Monthly Archives: March 2024

Subway Illusion-Valeria Luiselli

Posted on by under Valeria Luiselli

Faces In the Crowd by Valeria Luiselli is a unique novel that has stories intertwined in three time zones and seems to jump around in its thinking.  From the beginning of the story,  the story was from the perspective of a writer, who is the mother of two kids.  “I have a baby and a boy. They don’t let me breathe. Everything I write is—has to be—in short bursts.” (p.4). From what I’m feeling, she constantly was interrupted by home chores and the children, and these tasks deprived her of the basics of life as a writer. In her writing,  she talks about her past in New York, and I believe she misses her past and was sophisticated in her current life. At the same time, she had a dead-end marriage. Every person has troubles in reality, and the narrator expresses her life in writing.

 I find it interesting with the “ghosts” mixed in her story, and how she focused on Gilberto Owen.  “Yes, I say, it’s a book about Gilberto Owen’s ghost.”（p.57). Owen was a Mexican poet, but there’s a point where I can’t understand whether he’s from the past, now, or the surreal. The narrator claimed she had seen Owen’s face among the many other faces on the subway, but she never saw him. It reminded me of Nadja, both mysterious and spiritually like. They all seem to be a real presence to the narrator, but not to other people The narrator knows everything about him and it seems that she lives in Owen’s mind, how they think, reflect, and view the world parallelly. 

By the second half of the novel, it seems like Owen came into narrating the plot, where the narrator and himself take turns to talk. Owen talked about how he takes the subway every day and finds himself losing weight, just as the narrator has noted. 

“I was able to see the woman with the dark face and shadows under her eyes.” (p.108) Their narrative is like a closed loop, where Owen can see the narrator as well. That’s one of the things I like about this book, the narrators in this novel are bi-directional, they see each other, blend into the world of each other’s troubles, and their unique voices overlap in perfect harmony, as if becoming each other’s. As Owen is losing weight, he is rubbing himself out, and blending into the narrator and taking voices in the novel. 

Other than the parallel narrative Valeria Luiselli had used, I find that the novel also repeatedly mentions death. However, these deaths are abstract and poetic, and for me, they do not necessarily mean the physical cessation of life, but they can be spiritual and emotional death, and resurrection. “Naturally, there are a lot of deaths in the course of a lifetime. Most people don’t notice. They think you die once and that’s it.” (p.61) When we let go of some of our past, hatred, and sadness, is this not a form of death and rebirth? 

My question for everyone about this book was since the perspectives and storyline are complex and ambiguous,  whose perspective do you think the novel is from, and whose is most accurate and reliable about true facts of their lives?

‘The Book of Chameleons’ — José Eduardo Agualusa

Posted on by under José Eduardo Agualusa

The Book of Chameleons by José Eduardo Agualusa is beautiful and unique to read. The book was also very dreamy and it seemed like I didn’t know what was true and what was a lie or dream throughout the book. We follow the gecko’s point of view back and forth between reality, dreams, and the past.

The narrator of this novel is very interesting, his name is Eulálio, who reincarnated into a gecko. However, he still has the memory is man, and can think and observe what happens around him. Eulálio had always lived in Felix Ventura’s house, who is an albino.  Felix Ventura’s work is what I found most interesting in this book. He is a genealogist who makes up a new identity and family tree for people who have money and status but don’t have a good past. “He provides them with photographs of their grandparents and great-grandparents, gentlemen of elegant bearing and old-fashioned ladies”. (p.25)

Reading up here, Felix Ventura’s job makes me wonder, is it possible for people themselves to accept a brand new identity and get used to it? In the next scene, my question was answered. The foreigner came to Felix for a brand new identity, and he was given the name of José Buchmann and his Angolan identity. “Perhaps it’s like you see with a chrysalis, and the secret buzz of enzymes has been eating away at his organs.” ( p.63) Does a beautiful butterfly remember that it was once a small chrysalis? Why is this foreigner able to sooo easily adapt and embrace a new identity within a few months? I believe the novel also gives us an answer:  “Reality is painful and imperfect, and that’s just the way it is, that’s how we distinguish it from dreams.” (p. 94)  Similarly for us, if our past reality is ambiguous and painful, it is easier to replace and change.

