Monthly Archives: March 2021

Observation 3 – EOSC 333 201 (Web-Oriented Course)

On March 8th I observed Dominique teach her class EOSC 333 – Elemental and Isotopic Geochemistry. This course is normally face-to-face but because of the COVID-19 pandemic it is currently being taught online via Zoom. EOSC 333 is a 50-minute class for geology majors that takes place from 9:00 to 9:50 am on Mondays and Wednesdays. For this lesson ~15 of 27 students were present.

Dominique values student engagement and active learning, where she is constantly creating space and opportunities for her students to ask questions and interact with the course materials, and before moving on to a new idea or starting an activity she asks students if they need anything clarified. She also values constructivism, where during the lesson she provided students with opportunities to reflect on their own previous knowledge about a subject by prompting them with a question (i.e., regarding mid-ocean ridges or ophiolites) and express their previous knowledge out loud or in the Zoom chat, where she would then supplements them with new information so they can build on whatever foundation they came to class with. Lastly, Dominique values motivation through recognition, where she shares and acknowledges her grad students’ experiences and work throughout her lesson (i.e., figures her students have created from their research, conclusions they have come to with their research).

Dominique demonstrates pedagogical content knowledge, where she has the ability to teach her lesson like a coherent story, where she builds ideas off each other and clearly states linkages between ideas if students are not expressing that they can see these links. She knew what activities to do for particular ideas being taught, and knew when to stop and ask if anything needed to be clarified (e.g., she made sure students understood A before moving on to B, as she knew students could not understand and complete B without understanding A). Active learning was apparent throughout the entire lesson, where students were constantly given the opportunity to reflect on an idea that they had learnt about and apply their understanding to questions provided by Dominique.  She also provided the opportunity for students to go through the experiential learning cycle throughout the lesson, where students learnt about an idea and its importance, watched her apply the idea, asked questions on how/why she applied things the way she did and then tried to apply their understanding in a similar activity. Lastly, Dominique practiced formative assessment strategies throughout the lesson, where she provided low-stakes participatory activities such as call and recall questions and discussion-based questions.

The first ~20 minutes of the lesson was primarily lecturing combined with call and recall questions, where students would answer questions in the Zoom chat or out loud. After the majority of students answered a question, Dominique would ask for someone to elaborate on how they came to their conclusion (if no one already did that). Having students explain how they came to their answer is an excellent way for both the student and instructor to check the extent of their understanding of the idea being discussed (i.e., a form of formative assessment). Dominique’s slides have mostly pictures/figures/graphs/diagrams and very little text (< 10 words/slide). Having minimal text allowed for little distraction, where students could listen to what Dominique was talking about and focus and follow along with her as she discussed whatever graphics she had on the slide. Before finishing up with the lecturing portion of the lesson, Dominique asked if students need any clarification to make sure that students felt comfortable going into the class discussion/activity.

For the discussion portion of the lesson (~20 minutes), Dominique showed a slide with 5 questions on it (e.g., What is the depleted mantle?), where she would ask students about what their thoughts were for each question, working from the top to the bottom of the list. When prompted with a question, students wrote their answers in the chat. If people were not getting the answer correct, she would prompt them by going back to the relevant diagram the question was referring to, or she would get them to reflect back to previous lessons/labs where they may have discussed the idea before. When students began to figure out the correct answer, she gave them praise and asked them to elaborate on their answer, or she will elaborate for them to save time. Students mentioned to Dominique that they were not very active during the discussion portion because they tired because it was Monday morning and they were feeling exhausted from midterms.  After working through the questions, Dominique led students through a tree diagram of isotopic elements and encouraged them to annotate the slide and discuss why they chose to annotate the slide the way they did. Before she asked students to annotate, she gave an example of what she expected them to do. However, when students began to annotate the slides, Dominique’s Zoom/computer crashed. After a few minutes, she returned and asked students to annotate their own notes instead of her slide. The last couple of slides Dominique went through included calculations, where Dominique reviewed the equations and discussed the importance of understanding them (i.e., how to calculate the depleted mantle and the importance of understanding rare element distribution). Dominique made sure that students were comfortable with these ideas and equations because the students were going to be working on them in the lab component of the course later in the week. With a few minutes remaining until the end of class, Dominique gave a brief summary of the major ideas that the students learnt about in the lesson on a single slide. Once the summary was over, Dominique held an open question period for 10 mins, where students were free to leave or stay and listen to their peers’ questions and concerns.

