Albert Camus: Absurdity & Paradox

Albert Camus is one of the most famous and broadly read existential philosophers, but interestingly considered himself neither an existentialist nor a philosopher at all. Born in Algeria, Camus was a skilled writer, essayist, and playwright, but also an influential political figure who was active in the Resistance. His ideas on absurdity, revolt, and suicide have become indispensable to the study of existentialism. 

My presentation next week will be on his 1942 novel The Stranger. Please note that depending on your translation, the book might alternatively be titled The Outsider and I may use these terms interchangeably.

The novel is quite short and Camus’ philosophy is woven throughout, so I recommend reading the entire novel if you have time. I have selected a few chapters for required reading, however, which I believe most embody some of the themes I will be touching on in my presentation.

I have also assigned an excerpt from The Myth of Sisyphus, which I believe will provide some foundation for Camus’ understanding of the absurd.

I know it is a lot but if you have time, I really recommend looking at chapters 1, 4, and 5 from Albert Camus: From the Absurd to Revolt, which give a background on Camus’ political beliefs and his relationship with Jean-Paul Sartre.

Camus’ frank yet elegant prose never ceases to absorb me, and there are few authors of which I am familiar who manage to imbue their characters with more authenticity or honesty. I hope you enjoy them as much as I do.

Best,

Alex

 

Readings:

Camus_The Myth of Sisyphus_The Myth of Sisyphus

Camus, The Outsider_Part 1_Chapter Five

Camus, The Outsider_Part 1_Chapter Six

Camus, The Outsider_Part 2_Chapter Five

Camus, The Outsider_Afterword

 

Optional/Recommended:

Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus_An Absurd Reasoning_Absurdity and Suicide

1_The Absurd

4_Camus and Political Violence

5_Camus and Sartre

Slides/Presentation:

Absurdity & Paradox

Sartre: On Contingency

Hello everyone!

Next week I will be presenting Jean-Paul Sartre’s Nausea (1938), one his earliest and most loved works of literature. Now that we’ve become well acquainted with the French existentialist tradition, it will be exciting to finally take a closer look at some of the influential ideas that are distinctly Sartrean. This particular novel was important for introducing the philosophical attitude that Sartre will later come to substantiate in his major text Being and Nothingness. 

Due to the richness of the ideas put forth in the novel, I would like our discussion to focus on the tenets of his personal ideology, paying close attention to his solution to the central problem of existentialism, namely, how we ought to confront reality given its “contingency”.

I am posting one excerpt from Nausea that I believe covers a decent breadth of these ideas, and should also give you a good sense of what the experience of reading the novel is like. I am also posting an excerpt from Being and Nothingness which primarily goes over the notion of individual responsibility and “Bad Faith” which has come up a lot so far in our discussions. Finally, there is a link to the very short last chapter of Albert Camus’ “The Myth of Sisyphus”. A friend and intellectual rival of Sartre, Camus  presents an alternative approach to the existentialist dilemma thought by many to be more compelling than Sartre’s.

Nausea Excerpt.compressed
Being&NothingnessExcerpt.compressed

http://dbanach.com/sisyphus.htm

For those interested, I am also linking a short book by Sartre titled “What Is Literature?” which is worth browsing through and might be especially helpful for final papers:

https://archive.org/details/whatisliterature030271mbp

Also, here is the powerpoint I used during my presentation:

NAUSEA

Beauvoir, The Ethics of Characters

As we move forward time, no longer studying the historical backdrop for Existential thinking/art/literature, we will see themes and ideas more densely and fully explored. She Came to Stay (L’Invitee)  was published in 1943, placing it a few years before Sartre and Beauvoir explicitly came out and used the brand of Existentialism to publicize their work. This is the same year Sartre published Being and Nothingness, a work which  grew out of their shared intellectual pursuits, though Sartre explicitly wrote it.

In She Came to Stay Beauvoir masterfully uses her powers for narrative to approach difficult Hegelian and Heideggarian thinking, offering a keen insight as to the nature of being, and our relationship to others in the world. Beauvoir puts herself and the people around her directly in the novel. Francoise is herself, Pierre is Jean-Paul Sartre, and Xaviere is the real life person of Olga Kosakiewicz. Olga is a younger woman who, in an unconventional way, had joined Beauvoir and Sartre’s relationship in the 1930s. By the end of the novel Francoise, unable to reconcile this relationship, destroys her ‘other’ and brings finality to the story. Given that Beauvoir has publicly said that violence is a possessing of the other, something you can never do, what can we say about Francoise’s actions? Think about this and the other topics brought up in the critical texts for next class.

(Please read them in the listed order)

Simone de Beauvoir and the Ethics of Characters _PHIL 489 presentation (Slides)

Chronology of Beauvoir’s life

How to Read Beauvoir

She Came To Stay (Part 1)
She Came To Stay (Part 2)
She Came To Stay (Part 3)

Excess and Transgression in Beauvoir’s Fiction (Part 1)
Excess and Transgression in Beauvoir’s Fiction (Part2)

(Optional reading)
Ethics of Ambiguity (Read the first chapter)

If you have time, this article is absolutely fantastic, would suggest looking at it for paper topics!:

Scheu, Ashley King. “The Viability of the Philosophical Novel: The Case of Simone De Beauvoir’sShe Came to Stay.” Hypatia, vol. 27, no. 4, 2011, pp. 791–809., doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01199.x.

 

Hesse – Seriousness and Humour

Herman Hesse’s Der Steppenwolf (1927) is not usually found among the existentialist canon (Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man makes it into Gordon Marino’s anthology, but not this one) but nevertheless has a unique voice as a post-World War I existentialist novel, preceding Jean-Paul Sartre’s Nausea and released in the same year as Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time.

Hesse believed that this work was misunderstood by most people. Steppenwolf was meant to be an optimistic and hopeful novel of recovery and healing, instead of what was apparently taken as a denunciation of life by the mid-20th Century youth identifying with the middle-aged protagonist Harry Haller. What Hesse thought was the question, his audience had taken for an answer. The source of this healing, to Hesse, is a kind of unseriousness to life: what is called “humour” in the novel. This anticipates what Simone de Beauvoir will call “seriousness” in The Ethics of Ambiguity, which will be our main philosophical text of focus this week.

With the exception of the families of the landlady and the academic, Steppenwolf ‘s characters are unique in that they may all just be a reflection or part of Harry himself. Harry, in turn is a reflection of the author himself, who throughout his life also entertained thoughts of suicide throughout his life. I have linked, along with the novel excerpt, a short faux-autobiographical essay by Hesse himself which will provide some context into what Hesse believed his personal challenges were.

[Excerpt from Steppenwolf]
[Life Story Briefly Told, by Herman Hesse]
[Chapter II of The Ethics of Ambiguity, by Simone de Beauvoir]

(As a side note, Much of the scholarly work on this novel refers heavily to the psychoanalytic theories of Carl Jung to interpret what the characters represent for Harry as different aspects of his psyche that allow him to relate with and overcome himself. While acknowledging the influence that Jungian theory had on Hesse, I won’t be discussing Jung, although if any of you know the field better than I do, I’d be very grateful if you could provide some detail on what terms such as “animus” and “individuation” are.)

Dostoevsky: Golyadkin’s Search for Meaning

**PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR SLIDES**

Hello friends,

My presentation on Jan 24 will cover an earlier text of Dostoevsky’s called The Double. Though it is one of his lesser known (and, by extension, lesser philosophically analyzed) works, I personally believe that it holds a lot of the themes, techniques, and imagery that will inform his most revered texts, such as Crime and Punishment, Brothers Karamazov, and even Notes from the Underground.

The Double is a novella, so compared to his other texts it’s relatively short (hence, if you want to read the full thing you can), but in conjunction with another analysis I’d like for you to read, it would also be fine if you skipped chapters 2 & 3. What I’d like for you to focus on is Golyadkin (Senior, G1) and his relationship with his double (or Golyadkin Junior, G2, as I’ll refer to him), the narration, and the pace at which the scenes are playing out – I will not be going over the plot in detail in order to focus on analysis.

I will choose a particular chapter or two to focus on during my presentation, but for the sake of your understanding of the text, I feel it’d be more helpful to read more than just the chapters I am focusing on!

Finally, I am leaving you with Emil Filla’s 1907 work, Reader of Dostoevsky. Interpret it how you wish!

Melissa


Reader of Dostoevsky is in the Public Domain.