Here is the case of New Zealand’s Carbon Policy. New Zealand has been following the United National Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and been a member of the Kyoto Protocol since 2002, and the government of New Zealand started its nation-wild Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) in 2008 due to its commitments to this international agreement. Based on the climate change information available on the official website of New Zealand ministry for the environment, ETS was chosen because they believe it is the most cost-effective method to meet their goal: aiming to reduce greenhouse emissions back to the level in 1990 by 2050 and to take its responsibility in global climate change, and this is generally consistent with the Kyoto Protocol. The government of New Zealand says that ETS is adopted under the principle of liability and it ensures that those who cause environmental damages will be held accountable for the cost occurred. ETS provides businesses and consumers with financial incentives to change their behaviors because it creates a market of trading emissions and sets a price for emissions. Financial incentives will help New Zealand residents to decrease the amount of emissions as well as to make investments in discovering clean and renewable energy.
New Zealand Unites (NZUs) are defined by the Ministry for the environment of New Zealand as “carbon credits, allowance or offset credits”, and these emission units are measured in metric tonne of carbon dioxide. There are six greenhouse gases covered: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). Under the Emission Trading Scheme, NZUs can be traded among participants. The majority of participants is from Forestry, Energy Liquid fossil fuels and industry. The Ministry for the environment shows that there are three ways to participate: surrendering NZUs to the Government, earning NZUs FROM the Government and being given NZUs by the Government. Participating groups with spare units are able to sell them to those who need extra units. The climate information package supplied by the ministry for environment states that Most New Zealand residents do not participate directly and there could a small rise in energy prices. The package also claims that the over impact of ETS on New Zealand’s economy is very minor because the transition period could be extended infinitely and the price of emission for each sector is fixed and relatively low during the transition period. For example, the Carbon price for business from non-forestry sectors cannot be higher than $12.50 per unit.
The Global Warning Policy Foundation (GWPF) states in the article NZ Emissions Trading Scheme More or Less Dead, written by the University of Canterbury in 2013, that one reason that the ETS has not worked well is that the government of New Zealand put no restrictions on import of credits, and this made Zealand becoming as a “dumping ground” for worthless credits from elsewhere”. The main point of this article is that the EST has failed because it treats all greenhouse gases as neutral and thus not generates the appropriate incentives. This also implies that the ETS program is not as cost-effective as the government of New Zealand previously claimed. According to an office report, The Sixth National Communication on Climate Change, prepared by the United Nations climate change institute, Generation Zero, the difference between New Zealand’s targets and its projected emissions will be getting larger in the next 20 years. This report works as an overall assessment for New Zealand’s emission trading scheme and reveals that the total gross emissions are expected to increase from 72,834.9 Gg in 2013 to 82, 2442.2 Gg in 2030. This is an indication that the ETS might have failed on its original purpose. In 2013, the Gemanwatch and Climate Action Network ranked New Zealand no.41 on its Climate Change Performance Index, and this position is generally considered as “doing poorly” on climate changes. Another point this report contains is that the EST program has not, in fact, hold those who make environmental damages, accountable for the cost of emissions. The profitability of their business has not changed much. However, there are also some evidences available for New Zealand‘s success. An article, NZ trading scheme slashes carbon emissions, released by The Age National suggests that the emission trading scheme has generated motivations for investing in renewable energy, and a survey done by The Age National shows that in 2011, around 63% of businesses supported for the program while this number was only 27% in 2008. The article also points out that almost 80% of the energy consumed in New Zealand is from renewable sources, and this is the highest in 12 years. Evidences form the forestry sectors are also mentioned in this article: in 2007, there was a net loss of 18,000 hectares of trees; however, in 2011, New Zealand actually had a net gain of 5700 hectares of trees.
The emission trading scheme is not a popular policy among all the countries involved in climate changes due to the doubts in its effectiveness, and New Zealand is one of a few countries who implement it. New Zealand’s five years of experience provide us with some insights how ETS works and what possible results it will generates. It is difficult to conclude whether ETS has worked well or not for New Zealand and what developing countries can learn from New Zealand’s case. In other words, different countries may have very different situation and individual characteristics, especially in the case of developing countries. The road of dealing with climate changes is long, and a long-term effect is what people should focus on. Data collected from the past five years may not be significant enough to draw any long-term conclusion about the impact of ETS on climate changes.
References
“Climate Changes Information” ministry for the environment. n.d. Web.10 Mar 2014. <www.climatechange.govt.nz>.
“ NZ Emissions Trading Scheme More or Less Dead.” Global Warning Policy Fundation. GWPF, 2013
“The Sixth National Communication on Climate Change.” Generation Zero. UNFCCC,2013






















