Port Moresby – A Study in Contradictions

As some of you know, I spent much of my childhood growing up in Papua New Guinea (PNG), where my parents served in missions.  PNG is a 3rd world country, often considered to be one of the world’s ‘final frontiers’.  With over 700 distinct languages, rugged terrain, and tribal customs, the nation is one of the most undeveloped and primitive in the world.

Papua New Guinea political map  PNG Flag

This backwards, primitive image rapidly changes, however, when one visits the nation’s capital.  The capital city of PNG is Port Moresby, and is truly the gateway to the nation.  I have visited the city many times, and can attest that it is a truly fascinating place.  Port Moresby is a booming metropolis that is growing incredibly wealthy due to huge growth in its business sector and major investment (mainly from Australia and China) in PNG’s vast natural resources of oil and gold.  The city’s population is burgeoning rapidly, and its cost of living has skyrocketed.

 

The urban planning and structure of Port Moresby is a study in contradictions.  On the one hand, the wealthy and developed areas of the capital are similar to any modern-day city.  High-rise buildings, luxurious hotels, and modern apartments dominate the downtown landscape.  Port Moresby is also home to PNG’s only international airport, served by the national carrier Air Niugini.  Jackson’s International Airport and Air Niugini facilitate the transport of businessmen and investors from all over the world to engage in PNG’s vibrant resource industry.

 
Esterno  File:Air Niugini Boeing 757-200 SYD Zhao.jpg

On the other hand, Port Moresby IS the capital of a 3rd world nation, and the poverty and underdevelopment that characterizes the rest of the nation is readily visible in certain sectors of the city.  Standing in stark contrast to the wealthy downtown core, the outlying areas of the city are filled with run-down settlements, shantytowns, and primitive villages – areas unknown to tourists, ignored by the government, and forgotten by the businessmen and wealthy elite of Port Moresby.  Crime and violence run rampant, and the city has one of the highest crime rates in the world.

File:Port Moresby 080805-N-9689V-004.jpg  File:Poor coastal housing at Hanuabada in Port Moresby2.jpg  File:Squatters at Rubish Tip in Port Moresby.jpg 

The stark contrast between rich and poor in Port Moresby’s urban atmosphere is often hidden, but the two sometimes intersect in visible ways.  The photos below capture this reality, revealing the modern downtown core in the background, with primitive village huts built over the water in the foreground.

Moresby 

For Port Moresby’s architects and urban planners, the current challenge is to find a way to bridge the gap between the modern, wealthy sectors of the city and the primitive, village-like areas.  City planners must attempt to find a way to bring wealth and development to all areas of the city, focusing on modernizing architecture and infrastructure in the shantytowns of Port Moresby.  Rather than simply focusing on the modern downtown core, a city-wide development focus must be employed if true improvements are to come to the city as a whole.

© Image by Clinton Jackson|/images/details/876166|Buy

SOURCES FOR IMAGES:

http://geology.com/world/papua-new-guinea-satellite-image.shtml

http://devpolicy.org/png-37-years-after-independence-the-question-of-leadership-20121109/png-flag/

http://www.llns.com.pg/our_firm.php

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=63447

http://wikimapia.org/1803466/Parliament-House

http://islandmeri.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/views-of-port-moresby-on-a-dull-day/

http://www.placesonline.com/detail_information/3362669/crowne_plaza_hotel_port_moresby.asp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Air_Niugini_Boeing_757-200_SYD_Zhao.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Port_Moresby_080805-N-9689V-004.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Poor_coastal_housing_at_Hanuabada_in_Port_Moresby2.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Squatters_at_Rubish_Tip_in_Port_Moresby.jpg

http://livingtravel.com/pacific/papuanewguinea/portmoresby/portmoresby.htm

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/port-moresby-wired-for-change/story-e6frg6z6- 1226027895290

http://www.smec.com/Default.aspx?aProjId=708

http://www.emporis.com/city/portmoresby-papuanewguinea

Fast Food in Historic Buildings – A Disgrace to Architecture

Ever since our brief discussion in class regarding the use of historic buildings for modern purposes, I have been thinking a lot more about this issue and how much it bothers me!  The jumping off point for our discussion was the Athens Charter and Le Corbusier’s discussion of historic sites.  He points out that the old and the new must not be mixed in architecture, for do to so would be to mix the false with the genuine.  I completely agree with this aspect of his views.  In housing, I get very annoyed when new homes are built in a historic or ‘retro’ style.  Kelowna’s Kettle Valley is a perfect example – 21st century homes built to look hundreds of years old in architectural design!

To me, the most visible example of mixing the historic with the modern is the use of historical sites for fast food restaurants.  The phenomenon of ‘fast food’ has only come into existence in the last half-century or so, and to me it is one of the ultimate symbols of our modern, 21st century age.  Fast food is a revolution (and not necessarily a good one!), not only in the food industry but in the entire habit of food consumption.  Even 60 years ago, there was no way to receive a (grease-laden) burger and fries in a matter of seconds.  Even more radically modern is the possibility of purchasing this food from the comfort of one’s automobile thanks to the invention of the drive thru.  Fast food is an ultimate symbol of the fast-paced, yet sedentary, lifestyle that has become the norm in our modern, technological world.  Now, I am not opposed to fast food as such – to be honest, I quite enjoy a McDonald’s Double Quarter Pounder or Wendy’s Baconator from time to time!  However, I get downright upset when I see fast food restaurants in historic buildings.  In my mind, the placement of McDonalds restaurants in centuries-old marvels of architecture is to violate the sanctity of these historic sites, which have stood the test of time, and impose on them something from our modern era.  This blatant blend of the historic and the modern is an outright violation of this ancient architecture.

Let fast food restaurants be placed in modern-style buildings, and I wish them all the success in the world!  I have no bone to pick with them.  But please, let the historical buildings of our world remain historic, preserved in all their glory as relics of a by-gone era.  To convert them into nothing more than a peddler of fast food, an iconic symbol of the modern age, is a serious degradation.

  McDonalds – Budapest, Hungary

  McDonalds near London, England

  Pizza Hut – Kensington High Street, London, England

SOURCES FOR IMAGES:

– http://www.google.ca/imgres?q=mcdonalds+in+old+buildings&um=1&safe=active&hl=en&as_qdr=all&biw=1342&bih=555&tbm=isch&tbnid=WP6Oa61i1j-syM:&imgrefurl=http://andrewandnikkioverseas.blogspot.com/2013/06/more-budapest-buildings.html&docid=YdUo9vHJtu0PBM&imgurl=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-J2sB3v8tMBU/UbSZVFS17WI/AAAAAAAADLk/gY3mEd2_vJo/s1600/P1160085.JPG&w=1200&h=1600&ei=KJptUti7CqXxigKko4GgBQ&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:71,s:0,i:298&iact=rc&page=5&tbnh=189&tbnw=133&start=64&ndsp=17&tx=83&ty=113

– http://www.google.ca/imgres?q=mcdonalds+in+london&um=1&safe=active&hl=en&as_qdr=all&biw=1342&bih=555&tbm=isch&tbnid=TLBfOZsB1yRerM:&imgrefurl=http://www.flickr.com/photos/waviolette/4975509970/&docid=AH55NFV2npCzrM&imgurl=https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4125/4975509970_41c674446e_o.jpg&w=1080&h=840&ei=0JptUvDlNInMiQK7qoHICg&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:49,s:0,i:232&iact=rc&page=4&tbnh=179&tbnw=230&start=40&ndsp=15&tx=153&ty=107

– http://www.google.ca/imgres?q=pizza+hut+in+london&um=1&safe=active&hl=en&as_qdr=all&biw=1342&bih=555&tbm=isch&tbnid=IkEFaOc3zr0PoM:&imgrefurl=http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/688239&docid=FA4yJsnY-iIU0M&imgurl=http://s0.geograph.org.uk/photos/68/82/688239_44272930.jpg&w=479&h=640&ei=rJptUpSGGI_viQLsmIGYAw&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:13,s:0,i:116&iact=rc&page=1&tbnh=180&tbnw=149&start=0&ndsp=16&tx=52&ty=119

Equality in Utopia?

As my focal point of interest in history is the establishment and practice of Communism in the USSR in the 20th century, I naturally find it interesting to learn about anything related to socialism and its development in the modern world.  One particular idea repeatedly piqued my interest during our discussion yesterday, and the chart drawn on the board at the conclusion of class intensified my thoughts on the matter.  I had always assumed that all socialist thinkers believed in the full equality of every individual in all aspects of life – from their societal status to the very conditions in which they lived.  I was surprised to learn that this was indeed not the case.  As written on our chart, one of Soria’s assumptions was that ‘inequality was normal and desirable’.  Furthermore, he did not strive to abolish social classes but rather to ‘introduce harmony’ between them – for example, by ending poor individuals’ resentment of the rich by giving them their own private cottages to live in.  Further yet, one of his solutions was the ‘use of private property’.  To me, these were shocking statements coming from a utopian socialist!  While, from a capitalist viewpoint, it comes as a breath of fresh air to see a socialist advocating private property and accepting the reality of societal inequality, it strikes me as rather unusual.  Moreover, his solution for introducing harmony by giving cottages to the poor seems a rather unlikely resolution – even if the poor had small dwellings to call their own, would they not still be jealous of the upper classes who had more than they did?  I question Soria’s argument in this regard.  As I see it, the abolishment of social classes is essential to the successful establishment of a harmonious socialistic society.  After all, if inequality is still present, there will always be the threat of unrest and revolt from below.  Even if true harmony is created for a short time, it cannot be expected to last permanently under such conditions.