Categories
Uncategorized

Rodoreda: The Time of Misogyny

Quimet couldn’t have died fast enough. What an absolutely despicable good for nothing worthless man! While this novel was an easy read on the brain and for my understanding, it was also difficult to read because it was akin to watching a trainwreck in slow motion. I could tell where their relationship was going, and I recognized the patterns in Quimet’s actions and words (actually, he didn’t even try to hide it), and all I could do was watch Natalia fall into his trap and live a married life of despair. Even from the beginning, I didn’t like him all that much – I hadn’t despised him, because he seemed to have swept Natalia off her feet, but he was still incredibly pushy, talking about how Natalia would definitely be his wife by the end of the night and whatnot, despite her engagement to Pere. And then, he only continued to become even more annoying and misogynistic. Every day, he can say “Poor Maria” without explanation, but when it comes to Natalia, he’s pestering her every day about whether she’s still engaged to him or not, and gaslighting her into apologizing about meeting Pere (when she hadn’t even seen him since the break up)? The double standards are insane.

There was just nothing likeable about him. I hated everything he said. One dialogue that especially stood out to me was near the beginning of their relationship, when he said something about how Natalia would have to like everything he likes, and when she initially fought back, he basically said it didn’t matter and that she would have to like it anyways. Then, there was the whole issue of calling her Colometa – which, was cute the first two or three times maybe, but the entire novel? I don’t recall him saying her name even once, and to even extend the “Colometa” title to the dove business was like inflicting even more trauma on her. The passage that started around page ~100 where Natalia was complaining about the dove business was absolutely heartbreaking. Where Quimet was talking about how buying more and more doves was no problem because they cost nothing and were “no work” to take care of, Natalia was breaking her back and going crazy over caring for the doves, even trying to purposely mess with them so Quimet would stop seeing the benefit of keeping the doves. This shows his continuous pattern of pushing everything onto the women in his life, while either claiming no work for himself, or complaining about and amplifying what he is experiencing while disregarding the pain of women (case in point with his tuberculosis). Natalia was offered practically no relief even during her pregnancy, because Quimet would complain about his leg day in and day out, while also torturing his own mother about something as little as salt.

Something that deeply saddened me was that even the women in Natalia’s life didn’t seem to have her back. Senyora Enriqueta was encouraging the marriage and told her to ignore the “Poor Maria” issue, stating that marrying Quimet is better than marrying Pere. Therefore, this enabled Quimet’s terrible behaviour, and Natalia just stuck with her decision. I’m glad that Antoni gave her a chance of healing, but the aftereffects from the war and Natalia’s own trauma affecting her to the point where she came sparingly close to killing her own children with hydrochloric acid made me feel heavy and sad. There’s a lot more issues with Quimet that I could complain about, but alas…

Categories
Uncategorized

Black Shack Alley: Systemic Racism

This reading overall made me feel sad and exhausted. Not in a dramatic way, but because Jose’s life was just… reality. It was precisely the coming of youth, and the cards were never in his favour. Knowing that this novel was in part autobiographical makes sense to me. I think the most saddening character to me was M’man Tine. As a poor, black woman, she had long accepted her fate, so she decided to pour all her efforts and hard work into Jose instead. Although she seems harsh from Jose’s point of view in the beginning of the novel, as readers, we can see the hours she puts into her work – which is why she gets so mad when she initially comes home to see a broken bowl and Jose’s torn clothes. In a way, this reminds me of my own parents and grandparents. While I know that they want the best for me (in their mind), I often feel frustrated because that’s not what I necessarily want for myself. I also get scared because I don’t want to disappoint them or avoid living up to their expectations, similar to how Jose wants to frolic and have fun, but also wants to be seen as a ‘good child’ without the consequences of being too rambunctious (yelling and beatings).

M’man Tine seems to think that the only way Jose can have a good life is to escape Black Shack Alley, lest he suffer the same fate she did. This desire looks like pushing Jose into school, entering the bacculereate. However, when part 3 of the novel started, I felt heavy once more. When Jose was only offered a quarter scholarship, where they would have to pay the rest in order to ‘redeem’ or ‘benefit from’ the quarter scholarship, his mother talked about how they were doing this on purpose.

“They are too wicked! It’s because we’re black, poor and alone in
the world that they didn’t give you a full scholarship. They fully realise that I’m an unfortunate woman and that I couldn’t pay for you to go to the lycee. They know only too well that giving you a quarter scholarship is the same as not giving you anything at all. But they don’t know what a fighting woman I am. Well! I’m not giving up this quarter scholarship. You will go to their lycee!” (p. 125)

This situation made me think about how prevalent systemic racism is, and how you can never truly avoid it. While M’man Tine thinks Jose will live a better life (I can’t disagree), the circumstances he has to suffer under are similarly dismal. Giving into this scholarship would practically be giving into their ‘taunt’, but Jose and his family have no other choice. So, they have to continue suffering under this system of cylical racism instead of ‘escaping’ like M’man Tine wishes. As they say, out of the frying pan and into the fire? It makes me sad because this is what reality looks like, and it’s difficult to truly escape from these systems without giving into them for your own benefit.

So, I would like to ask: Do you see Jose’s pursuit of education as ‘liberation’ the same way his family does?

Categories
Uncategorized

Nada: Just Trying to Live

The whole novel of Nada felt eery to me, like I was waiting for the other shoe to drop. I suppose this is because of the aftermath of the Spanish civil war, as the lecture video states that the family’s trauma haunts the narrative – so it’s more like the shoe has already dropped, and everything is what happens after. I think it felt unsettling because I kept expecting something to blow up in her face, and then nothing did. Perhaps that’s what Andrea felt as well: she moved to Barcelona with hopes and dreams for university, and left with nothing, really. What can you make of an experience that hasn’t given you anything except the perilous effects of trauma?

I thought it was interesting how the novel never really discusses what happened in the war, but you can feel it simply from the atmosphere and people’s living conditions. Andrea is quiet and silent throughout the novel, but I think I relate to her position. How can you make a space for yourself when there’s barely enough space for others? I don’t think I would want to get myself directly involved with all of the family drama – she’s just trying to live. In a way, she feels like she’s sitting in the backseat of someone else’s life. Initially, she had a romanticized view of Barcelona, but the reality quickly diminished her expectations. Similar to Andrea, I felt somewhat empty after reading Nada. What exactly could I take away? I felt desolate, like the war-torn condition also affected my inner state. The novel simply displayed the reality of the effects of war. I think that’s why the lecture video was also intriguing, as it pointed out details I hadn’t previously noticed, which pointed to the effects of war. I’d be interested to find out if these fictional experiences differed vastly from the lived experiences, or if anything was adapted, or even less exaggerated than the real life.

It was a bit of a tough read, not because of the language or setting, but because of the emotional heaviness I felt. It’s also difficult to grasp because there’s no clear villain or antagonist, there’s no clear ‘hope’, you just have to make do with what you’re given. Lines aren’t drawn, and Andrea has been placed into this situation while hoping for the best for herself. It’s not worth it for Andrea to ‘escape’ really, and she can’t begin to solve her family’s problems. She just… lives. I think it’s a strong protection method, but perhaps other people would think it’s negatively avoidant.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet