Assignment 3.7 – King’s Statements through Interacting Allegories

This blog post will address three themes that emerge in Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water from pages 79-93. The first involves the dialogue between Lionel and Norma, in which they seem to talk past each other in the car on the way to the reserve. The second is in Lionel’s “third mistake” – getting a job as Bill Buffalo Bursum’s Home Entertainment Barn (King, Green Grass 80). The third sees Babo Jones attempting to tell the Old Indians’ creation story to patrolman Jimmy Delano. This post will discuss the allegories that King makes in these sections through the characters, and the possible meanings that the interactions of the allegorical figures might have.

Lionel and Norma

Throughout Green Grass, Running Water, the reader is presented with dialogue between Lionel and his aunt Norma as they drive. During these sections, it might strike the reader that they both seem to talk past each other, not hearing what the other is saying and, instead, talking into the air. Lionel’s treatment of what Norma has to say reflects a kind of ‘not this again’ attitude that one would associate with a stereotypical ‘rebellious teen.’ However, given that King chalks his novel full of allegory and metaphor, the style of this dialogue must have some meaning.

An attitude similar to Lionel’s comes up often in Canadian public opinion toward Aboriginal affairs with the oft-repeated response that First Nations should ‘just get over it,’ and that ‘it’ was ‘in the past.’ We could ‘move on already’ if it weren’t for their stubbornness and reliance on public funds – a reasoning commonly heard. “‘Long time ago, auntie,'” says Lionel (King, Green Grass 33). “‘Can’t change the past'” (ibid.). Given Norma’s constant lament that Lionel is trying to “be a white man” (King, Green Grass 80), his attitude toward her may allude to this popular non-Indigenous Canadian frame of mind. Lionel’s drowsiness as he drives may also aid this allusion, as white Canadians (and their government) may express a ‘tiredness’ of hearing about Indigenous issues.

At this point, Lionel says that he is “just thinking,” and that “some people think when they drive” (King, Green Grass 55-57). Later on, Norma sarcastically states, “You think any harder, you’ll be snoring” (King, Green Grass 79). The Canadian government may frequently say that they are concerned with Aboriginal affairs and are investing resources to work towards a “nation-to-nation relationship,” but they are really just sitting on the issue – sleeping, metaphorically. Lionel blames other things – the wind – for his sleepiness, just as the government may blame other circumstances for their inaction (King, Green Grass 79). He then attempts to set a distraction from his real problems – “‘Boy, if it weren’t for the clouds,’ he said, ‘you could see all the way to the mountains'” (ibid.). Norma sees through it – “‘You could see the mountains real good if you came out to the reserve once in a while'” (ibid.). “Mountains” here may allude to how big this issues are. From the Ottawa, the issues are not present, but on the reserve they are unavoidable.

Lionel and Bill Buffalo Bursum

Lionel’s third mistake, getting a job at Bill Buffalo Bursum’s Home Entertainment Barn, has tremendous meaning when one understands the allegories that King is making with Bursum. Jane Flick notes that ‘Bill Buffalo Bursum’ is a combination of “the names of two men famous for their hostility to Indians,” mainly in the form of exploitation (148). The first is Holm O. Bursum (1867-1953), who, as a New Mexico senator, proposed the Bursum Bill of 1921 (ibid.). This bill “aimed to divest Pueblos of a large portion of their lands and to give land title and water rights to non-Indians” (ibid.). The second is “refers to William F. Cody (1846-1917), an exploiter of Indians for entertainment in Buffalo Bill Cody’s Wild West Show[1]” (ibid.). Taken together, Bill Buffalo Bursum’s character is a reference to the exploitation of First Nations peoples for both their land and labour. The character’s ignorance towards Natives signifies the objectification of them in the past by the historical figures he alludes to.

Lionel story about getting a job and working at at Bursum’s store reflects the mechanism of this exploitation. Even though Lionel planned to go to school, he is enticed by Bursum to work at the Home Entertainment Barn (King, Green Grass 80). It is interesting to note that King has specifically chosen an entertainment store, further solidifying the allegory to William F. Cody and Buffalo Bill Cody’s Wild West Show. Lionel is then given a flashy gold jacket by the white owner, making him a piece in the white entertainment business.

Importantly, Lionel gets the job expecting to leave after a year, once he has saved up enough to go to university. However, he becomes tied into the job, continually telling himself that he would apply “next year,” but instead, his labour is exploited until the opportunity seems distant and impossible to him (King, Green Grass 83). Similarly, First Nations peoples were enticed by colonial governments to sign agreements that looked appealing in the short term, and that would allow those peoples to carry on afterwards. However, they were intended by the government to be enablers of unending exploitation of land and people. Within the context of Green Grass, Running Water, Bursum enacts one of these exploitative agreements with Lionel through his employment.

Babo Jones and Jimmy Delano

King goes to lengths throughout his text to craft Babo Jones, who is a character reference to a black slave aboard the San Dominick in Herman Melville’s “Benito Cereno” (Flick 145). As the ships barber, Melville’s character deceives the captain and leads a revolt, guiding those aboard to “freedom in Africa” (ibid.). This allusion is reinforced once when Babo says, “My great-great-great grandfather was a barber on a ship” (King, Green Grass 92), and again when Babo and Dr. Hovaugh cross the border and the border guard assumes that Babo is Hovaugh’s “property” (Flick 159; King, Green Grass 237). Moreover, Melville’s captain of the San Dominick is named Captain Delano, which is a name shared with King’s patrolman Jimmy Delano.

Jimmy Delano, however, may be another character that has multiple meanings outside of the text. Flick believes that he is an allegory for Columbus Delano, head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs under Ulysses S. Grant (146). During his time in office, Delano created the reservation system in order to make space for colonial expansion westward and to expedite the assimilation of Native populations, simultaneously hunting buffalo nearly to extinction and destroying the culture of Indigenous peoples from the plains (ibid.).

In the passage (King, Green Grass 91-93), Babo attempts to retell the creation story of the Old Indians to Jimmy Delano, but she is incapable of getting the story right (likely because it is not her story). Babo, through the book, seems to be fairly ambivalent about the policemen around him, and continually frustrates their efforts to get a story they are comfortable with. In effect, Babo is undermining the efforts of the white authorities to control the narrative. Because Delano’s character has two meanings, this not only cements the allegory to “Benito Cereno,” but serves to decolonize the acts of Columbus Delano.

As we know, King pays a great deal of attention to which stories are told, by whom they are told, and how they are told (King, The Truth About Stories 10). Babo embodies this in his care to tell the story correctly, but King disguises a specific reference to his ideas about the power of stories through the dialogue between Babo and Delano. In the context of the passage, they appear to be talking about straight razors, but the dialogue reads differently when isolated:

“… Have I got stories -”

“Those things are pretty dangerous, aren’t they?” (King, Green Grass 92).

Endnotes

  1. Please note that this article overlooks, excuses, or even supports William F. Cody’s exploitation of Native peoples, and that the views expressed are not supported by me. It is interesting nonetheless to read an example of how “Wild West” characters such as Cody are still popularly celebrated, rather than denigrated, for their colonial acts.

 

Works Cited

“A New Nation-to-Nation Process.” Liberal.ca. Liberal Party of Canada, n.d. Web. 27 July 2016.

Canadian Press. “First Nations Student Presses Trudeau on Third World Living Conditions.” National Observer. Observer Media Group, 28 Apr. 2016. Web. 27 July 2016.

Cooper, Sam. “A Bigotry Engrained in Bones.” The Province. Postmedia Network Inc., 10 Oct. 2013. Web. 27 July 2016.

Delano, Columbus. “Report of the Secretary of the Interior, 1873.” HathiTrust Digital Library. HathiTrust via Washington: G.P.O., 28 Apr. 2014. Web. 27 July 2016.

Flick, Jane. “Readings Notes for Thomas King’s Green Grass, Running Water.” Canadian Literature 161/162 (1999): 140-172. Web. 27 July 2016.

Historia – Bel99TV. “Buffalo Bill – William F. Cody – Real Film Footage – With His Wild West Show – 1908.” Online video clip. YouTube. YouTube, 17 Oct. 2013. Web. 27 July 2016.

Hyslop, Stephen G. “How the West was Spun – Buffalo Bill Cody’s Wild West Show.” HistoryNet. HistoryNet, 5 Aug. 2008. Web. 27 July 2016.

King, Thomas. Green Grass, Running Water. Toronto: HarperPerennial, 2007 [1993]. Print.

King, Thomas. The Truth About Stories: A Native Narrative. Toronto: Anansi, 2003. Print.

Martinez, Mathew. “All Indian Pueblo Council and the Bursum Bill.” New Mexico History. State Records Center & Archives, n.d. Web. 27 July 2016.

McSorley, Tim. “Government Inaction Has Led to an Independent Database for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women.” VICE Canada. VICE Media LLC, 5 Aug. 2014. Web. 27 July 2016.

Melville, Herman. Benito Cereno. Raleigh, N.C.: Generic NL Freebook Publisher, n.d. [1856]. Web. 27 July 2016.

“Pueblo Indians.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 11 May 2015. Web. 27 July 2016.

9 Comments

Filed under Unit III

9 Responses to Assignment 3.7 – King’s Statements through Interacting Allegories

  1. mariam manghat

    Hi Nick,

    Really enjoyed your post, I also chose to look at Lionel but with a bit of a different angle. I think his relationship with Norma and how she wants him to be accepting of his heritage was and is probably the relationship of many parents today. The children can be easily manipulated when they are younger into wanting to be heroes like John Wayne, and this can cause them to misinterpret their culture. I really enjoyed how you focused on a relationship with the Canadian government and Lionel, as it now does seem much the same. I think Lionel is hiding from his heritage and being so effected by a fictional character like John Wayne as a child were a big factor in him committing his three mistakes.
    Thanks,
    Mariam Manghat

  2. Samantha Smirfitt

    Hi Nick!
    I really enjoyed your post – you looked at a lot of characters that went over my head a bit. I was definitely intimidated by my unfamiliarity with the characters that you tackled so I appreciate that you fleshed out who the character allude to so fully. I specifically liked the time you took to expand upon the scenes and the characters interactions instead of just stating what each character was an allusion to. You provide a lot of rich hyperlinks that aid in your analyst – a lot of which are rabbit holes that piqued my interest and led me to Google more about the subjects.

