Fly at Your Own Risk

The Article, “Fly at your own Risk” definitely has the format of an article or newspaper report as opposed to the Everest documentaries that follow more of a story line. However, both contain a lot of content and facts that could be difficult for students to remember and recall. This is perhaps the main thing that deters me from non-fiction; trying to remember all the bits and pieces. However, presented the key main ideas and interaction with real life events provides a point for real engagement. The benefits are that the article addresses political, social, and semi-corporate issues that are relevant to Canadians. In this way, students are evaluating and understanding Canadian issues and discussing policies and so forth. There is opportunity to use this text to cover a multi-disciplinary text evaluation. Furthermore, some students may even have family members or friends who fly and can make personal connections to the material. In this ability to personalize the texts students, can perhaps intimate with the text and the text can make a deeper impact in terms of learning material. My question is what is the emphasis of the text? Are students to understand the main idea or to remember the facts and follow the investigative discovery outlined by the journalist? Regardless, I think that this gives student a good perspective on journalism and how they can write and back up what they are saying factually. Often times, students are unsure how to back themselves up when it is based on ideas or what they are taking from the authors. In this way, the article gives a practical application to writing and communicating information. Also, it forces students to read deeply and to critically follow the argument being presented because of the amount of factual detail in the text.

1 thought on “Fly at Your Own Risk

  1. magdalena

    I don´t think that when we give a text to the students they have to remember it all the way trough, almost the contrary, when we make our students read, we are doing this to made them develop intellectual process of inference and relation. Remember a long text sometimes it’s impossible, but if we relate it to their lives and actual problems will be a productive exercise.
    A reading of an specific text will bring the most simples questions to a teacher: What are we teaching and what do we expect that our students learn when they read this text?
    In that sense, we are not teaching memorization, we are teaching communication’s abilities. This article could be a useful to show the differences between a narrative text and a journalistic one.
    Students, and almost everybody, are used to read and write narrative texts. It’s the simples and the first way we use to communicated our experiences. A different thing happens when we talk about journalism; students, almost if they are good readers of newspapers, they don’t know how to start writing. This text is a clear example that with just a fact you can start and make a investigation and develop a mayor theme.
    For this specific text I would emphasizes and analyze the empowerment of civil society as a relevant actor for the construction of public policies and the critical character this text haves to the government institutions.

Leave a Reply