3 responses to “A3: Meet Nathan, the Conversational Research App”

  1. Joel Flanagan

    Hello Kevin,

    Thank you for sharing your podcast with us. It will be fascinating to see how the technologies you discussed converge in the future.

    I’m curious if offering a web interface could be an additional avenue worth exploring, especially since some schools have strict policies on downloading and installing apps on managed devices. Your podcast raised essential points about the challenges and opportunities ahead.

    Thanks for the engaging discussion.
    Joel


    ( 1 upvotes and 0 downvotes )
  2. Rich

    Hi Kevin,
    Thanks for your mini podcast with your brother on an imagined new app Nathan combining the functionality of Chat GTP and Siri. I think this is actually happening as Apple has partnered with OpenAi to cooperate on using this technology which will start to be unveiled in new iPhone releases and iOS upgrades. Recently I enabled Siri just to see if it had improved over the years, unfortunately not, Siri is still a flop in my opinion, however I feel confident that is about to drastically improve very soon (within 1 to 2 years), with Apple and other products regarding (really effective) voice activated Ai. I think Nicole Magne covered this really well in her A2 OER. I’m so excited for this technology!
    I liked hearing your thoughts on this in regard to how it may apply in the classroom. One interesting point you (or your brother?) made was the idea that it can keep a learner’s momentum going and their confidence up. If they are diving into a topic, they don’t need to get stuck on a point they don’t know, which could potentially derail their momentum. That’s a good point, all this information is already quick access scaffolded for them, so in theory they could dive deeper into something they are interested in. My question would be though, is there a need to balance that with the skill and habit of exercising the ability to research and discern information or will that come into play naturally when needed? One other question I wonder about is, does all this easy access to infomration affect our ability to retain knowledge and is that even important?
    Thanks for your thought provoking conversation.
    Rich


    ( 2 upvotes and 0 downvotes )
    1. Nicole Magne

      hey guys, weighing in here about the direction we’re likely to see Nathan moving forward. The use case by Apple with its “new” unimpressive Siri was done intentionally to limit hallucinations but is less powerful in its creative abilities. So in the use case of a product like Nathan – this Apple approach would actually work really well in the context of a lower- risk educational product aimed at students. Ethan Mollick (https://www.oneusefulthing.org) has a fantastic substack and his most recent newsletter covers this topic. Mollick writes that the new Advanced Voice mode in ChatGPT and the AI-powered Siri represent two distinct AI philosophies: Copilots versus Agents, and small models versus large ones. New Siri remains a “Copilot” focused on privacy, safety, and security, using a small model that runs directly on the device without an internet connection. This results in a very private but less powerful and safer AI experience, similar to the old Siri. Apple’s choice to use a small model ensures privacy but limits Siri’s capabilities, making it less impressive than larger, generalist models like ChatGPT. While small models are fast, cheap, and specialized, they lack the complexity and capability of larger models. A limited capability Nathan “Copilot” is likely the product we will see in the near future – especially if it’s going to get the approval of school boards and sanctioned into the classroom market.


      ( 1 upvotes and 0 downvotes )

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.