To make analysis consistent, I choose NextMaker Box for EVA review. This is in line with Founder Parade with a deep dive.
https://sites.google.com/view/assignment-1-analyst-report/home
Featuring original research and analysis on emerging learning technology markets and ventures published as Open Educational Resources (OERs) by professional educators enrolled in the University of British Columbia's Master of Educational Technology (MET) program. Browse and be inspired!
Posted in (A1) Analyst Report
To make analysis consistent, I choose NextMaker Box for EVA review. This is in line with Founder Parade with a deep dive.
https://sites.google.com/view/assignment-1-analyst-report/home
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Self reflection – after nextmaker box pitching, some questions still lingering on my mind: 1. Did I showcase the uniqueness of Nextmaker box and why it is not replaceable by other competitors? 2. Why users would stick to Nextmaker box for a reasonable period of time to promote consistency of STEM education via the kit and how the product could evolve if I were the Chief Innovation Officer? 3. given the fast evolvement and easy-to-replicate nature of tech related education kit, what could be the cutting edge of Nextmaker Box after first mover advantage is consumed?
From pitching perspective and if time allows, I would like to deep dive into target audience, investors, educators and end users (students), include a live demo for strong credibility, interview or customer feedback data analysis to testify the effectiveness, refine cost benefit analysis to highlight long term ROI.
A great pitch doesn’t just sell a product—it tells a story that resonates. Next time, I’ll focus on making the emotional and practical benefits of NextMaker Box even clearer.