In addition to the theme of dreams, truth and lies, the character Angela Lucia also adds romantic elements to this novel. She has a past she doesn’t want to talk about, but she has a future to pursue. Eulálio’s series of dreams was also fascinating. In these dreams, she was able to communicate with Felix, like a real man. This added the elements of fantasy and a more dreamy style to the novel. 

Moreover, this novel was set on Angola, and before reading this novel, I knew almost nothing about it. After finishing reading, when I searched and learned about the background of Angola, I realized how many painful memories of colonization and wars have brought to the people of Angola. Perhaps it is important it is for them to weave a false but beautiful past.  While the novel did not discuss much about Angola and war, the existence of Edmundo Barata dos Reis uncovered a real history of civil war, and the death of innocent children.

“Truth has a habit of being ambiguous too” (p 122). Referring to the title of this novel “ chameleon”, who changes itself into their surroundings to get closer to their prey. What do you think this reflects about human life? Do we hide our identity for our benefits?

$$$ To Burn—Ricardo Piglia

Posted on by under Ricardo Piglia

This week’s reading was the novel Money to Burn by Ricardo Piglia. To be honest, I can’t say I enjoyed reading the overall plot due to the violence, sexuality, drugs, and gang life embedded in it. However, I do enjoy the narrative techniques and the underlying ironic themes of inequality within the system and injustice. 

The story begins surrounding the main characters, Malito the boss; Dorda, who is heavy and quiet with a ruddy face; and Brignone, who has thin and black hair. They were called twins because of their similar looks, and they committed crimes together, but in reality, their relationship was much more than brotherhood.  Dorda and Bridgnone, with twelve other men, are a gang, and they commit a bank robbery and go on the run with millions of pesos. In this part (pg. 30-34) I love how Ricardo Piglia chose first to explore the bank clerk Martinez Tobar, who was tempted to steal the money due to his family condition and his daughter’s illness. Ironically, the next scene that happened was the robbery scene by the gang. I find this as a way of foreshadowing that something to happen next, but also gives the reader to context of social class and poverty. After escaping with the money, Piglia gave me two perspectives: the police, and the criminals’ hideout. In between, there is a lot of drug and sexual content involved, giving a different theme to this novel. In the world of gangs and crime, there is not only money and violence but also love. 

There was also another scene that was a highlight for me. On page 168, Malito’s gang was setting five million pesos on fire. ‘ they are evil to the core, bad from the innards out, mere animals,” (p169). There didn’t seem to be much agitation for the crowd until they burned the money. “The idea got out that money is innocent, even when acquired as a consequence of death and crime” (p.170). When they burned the money, the anger of the crowd rose. It seemed that their act of robbery was not such a great sin, but their careless attitude toward the money was completely violating social norms and unethical. 

Other than the reflection on money and robbery, the love between Gauch and Kid was also depicted in detail. In the last scenes when the injured twins are surrounded by the police, they still care for each other. “His back against the broken bedhead, embracing the Kid as if he were cradling a toy doll in his arms” (p.212). In such a criminal novel, embedding the soft emotions between two men was contrasting with the rest of the book, but also beautiful. 

My question for everyone: the epigraph of the novel wrote “After all, what is robbing a bank compared to founding one?- Bertolt Brecht “ I believe the novel suggests that society’ has double standards about crimes. What do you think about this quote and its relationship with the novel,  why is one a crime but not the other?

The “Love” across Age and Race– Marguerite Duras

Posted on by under Introduction

“Everyone says you were beautiful when you were young, but I want to tell you I think you’re more beautiful now than then (p. 3). “

This is the classic beginning of The Lover by Marguerite Duras, where the aged narrator when her looks are devastated, longs for a lover who expresses the love that transcends above time.

In this novel, the narrator looks back on her first love and offers her personal reflections on past regrets, sorrow, and joy. Unfolding in the first-person narrative, the novel explores the deep and hopeless love between a poor French teenage girl and a rich Chinese man in his mid-twenties.  For me what makes this story so influential is that it takes the life of the French colonists in Vietnam as the background, where there was a rise of nationalism among Vietnamese people and the idea of racial discriminatory views among French colonists. Under this concept,  this forbidden love between a French girl and a Chinese man highly reflects that love can transcend the prejudice of race, colour, and wealth. 

