Categories
Genre

Role Playing in the Math and Science Classroom…. can it be done?

Role playing in the science and math classroom I think has been neglected as a teaching style to promote student learning. It is true these techniques are often employed in social studies so I am trying to consider why they are not generally a part of the sciences.
Role playing may provide opportunities for students to learn with meaning as it can help them to understand the place of using these tools in life. Meaningful learning in my opinion increases student motivation because it gives their learning purpose. Of course this also depends on what the definition of role playing is…. I would argue that in science class even performing collaborative investigative activities like laboratory experiments could be consider a style of role play….. one without a set outcome, in fact the students would be discovering the outcome while they were involved in the role play, think of it like dramatic improv perhaps!
The use of immersive virtual worlds may be the future of providing these meaningful learning role plays in the science and math disciplines. Having students immersed in an investigation and even the possibility of stimulating their senses is an exciting idea indeed. I have often considered myself an advocate for experiential learning as I believe it provides purpose and real meaning to supplement student curriculum objectives. If that means performing a laboratory experiment, field work at a real world site or immersion in a virtual environment where students have the ability to use their visual, auditory and tactile senses then there may be some real opportunity for students to become engaged in what they are learning. Perhaps we have been and will continue to role play in science and mathematics, it was just a matter re-evaluating what role playing is in that context, and with virtually immersive environments becoming more possible students will able to experience their learning in even more ways in the future.

Often I think when we learn and teach about concepts in science and math we follow a more regimented structure to planning and curriculum delivery. We are less “free” to decide what is right and wrong when it comes to providing solutions to complex problems. Especially in math I think students often have difficulty mastering the numerical concepts because they have trouble relating to the content, they simply don’t understand why they are learning complex mathematical problems and how they are important for anything. Math being a tool is often taught from a theoretical perspective which is often advanced for young students who have no need for those concepts at that point in their lives. We see a bit more real world application example in the sciences as those disciplines often use mathematical tools to come to solutions to problems. Perhaps not using role playing techniques more often has contributed to this problem of students not relating to subject matter.

Categories
Framing Issues

What Makes Good Use of Technology?

Without realy doing any research I suppose using technology in a classroom is best used when it allows students to have a better undersanding of a topic that is being discussed. For example I have had students in the past who had trouble understanding the 3d shapes of molecules. I would not even want to imagine how hard it would be for them to understand without very detailed pictures in their textbooks (which is arguably also a type of technology).

Now it is possible to show 3d images of these molecules using digital software something that at the very least gets students attention (technology increasing student motivation? hmmmmm…)! This use of technology is not new….. it is simply a video derivation of another form of technology that has been used in chemistry classrooms for many years… the molecular model! In its day it was a great tool and actually still is. Just because we have new, fancy digital applications to use today doesn`t mean that the older types of technology have become obsolete. After all we still use ballpoint pens nearly everyday, right? That is also a piece of technology isn’t it? Most likely pretty high tech when it was first mass produced. So to get back to the digital imaging of molecular structures let’s not also forget that showing a digital image may also be a much quicker option to teach students visually about chemical shapes. Where as having them create models may take considerably more time. That brings us to another point that makes technology useful…. it can save us time. So to quickly summarize good use of technology in a classroom would facilitate at least two things:
– it would improve student understanding by manipulating the learning environment to involve different techniques for knowlege delivery
– it would improve student learning generally by lowering the time it takes for students to acquire knowledge and /or perhaps decreasing preparation time for teachers which allows them to focus on other areas that students may be struggling with

Any others that come to mind?

Imagine how hard it might be to explain the information in the following video without having the use of the molecular image of DNA?

Spam prevention powered by Akismet