EKM Workshop Materials for Monday May 26

Hi everyone.

The following are some supplemental materials for next week’s Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning workshop on Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories:

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618-627.

Wragg, E. C. (2012). An introduction to classroom observation. New York: Routledge.

We hope to see you there on Monday May 26th at noon in room T206.

Next EKM Workshop: Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories

The next event for the Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is a workshop that will explore Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories.

Would you like to know more about how to use teaching observation and inventories to evaluate teaching and how to use these tools in educational research activities? Join us for an informative session on Monday May 26th at noon in room T206. Bring your lunch and cookies will be provided!

Be sure to RSVP Erendira if you plan to attend.

Journal Club: Absence Monitoring to Reduce Nursing Student Attrition

This week’s EKM Journal Club explored the following paper:

Developing a national computerised absence monitoring and management system to reduce nursing student attrition: Evaluation of staff and student perspectives Currie K., McCallum J., Murray J., Scott J., Strachan E., Yates L., Wright M. (2014)  Nurse Education Today,  34  (5) , pp. 738-743. 

The study by Currie et al. surveyed large nursing cohorts in Scotland and described their work examining students and faculty perspectives on recording attendance. The study looked at a computerized system to monitor attendance. It is a mandatory requirement for hours to be recorded in the UK. Before indulging into the details of the study, those present at the journal club were asked about their thoughts regarding mandatory attendance and their experience within their own schooling. One member with experience in Nova Scotia mentioned that she had the same requirement of mandatory class hours and her attendance was recorded along with clinical hours. Others had mandatory clinical hours they had to accumulate, but did not remember a requirement to be in class at all times.

The paper explored that non-attendance is linked to attrition. Attrition rates were reported at generally around 20 – 25% in bachalaureatte nursing programs. Within the journal club, similar attrition rates across Canada were discussed for a four year degree programs, although advanced standing programs (such as our own) often have far lower rates of attrition. As a result, the authors wanted to identify students that were more likely to drop out and the researchers suggested that monitoring attendance could help identify those students earlier. The study also aimed to see if the intervention of monitoring attendance would help decrease attrition rates.

Many within the group questioned why students were not attending class and were more concerned about the reasons behind the absence rather than monitoring the absence itself. Some issues for non-attendance brought forward were health including self-care, family and the reality that school does not meet students’ expectations or needs. If we are trying to prevent attrition, it might be more beneficial to assess the reason for attrition rather than monitoring absence.

Those present also discussed the topic of support for students in areas other than academic excellence such as financial support, family support and counselling. It was mentioned that the pastoral support available where the study took place may be different from support commonly available here. In the study, one advisor was allocated to a small group of 10-15 students, rather than one advisor for every 120 students as it is the case in the UBC BSN program, and with many other programs in Canada.

Students’ attendance in the study was tracked and logged within a system that would send colour coded email messages to students at the end of each week. Green indicated good attendance with no issues, orange meant caution and that attendance was not perfect, while pink indicated poor attendance and the student was asked to contact a tutor. The system was not perfect and occasionally had glitches giving wrong colour coded messages to students.

Members of the journal club brought forward the issue that there was no gaurantee that students would not register attendance for peers that did not actually attend class (either by use of magnetic swipe card or signing in). Another attendee would like to explore further the correlation between attendance and academic performance; just because a student is sitting in class, does not necessarily mean that he or she is paying attention.

A poll was taken to determine what level of mandatory attendance should be implemented? Majority of the group said 80 – 90% with some grace towards illness. Many people within the group agreed that the paper did not have a productive approach in terms of attrition rates. The paper was quite simplistic in its approach when the issue is more complex.

Someone mentioned changing the word “mandatory” to “expectations” and providing students with a clear outline of appropriate guidelines. Another participant discussed the need to look at patterns of absences, as freqquent absnces on certain weekdays might indicate a pattern. For example, looking at the thread courses involved in the UBC SoN program and the difference in attendance rates at different times of the year, such as just before an exam or paper is due, or when there is an expected guest. If faculty can figure out why certain patterns occur, it can influence actions towards solving the problem and working with students in the process.

Other discussions threaded throughout the session included the question of professionalism in attending class as with being present for clinical work; is it really any different? Professional programs expect a certain level of commitment and attendance is more crucial than any other general undergraduate degree. Many thought that this should not be regarded in the same way as other adult education programs, where attendance requirments are more flexible.

It was noted there could be many valid reasons why someone would not attend class. What if someone is already well versed in a particular area, is it necessary for students to attend class when they already know the material? Do they have a right to skip the class or should they have an obligation to their peers in contributing their expertise and helping those with questions who are having trouble with the subject matter?

Another journal club member brought up the issue of students with consistently poor attendance and relying on other students for notes and information on what they missed. Is this fair to the students that make the effort to be present for class?

Lastly, within several nursing programs especially the UBC SoN program, students are mature adults. Some attendees believed it would be a waste of time to be tracking attendance since students are capable of making their own decisions and ultimately will do what they believe is in their best interest. This was contrasted with the alternative view that as students are entering a vocational program they should be expected to be present whenever possible to demonstrate commitment, responsibility, engender a sense of professional integrity.