    • NickBabey

      I’m glad you appreciated the hyperlinks! I spent quite some time exploring and looking for things that I thought would fit well. The ability to hyperlink is certainly one of the most positive aspects of the digital format. Even in news articles and op-eds, I find them frequently. They make pieces far more immersive, and, I think, can be seen as an extremely accessible and expansive intertext.

  3. Linda McNeilly Purcell

    Hi Nick and Danica,

    Thank you Nick for your post, I really enjoyed reading your analysis and comments. I too noticed throughout the book the various characters talking past each other. I wondered while I was reading why King choose to do this, and I like yours and Danica’s comment that it is related to past conversations between the government and First Nations Peoples. I think this is correct, and I believe King is using this as a method to show the lack of communication between First Nations Peoples and the government. He uses this as a way of showing that communication is a two-way street. When two people are together, and they do not listen to each other, then they are not communicating. However, I believe there is more to King’s message, and I believe it has to do with stories. King shows time and again the importance of stories, and the interconnection between people through stories, but if we do not take the time to really listen to each other’s story, we can never truly understand. My question to you is, do you agree with my analysis? If so, why? If not, why not?

    I look forward to your response.

    Linda

    • NickBabey

      I found that a lot of the cross-talking between Norma and Lionel is based on how those characters identify. Norma sees herself primarily as an Indigenous person, and she sees Lionel as a kind of ‘false’ Aboriginal. Lionel is distanced from his community and is attempting to enter a world outside of it. The comparison of their relationship to that between the Canadian government and First Nations people is valuable because it allows us to read into the importance of relative identities. So long as they cannot understand the roots and causes of the other’s position, they will continue to speak past one another.

      I do agree with your analysis. Understanding the roots of another’s perspective can only be done by understanding and learning their story as they would tell it. We can implement Chamberlin’s thinking here as well. His goal is to locate a common space where stories can interact, for at times (as we can see with Lionel and Norma), stories may not be compatible in and of themselves. He locates this space in the performance of stories and in the act of creating meaning. It is not possible to entirely understand the story of another (‘I’ will never be ‘you’), but if we take the time to identify the meanings being created and the impacts of another’s story, we may begin to make some progress through the legitimization of that story.

  4. DanicaFerguson

    Hi Nick,
    Great post! I really enjoyed your first section on the conversation between Norma and Lionel. As I was reading the novel, I picked up on the “talking past eachother”-ness however I did not stop to think about deeper meanings as to why this was. Your points and connections to their conversation symbolizing relations and conversations between the government and First Nations today make me think about that section of the text in a renewed light! I noticed as I was reading that this talking past each other doesn’t just happen between Lionel and Norma, but at many points in the text between a variety of characters. Do you think King is drawing the same connection each time or perhaps it may be different depending on the characters and the situation? Interested to hear your thoughts!

    Cheers,
    Danica

    • NickBabey

      I noticed it primarily between Lionel and Norma – which other characters did you notice cross-talk between? I assume that the meaning King is attempting to draw out of any of the relationships in his novel can be spotted by looking at the allegory behind those characters themselves, and how those allegories are placed in interaction.

      I would avoid thinking that King, elusive as he is, is drawing the same conclusion when he uses different characters. Identifying what those specific characters stand for would be the first step in understanding what the relationship between them could possibly mean.

  5. CamBullen

    Hi Nick,

    Stellar post as always. I hadn’t picked up on the allegory contained within the conversation between Lionel and Norma, but it is an incredibly powerful metaphor once noticed.

    I wonder if this allegory can be extended to Lionel’s three mistakes? It seems to me that – especially in the first and second mistake – Lionel’s mistakes were as much a function of other people and societal systems letting him down as his own poor decision making. This appears to be reminiscent of the way in which many Indigenous groups have hardship thrust upon them, yet they are often blamed for these ‘mistakes’.

    Maybe its a bit of a stretch, but do you think theres a relationship here?

    • NickBabey

      Absolutely! I wanted to look into Lionel’s three mistakes as a package to see if there was anything to uncover there, but that didn’t fit the constraints of the assignment. I’m sure you’re on to something there – Lionel’s stories could reflect the dark irony that First Nations are blamed for being oppressed by their oppressors. It would take a closer reading to elaborate further, I’m sure, but such a reading surely would be illuminating.

Leave a Reply to CamBullen Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *