Elect Charles Menzies -Metro Vancouver Director Electoral Area A: Supporting Effective Leadership in School Board

As residents in the UBC/UEL portions of Electoral Area ‘A’ we are also able to vote for candiadtes to the Vancouver Board of Education. Being able to have a voice and an impact in the Vancouver Board of Education discussions is critically important for our community.

Over the past decade essentially uncontrolled development at UBC and in the UEL has increased the pressure on our two local schools -University Hill Elementary and University Hill Secondary. Both schools are seriously over capacity and many of our more than 1500 school aged children are forced to find school placements outside of our community. This has to stop.

School board elections: Critical but ignored :: The Hook

After the uproar of the federal and US elections, B.C.’s municipal vote on November 15 will cause scarcely a ripple. In North Vancouver District, for example, voter turnout in 2005 was 30 per cent. In the City of North Van, it was 22 per cent.

For North Van School Board chair Chris Dorais, the impending election is full of potential for change. But with no mayoral contests in the City and District, he expects voter turnout to be even lower than usual. A small minority of the electorate will decide on change.

From the Vision Campaign website:Sharon Gregson | Vote Vision

Sharon’s work has involved advocating for quality, affordable care and early learning for Vancouver children. She supported the Garibaldi and Queen Elizabeth Annex parents when their schools were threatened with closure, advocated for new funding sources for UBC schools, pushed for opportunities for input into the Educational Facilities Review, and supported teachers who spoke out against high school classrooms that exceeded size and composition guidelines.

Advocating for new funding? Pushing for input opportunities?

Here’s an example of how former COPE Trustee Sharon Gregson advocated for new funding:

On 6/3/08 8:12 AM, “Sharon Gregson (trustee)” wrote: “I agree wholeheartedly that the situation cannot continue at UBC. However, to shrug off the provincial responsibility is not appropriate at this stage either. Education is funded at that level and I’m not just talking about the new schools as obviously that should be their number one prioroty (sic) to fund in this District. I am also refering (sic) to the renovations and modernization that is urgently required during seismic upgrading – renovations that are far more efficiently done during the seismic process. Right now the province has stopped that funding – since they started on the seismic upgrading issue.

As we all know, the District has been asking and now demanding capital at UBC for years and the District has, as far as I can see, jumped through all the hoops that the province has erected…and still the province plays games with kids lives by ignoring the problem.

I have been responding to all the emails from UBC parents urging them to put pressure on the Premier’s Office – after all it is only estimated that $17 million will be gained from the disposition of the Annex – all it would take is the Premier to decide this is one of his pet projects – after all he is the “mega mayor” – and the issue would be at least partially resolved. $17 million at the provincial level is a drop in the bucket for them to look like the good guys and save the day.

Advocating for new funding involved telling parents who’s children are being bussed out of the neighbourhood and who’s children attend school in a ‘decrepit’ building to lobby harder. Apparently 17 million is “just a drop ion the bucket” and with proper lobbying the “mega mayor” could be convinced to spill some our way.

Here is another example of the former COPE Trustee’s advocacy for new funding:

On 6/3/08 7:37 AM, “Sharon Gregson (trustee)” wrote: I cannot stress strongly enough how important it is for parents to contact the Premier’s Office directly (and to do it this week even if they have done it before) – as well as the MLA – without additional provincial funding commited (sic) for these capital projects the Vancouver Board of Education cannot adequately meet the needs of all the children in the Dunbar/UBC area. Time really is of the essence and additional pressure is urgently required.

Shifting responsibility to a different level of government is a sadly typical response of our politicians. What we need now are people who are willing to stand up and accept responsibility and to search for real solutions that can be effectively implemented. It is easy to stand in opposition and criticize those making the tough decisions. The true test is being able to make the decisions that need to be made, not saying ‘gee, sorry, it’s not my fault, but I’m in your corner.’

We need trustees who’s record of making decisions is clear. We need trustees who have real plans and programs that invovle more than urging parents to lobby harder.

Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject: Student Enrollment

I am writing to advise that, since receiving up-to-date student enrollment figures from all schools and programs as of Tuesday, Sept. 23rd, and Friday, Set. 26th, it has been determined that our enrollment has either met or positively exceeded our projections in the wide majority of enrollment categories. This is good news for our district as our funding and operating budget – ie. our financial stability – depend directly upon the accuracy and fulfillment of our projections.

At this time, I would like to thank all school administrators, support and teaching staff, and all district personnel who were responsible for ensuring our enrollment was fully accounted for.

A detailed report on enrollment is being prepared and will be presented to Committee V in the near future.

Thank you.

Chris

Chris Kelly
Superintendent of Schools
Vancouver School Board (District No. 39)

Ken Clement will be the first First Nations candidate to run for school board since Robert Kiyoshk ran unsuccessfully under the COPE banner in 1999. See The Province from Nov. 5, 1999.

School Board is one of the hardest and least appreciated of municipal-type councils -but it is also one of the most important. The three main municipal parties in Vancouver are holding nomination meetings on successive weekends in September (NPA Sept. 13; Vision Vancouver Sept. 20; COPE Sept. 28.)

Since my children began school in 1996 I have seen four different school boards and several dozen trustees. Some work hard -irrespective of their political parties, some work hard but only for their political parties and some didn’t appear to either work or understand the issues at all. Some very good people found themselves hamstrung by party affiliation and didn’t seem to be able to do good work when it meant cooperating with trustees from their opposing party. Over twelve years one does build up a set of strong opinions about the people in public positions and about what they should be able to do.

My criteria for a ‘good’ trustee involves some simple points. First and foremost, I think that they should have a history of direct and meaningful involvement in public education. Secondly, they should have a capacity to work well across political and partisan lines. And, finally, they should be able to demonstrate effective involvement with community members in a manner that builds collaborative engagement.

Using the above criteria here’s my list of the top people via for school board nominations from the three main municipal parties. Please note that if I do not know about a candidate (i.e. have never met with, talked with, or otherwise been able to see them in action) or if I have nothing positive to contribute about a candidate I will not list them below.

If I were voting today (in order of preference):

Helisa Luke (Vision): I have known Helisia since we were parents involved with the founding of Save Our Schools in the early days of the Gordon Campbell government. S.O.S., while severely attached by then Min. of Education Christie Clark for being a front group for the BCTF/NDP/COPE, was in fact a very middle of the road group of parents from across Vancouver who had really had enough. Serious cutbacks to education (through a legislated teachers contract, increases to MSP premiums, etc) made it difficult for schools to provide the education that we should have. S.O.S. included parents from all political stripes. Anyone who was there can have nothing but positive things to say about Helisia’s capacity to work in common cause with people of a variety of outlooks. For this work alone I would give Helisia my strongest support. I have also seen her work in support of public education since then through my role on a number of Parent Advisory Councils at school and district level. In this domain it is even clearer that Helisia is a candidate who is interested in education for all children and furthermore, that she truly understands what is needed to do a good job.

Patti Bacchus (Vision): I also first met Patti through the Save Our Schools campaign. Patti exemplifies the type of parent who gets involved because they care about education for all children, not just education for their children. Like many of us her first brush with education politics arose from her experiences as a parent, but Patti shows us that concern about education is a community effort. Patti has been involved in advocacy groups for special education, school seismic safety, and proper funding and resources for public schools. During the several years that I have been involved in the District Parents’ Advisory Council, I have had the opportunity to see Patti working as a parent advocate at the district level on a variety of committees and task forces. As a parent and community member I know that we would be well served by Patti

Bill Bargeman (COPE). I first met Bill when he was on the Vancouver Secondary Teacher’s Union executive. I am a strong supporter of unions and workers rights to fair representation in unions. However, I take a dim view of the unionist who use the hard won gains of previous generations to hide incompetence, avoid responsibility, or to opt out of ethical behaviour. Bill is not that sort of unionist. Everything that I have about Bill gives me great confidence in him. I respected his leadership in the teacher’s union. He’s the type of teacher that I would love my son’s to have. In my role on the District Parents’ Advisory Council I have seen him act in a firm, clear and respectful manner. As a union leader he would not always agree with the School Board. What makes Bill a rare leader is that he could take the disagreement and still keep the path open for collaboration. Too often politicians and others talk about the importance of unity or agreement when what they are really saying is be quiet if you don’t agree with me. Democracy, however, is built upon disagreement and the capacity to work through that. Bill can work with people even when he disagrees. The outcome is often a better thing for all concerned. Bill will make a great trustee. I look forward to seeing him elected!

Ken Clement (Vision). Ken has been a First Nations community worker for many years in Vancouver. One thing that our public system is failing on is the way in which aboriginal education is back-seated to a host of other concerns. Administrators and politicians will put in a good word here and there, but the real work that needs to be done is constantly overlooked. The problem is that the aboriginal voice in our education system is constantly silenced and ignored. By having a person like Ken on school board we can go a long way toward making sure that the Aboriginal
voice (parents and students) is heard.

Alan Wong (COPE). Alan Wong is one of the longest serving trustees on the school board. I have known Alan since I was a member of the COPE Education Committee about a decade ago (I’ve since left COPE to participate in Vision’s education committee). Alan strikes me as fair minded in his dealings with education issues. He clearly has strong perspectives, but is willing to consider alternatives without dismissing them out of hand. These are important qualities for a school trustee.

Stepan Vdovine (Vision). A UBC student and current school trustee in the outer Fraser Valley, Stepan has a lot going for him that makes him the right choice for Vancouver’s public education system. He has demonstrated that he can do the job. He brings a perspective to the job that is lacking among those of us who are a bit long in the tooth and who may have grown a bit jaded in the process.

Jane Bouey (COPE). Jane was a trustee during the COPE majority board of a few years back. Of all the trustees that I met during the COPE term of power she was among those that I most liked and appreciated for her sincerity, hard work, and willingness to actually make education work. Her work in the areas of special education in particular demonstrated to me that she has what it takes to be a good trustee.

Mike Lombardi (Vision). Mike is recently retired from one of the BC Federation of Teachers most critical staff jobs -communications director. I first met Mike around the issue of the provincial government’s grade ten exam policy. These exams have introduced an entire level of control and monitoring in the school system with problematic outcomes for many students. At the time Mike was involved in the Prince of Wales Parent Advisory Council and they were mounting a strong opposition to the new exams. Mike’s strength lies in the way he approaches an issue that he feels passionately about and is not afraid to make those opinions clear. As a member of the DPAC executive at the time I was struck by the forcefulness of his argument but also by the fact he was able to work with a large group of parents, many of whom actually supported the grade ten exams. The combination of Mike’s professional background in the teacher’s federation with his commitment to public education will make him a good choice for school board.

Carol Gibson (NPA). Carol will be a strange pick for those who know me. I would be the first to say that I disagree with Carol politically on many points. To be blunt, I think that she, like many of her NPA colleagues on the School Board, should take more decisive public action and positions on the matters before the school board instead of letting senior management do all the talking. That being said, Carol certainly demonstrated her capacity and ability to work with parents at the local school level and for this I would put a check beside her name on the ballot. University Hill area schools are grossly over capacity yet we have had practically no action for almost a decade. Former COPE trustee Kevin Milsip did a lot of good work during his brief term in office. Carol picked up the ball and worked with us at the school to get the information we needed and to keep our needed school concerns on the agenda.

__________________
If I were voting at the COPE nomination meeting here are my picks:
Bargeman, Bouey, Wong, Blakey -I would leave the fifth spot empty unless forced to vote for five. Then it would be Noel Herron.

Listing a vision for Vision – 12th and Cambie

It appears to be Vision Vancouver school board candidate Narinder Chhina’s wish list for school board and council. On the left side of the page is a Vision school board ballot. The letter X is marked in boxes for Chhina, Kenneth Clement, Shargon Gregson and Stepan Vdovine.

Vdovine was surprised to learn that he had been added to the Chhina list as the first he had heard about it was when the mailout arrived at his door.

Vision is running four school board candidates in the Nov. 15 election.

Home – mike watkins dot ca

The B.C. government, not the Vancouver board of education, selected a school in Premier Gordon Campbell’s riding for special treatment under a $30-million project unveiled this month, the board chairman admitted Sunday. But Clarence Hansen said he supports the government’s choice, even though some parents are angry over what appears to be political favouritism.

No politics? Then explain this:

Hansen said General Gordon “isn’t the one we would have picked” for the pilot but added that parents earned that right through their aggressive lobbying and creative ideas.

That’s interesting, as it has been abundantly clear that Committee II did not support in any way shape or form the aggressive lobbying and creative ideas the Gordon parents were putting forth. If anything such creativity was going to slow down the Gordon project from ever getting approval.

Frances Bula on the “Highlights of the NPA day”

In response to public comments by two school board candidates:

On the east-side exodus: candidates and commentators need to do a thorough job of studying the actual data. I have and, the situation is not a tidal wave of students flooding west. Is there cross boundary movement? Yes, there is. Is it a massive move from the depths of the poorest to the heights of the richest area schools? No, it is not.

However, the simplicity of blaming west-side for east side woes is compelling for those commentators not interested in the complexities of reality. Please keep in mind that much of this east/west so-called conflict is a serious error in perception not supported in real terms as there is no monolithic ‘west-side’ -there are pockets of wealth such as around Dunbar Heights, areas of West Point Grey, Shaunessy, SW Marine Drive, but in today’s Vancouver they are isolates and do not define an entire area).

To get a sense of what is actually happening a couple things have to be understood. First, there are district programs that draw directly from a cross-district student population. These programs, like French Immersion, High School Mini-Schools, International Baccalaureate, Alternative Education programs (Total and Ideal or Bing Satellite, for example), Montessori, Special Ed (Access, GLD, ELAC, for example). These programs pull from a wide area of the district. For some schools, Like Churchill and Kitsilano Secondaries cross boundary can be a high proportion of the overall student population. These are, in fact only one portion of total cross-boundary enrolments.

The second category is from one regular program to another regular program. On this score the Vancouver School Board data shows that if a student moves boundaries the move is typically from home school to a school whose’ catchment is adjoin the home school. This is not a major east to west drain.

Many of the readers of this blog will likely find the complexities and details more then they asked for. But it seems to me that people should inform themselves of the reality and the real evidence before making blind statements based upon their assumptions and misconceptions. Consider the follow data sheets from the UBC/UEL area to get a sense of some of the complexity of movement. Download special needs and ESL student data. Download UBC/UEL student data.

One other thing – there is another series element of cross-boundary enrolment that is being overlook and downplayed in this east-to-west- claim; it’s the west-to-east forced movement of several hundred children from the University area. Since we are not part of Vancouver proper we do seem to get ignored. But for about half a decade a growing problem of under-capacity in our local schools has led to hundreds of children of elementary level being bussed to schools more than 10 kilometers away. At the high school level this is contributing to overcrowding at nearby Byng Secondary where students will likely soon find themselves being forced further east again.

Last year, partly in jest, I suggested that high school students should be shipped east in order to solve the overcrowding at U Hill Secondary. Who knows, perhaps we will start to see happen because there is not immediate solution.

Highlights of the NPA day

Lakhbir Singh, the doctor running for school board, lamented the exodus of east-side kids to west-side schools. He blamed the Fraser Institute, in part, for its ratings that make people think east-side schools aren’t as good. But he knows they are, because he went to east-side schools and he didn’t become a drug dealer. Instead, he became a doctor and worked with the Canadian Navy. (That sensitivity about east/west schools seems to be a theme for certain candidates. Narinder Chhina, who’s competing for a Vision school board nomination, also talked about the east-side exodus at the Vision meeting last week and suggested banning cross-boundary enrolment, a proposal that provoked internal gasps from certain members of the audience who realized the revolution that would provoke among Vancouver parents.)

See an earlier comment I made on cross-boundary enrolments.