David Suzuki vs Fermented Barley

Sci Week gets David Suzuki, amongst many other pretty interesting activities open to all students.

Arts Week gets lots of bzzr. It’s hard to tell from the official website — which for some reason was never really updated or promoted — but there was Mardi Gras, the Poetry Slam, a Performing Arts Showcase, club booths and some mysterious Gladiator event I can find out nothing about.

Mardi Gras and the Poetry Slam were both 19+ events, so I naturally couldn’t go. Even if I could, I’d only go to the Poetry Slam to see what one is; large parties aren’t my favourite thing. Club booths can be discounted because Science students have that too, and I already joined the ones I wanted last term. Since I was running a fever on the evening of the Performing Arts Showcase, I didn’t go. My first Arts Week thus began and ended on a Tuesday evening.

The Gladiator event was still nowhere to be seen as far as I knew.

It’s probably really hard to organise a week for students of such diverse interests. Arts is likely the most varied discipline at UBC. Regardless, it just seems overly tragic to decide what unites Arts students is a love of malted barley. Two out of the only three running events (club booths don’t count) were 19+. That is two-thirds, which is also the majority. What happens if you — just possibly — don’t like bzzr?

You become an outcast. That means a loner. Like me.

My heart is all broke. I’ll go weep in my corner now.

Arts Career Expo

Because I am just such an up-to-date reporter, I write about an event almost as soon as I return from it. Also to prove that I have, you know, t3h sk1lls gained from going to the writers’ corner. But more on that later.

Overall, it was actually pretty good. I enjoyed it. At first, I wasn’t going to give a blow-by-blow account — it’s the middle of the week, after a long day of class (with the extra added excitement of a “police incident” at the Bio building — either a bomb threat or a gun threat, depending on who you ask — I was in class at the nearby Hebb Theatre during the whole affair so it didn’t affect me in the least), and I have to get up at six-something tomorrow for volunteering — but you know how long-winded I am.

The beginning and ending were slightly unfortunate. There were five hundred so people, so I am told, all stuck in the lobby of the Chan Centre. For some reason, the words “Chan Centre” deluded me into thinking we’d go inside where we can sit. My fault for not reading the print properly, I suppose. It was with some (negative) surprise, then, when the speeches commenced in the lobby itself, fifteen minutes late. The poor presenters had to rush, and you could tell the Dean was pressed for time. “She’s talking even faster than you,” a friend commented in an undertone to me.

I like our Dean. She seems genuinely enthusiastic about the value of an Arts degree and appears committed to providing the best support possible. That was my first impression on IMAGINE Day, and it’s still hanging around. The first Wednesday of every month is apparently when we can go to the Meekison Arts Students’ Space in Buchanan D to talk to her about the Arts degree. I may check that out next month.

At some point I admit I drifted off to admire the height of the trees outside the Chan Centre. It seems appropriate to be looking at trees on a day when they tell you to grasp your opportunities and to reach. On reflection, it might not have been the smartest-sounding thing to say, “The trees are tall”, when Genevieve asked what I was looking at. Coupled with my earlier observation — “Why are you so tall?” — while Genevieve and Cory were talking about U.S. politics, I might have sounded air-headed. Actually, I think that may be justified. I was trying to keep up with the discussion but the crick in my neck distracted me. (That reminds me that I need to look up voting sequences. Keyword: “primaries”. Says the person who only last year started finding out about how states vote for Congress and presidential elections. Sigh.)

The panels were pretty interesting. I enjoyed the non-profit one thoroughly, and the writers’ corner was kind of interesting to hear about people’s different experiences. The non-profit one was of interest because they gave some advice on how to get started, and there wasn’t anything I hadn’t really heard of from the writers’ corner.

Of course, the non-profit couldn’t really advise me on how to find where my passions lie beyond going out and trying things — in the end, it’s up to me to discover and focus. And writing is one of those things which I, at least, can’t keep asking other people about. It’s something I would do no matter what anyone else said because it’s what I do for myself. On the other hand, I have a perpetual dilemma about whether it can be something I can do for anyone else. Is sitting at home writing really going to help people in the way I want? That’s not something anyone else can answer for me, though guidance is always useful.

The career expo is probably something that is more helpful for people in upper years, or for people who at least have some idea of what they want to do. My ideas are currently vague: I want to help people (one-to-one), and I want to write. I’m good at school. Those are the limits of my self-knowledge. This is also the nice thing about being in first-year, however: you get to explore different things and test out the waters. I’ve not yet chosen the path I want to take, so I can’t yet ask the more specific questions about actually delving deeper into a particular field. Getting a general idea of what it’s like is still, however, useful: at least I know I’m not put off (yet), so I can keep looking into them. Knowing that you don’t want to do something can be just as useful as knowing what you might want to do.

As for the mix-and-mingle, I haven’t really got the hang of them yet. Generally I am hungry and hunting for edibles, so can’t stop to talk much. Or I look out for people I know, who introduce me to others, and I introduce people I know to others too. I’m still so used to being close to the people I talk to that I feel sad when I meet all these people I know I’ll probably never really get to know.