“I say that’s how I desire him, with his money, that when I first saw him he was already in his car, in his money. ( p. 40)” In the first part of the novel, the narrator emphasizes that she’s with this Chinese man for the money. Similarly, the rich Chinese man desires her young body and sex. At this point, this seems to be a fair trade. However, I feel great sympathy for the narrator. Her family looms over her like a shadow, the source of all her suffering comes from poverty and her mother. In such a family, her mother always sees her daughter in a patriarchal view and sees her as a commodity, caring about her daughter’s value in the marriage market. Her mother never provided the love a teenager needs, and so she is thirsting for the love she never had.  This accumulated desire for love was satisfied by the sex and love with this man, who cares for her. With the love of sexes, she was able to detach herself from the suffocating coldness that surrounded her. Reversively, this young girl seems to fulfill the desire for freedom of this rich young man under this nationalist context. However, despite such true love, their class and race differences hindered their possibility. 

As the narrator is looking back, without wondering how she faces this sorrow in her heart, she has already admitted from the bottom of her heart that he has loved, she has loved, and money, and interests and it has nothing to do with it. 

“ He told her that it was as before, that he still loved her, he could never stop loving her, that he’d love her until death.” (p.129)

In the end, the Chinese man manages to express his love years later, and my question for everyone is, how do you interpret this ending? Do you view this as a tragedy full of regrets or a completion of their complex love story?

The Hour of the Starrrr – Clarice Lispector

Posted on by under Clarice Lispector

 The Hour of the Star by Clarice Lispector is the shortest novella I’ve read, and I thought it was unique, but also somewhat strange. In this story, there are two narrative storylines, the first line is the narration from Rodrigo S.M.’s point of view. Rodrigo S.M. is a male writer who seems to be bored with life and struggles internally. “I am absolutely tired of literature; only muteness keeps me company. If I still write it’s because I have nothing better to do in the world while I wait for death” (p.56). It seems that in this world he can’t find agency, but he can when he is writing literature. He feels like a God who can control the images and lives of his characters and is omniscient. 

The character he chooses to write, the second storyline, is a poor girl Macabea. Macabeia was born in a remote town and later came to Rio de Janeiro. She was portrayed as a sickly, ugly, woman who was so poor that she could only eat hot dogs. Despite her pitiful life, Macabea never seems to be very disappointed or bothered by her life.

 “That girl didn’t know she was what she was, just as a dog doesn’t know it’s a dog. So she didn’t feel unhappy. The only thing she wanted was to live.” 

She is naïve and mentally free from anxiety. She doesn’t go overboard with coveting and thinking about things that are out of her range, such as God, makeup, or even spaghetti. It seems that Clarice Lispector’s message is that is knowing or seeing more about life really better for you? Macabea knows less, she feels content, and that’s probably why she’s so happy. I wonder if the reason why Rodrigo S.M. depicts Macabea in this way is because he is tormented and can’t stop thinking about the soul and death, and that a character like Macabea is very much in contrast to him.

Later in the story, Macabea meets Olímpio de Jesus, a metal worker and she loves him so much. However, Olympic betrayed her, which added another layer of sorrow to her heartbroken life. The helpless Makabeya turns to tarot cards, which give her some courage to look forward to the future: she will marry a blonde foreigner. Ironically, she was struck by an oncoming car right after she steps out. In the moment nearing death, she has a hallucinatory “star moment” occurs, and all humility is sublimated into splendour. I wonder if Rodrigo S.M. thinks that death is a relief for Macabea and he is rescuing him, or if this death is what he desires but has no courage to do so?

 In this novella, Clarice Lispector chooses to have two storylines, and I believe that both characteristics of Rodrigo S.M. and Macabea have personal meaning for her. My question is, Rodrigo S.M. and Macabea, who is more of the epitome of Clarice Lispector; or do these three characters overlap with each other?

Spam prevention powered by Akismet