Advent Calendar of Beer: Another year, another beer. Plus classic hockey. Post 3

Beer  #17: Parallel 49 Psychopz India Pale Lager 6.5% ABV
Rated: 7 out of 10

This beer is somewhat unusual, being a hop heavy lager rather than the more usual hop heavy ale. The Psychopz is smoother than what you would find in a typical IPA, with more muted floral notes on the nose. There is a slight tang in the aftertaste, but it is cleaner and crisper than its ale cousins while still maintaining bitter undertones.

Beer #18: Central City “Gary’s Gourd” Squash Ale 9% ABV
Rated: 4 out of 10

This beer has me somewhat apprehensive. A squash ale? With 9% alcohol? Can it possibly be any good? The first thing you notice is the rich dark velvety red colour that seems to absorb light like a black hole. Then there is the subtler than expected squash aromas, and the surprisingly good head retention. Then you take a sip. And your first thought is “wow, that’s not too bad.” And then this sickly sweet, bizarre, unholy flavour creeps up on you and fills your entire mouth. Good god the aftertaste is bad. I’m not even sure what flavour it is, but its not good. [Kiri tried some and reckons the aftertaste is a combination of cinnamon and nutmeg. Whatever it is, it shouldn’t be in a beer.]

 

Beer #19: Parallel 19 “Please Sir” S’more Stout 10% ABV 45 IBU
Rated: 5 out of 10

For the Australians out there who aren’t sure what a s’more is, think of marshmallow and chocolate sandwiched between arrowroot biscuits. Now, why would you put this in a beer? I don’t know. This beer pours an extremely dark black, and has very little carbonation. It has a sweet chocolate nose, with an underlying hint of the strong alcohol content. The underlying beer is a very heavy stout, which helps to provide balance to the sweeter s’more notes. But, it is still a very sweet beer. I know some people like these novelty beers, but they are not really for me. We’ve been brewing beers for over 500 years, we’ve generally got it figured out pretty good. No need to get too fancy with it.

 

Beer #20: Red Racer Imprial IPA 9% ABV
Rated: 6 out of 10

It appears that the high alcohol beers are coming out close to christmas this year. This one is a little more standard than the last couple though, being a reasonably standard IPA. The high alcohol content makes it a bit of a novelty, but the alcohol does seem to dominate a little too much. I think the flavour profile of this beer would be greatly improved it was around 6% ABV instead of 9%. The beer does have a nice amber colouring and reasonable head retention.

 

Beer #21: Parallel 49 “Sahti Claus” Finish Sahti  7.5% ABV 35 IBU
Rated: 6 out of 10

This beer was also in last years advent calendar, so this is the second time I’ve had a Sahti. Traditionally, this type of beer is flavoured with juniper berries, and often has a banana ester flavour. Last year I found, in particular, the juniper overpowering and said “I would certainly not have another.” But I actually like this years version… the juniper flavour is very understated, as is the banana ester taste. They underline the flavour of this rye and barley beer nicely, and the ester is also noticable in the aroma. A remarkable turnaround from last year – is it my palate or the beer that has changed?

Beer #22: Central City “Thor’s Hammer” Barley Wine 11.5% ABV
Rated: 6 out of 10

This beer is referred to as a barley wine because of the high alcohol content. It was conditioned in bourbon barrels, and the distinctive flavour of bourbon underlies this beer. But the overwhelming flavours here are sweetness with some malt. The sweetness is a bit overdone, with the aftertaste consisting of a mix of bourbon and honey. I’m not sure that this is a particularly good beer, but it if you consider it as more of a nightcap or desert wine then it is quite reasonable. I recently purchased a bottle of the Granville Island barley wine, and it will certainly be interesting to compare the two.

Beer #23: Parallel 49 “Vow of Silence” Belgian Strong Ale 10% ABV 25 IBU
Rated: 7 out of 10

This is another strong barrel aged beer, and is my favourite of the stronger beers so far. A rich malty flavour with an oaky finish, the alcohol in this beer complements rather than overwhelm or detract from the flavours as with some of the other beers this year. It has a deep golden brown colour, and a complex flavour profile. These extra strong beers are not my go to, but this is a fine example of the genre.

Beer #24: Central City “Jitter Buzz” Coffee Stout 9% ABV
Rated: 7 out of 10

This beer features Been Around the World cold brew coffee, and it really is almost as much coffee as beer. The aroma is a mix of coffee and malty chocolate, and the creamy white head has good longevity. I like the underlying beer here, but the coffee leaves a bit to be desired (like most North American coffee in my opinion). I wonder if this beer would work with a more delicately flavoured Australian coffee, or whether the coffee would be lost in the rich stout. In the case of this beer, the coffee creates an overly bitter aftertaste that somewhat detracts from an otherwise good, and very interesting, beer.

Advent Calendar of Beer: Another year, another beer. Plus classic hockey. Post 2

This is the second part of this year’s beer post. The first part can be found here.

