Author Archives: madison stanyer

Islamic Tropes in The Patriot Act

Hasan Minhaj engaged with several of the common Islamic tropes throughout this episode of the Patriot Act. Towards the beginning of his talk, he brought up how Muhammad bin Salman was thought to “save the Arab world” as he lifted the law that prohibited women to drive. This moment in history was a big step for Muslim women in Saudi Arabia as Islam is known to fill the criteria of the uniquely sexist trope although, his humorous commentary downplayed it’s seriousness and showed how it really panned out. The video consisted of a Muslim woman rapping about knowing how to drive a car even though she was never physically driving it. He showed how this act is still frowned upon in their country and that Saudi women went so far as to protest the release of this legislation. Minhaj goes on to explain the war between Saudi Arabia and Yemen. He reveals that the praised reformer, Muhammad bin Salman, has been in fact funding the bombings on Yemen that have killed thousands, including those in schools and hospitals, and has driven Yemen’s famine to a level of crisis. Minhaj describes Salman to fit the trope that Islam is inherently violent very obviously, especially with his exaggerated facial expressions and body language when he makes jokes about how people could ever praise this scheming man. This dramatized way of telling the news is, in my opinion, effective as it keeps the audience engaged and also constantly rethinking since this casual approach allows the storyteller to say the things that others tend to shy away from on high profile news channels.

After saying his piece on Salman, he brings up several other unethical Indian individuals that are in a position of power in the United States. The description of these Muslim men plays on the idea of the trope that the “Muslim mind” is irrational. Minhaj sheds light on John Kapur, Dinesh D’Souza, and Bobby Jindal’s “psychopathic” tendencies as political figures in a hysterical manner. The way that Minhaj makes jokes about these Muslim men and how he ended with a comedic video showing Muslim children with tainted minds because of the actions of these figures gets a message across in a deceiving fashion. These men can have an impact on the lives of our youth through their irrational actions on broadcast TV, which can sometimes be disguised by mainstream news channels. Hasan Minhaj’s comedic news broadcasting provided evidence for these tropes through his speech as a way to communicate withi his audience. These tropes are common knowledge and when they are brought to life in a comedic way it can be easier for people to digest and discover the real issues through their laughter.

“To Wash Away the Tears”, an Artist Warrior in Action

The display in the Multiversity Gallery, “To Wash Away the Tears” by Hopokeltun (Shane Pointe), spoke to me the most out of any other artwork in the museum. Its presentation and the underlying message gets you thinking about the history of Aboriginals living in colonial times and also allows you to grasp a better understanding of their fight for identity. Its appearance consists of a large canoe with different items laying inside. There are handwoven blankets and paddles with traditional paintings and patterns and amongst that there are Elvis memorabilia. At first, it seems like a complete misrepresentation of Aboriginal identity and somewhat of a distraction from the fascinating cultural pieces displayed around it. This is the kind of reaction that “artist warriors”, as stated in the Kramer article, want to be rid of. Their main goal is to create a new conversation about Indigenous identity by challenging traditional forms of art with more contemporary pieces in western museums (Kramer 173).

On its left, you see a dated weaving tool that represents how they made beautiful blankets, and on its right, you can study the hundreds of different woven baskets used by generations of Indigenous people. These are the types of displays that people expect to see in an Aboriginal museum that has the goal to maintain the prosperity of Aboriginal identity and this is what Hopokeltun wants to change with his progressive artwork being the center of attention amongst all the history. But people still ask: why would the Musqueam Pointe family want to represent thousands of years of their family tree with Elvis memorabilia?

The answer is simply that his display does not represent the thousands of years of tradition, it is a token of respect to the sister Maggie of the Pointe family. Hopokeltun wanted to share the story that isn’t usually heard through artwork.  This piece specifically recognizes Maggie’s “attitude towards life”, which is the only information that we receive about her link to the artwork. Her “attitude towards life” consisted of rebelling against her already fragile culture and giving into the music of those that they were fighting against. We don’t exactly know this information from the description but it is suggested when you think about the history of Aboriginals in Canada. Hopokeltun chose to represent his families identity by physically showing the struggle that they faced with the constant invasion of the government trying to change their “savage-like” way of living to that of non-Aboriginal Canadians.

We can comprehend that the family and Maggie are still in touch with their culture from the contrasting pieces in the artwork; the historic canoe and traditional blankets. Although the more important items in this piece are those that do not belong to Aboriginal culture at all. It serves as a reminder that the Pointe family is not forgetting the history between the government and their people. I believe that people can interpret this piece in different ways depending on their own views. Although, it has an overall uniqueness and is meant to stand as a meaningful contemporary piece that should be in your thoughts as you peruse around the museum and when you walk through its doors. 

Debate Result: Social Media Enables Socio-Political Change

My role in the debate was to assess the positions of both sides of the arguments and provide a result to who had the better rebuttal in the end. In order to do so I had to keep an open mind when reading through Dean’s article “Technology: The Promises of Communicative Capitalism”. When providing a result for a debate, you must take down important points for each side in preparation. When doing this I found that I had more points down for how social media inhibits sociopolitical change, this may have been because Dean’s article was ultimately very negative in relation to technology and the media although, when listening to the other side of the debate I was persuaded to think that social media has a strong influence in enabling socio-political change. They brought up points about the incredible #MeToo movement that went above and beyond to produce actual change and it started out online by people who created awareness of the issue. Their points about how the internet provides a faster and easier way to promote change with a large number of users, more that could ever be apart of a protest, stood out to me as well as change requires many voices. The only point I found that went against their statement was when they mentioned that memes encourage awareness for socio-political change. This kind of entertainment media is not something that can promote vast change in any political aspect as people can’t take the real issue seriously or even gain knowledge on it when watching a silly meme on Twitter. Ultimately, I agree with how the majority of social media can promote socio-political change by creating awareness but we ended up favouring the other side of the debate because of the examples they provided and how they communicated their argument.

When listening to the other debate of the Castell’s article I found it a bit easier to make a decision when regarding social media and socio-political change. Their arguments discussed a narrower topic than the Dean debate, the Egyptian Revolution. Because we watched The Square in class and had knowledge on the subject already, it was a bit more interesting to follow along when our classmates were debating. In the end, I sided with how socio-political change enables political change because of the amount of positive change that happened in Egypt from posting online and gathering awareness. They dethroned two dictators that were ruining the country from the numbers that they generated in protest and online.

I found this debate incredibly eye-opening and a valuable exercise to gain knowledge on both sides of the argument for social media and socio-political change when studying media studies. 

Works Cited

Castells, Manuel. “The Egyptian Revolution.” Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, 2nd ed., 2015.

Dean, Jodi. “Technology: The Promises of Communicative Capitalism.” Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics, Duke University Press, 2009.

The Silent Movement on Twitter: Friday October 13, 2017

Rose McGowan is a sexual assault survivor of Hollywood’s infamous Harvey Weinstein. A traumatizing hotel room incident in 1997 caused her to obtain an influential voice in the matter, fighting for the women who experience sexual assault everyday. She shares her voice on many online platforms with Twitter being the major one (Chan). On October 12th 2017, McGowan tweeted about Weinstein’s maltreatment to speak out against the issue. Twitter then suspended McGowan’s account, with their reason being that she violated one of their policies by including a personal phone number in the series of tweets, as reported from The New York Times. After posting on Instagram that her account had been suspended, she called on her followers and anyone who wanted to join the fight to “be her voice” (Chan).  In this case she had no voice because of Twitter, so other women decided that they weren’t going to either. #WomenBoycottTwitter started trending on October 12th and the next day, Friday October 13th, women’s voices were silenced in protest against the platform (Zhang).

“Participatory culture”, defined to be “a range of different groups deploying media production and distribution to serve their collective interests”, is directly linked to fandoms as described by Henry Jenkins in his article “Why Media Spreads” (2). McGowan’s fandom, referred to as the “Rose Army”, was a force not to be reckoned with due to the power they held in circulating the same media, which was the thousands of posts using #WomenBoycottTwitter (Jenkins 1; Bonazzo). McGowan created a social dynamic from participatory culture that otherwise wouldn’t have been possible without the existence of social media.  Her voice on the online platform made it possible for people to come together in such large masses and stand up against this societal issue instead of shying away from it. There would be a definite lack of communication and numbers needed to speak out against people like Harvey Weinstein and to stick up for his victims without social media platforms like Twitter. In McGowan’s case, Twitter acted as a positive and negative factor. It gave a portal for people to share opinions and band together to start conversation but it also acted against that conversation. Twitter shouldn’t be silencing individuals who are creating conversation about serious issues of sexual harassment, especially in this day and age. Their response to the controversy was deceiving and lacked personal touch, like they copied and pasted it from their library of automated responses: “Twitter is proud to empower and support the voices on our platform, especially those that speak truth to power. We stand with the brave women and men who use Twitter to share their stories, and will work hard every day to improve our processes to protect those voices.” (Twitter). Twitter or any platform of social media may or may not attempt to protect the voices of their users but if they choose not to, they will face the forceful social dynamic of their own users in protest.

Works Cited

Bonazzo, John. “The Biggest Twitter Storms of 2017.” Observer, 26 December 2017, https://observer.com/2017/12/social-media-controversies-year-in-review/. Accessed on 1 November 2018.

Chan, Melissa. “Here’s Why Rose McGowan’s Twitter Account Was Suspended.“ The New York Times, 12 October 2017, http://time.com/4980004/rose-mcgowans-twitter-harvey-weinstein/ . Accessed on 1 November 2018.

Jenkins, Henry, Ford, Sam, and Green, Joshua. “Introduction: Why Media Spreads.” NYU Press, 2013.

Twitter Safety, 12 October 2017,                                                                                         https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/918502757102903296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E918502757102903296&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Ftime.com%2F4980004%2Frose-mcgowans-twitter-harvey-weinstein%2F. Accessed 1 November 2018.

Zhang, Laura. “Banning of Rose McGowan prompts a Twitter boycott by feminists.” The Independent, 13 October 2017, http://theindependent.sg/banning-of-rose-mcgowan-prompts-a-twitter-boycott-by-feminists/. Accessed on 1 November 2018.

The Media’s Side to the 2017 Pepsi Commercial ft Kendall Jenner

Ads for major companies play a very important role in their representation and marketing. The whole world is watching this 30-second production, creating many different opinions. Praise and criticism comes along with making these ads, especially when they stir up controversy. Recently, we’ve seen a Nike commercial including Colin Kaepernick, a former NFL football player who started the #Takeaknee movement during the national anthem. His intentions were to protest police brutality against black people occurring in the United States. This created a lot of backlash in the media, as stated in an Independent article. It also served as a reminder of the Pepsi ad involving Kendall Jenner that came out in April of 2017.  This ad created a situation that undermined the Black Lives Matter movement without supposedly realizing its “racial tone-deafness”, as described in BBC and Huffington Post news stories. At the beginning of the ad model, Kendall Jenner is in the middle of a photo shoot when she notices a large crowd protesting outside. Everyone is holding signs displaying peace symbols and statements including: “join the conversation” and “love”. Kendall joins the protest. While grabbing a can of Pepsi she walks up to the front of the protest line to then hand it to a police officer. He drinks the pop and the crowd cheers, celebrating the “unity” between the two forces. This brought up many questions about Pepsi’s intentions for this ad as it began circulating in the media. 

According to Stuart Hall in his article “Encoding, Decoding”, he believes that a message from factual events must be constructed in the production stage for it to be of value to the receivers. The message is interpreted by a single group and set in place,“ encoded”, at the beginning of the communication process and then broken down into different interpretations, “decoded”, at the end by the audience at which it’s received. In regards to the Pepsi ad, the “encoding” of the message for the protesting movement was to be “a global message of unity, peace, and understanding.” as Pepsi described in a tweet. When it reached different audiences around the world, it was “decoded” into a very different message. The overwhelming response consisted of criticism for “painting a privileged, white model as a peacemaker between civil rights activists and police.”, as BBC described it. A particular conversation during the “decoding” stage in Huffington Post article brought up that it looked like a replica of the trended Black Lives Matter photograph of Ieshia Evans in Baton Rouge in 2016. The Huffington Post article commented: “Unlike Jenner, however, Evans was arrested. If only she had a Pepsi in hand.” This analogy of the contribution of a Pepsi in historical black movements seemed to be a trend in discussions, including Bernice King’s (daughter of Martin Luther King) tweet: “If only daddy would have known about the power of #Pepsi.”

The “decoding” of this controversial ad resulted in an overwhelming response of criticism and shock. The conversation lead to a large audience questioning the cultural diversity and ethics of the production team and the head of Pepsi itself. The public’s response formed a contrast in the original message that was “encoded” by Pepsi. One must ask, how did anyone perceive this insulting message as unifying? It raises the concern that Pepsi possibly made this ad to gain publicity from the controversy.

 

 

Citations:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/taking-a-knee-national-anthem-nfl-trump-why-meaning-origins-racism-us-colin-kaepernick-a8521741.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/kendall-jenner-appropriates-the-resistance-to-sell-you-pepsi_us_58e40c27e4b0d0b7e165bdec

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/41465222/kendall-jenner-feels-bad-after-pepsi-black-lives-matter-advert-controversy

Bernice King’s Tweet

https://twitter.com/BerniceKing/status/849656699464056832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E849656699464056832&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fobserver.com%2F2017%2F04%2Fkendall-jenner-pepsi-civil-rights%2F

Pictures

1. https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/pepsi-advert-pulled-kendall-jenner-protest-video-cancelled-removed-a7668986.html

2. https://thinkingraceblog.wordpress.com/2017/04/24/that-pepsi-commercial/

3. https://www.pride.com/activism/2017/4/05/even-martin-luther-king-jrs-daughter-couldnt-believe-kendall-jenners-cringey-pepsi-ad

Other trended tweets involved in the discussion:

Phil Lewis

https://twitter.com/Phil_Lewis_/status/849416977525465089?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E849416977525465089&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fobserver.com%2F2017%2F04%2Fkendall-jenner-pepsi-civil-rights%2F

Scott Ludlam

https://twitter.com/Scottludlam/status/849404357485481984

Xavier Burgin

https://twitter.com/XLNB/status/849425654978408450?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E849425654978408450&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.harpersbazaar.com%2Fcelebrity%2Flatest%2Fnews%2Fa21830%2Fkendall-jenner-pepsi-commercial-twitter-reactions%2F