any) of these programs will work with a specific group of students, the teacher needs to look at whether or not the program will enhance the learning. This is true for any type of technology that is integrated into a classroom. Teachers and students should not be using technology just because it is easily accessible, but rather, the benefits needs to be evaluated. All of these programs fit into a constructivist classroom, where the teacher takes on a facilitator role (instead of being the expert). It allows students opportunities to work collaboratively with their peers while they develop their problem solving and critical thinking skills. Through this process students are able to expand their understanding of specific topics that they find interesting and it allows them to take ownership of their learning. I think all of the learning environments teach students the 21st century skills to become life-long learners. It’s up to individual teachers to decide which ones fit the needs of their individual students.  

 

Program Benefits Limitations
Jasper Series (used Anchored Instruction) -Inquiry based

-helps students critically think about complex problems

-fits in a constructivism classroom

-makes connections to other subject areas (science, socials, English)

-short enough to hold student attention (approx. 17 mins.)

-encourages collaboration

-students actively engage with the questions

-A little dated (1990s)

-for grades 5+ only

WISE (Web-Based Inquiry Science Program)

(used SKI design)

-Inquiry based

-can use existing units or can edit own

-can create own unit

-contains a “teacher community” to help support teachers

-has students using technology

-fits in a constructivism classroom

-encourages collaboration

-students actively engage with different activities (answer questions after viewing videos)

-for grades 6+ only

-very lengthy units, might need to be chunked by the teacher

My World (used Lfu approach) -for K-12 classrooms

-helps students create and analyze data (visual)

-teachers are able to see existing projects

-students are able to collaborate

-has students using technology

-opportunities for teachers to collaborate

-supports inquiry skills

-fits in constructivism classroom

-many of the existing projects are quite complex, might be more suitable for middle school and up
Chemland (used T-Gem) -encourages collaboration

-teacher is facilitator

-fits in constructivism classroom

-has students using technology

-inquiry based

-interactive

-students able to explore topics of interest

-complex science topics, therefore, suitable for high school/university students

4 comments

  1. Hi Nicole!

    Although these programs may apply to Middle School and above, I think you would definitely agree that the pedagogical concepts behind each TELE can be applied to students in the Junior School. If you could design any TELE for these younger students, would you use similar technologies and change the content to be more appropriate, or would you change the medium entirely, perhaps to be more tactile and experiential?

    Cheers,
    Gordon

    1. Hi Gordon,
      I think that I would change a little bit of both. The content would need to be changed so that it would be more appropriate, especially for those students who are not strong readers. I would also want it to be a little more tactile for students. In the primary grades, students are still using blocks, cuisenaire rods, unifix cubes, etc to explore their number sense. I was hoping to find some sites or programs that are a little more basic and deal with some of the “building block” concepts of math.
      Thanks for your response,
      Nicole

  2. Hi Nicole,

    Have you looked into PhET simulations https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations/category/new? Some of our classmates discussed this for the LfU model. I know you teach upper intermediate and I think your students will respond to well to it. I explored this with some of my students the other day as they were struggling with Area and Perimeter. They were engaged and responded well to it. I will definitely be exploring more and seeing what other simulations will be powerful for my students.

    1. Hi Amanda,
      Thanks for the reminder of PhET simulations. Yes, I have explored this a little bit with my students, but probably not as much as I should as it is a great resource. Are there any other resources that you use with your students?
      Nicole

Leave a Reply to gordon chiu Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *