Geographical Sciences Field Course (GEOS 309) 

Geographical Sciences Field Course (GEOS 309) 

Instructors involved in EaSEIL  

Nina Hewitt and Brett Eaton* (Course Designers and Instructors)  
*Instructor from 2022 to 2024 

Context: Course Description   

Level: 3rd year  

Credits:

Term: Summer

Capacity: ~25 students 

Additional fees (2024-2025): $ 1195 (transportation, meals, accommodation) 

Instructional team: 2 instructors, 2 teaching assistants 

This is a multi-day course (~11 days) held in late May-early June at the UBC-Teck Geological Field Station (Syilx Lands – Oliver, British Columbia, Canada) with day trips to various field sites in the local area. 
Note: GEOS 309 was first taught on this location in the Summer of 2022. 

nʕaylintn “nye-lin-tin” (McIntyre Bluff). Photo credit: Nina Hewitt, 2022

Overarching Learning Goals

This course builds student knowledge and skills on the basic methods/techniques of field work in geographical sciences including surveying and mapping, field sampling, instrumentation, electronic data acquisition, and the design and implementation of field projects. Students engage in peer-to peer and student-to-instructor learning.

Prior to Field Course

2 required meetings (1.5 hours each) to prepare for field week. Meeting 1 (virtual): Meet-n-greet, review safety procedures and equipment needs; and Google Earth mapping exercise. Meeting 2 (hybrid/mandatory): short lesson, overview of safety, travel arrangements.
Pre-requisite mandatory forms (signed code of conduct; emergency medical and diet information) and safety training (Heat stress awareness online course).

During
Field Course
(11 days; 8-5 pm)

Day trips in the area, guest-lectures/workshops with community as co-educators. Opportunities to practice survey, data collection, field observation, sketching, note taking. Daily field assignments (individual reflections/write ups, field notes, summaries, sketches; 3 group technical reports).

Other

Breakfast and dinner at the field station, packed lunch for field day.

Students practice careful field
observation via landform sketches1
Biogeography & Soils1
Fire history1

Goals (G) and Motivation 

G1: To offer a place-based, contextually grounded and cooperative field experience that includes voices, Knowledges and perspectives of local Indigenous and non-Indigenous community members as co-educators. This goal recognizes local community connections to and knowledge about the land, adding knowledge that we (instructors) cannot supply. The objectives were to: 

    a. Enhance student and instructor cultural awareness and knowledge about local Indigenous communities and honour their perspectives, Land rights, cultural and historical legacies;
Visit to Nk’Mip Desert Cultural Centre1

Jenna cnúk Bower, leading visit to Nk’Mip
Cultural Centre1
  1. Enhance student knowledge about regenerative farming; FireSmartBC practices; local grassland ecology and soils; river restoration and management; and geomorphic/landform processes. 
Gene Covert – Regenerative Farming
Workshop at Covert Farms1

Teaching assistant and PhD candidate in fire
ecology, Daniel Robinson, demonstrates a
jackstraw stand2
Dr. Jason Jones, Fire Risk Ecology and
management workshop that informs annual
fire hazard assessment GEOS 309 does at the
UBC-Teck Geological Field Station2
Okanagan Nation Alliance – Okanagan River
Restoration Initiative delegate, Zoe Eyjolfson,
teaches about River restoration and channel
features3

G2: To develop accessible activities that build on field techniques in Geosciences and teach skills of soils, vegetation and landform interpretation and exploration pertinent to new field location 

G3: To enhance inclusion and accessibility by adding approaches that make the course more accommodating for a diverse array of students and building a sense of belonging prior to the course 

Activities  2022-2023  2023-2024 (Ongoing) 
G1: New Land acknowledgement in syllabus, established and continued building reciprocal relationship with local community members, pre-field assignments about nsyilxcən language (designed by co-educator J. cnúk Bower – Nk’Mip Desert Cultural Centre
G2: Implemented New pre-field mapping exercise to introduce students to local Okanagan geomorphology and included information of local and Indigenous place names 
G3: New short activities in pre-field meetings to establish peer connections, introduce pronouns; offered Virtual tour of the UBC-Teck Geological Field Station to prepare students for field week so they could focus on learning  
G1: Visit to Nk’Mip Cultural Desert Centre (optional ‘22, embedded in course as of ’23; tailored to course as of ‘24); research sensitivity & language revitalization with J. c. Bower (co-educator) plus reflection (this activity did not happen in 2024 or 2025 due to limited time and funding, and the addition of an experience with Okanagan Nation Alliance, below) 
G2: 3 new local community members as co-educators – workshops/guest lectures/activities 
G1&G2: New local community member as co-educator (Okanagan Nation Alliance Representative) to learn about the Okanagan River Restoration Initiative (ORRI) in the field 
G2: Changed focus of/extended with applied activities some guest lectures, re-connected with landowner to access their land for study 
G3: Collaborated with students to create sleeping arrangement, changed language to refer to groups (diverse not co-ed) 

Note: For a detailed description of Goal 1 and related activities, refer to: 
Hewitt, N., Mazabel,S., Lukes,L., Eaton,B., Bower, J. cnúk. (2025). Fostering a sense of place and partnership in geoscience field education with Indigenous and other communities. In J. E. Wessell (Ed.), Experiential Learning in Geography II: The World as our Classroom (pp. 45-60). Springer Nature. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82575-0 

Impact 

Total number of students enrolled 2022-2025 (four course offerings): 86 undergraduate students, plus 5 MSc students (the latter choose it to expand their field techniques and obtain credit toward Engineering Geoscientists of BC certification) 

Students enrolled in GEOS 309 Summer 2024 (n=21) completed an online anonymous survey at the end of the course. They were asked to share with instructors about their experience in sessions with community members as co-educators in which speakers shared knowledge, experiences and perspectives relevant to the subject of study. More details in forthcoming publications/presentations.

“This was an excellent class and I would recommend it to all students in the environment/geography disciplines. The breadth of opportunities presented in just 11 days allowed me to pick up so much knowledge and skills, make longlasting connections with peers in my discipline, and also figure out which area of geoscience I was most interested in and continue pursuing courses in said areas. I also enjoyed the focus group I felt that was a pretty exciting way to get involved in the department.” [The focus group was about updates to the BSc program in Geography of which GEOS 309 is a capstone course] (anonymous student comment in Student Evaluation of Teaching Survey, 2025 – shared by instructor on July 11, 2025) 

“The students said the community engaged aspect was really important to them, because they heard from people that loved the place and had managed to deal with the wildfire risks in particular ways, and even embrace them.” [Instructor reflective interview, Aug.’23] 

[The virtual tour of the field station] “It was clear to me that some students had done it and used it and that it was helpful because they were saying things that came out of that” (Instructor reflective interview, Aug.’ 24) 

“One of the most important things about field camps is those peer-to-peer relationships” (Instructor reflective interview, Aug.’23) … “[The students] were able to have an introduction with 3 or 4 different people [in the meet-n-greet pre-field activity], I think it was nice, it contributed to an atmosphere that this is about peer connections” (Instructor reflective interview, Aug.’ 24) 

“Partnering with community members as co-educators contributed to student understanding of professional competencies relevant in the field of study such as fire ecology and management; viticulture and sustainable farming; and in forging meaningful, reciprocal relationships with Indigenous and other non-Indigenous communities. Students built an appreciation of the importance of including multiple perspectives to understand topics of interest, and of the value of learning from those with lived experience in the place of study.” (Instructors, Advancing Community Engaged Learning Final Report, Nov.’23) 

“Another surprising outcome of partnering with community members as co-educators was its role in reshaping the co-instructor perspectives on field camp. Traditionally, geographical sciences field camps have tended to revolve around rather western forms of engagement with place – instrumentation, measurement and other approaches that treat the space as an object of study. Thus, by reaching out and engaging with local peoples, we learned that there was more to the space than we could uncover with our field methods, when viewed through the lens of those who call it home; We did not only enhance our cultural awareness and knowledge about local Indigenous communities, in terms of language and ecology and values, we also witnessed the power of community storytelling as a means to decolonize field-teaching practices.” (Instructors, Advancing Community Engaged Learning Final Report, Nov.’23) 

  • These field-based courses are very invaluable to students for peer-peer relationship development and for immersive, in-field skill-building opportunities for students. They are worth the effort! 
  • Incorporating local Indigenous and non-Indigenous community members’ voices, perspectives, knowledge and experiences in courses requires relationship building. This takes time and effort, be patient. Your efforts may not be their priority. 
  • When engaging with community members as co-educators, consider how your plans are responsive to your partners’ needs and wishes. Early and ongoing communication about mutual interests, needs and benefits as well as appropriate acknowledgement of contributions (e.g., honorarium, tokens of appreciation, gifts) is essential. When honorariums are the most appropriate way to give back, secure ongoing funds to develop and sustain meaningful relationships with partners. 
  • Changing a field course location and format requires dedicated time for planning logistics (e.g., safety plans, site rules, transport, catering) and develop new activities pertinent to the new location.  If available, connect with other instructors who have taught at the same location, their guidance and experience is invaluable. 
  • Securing funds to make field-based learning experiences financially accessible for students is important, so curricular development effort costs are not included in additional fees to students. 

Other work by Nina Hewitt: 

The Biogeography Teaching and Research Lab, under the direction of Dr. Nina Hewitt has developed a series of immersive Augmented and Virtual Reality field trips as a way to engage learners in the biogeosciences. 

Where can Geographical Sciences Take Me? (Hewitt, N., 2022, Geography Major’s Tea)  

High Park in Focus: A 360° experience of Toronto’s Black Oak Savanna* (Hewitt, Yan, Croy, Peirce & Scobie, April 2025)

Note: The main 360° tour is being updated for clarity and sound (Summer 2025).  
*May not work in all browsers, since, only WebGL-enabled browsers are supported, and the browser must support JavaScript and cookies.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet