Event invitation: Journal and Book Club Brown Bag

April Journal club

Maura MacPhee, Elizabeth Kenny McCann Education Scholar, will lead the discussion of a paper* on analytical rubrics.

*Shipman, D., Roa, M., Hooten, J., & Wang, Z. (2012). Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: The positive and the negative. Nurse Education Today, 32,246-249.

Read about past brown bags here:

March: https://blogs.ubc.ca/teachingmatters/2015/03/19/recap-case-base-learning-and-simulation-brown-bag/

February: https://blogs.ubc.ca/teachingmatters/2015/02/24/recap-threshold-concepts/

 

Question? Comments? Suggestions?

Contact:
Khristine Carino, DMD, PhD

Flexible Learning Coordinator

School of Nursing | Faculty of Applied Sciences | The University of British Columbia

khristine.carino@ubc.ca

 

Recap: Case-base learning and simulation brown bag

march 17 imageBy Maura MacPhee

Please see the outline of key points from the March 17th Brown Bag article. We had a good discussion about using case-based learning and high fidelity simulation in our undergraduate nursing program. We also discussed the importance of having measurable indicators for student competency assessment. We are currently working on a project in the School of Nursing to level core practice competencies so that we can better assess student learning gaps and provide supports proactively—before students get too far along in the program. Stay tuned…. Maura

 

EKM Brown Bag March 17, 2015

Raurell-Torreda, M., Olivet-Pujol, J., Romero-Collado, A., Malagon-Aguilera, M., Patino-Maso, J., & Baltasar-Bague, A. (2015). Case-based learning and simulation: useful tools to enhance nurses’ education? Non-randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(1): 1, 34-42.

Key findings from article

  1. European Schools of Nursing are trying to standardize education and licensure requirements. Bologna Process-European Ministers of Higher Education.
  2. Shift from rote memorization to focus on competencies needed for safe practice.
  3. Came up with 6 categories.
  4. Exploration of methods to best teach core concepts/competencies. Problem-based, cooperative, case-based, role play, simulations.
  5. Case-based learning and simulation used in this article.
  6. Case-based: students feel more connected to reality and learn how to plan for care delivery. Increases autonomy, bridges theory-practice, increases student motivation. Considered the best ‘low tech’ way to help students integrate and apply competencies (KSA)
  7. Simulation-main principle is safe practice with debriefing/feedback. Decreases pressure.
  8. In the US, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing have been using simulation to help prepare students for making accurate decisions, work in team, communicate better, consider outcomes of incorrect choices.
  9. Used Lunney’s (2010) case study outline to create cases for 8 areas of nursing knowledge:
  10. Medications, med diagnosis, history, current disease info, nursing diagnostics, intervention, physician orders, lab data and tests (p. 36)
  11. Students worked in groups of 3-5 students to do a care plan.
  12. Randomly assigned to groups of 2-3 for simulations.
  13. “Blinded” professor scoring performance of Yes/No
  14. Used 5 purchased medical-surgical scenarios from NLN.
  15. Student/nurse performance was scored for:
    1. Patient safety and communication
    2. Patient assessment
    3. Recognition of signs and symptoms
    4. Problem identification
    5. Nursing diagnostics and interventions to address key problems
  16. Findings:
    1. Experimental better than Control group on patient assessment
    2. Experienced nurses superior on nursing evaluations and interventions to Controls: same as Experimental group
    3. Nurses with more years of experience did better with assessments and interventions.
    4. Trend: Both groups of students outscored nurses on patient safety (e.g., rules-based policies, such as checking ID bands, allergies)
    5. Trend: Control group showed worse critical thinking than the other two groups

 

Design

Control (Traditional classroom)→simulation performance: 80 minute lecture and discussion (66)

Experimental (Case-based)→simulation performance. 50 minute lecture/discussion and 30 min case work (35)

Experienced nurses→simulation performance (59)

Students 2nd year in clinical core course: Adult Patients 1. Had not had any clinical practice in hospital. Course focus is on nursing process.

OSCE with checklist-tested it for validity/reliability.

Implications from Authors

  1. Assessment is considered the most critical phase of nursing process—identifying the problem. (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 1998).
  2. Case-based learning may be one way to help students standardize patient assessment protocols (and other aspects of nursing process). Students need to “always receive patient information in the same manner and learn to structure this information systematically” (p. 40).
  3. Case-based learning resulted in superior assessment skills among students; some evidence of enhanced critical thinking skills.
  4. Patient safety needs to be taught in schools of nursing-and reinforced in practice to ensure transfer of learning. If patient safety standards are not being consistently met by nurses in practice, simulations for students and nurses should be used to reinforce patient safety practices.
  5. Case-based learning should be used in tandem with simulation. “…the student who fails in a simulation will most likely not be competent in clinical practice. Therefore, we must identify the category in which failure occurred in order to strengthen aspects of the undergraduate curriculum and apply this feedback to improve academic preparation of students entering the professional environment.

Recap: Threshold Concepts

brownbagBy Maura MacPhee

Our first 2015 journal article was: “Caring as a ‘threshold concept’: transforming students in higher education into health(care) professionals” by Lynn Clouder.The article can be found in Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 505-517.

The concepts we discussed from the article: threshold concept versus core concept, troublesome knowledge, non-linear learning, integration, disciplinary boundaries, liminality, critical reflection, emotional capital.

Threshold concepts are those concepts that represent transformative learning—when a student gains a new identity of themselves as a professional within their discipline. The article argues that this is an emotional transformation that can be difficult and “troublesome” for students—as they grapple with new identities and become professionally socialized. The “liminal space” refers to those occasions when students are dealing with “unsettling episodes” (e.g., unethical behaviours in practice areas) that they must emotionally resolve. Once a student is transformed and has a new identity, there is no going back.

In our group, we discussed ways of recognizing these troubling emotional issues for students, and we identified some ways of helping students cope with new identity development. Some strategies:
1. Critical reflection/journaling with constructive feedback
2. Time after clinicals (i.e., post-clinical conferences) for debriefing
3. Peer support groups for sharing (neutral faculty facilitator)

There was general agreement that “caring” is a threshold concept for nursing. But how do we differentiate between caring in the nursing profession and caring by other healthcare professionals? Note: The article was written from a physiotherapy perspective. The group commented that we need to have more discussions during curriculum revisions with respect to our threshold concepts and how we should teach them.

We briefly discussed the four phases of caring (Tronto, 1993) that were mentioned in the article.
1. Caring about “involves recognition that caring is needed” (assessment)
2. Taking care “involves taking some responsibility for the identified need and determining how to respond to it” (diagnosis)
3. Care-giving “involves meeting of need for care, direct contact and physical work with clients at a care-giving level” (planning, implementation)
4. Care receiving “involves (the) client’s response to care” (evaluation)
Is there a parallel between these types of caring and nursing process? Is nursing process our unique, disciplinary approach to caring? (See the nursing process connections in bold).

As noted in the article, in many instances, healthcare professionals focus the “cerebral” work of their disciplines at #1 and #2. #3 may be the essence of bedside nursing, and yet, we often give it away to others as functional tasks. This is happening in nursing practice–a shift towards skill mix with practical nurses and care aides delivering the bedside care.

Two questions were posed for further reflection. Please share your comments to these questions.
1. How do we level threshold concepts, such as caring, in an accelerated program?
2. How do we evaluate transformative learning in students?

Stay tuned for the next brown bag on March 17th (St. Patrick’s Day) from noon-12:50.-Maura MacPhee