Week 4 – Twenty Love Poems

After learning about Neruda and the choices he made, I wasn’t sure what to expect when reading this. However, I was surprised by the poems I read because some were sweet and softer, compared to what I was expecting. I quite enjoyed the different poems that were written because while the theme (women) was consistent throughout, no two poems were written the same way. It felt as though the first few poems were much more sexual and really touched on the desires Neruda felt towards women, and how he saw them through his eyes. However, as I continued reading the writing shifted to something a bit more heartfelt and sadder, and could be interpreted as feelings of love and loss with a person or even yourself . It was kind of like a “love-story” was being unraveled before my eyes, but with a sad ending. At the start you could sense Neruda’s attraction to women, from the way he described them, but as he continued to write it felt as though he had lost someone who he couldn’t forget and continued to long-for them. Moreover, in the end his final poem ‘The Song of Despair’ completely encapsulates the utter loss and sadness he feels for losing the women he loved . I found the order of the poems interesting. regardless of whether or not it was done on purpose.

I have read my fair share of poems from high school and something that I was always able to do was imagine what was being said, but for some reason I had a hard time putting the words into pictures this time. The poems were very descriptive and it seemed easy to paint a picture in your head but for some reason I couldn’t, and maybe that had to do with the simplicity of the lines. Neruda didn’t use fancy words or make odd comparisons that were hard to understand, he instead wrote in a way that was easy to follow and understand. Rather then painting pictures in my head, I felt myself feeling and hearing more. For example, the line “…leaves garnered your voice, that was slow and at peace.” (I Remember You As You Were), I could hear the slight rustling of leaves accompanied by a husky and soft voice. While I was still able to imagine some lines, my main focus was on the emotions I felt when reading the different poems.

As I mentioned before, Neruda used simple language in his poems and he did that by using nature to tell a story. It was interesting to see how he used the simple, natural world to describe the beauty of women and his feelings of loss. Maybe it was his ability to describe women using nature, that seemed to soften his objectification of women throughout the poems. It is possible that if he lessened the use of nature in his writing style, he would be seen as less poetic, and more aggressive.

Question to think about: Neruda relied heavily on nature in his poems, is there a reason he felt the need to do that? What was it in nature that made him describe and compare women to it?

2 thoughts on “Week 4 – Twenty Love Poems

  1. DanielOrizaga

    Alizey, I don’t know if I am qualified at this moment to answer your question, but it seems to me that it could be a good start for discussion: is a relationship between the use of metaphors about Nature and the objectification of women in Neruda’s poety? At this point in his life as a poet, Neruda still has features that are very close to the poetry that was written in Latin America at his time. Then he will find his own voice.

    Reply
  2. Nicholas Latimer

    Hi Alizey! Interesting thoughts about your visualizations (or lack thereof) while reading. First of all – I think its super cool that your other senses stepped in when you couldn’t narrow down what to picture. The thought of reading these poems with the sounds of crashing waves or crackling leaves is pretty magical to me!… I wanted to comment here though because I shared some of your challenges – but rather found myself putting Neruda’s words into pictures – not of the romantic and descriptive loving scenes – but rather into nature itself. For example – I felt to be sitting on the pier late at night with stares flickering brightly – just because he references the brightness of stars as the twinkle of (some woman’s) eyes. I’m not sure why I couldn’t picture the women he wrote about – despite the obvious focus of his poems…

    Perhaps the natural imagery was distracting from his female subjects. Although I do not think this was why he chose to use it – as I feel he was proud to be describing naked women to his readers – but maybe it was the opposite – to intertwine two beautiful concepts which anyone can appreciate.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *