09/27/14

#4 Merger = Tax Inversion? = save costs

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/tim-hortons-burger-king-reaction-u-s-cracks-down-on-tax-inversions-1.2774913

pppppppppp

On 23 Sep, 2014, the merger of Tim Hortons and Burger King was doubted for tax inversion.

This news also introduces the definition of Tax Inversion. It cites that:“ A tax inversion works when a U.S. business merges with or is acquired by a foreign company in a country with a lower tax rate. The new company then pays most of its global taxes in the jurisdiction with the lower rate, thereby shielding profits from taxation they used to have to pay.( cbcnews  Sep 23, 2014)”(4)

According to the figures in the KPMG website, Canada’s corporation tax rates is 26.5% in 2014 while that is 40% in the United States.(1) And the Burger King’s revenue in the end of 2013 reached to $1,146.3 million USD while its net income reached to $233.7 million USD, which is searched from the financial statement in businessweek. (2)If the Burger King relocates it company to Canada, it can release a bulk of tax burden( roughly at $31.55 million USD).

This might be a strategy for the Burger King to cut its total costs and become more profitable.

However Obama urged for “economic patriotism”(3) from the U.S. companies, corporation inversion is still a common phenomenon in America.

 

Reference list:

(1)”Canada’s corporation tax rates is 26.5% in 2014 while that is 40% in the United States.” http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/pages/corporate-tax-rates-table.aspx

(2) “$1,146.3 million” & “$233.7 million”

http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/financials/financials.asp?ticker=BKW

(3) “economic patriotism”

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/tim-hortons-burger-king-reaction-u-s-cracks-down-on-tax-inversions-1.2774913

(4)”A tax inversion works when a U.S. business merges with or is acquired by a foreign company in a country with a lower tax rate. The new company then pays most of its global taxes in the jurisdiction with the lower rate, thereby shielding profits from taxation they used to have to pay. ”

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/tim-hortons-burger-king-reaction-u-s-cracks-down-on-tax-inversions-1.2774913

09/20/14

#3 Is part-time work the new normal?

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/09/07/is_parttime_work_the_new_normal_goar.html

joe_oliver.jpg.size.xxlarge.letterbox

Canadian labor market shows a sign of part-time employment. Since last autumn, Canada has created 50,000 part-time jobs but lost 20,000 full-time positions.

Doing a part-time job may has some negative impacts for labors. For example, they may not be offered the health insurance by the employers. So there is less work security. And part- time workers are always regarded as unemployed. They do not claim to government that they get jobs, however they are part-time. So government grants the unemployment welfare to them, and they do not need to pay taxation. Hence, there is a large withdraw in government budget balance.

On the other hand, the part- time jobs usually need low skill levels, so the work may be low productivity. With an 50,000 increase in part-time jobs but 20,000 decline in the full-time, the national total productivity might be pulled down.

However, it does have some positive aspects. As mentioned above, part-time jobs require low skills, and it is capable for most of workers. So it can release the unemployment pressure to some extent, while full-time jobs need high level of skills and knowledge. And in statistic, it does work, the unemployment rate does decline which shown on the picture.

according to the Statistics Canada:cg140905a002-eng
And what if retirees do the most of increased part-time jobs? They might be more productive and have more experience than freshmen. So the national productivity would increase and the market allocates resources more efficiently.

 

reference list:

news from:http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/09/07/is_parttime_work_the_new_normal_goar.html

chart: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/140905/dq140905a-eng.htm?HPA

09/20/14

#2 Alibaba shares surge in their NY stock market debut

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-29282407

Extract:

Shares in the company made their debut in the US at $92.70 (£57), after being priced at $68 late on Thursday. Alibaba operates a series of online marketplaces in China and elsewhere, handling more transactions than Amazon and eBay combined. It is responsible for more than 80% of online e-commerce in China.( BBC news, accessed Sept. 20th, 2014)

_77700303_tv023965853

 

Taobao is the most famous part of Alibaba in China. People in China do know Taobao, the online shopping medium. Just in 11.11, 2013, Singles’ Day, Taobao created a grand record—the daily turnover researched to $8 billion( Dailymail by Simon Tomlinson 11 November 2013 ), which is about 50% the daily gross turnover of China. And this medium rebuilds Chinese people’s shopping styles.

And the Alipay, a third-party online payment platform of Alibaba, now  embedded in our daily life. Consumers can use it to pay for bills, taxi payments, credit card, in-store purchase, etc. I use it at least 3 times a week.

As for the popularity of  online shopping, e-commerce grows faster than any other field in China. Everyone wants to take a piece of cake in this market. And Alibaba also has many competitors, e.g. JD.COM, and dangling.com. But Taobao accounts for around 80%, legal monopoly in this field, referring to the chart in the Baidu Wenku. Why do consumers prefer to choose Taobao? Branding may be biggest factor; as for me, the first idea to buy something, is Taobao, branding for more choices and lower prices.

reference list

Taobao accounts for around 80%, legal monopoly in this field, referring to the chart in the Baidu Wenku ” http://wenku.baidu.com/view/39d57869561252d380eb6e45.html 

“the daily turnover researched to $8 billion”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2500413/Worlds-biggest-shopping-spree-China-set-spend-8BILLION-Singles-Day-loveless-persuaded-console-retail-therapy.html

09/9/14

#1 Is Apple Really Serious About Sustainability?

http://business-ethics.com/2014/04/27/11639-is-apple-really-serious-about-sustainabilit/

extract:

Dear EarthTalk: Apple just put out a big PR campaign about its sustainability initiatives. Has the company made real progress in this regard or is this just more corporate “greenwashing?” And how are the other big tech companies addressing their carbon footprints? — Billy A., Oakland, CA (business-enthic magazine  by admin2  April 27, 2014)

apple

 

With the issue of global warming, the environmental protection is the strategy for every country, every company and every person. And companies have the responsibility to the environment when they produce their goods and services. However, recycling is a good deal for both companies and environment, though they may pay more for collecting the used electronic products. But to some extent, this program, like Apple’s Recycling Program, build a higher reputation in consumers’ mind. Although this positive externality is invaluable, the higher brand loyalty always brings more profits to firms. Excepting this, firms may be free to pay more extra tax for environment protection, which firms should pay if they discharge pollution. And customers also get benefits from the program. These products are abandoned if there is no recycling program, and customers pay for new ones without any discount or return. But now consumers can receive gift cards if they return the iPhones, Macs; they could pay less for new goods.

Apple has a Recycling Program, If you have an extra, old, unused Apple products, if you are interested in recycle your products, press it~ OwO

PS:I am not advertising for Apple.~\(≧▽≦)/~

Recycling is the ethics that business to environment, consumers and themselves.

 

reference list:

picture from:

http://business-ethics.com/2014/04/27/11639-is-apple-really-serious-about-sustainabilit/