Posted: August 9th, 2011, by lesliedawes
This is the link to our collaborative module built in Moodle.
Collaborating with our group to build this module was a very rewarding experience. I learned so much about ‘memory’ and also more about how to design a learning management system, ‘Moodle.’
Our group was a fabulous group to work with. They were all knowledgeable when it came to planning, implementing, designing and editing. It was a wonderful learning opportunity.
http://m1.cust.educ.ubc.ca/CUSTmoodle/course/view.php?id=53
Filed under: Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted: August 4th, 2011, by lesliedawes
Interactions are very important online. Discussion Posts serve as the main way for asynchronous communication between students. Here is an example of a reply from my preceeding post on Culture, Technology, and Religion.
Subject: Re:Culture, Technology and Religion Topic: Module 9: Favorite Questions
Author: Leslie Dawes Date: July 21, 2011 8:55 AM
Hi Irene,
Thanks for your reply. I like how you summed up what you think the future of religion and technology should be. You wrote,” We try to save lives, or improve the quality of lives, that is what religion should be about I think, and what technology should be used for.”
Perhaps that should be a curriculum focus in our pedagogy. In Dr. Feng’s paper about “Contribution of Quotidian Pedagogy to Environmental Education: Revisiting Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Nature in Technological Culture,” he comments that ,” reviving existentialism in education (Feng, 2004), by valuing our position as limited, caring beings, for whom meaning and compassion need to be infused with pedagogy.”
Teaching students that accountability and responsibility is important when using any technologies. Ethics and how we engage students with technology needs to be part of the equation. Students are our future leaders and they need to be prepared for the challenges of the world in the years to come.
Leslie
Reference:
Feng,F. (2005). Contribution of Quotidian Pedagogy to Environmental Education: Revisiting Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Nature in Technological Culture, Paper presented at AERA, Ecological and Environmental Education SIG, Montreal, Canada.
Filed under: Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted: July 20th, 2011, by lesliedawes
Subject: Culture, Technology and Religion Topic: Module 9: Favorite Questions
Author: Leslie Dawes Date: July 20, 2011 3:54 PM
Doing this week’s readings and watching some clips got me thinking about the connection between culture, technology and religion. I had never heard The Beatle’s Revolution No.9 played backwards before. That was very interesting. The sounds to me seemed to be a combination of religion, technology and culture. As was mention in the question part of this module does religion and technology discussion begin where Murphie & Potts left off? Thinking about all the chapters in their book, I am curious why they didn’t include a chapter about this week’s focus. Maybe, they will have a sequential to “Culture and Technology”, which I really enjoyed reading and discussing.
So, what does religion and technology have in common? Over the centuries it appears that they have had many differing opinions. Secret societies, namely the Masons were formed in defiance of the church to promote the advancements of mechanical processes (technology).Yet these men were very spiritually connected. Maybe, it has been the restraints of organized religion that has created fictions.
Religion in its purest form is an attempt to explain the world and how it functions and our relationship to it. Science in its purest state attempts to explain the same thing. They do have a commonality.
As Noble states,” The spirit of engineering easily mixed with the militant Protestantism into a specific American credence of salvation through technology was what propelled the colonialization of America to a construction of a paradise.”
Now what about the future of the relationship between religion and technology? Will it change? Will technology become so powerful that religion will lose influence in our society? Or will they continue to influence each other? Thoughts?
Leslie
References:
Murphie, A.& Potts, J. (2003). Culture and Technology, New York. Palgrave MacMillan.
Noble, D. F. (1997). American by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. NewYork: Alfred A. Knopf.
Filed under: Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted: July 4th, 2011, by lesliedawes
I have really enjoyed reading Murphie and Potts, 2003, Culture and Technology. When I read about Nanotechnology, I was fascinated. My video production explores this wonderous technology and how it is impacting our present and future interactions with man-made products. These products have enormous effects on our lives and our environment.
I made this video using Photostory3. I like the way the program integrates pictures, text, voice and music to make whatever your imagination can create. It is fun to use and I have been using it with my Grade One classes over the last five years.
Filed under: Uncategorized | No Comments »
Posted: June 2nd, 2011, by lesliedawes
Welcome to my blog for etec 531 Culture and Technology. As I progress through this course I will be posting my assignments and some of my reflections. This is evidence of my learning journey in etec 531, as I am a perpetual student of learning!
Leslie Dawes
Filed under: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »