by Simon Donner
You may have heard climate scientists, myself included, state that “global warming” has indeed continued with little interruption over the past 10-15 years, but that more of the heat trapped in the climate system by greenhouse gases has been “going into the ocean”.
This is not the rhetoric of irrational climate alarmists. This is what the measurements show.
The human enhancement of the greenhouse effect has reduced the outgoing radiation to space and increased the energy content of the climate system, as is shown on the graph to the right.
The best known manifestation of this energy budget change is the warming of the lower atmosphere: that excess radiant energy being converted into warmer air temperatures. However, in terms of the change in total energy, the famous change in the atmosphere (purple) pales in comparison to that of the oceans (light and dark blue).
It makes physical sense: the oceans are a big deep reservoir of a liquid with high heat capacity. A change in average ocean temperatures requires a lot more heat than an equivalent change in average surface air temperatures.
The graph shows that >90% of the excess heat generated by enhancement of the greenhouse effect has gone into the oceans. Now, suppose that decade-scale natural variability in ocean circulation marginally increases the fraction going into the ocean (dark blue), say from 92% to 93%, at the expense of the atmosphere. You’d barely see it on the above graph, because the ocean slice is so big and the atmosphere slice is so small. But it would cause a noticeable change in the rate of atmospheric temperature increase.
The ocean data suggests that has happened over the past 10-15 years. The next graph, from Trenberth and Fasullo (2013), depicts the change in ocean heat content only, expressed for the upper ocean (light blue) and the total depth of the ocean (purple).
This graph shows that in the late 1990s, right after the last strong El Nino event, ocean heat storage increased in part because ocean depths below 700 m began accumulating heat. The change in where heat is being accumulated was probably driven by the decade-scale variability in Pacific Ocean conditions.
Had this bump in ocean heat uptake happened when human activity was not warming the climate system overall, the global average surface air temperatures would have declined. The fact that the global surface temperature trend has been slightly positive since the late 1990s is a testament to the fact that human activity has been warming the whole climate system.
Of course, we don’t have gills. We all live on the surface. The most noticeable outcome to us air-breathers is the lack of those strong El Nino events since 1998. During a strong El Nino event, the equatorial Pacific Ocean essentially releases heat into the atmosphere (on net), driving changes in atmospheric circulation and weather around the world. In other words, as climate scientists are repeatedly trying to explain to the media, global warming has continued, but more of the heat has gone into warming the deep ocean.
It should then come as no surprise that climate scientists are so interested in when the Pacific Ocean pattern changes and/or the next strong El Nino event occurs. When that happens, maybe next year, maybe the year after, maybe four years from now, we’ll very likely to see new global surface temperature records and an end to the obsession with the supposed pause in “global” warming.
You’re using a typical red herring argument. That 0.09C of ocean heating is not comparable to surface temps. The actual amount of heat represented by that 0.09C is actually very significant since the heat capacity of water is so high. That additional heat isn’t going to stay in the oceans, either. Eventually it moves to the atmosphere, and it doesn’t raise surface temps by 0.09C, it raises it based on the thermal capacity of the air, which is much lower.
Pingback: Biggest Snowfall of Winter? (5-10″ possible by Friday morning) || Conservation Minnesota
Pingback: A Blessed Thaw (another very plowable storm by late Thursday – the “Grumble Factor”) || Conservation Minnesota
Pingback: More Heat is Going into the Ocean. Really. | Climate Denial Crock of the Week
Pingback: Thursday Severe Risk & Blizzard Potential In The Upper Midwest
Pingback: A Whiff of March! (40F today – 43rd snowiest winter on record for MSP to date) || Conservation Minnesota
Pingback: Coldest Winter Since 1979 For Lower 48 States & Late Week Severe Risk East of Mississippi River
“The 0-2000 m layer of the world ocean has warmed by ~ 0.09°C (~ 0.16°F) [24.0±1.9×1022 J] during 1955-2010.
For perspective, if all the heat stored in the world ocean since 1955 was instantly transferred to the lowest 10 km ( 5 miles) of the atmosphere, this part of the atmosphere would warm by ~ 65°F.
1. A warming and acidifying ocean is not a good thing for those that live in it.
2. The next El Nino could be a cracker.
This of course will not happen. It is simply illustrative of the amount of heat stored in the earth system since 1955.”
— Levitus et al. (2012), GRL.
For context. that’s more energy than the estimated energy contained in the world’s fossil fuel reserves as of 2010 but is. admittedly, less than the approximate energy released in the formation of the Chicxulub Crater in the Yucatán Peninsula. (via Wikipedia)
And all that heat has produced a theoretical temperature rise of 0.09C since 1960. Too small to even have been measured.
Remind me why an undetectable change of less than one tenth of a degree since my birth is something I should be worried about?