The Reading Log

References for Reflective Narrative

Edelson, D.C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(3), 355-385.

Furtak, E. M. (2006), The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Sci. Ed., 90: 453–467. doi:10.1002/sce.20130

Gobert, J., Snyder, J., & Houghton, C. (2002, April). The influence of students’ understanding of models on model-based reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), New Orleans, Louisiana. This is a conference paper. Retrieved conference paper Saturday, October 29, 2013 from: http://mtv.concord.org/publications/epistimology_paper.pdf

Holder, J. (2017, February 10). Reshaping instructional design: A tale of jasper series inspiration [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://blogs.ubc.ca/jessicaholderetec533/2017/02/13/reshaping-instructional-design-a-tale-of-jasper-series-inspiration/

Citation in text: (Holder, 2017, February 10)

Holder, J. (2017, February 24). Finding one’s place through inquiry [Web log message]. Retrieved from https://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/02/24/finding-ones-place-through-inquiry/

Citation in text: (Holder, 2017, February 24)

Holder, J. (2017, March 3). Staying afloat: sink and float density t-gem [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/03/03/staying-afloat-sink-and-float-density-t-gem/

Citation in text: (Holder, 2017, March 3)

Holder, J. (2017, March 18). Individualism, immersion, evolution [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/03/18/individualism-immersion-and-evolution/

Citation in text: (Holder, 2017, March 18)

Khan, S. (2007). Model-based inquiries in chemistry. Science Education, 91(6), 877-905.

Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies for teaching with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 215-232.

Kostiuk, A. (2017, February 10). Problem solving with anchored instruction [Weblog message]. Retrieved from  https://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/02/10/problem-solving-with-anchored-instruction/

Citation in text: (Kostiuk, 2017)

Kostiuk, A. (2017, February 25). Developing spatial literacy using google earth [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/02/25/developing-spatial-literacy-using-google-earth/

Linn, M. C., Clark, D. and Slotta, J. D. (2003), WISE design for knowledge integration . Sci. Ed., 87: 517–538. doi:10.1002/sce.10086

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Proulx, J. (2013). Mental mathematics, emergence of strategies, and the enactivist theory of cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 309-328.

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4 -14.

Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. The foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1)1-23.

Shyu, H.-Y. C. (2000). Using video-based anchored instruction to enhance learning: Taiwan’s experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31: 57–69. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00135

Sikkes, M. (2017, February 23, 2017). Including and motivating students of today [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/02/23/1568/

Cited in text: (Sikkes, 2017)

Sverko, C. (2017, February 23, 2017). LfU and geospatial technologies [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/02/23/lfu-and-geospatial-technologies-mind-blown/

Cited in text: (Sverko, 2017)

Vye, N., Goldman, S., Voss, J., Hmelo, C., Williams, S., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). Complex Mathematical Problem Solving by Individuals and Dyads. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 435-484. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233775

Winn, W. (2003). Learning in artificial environments: Embodiment, embeddedness, and dynamic adaptation. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(1), 87-114.

 


References for The Commonplace Notebook

Bjorgan, D. (2017, January 22). Keywords: Collaboration, gender engagement, risk-taking [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/01/22/keywords-collaboration-gender-engagement-ri      k-taking/

Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British journal of developmental psychology, 3(1), 21-29.

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, (40), 1, pp.65-80.

Furtak, E. M. (2006), The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Sci. Ed., 90: 453–467. doi:10.1002/sce.20130

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools, 2nd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall. Retrieved from Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jonassen+mindtools&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Search

Khan, Samia. (n.d.). Overview: Important terms:Technology. Retrieved from https://connect.ubc.ca/webapps/osc-BasicLTI-BBLEARN/iframe.jsp?course_id=_882431&content_id=_3936534_1&id=

Linn, M. C., Clark, D. and Slotta, J. D. (2003), WISE design for knowledge integration . Sci. Ed., 87: 517–538. doi:10.1002/sce.10086

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Proulx, J. (2013). Mental mathematics, emergence of strategies, and the enactivist theory of cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 309-328.

Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. The foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1)1-23.

Sverko, C. (2017, January 22). Wide and varied views on technology in math and science [Web log message]. Retrieved from https://blogs.ubc.ca/stem2017/2017/01/22/wide-and-varied-views-on-technology-in-math-and-science/

Winn, W. (2003). Learning in artificial environments: Embodiment, embeddedness, and dynamic adaptation. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(1), 87-114.

 


Further Readings of Interest

Adamo-Villani, N. & Wilbur, R. (2007). An immersive game for k-5 math and science. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference Information Visualization, 921-924.

Ahmed, S., & Parsons, D. (2013). Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Computers & Education, 63, 62-72.

Adedokun, O. A., Hetzel, K., Parker, L. C., Loizzo, J., Burgess, W. D., & Paul Robinson, J. (2012). Using Virtual Field Trips to Connect Students with University Scientists: Core Elements and Evaluation of zipTrips™. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 1-12.

Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D., & De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and instruction, 4(1), 27-43.

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of educational research, 63(1), 1-49

Clements, M. K. A. (2014). Fifty years of thinking about visualization and visualizing in mathematics education: A historical overview. In Mathematics & Mathematics Education: Searching for Common Ground (pp. 177-192). Springer Netherlands.

Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2008). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: Graphic representations and problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5), 184-196.

Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2011). Deepening students’ scientific inquiry skills during a science museum field trip. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 130-181.

Hsi, S. (2008). Information technologies for informal learning in museums and out-of-school settings. International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, 20(9), 891-899.

Jacobsen, M. & Wilinsky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education. Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34. http:ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4

Jones, K. and Mooney, C. (2003). Making Space for Geometry in Primary Mathematics. In: I. Thompson (Ed), Enhancing Primary Mathematics Teaching. London: Open University Press. pp 3-15.

Khan, S. (2014). Going mobile in science teacher education. In C. Miller & A. Doering (Eds.), The New Landscape of Mobile Learning: Redesigning Education in an App-based world, Minnesota: Routledge.

Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., & Crowston, K. (2012). The future of citizen science: Emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298-304

Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70.

Rogers, Y., Price, S., Randell,C., Stanton, D, Weal, M., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2005). Ubi-learning integrates indoor and outdoor experiences. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 55-61. http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=15515634&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Rogers, Y., Price, S, Fitzpatrick, F., Fleck, R., Smith, H., Randell, D., Muller, H., O’Malley, C., Stanton,D., Thompson, M., & Weal, M. (2004). Ambient Wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. Proceedings of Interaction, Design and Children, Maryland, US, 3-11.

Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), pp. 260-272.

Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students’ mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 399-419.

Roschelle, J. & Singleton, C. (2008). Graphing calculators: Enhancing math learning for all students, In International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, Springer International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, 20, 951-995.

Shepardson, D.P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 327-348.

Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM47(3), 319-329.

Sinclair, N., & Jackiw, N. (2010). Modeling Practices with The Geometer’s Sketchpad. In Modeling Students’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies (pp. 541-554). Springer US.

Spicer, J., & Stratford, J. (2001). Student perceptions of a virtual field trip to replace a real field trip. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 345-354.

Squire, K., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City Mystery: Developing science argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5-29.

Weal, M. J., Michaelides, D.T., Thompson, M.K., & De Roure, D.C. (2003). The Ambient Wood journals: Replaying the experience. Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext, Nottingham, UK, 20-27.

Williams II, R.L., Chen, M., & Seaton, J.M. (2003). Haptics-augmented simple-machine educational tools. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(1), pp. 1-12.

Xiang, L., & Passmore, C. (2015). A framework for model-based inquiry through agent-based programming. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2-3), 311-329.

Zucker, A. A., Tinker, R., Staudt, C., Mansfield, A., & Metcalf, S. (2008). Learning science in grades 3–8 using probeware and computers: findings from the TEEMSS II project. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 42-48.