Categories
Agostino

Agostino: a boy, a man

Even though I am shocked, I feel bad for Agostino too…

  1. From the beginning, I could tell the story started to go in a weird direction, especially when I read the depiction of how he feels proud of the attention his mother receives and the envy he imagines from others. And he feel disappointed when he saw his mother’s eager of being with other men when his mother accepted the invitation of a boat ride from a young man, thinking his mother does not belong to him in the way he imagined, this unsettled him and triggered him of the past he does not wish to recall.
      • This opening places strong emphasis on the description of the physical body, as well as on how Agostino pays attention to his mother, keeping Agostino’s world small and exclusive to her. This suggests that in Agostino’s boyhood, after his father’s death, his mother is all he has. He looks only at his mother and belongs only to her, and therefore believes that he occupies the same exclusive position in her life as well.
      • In this world he has ideally created, everything feels safe and secure. The emotional roles are clearly defined, and his identity is stable, while the relation is solely exclusive between his mother and him — everyone plays their own roles: his mother belongs to him, and other people are strangers outside their world who pose a threat to him (so he thinks everyone else is jealous of him!) However, he is in a state of conflict, on the one hand, he feels good to see people jealous him, on the other hand, he feels disappointed to be excluded.
      • Thus, he soon understands that he no longer holds a privileged position in his mother’s decision when he realizes his mother’s actively eager to be with other men, this mother-son world started to fall.
  2. He soon turns into adulthood. When he cannot stand this mess, he starts to keep himself away from his mother and tries to get along with a group of aggressive and crude boys, who speak openly and violently about sex. Agostino wishes to be involved with them and wants their sympathy, hoping to become a man by staying with them. But they do not provide any positive response; instead, they mock Agostino’s innocence, humiliate him, and bring him emotional degradation.
    • Among this group of boys, I feel like the sexuality is linked tightly to power, cruelty and dominance, and be used as a topic of conversation to brag about. And it reveals that how the masculinity is performed through humiliation and aggression, and these means become a way to show off a man’s power and masculinity. Agostino’s previous life could never give him such permission to get involved with those boy, so he is neither accepted by the group (as a sign of grown up), nor be able to return back to his childhood world (still be regarded as a boy).
    • I think that in the process of Agostino’s fast growth from a boy to a man, it is not a gain, but a loss. He grows without proper guidance, experiencing only brutal exposure. He loses the perfect image of his mother in his own world and loses the feeling of safety from his boyhood, yet never truly gains the power to become mature. It is not a man growing up from a boy, but a boy forced to accept a cold world without sympathy.

Just as the video lecture mentioned, this book focuses only on a short period of Agostino’s experience, so we are not able to see his day-to-day life. I think he is growing up in a very fast way and can never return to his previous life, but I do not think he has become a man (at least not ready to be a man!).

 

Categories
Bombal Shrouded Woman Uncategorized

Don’t marry him!!!

  1. I really like the way the whole book is divided into many distinct parts! Each of them refers to a different story of the past. This kind of structure gently makes us as the reader feel we are involved into each remembered moment, creating the feeling of participating in her memories, while those stories do not seem cumulative to us.At the beginning, she is dead, which means she has lost everything. Later, the text turns back to her past, a time when she still had everything. This contrast makes us wonder whether the narrative is a dream, or whether she has truly died.And the overall tone is very beautiful. For example, at the beginning she describes the rainfall in a vivid way, by depicting the motion of the rainfall, we can imagine the scene while we read it. And when she describe how she remembers Richardo, she did not simply give us his appearance, instead, the narrative is infused with a strong sense of subjective memory and the descriptions of his expressions, giving us the sense that he is not merely a character in a fiction, but as someone vividly alive, and once lived in someone’s memory.

    But why does she mention his name so late? Is this simply a narrative technique, or it has some specific purpose behind it?

  2. Her first love is bitter, even though it was sweet at the beginning, I don’t like the way Ricardo treats her. And also from the way she portrays him as someone who is easily influenced by his mother’s opinions (at least it seems to me like that) and from the way they break up,  I don’t think he takes this relationship seriously. As when he claims that “love affairs are not eternal” to excuse the breakup and insists that he is not the one to be blamed, I think it somewhat makes me think he is emotional irresponsible.What is more, she describes her own blood as if it is shared with Richardo’s, implies to the physical and mental bond between them. But I think it is more likely expressing the cost of love?
  3. And I like how it says: “…for that insignificant boy, that good-for-nothing, you’re making yourself cheap! You who have your life before you, you who can choose the husband you want, you so proud, so intelligent…” (Yes, don’t marry him!!!) Also, she tries to use sex or a threat to keep a man, which gives me the sense that in such a relationship, the person who is more deeply in love often ends up in a lower position (Don’t marry him!!!!!)

 

 

 

Categories
The Combray

Proust, The Combray

At the beginning, I found it strange that the text starts with a detailed description of the state of sleep — especially focusing on his conscious experience between being awake and asleep. Why would the author spend so much time on what, on the face value, seems to be just a man waking up in confusion? Does this opening help us form a general sense of what will unfold in the rest of the text? But soon I found that the author does not simply depict a scene, he is explaining the process of a person’s consciousness. He explains that memory is not linear, that consciousness happens first and then the understanding follows, and since the self consists of the perceptual senses and  consciousness, thus the self is neither stable, nor unchangeable.

In the later on texts of the Combray, the way he views the Combray from a loving and curious perspectives and the way he interacts with his aunt all provide us with plenty of colourful images and vivid imagination when we are reading it. And he when he describes this town, he does not just focus on talking about the physical layout of it, but imbuing it with deeper spiritual connotations. This transformation from physical space to mental space (consciousness) gives us some philosophical insights into time, and also explains the concept of  involuntary memory, which means the physical sensations can activate our memory and allow for deeper interactions between body and mind. For example, in Proust’s account, he walks through the garden and smells the scent of the flower, and then these scents become the medium to awaken his memory.

I like how his narrative goes, which is non-linear, and flexible –When he tastes the madeleine cake, memories of his childhood come out, giving us an image of how the present and past overlap, and further on indicates his idea of the time: the time is not something that could be measured through the clock or other instrument but is intrinsically constituted by the interconnections of the conscious experiences.

I might be wrong, but from my perspective, I find it might be a reflection of the microcosm of society at that time, and he skillfully integrates the society of that era into his descriptions, including post-Revolutionary French society of that time and social class transformations. So he mentions a lot about the interaction between different classes and the interaction between industry and nature in the book.

Moreover, since this book is a translated work, it necessarily passes through several layers of interpretation, which may introduce certain biases for the readers. The translator is a more modern American writer, while the original text was written in 1913’s French, in a very different historical and cultural context. So I think that the translator would inevitably bring her own understanding and perspective to the text, and we come to understand the book through these multi-layered interpretations.

Categories
Uncategorized

Hello world!

Welcome to UBC Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Spam prevention powered by Akismet