3.3 A River of Allusions

For this assignment, I will be illuminating some of the allusions contained within pages 230 – 241 of the 2007 reprint of Green Grass, Running Water by Thomas King. The characters that figure most prominently in this section are the four “old Indians” (365), as King terms them, and Lionel Red Dog, Dr. Joseph Hovaugh, and Babo Jones. For the purposes of this post, I am going to focus on the four old Indians and Lionel Red Dog so that I can go into detail while making connections between pages 230-241 and the rest of the novel as a whole.

The four old Indians are one of the central mysteries of Green Grass, Running Water, and my understanding of them was limited during my first reading. After being assigned my section, however, I worked through the book again trying to understand the role that they play, and thankfully I gained some clarity.

The character of the Lone Ranger within the world of Green Grass, Running Water is in actuality First Woman from First Nations creation stories (who is also sometimes called Sky Woman), and on page 71 First Woman adopts the identity of the Lone Ranger in order to avoid impending violence at the hands of other rangers. She retains the alter-ego, as it also allows her to escape from the prison for Indians at Fort Marion; and thematically this resonates with other material in the novel that shows aboriginal people oscillating between whitewashed identities and embracing their cultural heritage as they navigate the rough social waters of colonial North America.

The others of the four old Indians are Ishmael, Hawkeye, and Robinson Crusoe. Ishmael is in fact the Navajo deity Changing Woman, and, like First Woman/the Lone Ranger, she becomes Ishmael for the protection that identifying as a male hero of Western literature offers her (King 225). In the same way, Robinson Crusoe is Thought Woman and Hawkeye is Old Woman, while Thought Woman is originally a figure from Navajo creation stories and Old Woman hails from First Nations tales generally (Flick 159, 161).

Throughout Green Grass, Running Water, these four women tell each other their origin stories as they simultaneously try to “fix the world” (King 236). At first I found this very confusing, but then I realized that their actions and their stories are one and the same, and that each time one of them begins a story a landmark in the timeline of their group’s mission to Canada is reached. When the Lone Ranger begins her story with “Gha! Higayv:lige:i” (a saying which shows that this is the beginning of a world-fixing cycle, because repeating it is deemed unnecessary on page 234), the four old Indians arrive in Canada (15, 22). When Ishmael begins her story, the group meets up with Lionel and gets into his car (104, 106, 121). When Robinson Crusoe has her turn, Coyote turns on a light to guide the Indians to the site of their intervention – the dam (231, 233); and when Hawkeye tells what happened to her, the four set out across the prairies to complete their task (327-28, 332-33).

The reason that it works this way is because Thomas King is trying to communicate to his readers that stories are an extremely powerful means of shaping the world. Origin stories, in particular, determine our world views; and in order to change society – to “fix the world,” as it were – stories that have been the root causes of problems must be altered, corrected, or retold in the right way. Also, the corrected stories must be told over and over again in order for them to take effect (hence the four old Indians taking turns and repeating their cycle again and again, as indicated on page 9 and page 430).

This is one of the actual jackets that John Wayne wore for a movie. It is currently being auctioned as a collectible.

This is one of the jackets that John Wayne wore in film.

Lionel Red Dog personifies the sort of change that the four old Indians are trying to achieve. He is at the centre of their mission to Canada, because his sense of self has been confused by colonizing narratives ever since he was a little boy. As a child, he swallowed the lie that John Wayne is the best role model a kid can have, and as a result he has spent most of his life unable to connect to his cultural heritage, to his family, or to his true self (241-243).

The Indians meet up with Lionel partly to deliver to him a fringed leather jacket (they mention it on p. 234), as this gives him the chance to look and feel like John Wayne for a moment and to realize how ill the image fits him. Then, after noticing that the jacket smells rotten, and finding out that its true owner is George (a wife battering exploiter of First Nations culture, and a reference to General George Custer), Lionel willingly gives up this marker of identity and is able to enjoy a moment at his reservation’s sun dance with Alberta Frank, the woman he loves (382-88). This is something like a rite of passage for him.

As I mentioned, though, I couldn’t possibly cover all of the references between pages 230 and 241 of Green Grass, Running Water in any detail while staying under 1000 words. There are many more interesting allusions to be discovered, and while I hope that I haven’t passed over any of your favourites, please feel free to comment below and expand the discussion! I researched the contents of this section of the text thoroughly and I would be happy to engage in a dialog.

 


Works Cited

“Character Analysis: Ishmael.” Cliffs Notes. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. N.d. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/m/mobydick/character-analysis/ishmael>

Flick, Jane. “Reading Notes for Thomas King’s Green Grass Running Water.” Canadian Literature 161-162. (1999). Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://canlit.ca/pdfs/articles/canlit161-162-Reading(Flick).pdf>

“John Wayne Biography.” Encyclopedia of World Biography. Advameg. N.d. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://www.notablebiographies.com/Tu-We/Wayne-John.html>

King, Thomas. Green Grass Running Water. Toronto: Harper Collins, 2007. Print.

Neuhaus, Mareike. “That’s Raven Talk”: Holophrastic Readings of Contemporary Aboriginal Literature. Regina: U of Regina P, 2011. Google Books. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://bit.ly/1Fs4qVm>

Roach, David. “Hawkeye.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica. Aug. 7, 2013. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1938296/Hawkeye>

“Robinson Crusoe.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica. June 6, 2013. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/505784/Robinson-Crusoe>

Smith, B. R. “The Lone Ranger.” The Museum of Broadcast Communications – Encyclopedia of Television. Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity. N.d. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://www.museum.tv/eotv/loneranger.htm>

United Artists. A John Wayne Jacket from “The Alamo.” 1960. Heritage Auctions, Dallas. Heritage Auctions. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://bit.ly/1bcFu9s>

Urwin, Gregory J. W. “George Armstrong Custer.” Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica. July 21, 2014. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/147393/George-Armstrong-Custer>

“Woman Who Fell From the Sky.” Myths Encyclopedia. Advameg. N.d. Web. Mar. 16, 2015. <http://www.mythencyclopedia.com/Wa-Z/Woman-Who-Fell-From-the-Sky.html>

3.2 Original intersections

This blog post is in response to the question, “What are the major differences or similarities between the ethos of the creation story you are familiar with and the story King tells in The Truth About Stories?”

To answer this, I spent a great deal of time studying the Genesis story from the Bible (New International Version, Gen. 1-3) as well as the sky woman story that Thomas King tells in his Massey lecture series (King 10-20), and this is what I found:

Differences

In the sky woman story, humour is important; a woman can be independent; community includes both human and non-human creatures who can make decisions together; all creatures are creative, but humans are creators; humans do not need others of their kind; magic exists and is connected to singing and dancing; there seems to be a limited amount of space on earth; and humans can have as part of their nature a leaning towards disorder and chaos.

In the Genesis story, there is no magic per se, but physical actions and spoken words are extremely powerful. There is a supreme and single (although triune and personal) deity who functions as lawmaker, provider, creator, and orderer; the earth, albeit at the direction of the deity, brings forth much of creation from itself; humans need each other for companionship; love relationships, in particular, are necessary; disharmony and inequality come about between man and woman because of disobedience to God; death becomes a reality, although it is not one to begin with; toil as necessary and discomfort with the self (shame) arise out of disobeying God; humans are god-like and made to be benevolent rulers of creation; and it is communicated that creatures who do evil ought not to live forever (because evil is just that bad).

Another interesting element which I want to point out is that, while the Genesis story is generally seen as being highly gendered, it is different from the sky woman story in that it does not necessarily begin with a person of any distinct sex. The Hebrew word “Adam” is the word for all of humanity, and some people believe it is possible if not probable that the Adam of the Genesis story contained both sexes until God divided them into two persons so that they could have companionship (Gates 1-4). In this interpretation woman does not come second, but is a part of the original singular person.

Similarities

In both stories, human curiosity can lead to big changes in the world; human actions can shape its nature, and people have the capacity to be troublemakers; different beings are shown to have differing abilities; fertility is considered good and foundational; pleasure is also good; the earth provides resources, including food, for the creatures depicted as sentient; pairs are very important and are usually, although not always, complementary (examples from the two stories being twins, men and women, dark and light, two types of food-bearing plants, and good and evil); sentient creatures do not consume one another, and nothing is originally intended to die; every being has free will; creation is essentially good, full of trust and harmony; and evil is not a part of the original picture.

 


Works Cited

Gates, Jennifer. Gender and Ontology in Genesis 2. Academia.edu. Academia, n.d. Web. 8 Mar. 2015 <http://www.academia.edu/7965864/Gender_and_Ontology_in_Genesis_2_3>

King, Thomas. The Truth About Stories: A Native Narrative. Toronto: House of Anansi, 2003. Google Books. Web. 8 Mar. 2015 <http://books.google.ca/books?id=yyt5lyvBr18C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false>

New International Version. Colorado Springs: Biblica, 2011. BibleGateway.com. Web. 8 Mar. 2015 <https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+1+-+3&version=NIV>

Spam prevention powered by Akismet