Categories
Antarctic News

NSF gives company Raytheon extended contract for Antarctica

Info

NSF gives company Raytheon extended contract for Antarctica

by Kris Molle

last update: Apr 13, 2011 09:36 PM

From various articles: Raytheon Technical Services Company LLC, a subsidiary of Raytheon Company, has received a one-year extension to its contract with the National Science Foundation (NSF).

The award will be approximately $157 million. RTSC’s Raytheon Polar Services Company (RPSC) has been under contract to the NSF to support the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) in providing logistics, operations, and maintenance support to sustain year-round research programs at three U.S. stations and two science vessels in the Antarctic since 2000.

RTSC President John D. Harris II said “We are excited to continue working with the National Science Foundation’s Office of Polar Programs in support of Antarctic research. I had the opportunity to visit some of the USAP facilities on ‘the Ice’ earlier this year, and I am proud of the accomplishments of our employees in that harsh and challenging environment.”

The RPSC has approximately 350 full-time employees and hires up to another 1,000 seasonal employees to work in Antarctica during the summer and winter seasons for a wide variety of occupations, including heavy equipment operators, mechanics, computer technicians, mountaineers, and many others.

“Our employees are eager and ready to continue to support the NSF research mission in Antarctica, providing the same high level of support we have been committed to for the last 11 years,” said RPSC program manager Sam Feola.

Read:

Canadian Business, 8th April 2011

PR NewsWire, 8th April 2011

Business Week, 8th April 2011

Categories
Arctic News LINKS

Catlin Arctic Survey: Dr Helen Findlay talks ocean acidification

Dr Helen Findlay gathering water samples with a Niskin bottle

If you want to understand how ocean acidification might impact some marine creatures you need to do two things. First go to the seaside and find a seashell. Then go to a shop and buy a fizzy drink, any brand will do. Put the seashell in the fizzy drink and leave it for a few days. You will see that it is starts to dissolve away.

A similar process is happening in the oceans today. Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is being absorbed into the ocean. When carbon dioxide dissolves in water it forms carbonic acid. Fizzy drinks are carbonated – they have carbon dioxide bubbled into them and this makes them acidic. Carbon dioxide is taken up into cold waters more rapidly and so the process of ocean acidification affects the coldest seas, such as the Arctic Ocean, the most.

Sampling bottlesSampling bottles

On the pH scale the oceans are actually basic – the current average pH level of the oceans is about 8.2 (compared to freshwater which is pH 7). By continually adding more carbon dioxide, and increasing the amount of hydrogen ions, the ocean is becoming more acidic – the pH level is dropping. The pH level will continue to decrease into the future as long as carbon dioxide keeps being absorbed by the oceans.

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, there has been already been a 0.1 drop in pH level. Models predict that the pH level will continue to lower (become more acid) to 7.8 in the next 100 years and to 7.4 in 300 years.

This may seem like a small amount but the impact can be quite large. All organisms need to regulate their internal pH and marine creatures are no exception. The difference is that many marine organisms are more dependent on the ocean to act as a pH regulator. It is also important for those organisms that have shells made of calcium carbonate – they find it difficult to maintain their shells, which start to dissolve as the pH decreases (just like in a fizzy drink, only much slower).

The Arctic acts as a bellwether for acid levels in our seas and their impact on the marine ecosystem. Acidification is thought to happen here faster than anywhere else but there is still a lot we don’t understand about how the sea ice and associated processes affect how carbon dioxide is taken up into the Arctic Ocean. The research being carried out here at the Catlin Arctic Survey Ice Base is trying to find out more about the transfer of carbon dioxide through sea ice, what this means in terms of ocean acidification and how acidification, or changes in these processes, might affect the organisms that live in and under the sea ice.

Dr Helen Findlay and Dr Victoria HillDr Helen Findlay and Dr Victoria Hill

Categories
Archive General Posts

Arctic sea ice extent – click graph for full view

Categories
Arctic News

First North Pole Ozone Hole Forming?

“Put on your sunscreen”—damaging air mass could drift far south.

Main Content

Stratospheric clouds in the Arctic (file picture) worsen ozone loss, experts say.

Photograph from Picture Press/Alamy

Christine Dell’Amore

National Geographic News

Published March 22, 2011

Spawned by strangely cold temperatures, “beautiful” clouds helped strip the Arctic atmosphere of most of its protective ozone this winter, new research shows.

The resulting zone of low-ozone air could drift as far south as New York, according to experts who warn of increased skin-cancer risk.

The stratosphere’s global blanket of ozone—about 12 miles (20 kilometers) above Earth—blocks most of the sun‘s high-frequency ultraviolet (UV) rays from hitting Earth’s surface, largely preventing sunburn and skin cancer.

But a continuing high-altitude freeze over the Arctic may have already reduced ozone to half its normal concentrations—and “an end is not in sight,” said research leader Markus Rex, a physicist for the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Bremerhaven, Germany.

Preliminary data from 30 ozone-monitoring stations throughout the Arctic show the degree of ozone loss was larger this winter than ever before, Rex said.

Before spring is out, “we may even get the first Arctic ozone hole … which would be a dramatic development—one which would make it into coming history books,” he said.

“It’s too early to call, but stay tuned.”

Atmospheric chemist Simone Tilmes, who wasn’t part of the study, agreed.

“We do not know at the moment how large the ozone hole in the Arctic will grow, because the thinning of the ozone layer is happening right now,” said Tilmes, of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colorado.

Full confirmation may require computer simulations and satellite measurements, which study leader Rex said would “be very useful to provide an independent view of the ozone loss this year.”

An ozone hole is an area of the ozone layer that is seasonally depleted of the protective gas—such as the well-known hole over Antarctica.

(See “Whatever Happened to the Ozone Hole?”)

“Beautiful” Clouds Harbor Ozone-Fighting Chemicals

In the 1980s scientists realized chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other ozone-depleting chemicals—then widely used in aerosol hairsprays and refrigerants, for example—were degrading the ozone layer.

The 1987 Montreal Protocol initiated a global phase-out of CFCs, replacing them with alternatives that don’t destroy ozone. However, CFCs can persist for decades in the stratosphere—the Antarctic ozone hole is still there, though it’s expected to grow smaller in coming decades.

Once in the upper atmosphere, CFCs break down into chlorine atoms, which, when activated by sunlight, destroy ozone molecules.

Cold temperatures speed up this process through polar stratospheric clouds (see picture), “beautiful” and still little understood formations that occur once stratospheric temperatures drop to at least -108 degrees Fahrenheit (-78 degrees Celsius), Rex noted.

The clouds provide “reservoirs” for inactivated byproducts of chlorine. On the surface of the cloud, these byproducts react with each other and release “aggressive” chlorine atoms that attack ozone molecules.

The whole process stops as soon as it gets warmer and the so-called Arctic polar vortex breaks up, Tilmes said.

At about 6 million square miles (15 million square kilometers), or 40 times the size of Germany, the Arctic polar vortex is a frigid air mass that circles the North Pole in winter.

Warming Link to High-Altitude Cold Snap?

The cold snap is no coincidence, research leader Rex added.

“This is the continuation of a long-term tendency that the cold Arctic winters have become colder,” Rex said.

And global warming may drive this trend, he added. As greenhouse gases trap heat in the lower levels of the atmosphere, the higher levels tend to cool, he said.

Of course, the “process is more complicated than this simple explanation”—there may be many ways in which greenhouse gases influence high-altitude temperatures, he added.

Low-Ozone Air to Fly South for Spring?

Any spike in UV radiation can impact both the Arctic ecosystem and human health, research leader Rex noted. For instance, more sunlight can slow the growth of certain species of ocean algae that provide food for larger organisms—and whose absence can have reverberations up the food chain.

(See “‘Crazy Green’ Algae Pools Seen in Antarctic Sea.”)

More worrisome, Rex said, is that ozone-depleted air can catch a ride south to more highly populated areas with the Arctic polar vortex.

Low-ozone air is often pushed southward to 40 or 45 degrees latitude by natural atmospheric disturbances, Rex said.

A low-ozone air mass’s southern “excursions” can take it as far as northern Italy in Europe or New York or San Francisco in the United States, he said.

The rapidly shifting vortex might last into April, when people are starting to spend more time outside, NCAR’s Tilmes noted.

“A good message for people [is] to just be aware that this is a year where ozone will be likely thinner this spring.

“You should watch out for your skin and put on your sunscreen.”

Rex noted that, however, that since the mass is constantly moving, low-ozone episodes would only last a few days in a given region.

Rex also said this winter’s decline in ozone doesn’t mean that the Montreal Protocol isn’t doing its job.

“People could mistake that and say we have banned CFCs and [it] doesn’t seem to work,” he said.

“That’s not the case. It’s just the timescale—CFCs take so long to disappear from the atmosphere.”

Categories
Archive Lecture Posters

April 2011: The IPY and Canada’s Three Oceans: A Baseline With Warning Lights: Recruits Needed

Spam prevention powered by Akismet