Revised Definitions of Cognitive Dissonance

Introduction:

Based on the criteria and objectives, the concept of “Cognitive Dissonance” will be explained by a psychology student. The audience is composed of fellow university students from various disciplines, therefore I expect some audience members to possess only basic knowledge of this concept.

Parenthetical Definition:

Cognitive dissonance (mental conflict due to inconsistent thoughts, beliefs or attitudes) causes feelings of unease and discomfort.

Sentence Definition:

Cognitive dissonance is an unpleasant psychological conflict which arises when contradictory information challenges currently held beliefs or attitudes (Britannica, 2021).

Expanded Definition

What is Cognitive Dissonance?

Cognitive dissonance is mental conflict which arise due to beliefs and actions being challenged by contradictory information. People tend to strive to maintain consistency in their beliefs and perception. The inconsistency between what one believes and how they actually behave causes discomfort (Cherry, 2020).

For instance, if an individual is aware of the environmentally harmful effects of fuel-based cars, yet still drive one, then that individual may experience cognitive dissonance because their action contradicts their knowledge of the potential harm of fuel-based cars. This cognitive dissonance may be amplified if the individual considers themselves as environmentally conscious.

 

(https://alcoholstudies.rutgers.edu/changing-minds-to-save-them/)

What is its history?

Leon Festinger was came up with the cognitive dissonance theory in 1957. Festinger studied committed cult members who went as far as to give up their homes and jobs to join the cult in order to be saved from a flood that was predicted to destroy the earth. When this flood eventually did not occur, the more committed the members were, the more they held on to their beliefs about the flood, despite being proven wrong. Instead of coming to terms with their wrongful predictions, committed members attempted to protect their beliefs by attributing the absence of the earth destroying flood to their faithfulness to the cult (McLeod, 2018).

Festinger explained that people do this because cognitive dissonance causes unease and discomfort. On the other hand, alignment across our beliefs, attitudes, and behaviour promotes mental harmony. Therefore, humans seek to maintain this harmony in order to escape the stress of mental dissonance (McLeod, 2018).

Today, despite its criticisms, the concept of cognitive dissonance is considered one of the most pivotal theories in social psychology (Harmon-Jones & Mills, 2019).

What causes it?

Cognitive dissonance may occur due to forced compliance, where an individual is required by external forces to behave or act in a certain way that is inconsistent to the individual’s own beliefs. To draw on the fuel-based cars example used previously, although one may be environmentally conscious, there may be external factors that force them to rely on fuel-based cars. For instance, individuals may need to travel between cities for work or school, and public transportation may not be sufficient to reach destinations. Additionally, electric cars are often expensive and not accessible for many people.

A second reason cognitive dissonance may result is due to decision making. If an individual must choose only one option when the alternatives are equally desirable, then that individual may be faced with dissonance in deciding which option to choose, because both have advantages and disadvantages the other does not have. Lastly, learning new information that contrasts the information believed and accpeted by an individual may cause dissonance as well (Cherry, 2020).

What is needed to resolve it?

People experiencing cognitive dissonance will attempt to reduce it. As is with the case of the cult members in Festinger’s study, one method is to protect ones beliefs by seeking out more support for that belief. Likewise, individuals experiencing cognitive dissonance may attempt to rationalize their beliefs or actions when faced with conflicting information. Environmentally conscious drivers of fuel-based cars may rationalize this behaviour by telling themselves that other alternatives are beyond their financial capabilities and they have no other choice but to continue driving fuel-based cars. Individuals may also convince themselves of the insignificance of their contradictory actions. Environmentally conscious drivers may excuse their use of fuel based-cars by convincing themselves that the harm done by one more person driving fuel-based cars is insignificant, especially in comparison to the amount of carbon emmissions produced by factories or by the private jets of elites.

On the other hand, individuals may deal with cognitive dissonance by changing their beliefs and actions. Despite being this being the most effective method, people often do not choose this method because it is difficult for people to change deeply held beliefs. Sometimes, like with the cult members who gave up their homes and jobs for the cult, changing ones beliefs and values means coming to terms with the unpleasant reality (Cherry, 2020).

Works Cited

Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2019, April 5). Cognitive dissonanceEncyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/cognitive-dissonance

Cherry, K. (2020, July 02). What is Cognitive Dissonance? Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-cognitive-dissonance-2795012

Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and perspectives on the theory. In E. Harmon-Jones (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (pp. 3-24). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-001

Leod, S. (2018, February 05). Cognitive Dissonance. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive-dissonance.html.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*