From observing Dominique, I learnt a lot about being flexible as an instructor. For example, even though Dominique was cut out of the Zoom call for ~6 minutes, she still finished right on time, and at no point did she seem rushed during the rest of the lesson when she returned. In addition to this, Dominique tried to understand why her students were being particularly quiet during the lesson (in comparison to previous lessons) so that she could help them engage with the materials more. Because they were feeling so burnt out from midterms, she offered an option to make the midterm weigh less if they got a poor grade on it, and the weight could be reflected by their final exam score; the students appeared to be thrilled about this option. These actions made me remember that classes are there for the students to learn and grow and that life happens and sometimes we need alternative solutions to aid both learning and mental health. Dominique also acknowledged her students’ names when they answered her questions throughout her lesson in order to build connections and make the students feel seen. Another thing that I learnt was that Dominique does not share the learning objectives or outcomes with her students until after the lesson, where she adds them on the lesson slides and uploads them on Canvas after the lesson is complete.

 

Practicum 2 – EOSC 333 201 (Web-Oriented Course)

On March 10th, 2021, I instructed a 50-minute synchronous lesson over Zoom for Dominique. For this lesson, ~12 students showed up (which seemed to match with the attendance that Dominique had, perhaps slightly fewer students). The lesson I taught was on the geochemistry of large igneous provinces (LIPs). Dominique provided me with the learning objectives for the lesson I would be teaching, the relevant textbook and chapter provided for the students, as well as the lessons she was teaching before and after this lesson to help me bridge my lesson materials to hers. Students are expected to come to class having read the required readings, however, Dominique mentioned to me that she does not think that many of them review the readings.

I created the lesson from scratch, which was a challenge as I am not as well practiced with isotopes when it comes to geochemistry. As I created this lesson I realized I lacked pedagogical content knowledge because I was unsure of what areas of the lesson students may struggle with and the best approaches to supplement their learning with. In addition to this, I relied heavily on the textbook for information and examples to use for teaching. Because of this, I went to the default method of how I teach, which was to plan a lesson that had lecturing and mostly call and recall and discussion-type questions for active learning and formative assessment. I also incorporated my own research into the lesson to help create motivation at the beginning of the lesson, showing that what they are learning in this class could be applied by them to investigate a variety of questions related to LIPs if they choose to pursue an undergraduate thesis project or a graduate degree. In addition to this, I showed them some cool field photos of me working on LIPs, letting them know that studying geochemistry can take you to unique places if they are interested in fieldwork and traveling. I noticed that sharing my experience with the subject at hand with them at the beginning of the lesson helped engage them because they became very active in the Zoom chat.

For one of my discussion questions, I asked students to look at a series of MgO vs. major element oxide diagrams and describe the patterns that they are seeing and then interpret what they mean and how they came to their conclusions (i.e., What minerals are being fractionated out of the melt? How do you know?). For one of my discussion activities, I asked the students to interpret four different chondrite-normalized rare earth element graphs that I displayed on the screen. I asked them what the patterns reflected with respect to melt-generation and rock-forming processes. These discussion questions were successful as the students indicated to me that they had been introduced to these graphs in previous lessons, just for different rock types and geologic settings. Doing these discussion activities helped students apply a familiar analytical tool to examples that they had not practiced interpreting before, thus supplementing their data interpretation skills, which is a critical skill for a geologist to have.

Next time I think I would like to try a 20-minute lecture paired with formative assessment questions (i.e., poll questions) with 30-minute activity to increase the amount of engagement and active learning in the lesson or teach the lesson as a flipped classroom. I did not realize that the students learnt the geochemical tools in the first half of the term and the second half was on the application in different settings. Knowing that now, I would create a worksheet that would allow students to work together and apply more of the geochemical tools they have learnt about to a particular LIP setting, perhaps one mentioned in their required readings or the LIP that I was working on for my thesis research. For the activity, I would give students ~ 20 minutes to complete it and then leave 10 minutes to debrief the activity and hold a discussion and question period regarding both the activity and lesson materials. For next time I would also get more sleep! I was very nervous about teaching this lesson because I was not as confident in myself as I have been in previous lessons I have taught in other courses. Basically, I was afraid that I would provide the students with incorrect information, and I was afraid of not being able to answer student questions. Anywho, this wasn’t the case at all when it came to me teaching the lesson, however, I felt very fatigued and because of this, I think I was less coherent than I could have been. I think it is important to be coherent as it may make students feel more at ease during a lesson, for example, if you seem confident and fully present as an instructor then your students may feel more comfortable learning from you and thus be more attentive and engaged because they get the impression that you know what you’re doing and that they are in good hands.