Monthly Archives: June 2017

Unit 2 Reflection

In unit 2, I have mainly learned to prepare for a formal report and make my LinkedIn profile look professional.

Proposal and Outline for Formal Report

The most difficult part to prepare for a formal report was to choose an appropriate topic and appropriately find the scope of question to investigate and write a formal report for it. I always want investigate why people still misuse or overuse antibiotics though public media have repeatedly reported the harm of it. Since recently I heard China almost consumed half of the world’s antibiotics and I have connection in China, I was so ambitious and eager to do a project that were related to China and Canada. However, I did not realize that this assignment was not  for a research paper. Instead, it was for a formal report. From the comments from Erika and Matthew, I realized it was too ambitious to do it. Therefore, I have narrowed down the research to local Vancouver area. Also, through what I reviewed Matthew’s proposal, I can see his proposal was more specific than mine, and his proposal clearly showed who it was for. Thinking about the audience was very important no matter what I wrote, so I cleared my mind and decided my target audience were the health providers and health educators. Also, I learned that to write a peer review, I should follow the order of what the author wrote. It would make the author easier to follow and edit it. Moreover, in the first few memo, I did not follow the format what the textbook taught, I have got back to reread the textbook in order to make my future memo look more professional.  Often I found my writing was too wordy, so I should write more concisely in the future.

In addition, through writing the research plan and schedule for the formal report, I found the weakness of mine as I found when I wrote the proposal. Originally, I chose both survey and interview as my primary source. However, as I wrote the questions for the survey, I found I did not have to do the interview in order to have those answers. Why not just put the questions on the survey? As well, it would save time. I found at the beginning, I always want to do something big qualitatively and quantitatively, but it turns out that it is not necessary and not suitable. Hence, I decided only using the survey as my primary source. Moreover, I really like the idea of writing a schedule for the formal report. I am not a person who plan well to do things. I believe the compulsory schedule would really help me to finish the survey and formal report on time.

LinkedIn Networking

By reading the tips of networking through LinkedIn from my peers and writing my own tips for it, I have learned so much about how to make a professional LinkedIn profile for best networking. Prior to this assignment, I had very few connection and I did not even have a profile picture. However, after I read what peers wrote the tips of LinkedIn networking and did some research on my own, I just realized the importance of networking through LinkedIn. I have chose the best picture I thought for it and added some essential parts on it. Many employers pose jobs on it and many people get their jobs through LinkedIn. My original connection was around 50, but now my connection has been doubled. I found it is really helpful to expand network through LinkedIn with current LinkedIn connection. For example, I have had previous alumni who currently work in Google and they are on my LinkedIn connection, then I search their network and can successfully add their Google colleagues to my own network. As I expand my network, I expand the topics of articles and news feed that I can read through LinkedIn. It will be a powerful tool for networking if I can use it more smartly in the future.

The link for the updated formal report proposal and peer review are as following:

Formal Report Proposal of Yin Zhou (Maggie)

Peer Review From Matthew Fung for Yin Zhou (Maggie)

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Unit 1 Reflection

The assignment to write three different definitions for a complex term, peer review to other’s assignment and editing the definitions based on the peer review were very useful processes that allowed me to practice technical writing, reflect mine and analyze peer’s writing. Through these processes, I can see my weaknesses of writing, and I am thankful for Justin to point them out. I have edited the original assignment regarding to the peer review.

The complex term I picked was “synapse”, which is a very familiar term for a Chemical Biology student like me. When I was writing my original assignment, I repeatedly reminded myself, “make it simple to be understood for all college students”. Although I have tried to think in this way, it turned out that many jargons lacked enough explanation in it regarding to Justin’s review. I was quite surprised when I read the review because I thought I have made it very simple for college students with all backgrounds. However, that was just too subjective. I believe my peer may have the same feeling. I reviewed the definitions of “Linked List” (a term related to programming) written by Justin who is a Computer Science student. Since I barely have any programming knowledge, I honestly felt quite struggled to understand it. From this experience, the most important thing I have learned is that I have to carefully and objectively consider the audience that I write for. For science writing, if I want to write for the general audience, I should simplify the concept as much as possible. If it is possible, using analogy could be a very useful way to interpret a complex concept to general audience. I should either minimize the use of jargons or fully explain the jargons in my writing.

In addition, as Justin commented, using paragraphs instead of bullet points in a major part (function of synapse) of the expanded definition could be looked more professional. I also think it makes the overall structure of the assignment look more neat. As well, I agree that by using etymology would make the writing more interesting, so I have added the history background of the discovery of “synapse” to the original assignment.

I have attached the edited assignment, as well as the link to my original assignment and the  review from my peer as below.

Maggie Zhou’s Edited definition of synapse

Maggie Zhou’s Original definition assignment

Peer Review from Justin Chau for Maggie Zhou’s definition assignment 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Biology, computer science, Programming