Categories
Course Reflections Issues in Science Public Engagement Science Communication

“A tablet a day, and I was limitless.”

Source: Film O Filia

 

If someone approached you claiming their product would allow you to use 100% of your brain, would you buy it?

 

Source: National Institute of Mental Health

You are probably familiar with this scenario if you watched the thriller ‘Limitless’, released earlier this year, starring Bradley Cooper. The plot of ‘Limitless’ is based on one of the most commonly perpetuated ideas in society, that we use only 10% of our brains (this number varies depending on who you ask). But is this science fact or science fiction? Before you aspire to become an all-encompassing genius like Bradley Cooper in the film, let’s let science speak for itself.

 

The human brain is the most complex organ of the body and controls every aspect of our lives. It weighs roughly 1.4 kg, and uses a whopping 20% of all the food energy we take in. Scientists have divided the brain into many sections based on the functions they perform. These are some of the major brain lobes and their function:

-Frontal Lobe: reasoning, planning, parts of speech, movement, emotions, and problem solving.

-Parietal Lobe: associated with movement, orientation, recognition, and perception of stimuli.

-Occipital Lobe: associated with visual processing.

-Temporal Lobe: associated with perception and recognition of auditory stimuli, memory, and speech.

This is by no means an exhaustive list, as these lobes contain several sub-divisions, which are known to perform even specific tasks.

Source: Mysid

Evidently, these divisions compose the entire brain, not a mere 10% of it. What is true then, is that we may not use all parts of our brain at the same time, but every section of the brain is necessarily used at some point to perform certain tasks. We know this to be true by studies of brain damage. When almost any part of the brain is damaged, there is always a loss of abilities. Furthermore, brain-imaging technologies have shown several areas of the brain (more than 10%) to be active at the same time under many circumstances, such as during sleep. This fact alone is enough to debunk the notion of using 10% of our brains as a myth by default.

 

Source: Human Diseases and Conditions

So, despite how much science has progressed in studying the brain, most people still dwell in ignorant bliss. Perhaps because advertisers and the media prey on them by stating this phrase as scientific fact. Shockingly, even people who profess scientific background take part in spreading this misinformation. The truth is, this is a misquote that has gone viral, and is absolutely misleading people as science.

 

Let’s focus on the opening question.

 

There do exist substances, such as certain drugs or functional foods that can improve or enhance mental functions. One such substance that you may be familiar with is the caffeine in coffee or energy drinks, which improves memory and concentration. Nonetheless, based on the claims of the person, it would be wise to refuse their offer, because truly humans already use 100% of their brains.

 

 

Further reading:

http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/tenper.html

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10%25_of_brain_myth

Categories
Biological Sciences New and innovative science Science in the News

A Bond Betwen Man and Machine?

It is apparent that the trend of products today is to become smaller and smaller. We use many products today that achieve the same uses as its much bulkier predecessors. Just think back to the days of primitive cell phones. To say they were ‘big’ would be an understatement. While most would say that having small and compact devices are a matter of convenience, there are other compelling reason for us to look as deep as nanotechnology. One of these reasons includes potential medical applications.

Source: Wall Street Journal

In fact, medical researchers have been trying to devise useful nano-machines or nano-robots for quite some time. A barrier they had in successfully applying them to medical treatments was the lack of a means of propulsion. This is crucial for maneuvering these machines through areas of the body such as the bloodstream.

Source: University of South Caroline Beaufort

Until recently, there had been no viable motor to accomplish this task. Researchers have now discovered a means to make motors at the nano-level, which spin at 600 revolutions per minute and can move things 2,000 times their weight. What is the secret to such magnificent specifications? Carbon.

Source: BBC News

Carbon is one of the most abundant elements in the universe. However, it is often overlooked in materials manufacturing in favor of metals. Interestingly, carbon is convenient to work with and has suitable properties for nanotechnology. Nano-tubes composed entirely of carbon atoms arranged in hexagons can be made into a yarn that can be used as a type of electric motor.

These carbon fibers, which are 100 times stronger than steel of the same dimensions, are coated in an electrolyte. This allows the fibers to expand when voltage is applied. The expansion can produce a torque on par with much larger conventional electric motors.

Researchers propose that this type of motor can be used to produce ‘flagella’ for nano-robots. These nano-robots can then be used to deliver drugs, fight diseases, and remove parasites. The applications do not end there. Scientists can apply this technology in several other ways to treat the body’s problems.

I am awestruck as to how ideas which were once science fiction are now commonplace. In the future we can perhaps expect to see nano-machines populating our bodies, constantly monitoring and regulating it, defeating disease once and for all. Nanotechnology may give us the ultimate bond between man and machine.

Source: BBC News

Readers may be interested to note that researchers from UBC were involved in this collaboration with researchers from other countries.

For more information

See article:

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2011/10/12/science.1211220.abstract

Categories
Environment Issues in Science

The Green Car Trophy: Did Hybrids Cheat to Win?

Whether you sincerely care about the environment or not you have probably heard about the Toyota Prius. As the icon of ‘green cars,’ the Prius provides spectacular fuel economy and most importantly, outputs less environmentally harmful carbon emissions. The Prius is able to achieve these feats because of its innovative hybrid drive-train, which combines a small gasoline engine with an electric motor. The electric motor generally powers the vehicle using a large battery pack at slow speeds, while the gasoline engine kicks in at higher speeds or whenever power is needed.

Photo by: Robert Scoble

Sure, as test figures reveal, the Prius indeed uses less gasoline when being driven, but do the Prius and similar hybrid electric vehicles really reduce the negative impact on our environment? Delving into the manufacturing process of hybrid vehicles will surely make you think otherwise.

Research suggests that the manufacturing process of a Prius contributes more negatively to the environment than driving several gas guzzling sport-utility vehicles, for a distance triple its lifetime mileage ever could. The culprit which taints the Prius’ beloved reputation is its main component, the battery. The amount of effort required to make this Nickel-based battery is absolutely staggering.

A hybrid car’s battery production starts with mining and smelting nickel. The factories which carry out this process are dangerously damaging to the environment. They let out copious amounts of Sulphur Dioxide, the major cause of acid rain. Energy coordinator David Martin of Canadian Greenpeace spoke about the impact of such a factory on its city saying, “The acid rain around Sudbury was so bad it destroyed all the plants and the soil slid down off the hillside”.

 

‘each container ship is as polluting as fifty million cars combined’

 

The next process required to create the battery is refining of the nickel, which is done in a select few specialized places across the globe. As a result the nickel must be transported to this specialized location. Ensuing refinement, the nickel must then be transported again to another place for further modifications to be able to incorporate it into the battery. Finally, it must be shipped back to the manufacturer for assembly. In the Prius’ case, the nickel must be shipped from Canada, to Europe, China, and back to Japan. All this shipping is no simple task. It requires the use of massive container ships. Regarding these container ships, a study by the Danish government’s environmental agency revealed that each container ship is as polluting as fifty million cars combined.

The issues discussed so far are only about 75% of the problem. As with other batteries, the batteries used in hybrid cars have the inherent flaw of a limited lifetime. After this lifetime, the cars will become impractical to use. At this stage, the batteries will require special attention for disposal, as they contain environmentally harmful electrolytes.

It can be attracting for consumers to buy into hybrid electric vehicles, given they are at the pinnacle of fuel efficiency. However, consumers need to ask themselves whether the environmental impact of manufacturing and disposing of the batteries in hybrid cars is outweighed by the lower lifetime carbon emissions produced by driving the vehicle itself.

Until science figures out eco-friendly manufacturing processes, we should probably focus on carpooling, using public transport, and other alternatives to hybrid vehicles!

 

watch?v=YGT6alnrg7I

Spam prevention powered by Akismet