How is Netflix’s recent shakeout a good thing?

When Netflix announced on September 18th that they will separate their DVD division and turn it into a subsidiary called Qwikster, the stock value decreased and the company lost 1 million subscribers. What could have been the plan behind this, at the moment, rather disadvantageous decision?

DVD's and Netflix - the end of a longterm relationship

During the last class discussion, somebody pointed out that Netflix might be looking for an exit strategy for the DVD/BluRay rental division. The increasing trend of streaming moviesĀ  over the internet and the accompanying decline of disc rental is welcomed by a company like Netflix, where the omission of almost all expenses for logistics and physical media would be considered a great economic achievement.

By dropping the physical rental department and becoming a streaming-only company, Netflix is ready to enter or even establish the foundation for a much bigger market of streaming movies over the Internet. Part of the reason for this reorientation could be the oncoming launch of Netflix in Europe.

 

Is Netflix's shakeout related to a European venture?

For all we know, the costly separation of Netflix and their DVD division might just be part of bigger plan that involves both seizing the opportunity of the yet sparsely populated European streaming market and fortifying existing strengths in North America.

 

 

 

 

 

Sources:

1) http://blog.netflix.com/2011/09/explanation-and-some-reflections.html

2) http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2011/09/20/netflix-is-still-worth-195-despite-all-the-drama/

3) http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/08/netflix-spain-britain.html

 

Hooters for lunch – yes, really.

The concept of the Hooters restaurants is not only to provide their customers with food but also to entertain them with their scantily-clad waitresses who are contractually encouraged to start and take part in conversations of Hooters’ customers.

For better illustration, please watch a Hooters Commercial.

What is striking is the vast amount of sexism that Hooters’ business concept is based on. Not much different from an escort service, Hooters sells the company of women for money. While I’m not trying to say that all of the so called “Hooters girls” feel discriminated, it doesn’t seem ethical of a company to treat women the way Hooters does. Male applicants can’t even apply as a waiter, only girls are hired as waitresses. On Hooters.com, it says that “Very bubbly, outgoing personalities!” are preferred. Furthermore, the low payrate of $2/hr will encourage girls to earn more tips by being talkative with random customers.

I also want to point out that regular customers of Hooters include families with children for which the “Hooters girls” could be bad role models. In conclusion, the company’s business concept can be regarded as offensive towards women and unethical in its demand on female employees.

 

Sources

1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2008/apr/11/women.business

2) http://www.hooters.com/Hourly.aspx

3) http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/06/15/the-best-and-worst-of-being-a-hooters-girl/