After reading my classmate Jimena’s blog about Puma as sustainable business, it was unexpected for me to hear that from Puma. Then I thought to myself, why it shocking to hear that from a highly recognized brand? It was because of all the fake, copied items that I’ve seen in multiple places and occasions which had degraded high-brand imaging for the company.

I was in Korea this summer, and I saw a stunning amount of copied Puma products, that were noticeably fake. These are couple of the examples.

 

 

I don’t think Puma does enough copyright control of their product to brand their product as high-end products especially in the Asian markets. It has come a point where customers are buying these products as a “joke” because of the obviousness of the product which degrades Puma’s reputation as a company that provides high-end atheletic wear.

I feel like Sustainability regiments are something company’s with successful brand-imaging and customer loyalty would gain from such as Starbucks. Because the quality of their product is assured in customers, sustainable campaigns add as a bonus to attract more customers by stimulating the feeling of deed in supporting a good cause. Puma has yet to gain that from their products alone, and I think that is one of the reasons why their sustainable campaigns are not getting recognized or credited in the fashion market.


 


Comments

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

Spam prevention powered by Akismet