January 2016

Student participation: What about seeking-help?

When I first began researching my inquiry question regarding participation in a classroom, I thought of participation in terms of group discussion, answering questions put forth by the teacher, and willingness to learn. It was not until I read Calarco’s article that I realized that an actively participating learner knows how and when to seek help. Calarco defines help-seeking in schools as “children’s requests for assistance, clarification, information, and checking-of-work from teachers” (Calarco, 2011, p. 865). Seeking help is a huge component of education and is a very proactive action. In her study, Calarco examines the differences that social class has on students’ ability to seek assistance with their learning. When students chose to get help, they are involved in the process and are engaged with their education. The study revealed that “middle-class students used direct and proactive strategies” and that “working-class students tended to be more patient and less proactive” (Calarco, 2011, p. 873-874).

I find this quite a controversial topic, especially how in the conclusion Calarco (2011) alludes to these findings as being predictors for cultural capital later in life. When I finished reading her study, I started to think about how a teacher could help combat this issue. Calarco (2011) acknowledged that the teachers whose classes she observed did not have any help-seeking strategies or routines set in place for her students – it was entirely up to the students to take it upon themselves to seek assistance. I think that it would be very beneficial to set in place comfortable routines that make it a less involved process to seek help. One idea I found was a “help marker” – a star shaped figure that stands on a student’s desk to indicate that he or she needs help. I also think Plickers would be a great tool to check for understanding. Calarco also (2011) discusses how it is not until students are engaging with the activity or assignment, do they realize that they need help. Using Plickers after students begin working would be a stress-free and anonymous way for students to admit that they need extra guidance. If technology is not available, a mid-activity traffic lighting question could work as well – “Heads down, cards up!”.

Students in a classroom come from various backgrounds, and it is a part of the teacher’s job to create equal opportunities for student learning. Anonymous or less-involved ways to check for understanding is one way teachers can help those students who are less inclined to make the trek from their desk to the teacher’s or raise their hands to get help. Being proactive to find those who are struggling could help this, which then helps facilitate a safe, comfortable classroom. Hopefully, these strategies can then translate to students feeling comfortable enough to then take the initiative to seek assistance on their own as well.

Source: Calarco, Jessica McCrory. “”I Need Help!” Social Class and Children’s Help-Seeking in Elementary School.” American Sociological Review 76.6 (2011): 862-82. Web.

Plickers

What about conflict?

Coming home today I had a thought, “What do you do when kids don’t get along?”

Through my observations, I’ve seen an instance or two –  or twelve – of unnecessary, pointless arguing, bickering, or teasing. It has really caused me to wonder what a teacher can do to make kids get along? The arguments and “problems” seem so insignificant to you as an adult, but for a child at that moment they are a huge issue. Being at the front of the line or being the one to do a certain classroom task are very important parts of classroom life, which can then create some tension between students.

When disagreements occur, how do you figure out the truth if you weren’t present for the incident? That is an issue I have been contemplating over the past few weeks. Teacher biases can also have a great influence on these situations. As a teacher candidate I have found myself wondering with how I will respond and cope with disagreeable situations between my future students? As I spend more time in classrooms and begin to form the roots of my Teacher Philosophy, I realize how important empathy and kindness are to me and how I want my classroom to feel safe. Empathy is a learned emotion, and a difficult one to fully embrace at a young age. There’s the golden rule, “Do onto others as you would have done onto you,” but empathy takes that a few steps further. Thinking about how the other person is going to feel before you respond to a situation is a very hard skill to learn. I have a soft spot for the underdog and have to remind myself about the “overdogs” in the situation as well. Just because a child said or did an unkind thing does not mean that that child is themselves, unkind.

So! For where I am at so far in my teacher education, I think in difficult social situations with students, the truth is where to start. Do your best to dig through the mess to find out what happened and when that does not work… I’m not sure! I’m also realizing that this may be a “learn as you go” part of teacher education. Every disagreement, conflict, or incident between students is unique so it would be impossible to perfectly prepare and plan exactly what to say for each one. So, I leave you with what I have learned so far…

Do your best to seek the truth to help students build empathy towards their peers.

Does assessment kill creativity?

Does assessment kill creativity? My initial response to this title is that maybe sometimes criteria for assessment can? If students are continuously limited in the form they are assessed, then absolutely. There is also that draw to only meet expectations, “If I do the bare minimum, I will get by.” If 1+2+3=A is the only acceptable, easy way to achieve A, why would you bother to go further to 1+1+2+2=A?

When reading Beghetto’s article, what stood out the most to me was the idea of displaying only the “best work” of your class. This action, I would think, would have obvious social and emotional effects for creativity. I strongly reacted to this idea because of possible limiting effects it would have on some students. I imagine most classes have a few students who consistently lead the pack – the ones who would always have their work on display. If you knew yours was probably not going to make it on the bulletin board, why would you put in extra effort to try?

When I first read the title, I had a similar response to Beghetto’s initial answer, “it depends”. I really appreciate the idea of student perception of assessment. I think it has a strong relationship to self-efficacy as well. If a student does not feel they can complete the task – or complete it well, I can imagine that would be a huge hindrance to performance. Teachers need to be there to support ability and not allow the weight of assessment to hinder it.

Beghetto’s article offers many useful strategies to take the weight off of assessment to leave room for creativity. His strategies, such as reducing the pressure by not emphasizing evaluation, do not just aid in creativity, but extend to so many issues that occur within a classroom. Creating a comfortable, safe classroom climate has endless benefits, including creativity. Students need to feel safe in order to try.

I’ve always thought of creativity in the sense of freedom and innovation. The title “Does assessment kill creativity?” is a bold question and I agree with the article – it can. What I am most taking away from Beghetto’s work is how a teacher needs to create a safe space for students to express their original ideas, but how the assessment is there as a framework to keep creativity appropriate to the activity being assessed. If you want your class to be creative and come up with descriptive words for a nature poem about water, you want to encourage possibilities and interpretations, but keep the answers appropriate, such as how maybe water in the bathroom isn’t quite what we’re looking for!

Source: Beghetto, R.A., (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity? The Educational Forum, (69) 2 p254-263