Overall, the study in the paper indicated that recording attendance might help identify students at risk earlier (although this was not gauranteed) but there were issues in adopting an automated sytem, and it could be perceived as punative, and would not necessarily alter attrition.

Below are the presentation slides and polls taken during the session:

EKM Journal Club Slides May 10

Thank you to all who attended the journal club, it was quite a controversial debate!

The next event for the Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning will be a workshop exploring using Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories. The workshop will take place on Tuesday May 22 at noon in room T182. Erendira will send out a reminder and of course cookies with be provided!

Please RSVP to Erendira by email if you plan to attend.

 

EKM Journal Club May 5th: Absence Monitoring to Reduce Nursing Student Attrition

Greetings all,

Next week we will be exploring the topic of student absence monitoring at the next Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Journal Club. The session will be held on Monday, May 5th from 1200-1300 in Room T182. Below is a link to the paper we will be reviewing:

Developing a national computerised absence monitoring and management system to reduce nursing student attrition: Evaluation of staff and student perspectives Currie K., McCallum J., Murray J., Scott J., Strachan E., Yates L., Wright M. (2014)  Nurse Education Today,  34  (5) , pp. 738-743. 

Please join us for an exciting discussion related to absence monitoring and nursing student attrition from both staff and student perspectives. We would like to welcome faculty, clinical instructors, as well as students to attend. Bring your lunch and a beverage, cookies will be provided.

Please RSVP to Erendira if you plan to attend.

See you there!

 

Journal Club: Grading of Group Assignments from Nursing Students’ Perspectives

This week’s EKM Journal Club explored the following paper: Understanding nursing students’ perspectives on the grading of group work assessments Smith M. & Rogers J. (2014) Nurse Education in Practice, 14(2) 112-116

The study by Smith and Rogers sought the perspectives of two large nursing cohorts (475 and 275 students) regarding group work itself as well as the grading process involved. Before indulging into the details of the study, those present at the journal club were asked the reasons for which they valued group work.

Many agreed that group work allows for an easier grading process compared to administering individual assignments. Additionally, journal club members believed that group assignments facilitate team work and relationship building among peers. Some disadvantages associated with group work were also identified. Teachers found that students sometimes felt they were penalized when the dynamic was not favorable, and when others in the group were perceived to be putting in less work than required.

Those present also discussed situations where students did a poor job presenting the material in a class group-presentation and the need for instructors to re-teach it as a consequence, creating additional stress for both parties involved. Finding time to get together to work on group assignments was also presented as an issue, as was the debate of students picking their own group vs. being put into groups by the instructor.

The study reported in the paper was a creative mixture between a cross-sectional and longitudinal design. Two groups of students were examined by survey on their attitudes to group-work and grading (particularly same-mark for the whole group vs. peer weighted marking for part of the grade). One cohort was a group of new students, and a the second a group of senior students, who were surveyed before and after a group assignment.  The surveys were reviewed by experts with no association to the study and were also piloted by 6 student volunteers, and modifications were made accordingly.

While all students valued team working skills in the context of nursing and agreed that group assignments encouraged these competencies, many did not enjoy the assessment aspect of group work. Overall, students believed that group work penalized good students and that it was not as reliable as individual assessments. Students’ opinions changed minimally throughout the course of the study: while the majority of students indicated not having a preference for either grading method before the assignment, 37% reported feeling more comfortable with the weighted approach after having completed the assignment.

Responses from those present at the journal club were varied when asked their opinions on considering student preferences (as only about 45% of students actually liked group-assignments in the study). After much discussion, most agreed that student preferences should be considered to some extent in assessment design, but should nort be the presiding factor in selecting an assessment strategy.

The pros and cons associated with weighted marking were discussed, and while some found it important to engage students in evaluating their peers, issues surrounding grade negotiation amongst students were brought forward. Additionally, students’ inexperience in grading and lack of knowledge in what to look for in an assignment as well as their tendencies to mark more emotionally compared to instructors was also considered. Good clear marking rubrics were agreed as an essential component for the process to work effectively. It was also noted that with small groups (such as 2 or 3 students) peer review and grading might not be an approriate strategy to use in group work, and simply awarding a shared grade might be simpler to manage.

Overall, it was found that the study was well designed, however, the methods section could have been presented more clearly. While the authors addressed the quality of the questionnaires, only face validity was considered. However, there was a good attempt to establish this. Most agreed with the author’s recommendations and valued the suggestion to build teaching strategies into the course that allow students to reflect on team processes and the skills required for positive outcomes.

The presentation slides used throughout our discussion can be found here:

Group Assignment Journal Club Slides

 

 

Next EKM Journal Club: April 8, Grading of Group Work Assessments

Hello all,

Our next Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Journal Club will be held Tuesday April 8th at 12:00-13:00 in Room T182. We will be exploring the following paper:

Understanding nursing students’ perspectives on the grading of group work assessments Smith M. & Rogers J. (2014) Nurse Education in Practice, 14(2) 112-116

Come along and enjoy a lively discussion with your colleagues about the issues raised in this paper. All faculty, clinical instructors and students are welcome. Bring your lunch and a beverage, cookies and coffee will be provided.

Please RSVP to Erendira if you plan to attend.

See you there!