Finally, barring the fact that the Chan Centre lobby is not the easiest place to put five hundred-so hungry people — I pity the waitresses — the food was very good.

David Suzuki & The God Debate

On Monday, I shamefacedly left an important Blog Squad meeting in order to get to the David Suzuki talk on time. Who knew that it would already be full by the time I got there? My friend and I gazed forlornly at the unfriendly building that refused to have more of us, and then decided to join the sweeping crowds of students who persisted in going in anyway. We all managed to squish inside the Wesbrook hall, mostly by sitting on the stairs. No doubt it was a fire hazard, but it was worth it.

Now, I only went to the David Suzuki talk because Stephen Lewis mentioned him with great respect, and I like Stephen Lewis. And David Suzuki seems to be famous. I didn’t really know who Stephen Lewis was before I went to the SLC either — I always feel like I’ve heard his name before that but don’t remember how — but he’s famous, and other people are excited about him, so curiosity gets the best of me and I go to listen to famous people.

David Suzuki talked about the internment of Japanese-Canadians during WWII, about the role of genetics and civil rights, and his views on the role of science and universities. It was interesting, and nowhere near as bad or as pretentious as I had feared it might be (having been warned by Genevieve beforehand). It was really quite good and I enjoyed it. (Though not as much as Stephen Lewis.)

Yesterday, the debate, “Does God Exist?”, was also overflowing by the time I could spare myself to go. I managed to get into a room with a screen where I ate my last-minute chicken sandwich dinner from Hubbards in peace.

The debate itself was alright. There were a couple of new points I hadn’t heard of on the theistic side, and I thought the theologian made a good showing. He argued most of his points very well. When talking about other religions, however, he wasn’t so strong. For example, he said the Qu’ran was filled with mostly wild inaccuracies and mythological exaggerations, or something like that (without ever providing any evidence to support the point). This triggered a collective “ohhh” of disapproval in my room; it didn’t seem right for someone who demands respect for his religion to speak in a less than respectful manner of another religion, even if he doesn’t agree with it.

To my disappointment, the atheist — who doesn’t seem to know if he’s an agnostic or an atheist, or if he does, didn’t bother coming up with a valid argument as to why we should not be arguing over terminology and instead settled for evading the attack — didn’t do nearly as well. He tried to use humour, but humour doesn’t sustain weak arguments. He never once presented a concrete argument for why God doesn’t exist, only that the arguments for God’s existence are too weak. But I could easily conclude that I don’t know and that God may or may not exist. He seemed to be taking a leap of faith in believing that God’s non-existence is the more reasonable option. There were some theistic points he could have jumped on and attacked more thoroughly — like the claim that historians (using rhetoric that implies the general community) agree that the Bible is a historically accurate document, far more so than the Qu’ran. I wish they’d got a better atheist to argue; it would have been a fairer debate.

Second Snow

Today being only my second snowfall, I am still in enough wonder and awe to believe it something beautiful.

I’m somewhat confused by Vancouver’s apparent response to what isn’t even a foot high of snow, though. A lot of people didn’t — couldn’t — turn up to class today for reasons that are beyond my knowledge. Traffic accidents seem to be the main culprit, but it’s hard to know when you live on campus. When I got to my American lit class, someone mentioned that UBC is the only post-secondary institution open today. Which really confuses me, because don’t we have what is scorned by any other Canadian as pitiful amounts of snow? Someone was telling me how in Edmonton, snow is waist-high and it’s -44’C. People still seem to manage. And don’t so-called experts predict there will be fiercer winters for Vancouver in the future? I obviously don’t know how true this is, but other people reference it, so if this is true, Vancouver seems a little unprepared…

Questions like this remind me of how foreign the city still is to me sometimes. I think it’ll be foreign to me for a long time.

On preparing for taxes

I got an email today about upcoming taxes and how UBC needs my SIN (Social Insurance Number) and my address updated. My SIN is still new enough that I forget I have one sometimes, thus ensuring my “Oh!” moments.

Anyway, I submitted my SIN, and consequently found some kind of PEN (Personal Education Number). It’s not my UBC student number — I don’t consciously remember seeing it anywhere before. Apparently it’s my BC high school number, which is very weird because I have never studied in a BC high school. I don’t know if it’s something that was automatically given to me when I applied to UBC, but I definitely don’t remember inserting this apparently random sequence of numbers. Of course, if the powers that be insist on me having a number, I’m not going to object. I’m just mildly bemused.

There’s another box that asks for my OUAC number, which is closer to something I would have since I do remember getting a number when I applied through the OUAC for other Canadian universities.

But the BC one? I was in HK, which is as far from BC as you can get. (Well, not literally, but it’s on the other side of the world. It’s a close enough generalisation.)

Anyway, for those of you who haven’t inserted your SIN because, like me, you didn’t live in Canada before — go ahead and submit it. There’s a $100 fine if you don’t. (Talk about incentive!) Yes, even international students should have SINs. They apparently begin with the digit 9.