Beer #9: Parallel 49 Bodhisattua  7.5% ABV
Rated: 5 out of 10

The Bodhisattua is a dry hopped sour beer. Sour beers are super trendy at the moment, but I’m still yet to find one that I really like. This one is the closest so far though. A lot of sour beers taste more like a warhead than a beer, but this one is a bit more understated. Like most sour beers it has absolutely zero head retention, and is carbonated more like a soft drink than a beer. Not bad, but just not my style of beer.

Beer #10: Red Racer Copper Ale 5% ABV 23 IBU
Rated: 6 out of 10

There is only way to describe this beer: malty. If you’ve ever taken a brewery tour, you’ve probably been given a bit of malt to chew on. If you can remember that smell and that taste, then you have this beer. It’s not exactly a terrible thing, but I think that the maltiness could be offset with a bit more hops. I’ve had this beer before, and seem to remember liking it more than I do at the moment. Not sure if it is a batch thing, or if my palate is still shocked by the hot green curry I had for dinner.

Hockey game #2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=108&v=w6JaDUeH8A8

Once again, I’ve borrowed this game from the Pass it to Bulis blog. This is a highlight clip from a 2003 game where Marcus Naslund put up 6 points. I enjoy watching older highlights of sports, and even though 2003 wasn’t that long ago it is from before I had ever seen a game of ice hockey.

The thing that really stands out to me is the goaltending. This is during a period when goalies were still perfecting the butterfly technique. Now, this goalie was the fourth string goalie on one of the worst teams in the league, so maybe he’s not the best example. But, the side-to-side transition is much weaker than the current crop of NHL goaltenders. A more modern goalie will push across his net while staying down in the butterfly position, while the goalie in this clip partially stands up to move across. The modern setup is much more compact and also much quicker.

 

Beer #11: Parallel 49 “The Toques of Hazzard” White IPA 9.2% ABV 76 IBU
Rated: 7 out of 10

This beer is an interesting contrast to the previous beer. This one is all hop. Because the beer is a white IPA, there isn’t much body to contrast with the bitters that clock in at a rather large 76 IBU. The high alcohol content is, however, reasonably well balanced but does finish a little bit on the heavy side. The one place this beer lets itself down in the aroma department – there really isn’t much to talk about. Overall it is a reasonable but not particularly special drop.

 

Beer #12: Central City Getoff Maibock 5% ABV
Rated: 7 out of 10

This maibock is a heavily flavoured lager. It has a smokey finish, and is rich in hoppy bitterness. While the beer has a rich golden colour, it is light on carbonation and aroma. It is a pleasant enough beer, but doesn’t really have any standout features that might draw you in, and the smokey finish is a little bit overbearing as you approach the end of the beer.

 

Beer #13: Parallel 49 Mr. Needles 5% ABV
Rated: 6 out of 10

This beer is a fir pale ale. Unfortunately, the label is missing and there is not much information about it online. It does, however, taste similar to a couple of spruce tip beers that I have had before. It is certainly a christmas beer, as it tastes vaguely like you might expect eating a christmas tree to taste. It is sweeter than most beers, although the aftertaste is dominated by the fir. It’s an interesting beer, certainly worth trying once, but I’m not sure you would really want to drink it on a regular basis.

 

Beer #14: Red Racer Super Sonic IPA 6.5% ABV
Rated: 8 out of 10

This beer is a classic Pacific North West IPA. Like a bearded kangaroo, it’s both hoppy and hipster as all get out. It has a strong, classic hoppy aroma with nice floral undertones, and an upfront kick in the face of bitterness. The only real fault with this beer is that it doesn’t hold its head very well, but otherwise it is very well put together. Among a very wide variety of craft IPAs this one certainly sits towards the top.

 

Beer #15: Parallel 49 Ugly Sweater Milk Stout 5% ABV 30 IBU
Rated: 7 out of 10

This is an interesting beer. I think it would probably make a great stout without the lactose but, being a milk stout, it has had lactose added. Does the lactose improve or detract from the beer? I’m not sure. I think it helps with the nose and smooths the foretaste, but the lactose comes to dominate the aftertaste. If you are the type of person who thinks they don’t like stout, then this is probably one to try as the lactose adds a sweetness that cuts through the malty stoutness. Almost gave this one an 8, but ended up going with 7.

Beer #16: Red Racer IPA 6.5% ABV
Rated: 8 out of 10

This IPA is out there on the floral end of the IPA spectrum, it’s chock full of flowery hops.  One of the best things about this beer is that it pours with a great head and also does a great job of retaining it – which is a little unusual for a pacific north west craft beer.[1] This is also a very drinkable beer given it is 6.5% ABV, so you might to pace yourself a little. It’s not as sophisticated as the Super Sonic, but it is a nice bold floral IPA.

 

 

[1] One thing that really sucks about drinking beer in Vancouver is that the beer can’t hold a head and all pubs are table service. Which means that by the time the server picks your beer up from the bar and brings it to you, all you have is a headless alcoholic liquid. Every now and then you just want to get a nice old hit of foam in the ‘stache, but it’s not going to happen in Vancouver.

Advent Calendar of Beer: Another year, another beer. Plus classic hockey.

 

So, Kiri purchased me another advent calendar of beer this year. And I’ve decided I’ll do some more beer reviews. But this year I’ve going to mix it up with some classic hockey games that you might want to watch while drinking some good beers. I’m going to piggyback off the Pass It To Bulis blog, who are showcasing 20 of the best games throughout the month of December.

I’m going to link directly to the videos, rather than their posts, as I think they give away a bit much in their posts. Given that most of my blog audience (meagre as they are) will be Australians and Australians living in Canada, they may not know how the games finish, and I want to preserve the mystery. If you have always wanted to watch some hockey, these games are probably are a great place to start.

After the month is over I’ll compare my beer ratings with the ratings of last year’s beers

 

Beer #1: Parallel 49 Rock the Bells 7% ABV 12 IBU.
Rated: 4 out of 10

In the 90’s in Australia there was an iconic ad for Cranberry juice that ended with the line “Where’s the cranny, granny?” Well, I finally found the cranny in this sour cranberry ale. I think I also found the granny (or at least the grannies old bath water). This beer is very sour, has a nice amount of cranberry, but also has a slightly skunky aftertaste. Not a favorite.

Beer #2: Central City Red Racer India Session Ale 4% ABV 12 IBU.
Rated: 8 out of 10

I’m pretty sure I had this beer for the first time in last year’s beer calendar, and it has since become a semi-regular for me. It is a good IPA by any standards, and becomes very good when you consider that it is only 4% ABV. The flavour to alcohol content is quite possibly the best of any beer out there — a good beer to have a couple of while you watch some hockey.

 

Hockey Game #1: Vancouver Canucks vs. Calgary Flames April 10 2010.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNQYtEwAabY

This game is the Canucks final game of the 2009-10 regular season. They have already qualified for the playoffs, having guaranteed themselves top spot in their division. So why are we watching a dead rubber? Because of the Sedins and, specifically, Henrik Sedin[1]. Henrik Sedin enters this game 1 point behind Alex Ovechkin in the Art Ross Trophy race, which is awarded to the player who leads the NHL in points (goals + assists) . Alex Ovechkin is playing his last game the next day, so Henrik needs to put a few points on the board. Can Henrik build a big enough lead? You’ve gotta watch the game to find out!

[1] The Sedins are absolute freaks. They are identical twins, born in Sweden, who both play for the Canucks. Henrik wears number 33, and Daniel wears number 22. I don’t think I’ve ever seen two sportsmen, in any sport, who have better chemistry than these two. Their instincts are amazing, and it leads to some incredible no-look passing.

 

Beer #3: Parallel 49 Jerkface 9000 5% ABV 37 IBU.
Rated: 7 out of 10

This beer has an ugly label, a stupid name and…. a surprisingly not bad taste. Maybe it’s even good. The only clue on the label as to it’s character is the ugly character (he is one disturbing dude) and the tagline “North West Wheat”. I usually associate the pacific north west with bold, heavily hopped beers, while the modal wheat beer seems to be a poor imitation of Hoegaarden. So I wasn’t expecting much — surely those things can’t work together? But this does seem to work, somehow. I can’t quite put my finger on it — perhaps a hint of grapefruit that ties it all together? In any case, if you are like me and have seen this one in the bottle shop before, but never bought it, I say give it a try. You might just be surprised.

 

Beer #4: Central City “The Dominator” Brett Saison 6.5% ABV
Rated: 7 out of 10

I’m often a little sceptical of saisons. They are a fairly trendy beer right now, and that means that a lot places are trying them, and they are often hit and miss. This one counts as a hit. The saison nature of the beer is more apparent in the nose than the flavour, although it does also have that distinctive sourish saison aftertaste. But it is the foretaste where this beer stands out – a good solid whack of flavour that is almost like a lager with a hit of citrus.

 

Beer #5: Parallel 49 Salty Scott 7.5% ABV 17 IBU
Rated: 8 out of 10

The Salty Scott is a sea salted caramel scotch ale. Again, the first time I had this beer was last year’s calendar and it is now in my regular beer rotation. The saltiness is understated, but noticeable, and the caramel is smooth and not overwhelming. But the highlight of this beer is the nose – a nice smooth hit of caramel. A great beer to drink on a cold and rainy night, like tonight. Plus there is a Canucks game on CBC at 7pm!

 

Beer #6: Red Racer Northwest Pale Ale 5% ABV
Rated: 8 out of 10

I poured tonight’s beer into an old Chimay glass that I have, and that was a good choice. The wide glass really helped bring out the fruity aromas of this pale ale. This beer sits somewhere in between a more traditional pale ale and an IPA – it starts fruity, and finishes with a strong kick of hops. It is a good beer, but not the type of beer that you would want to drink a lot of – the sharp taste seems like it might get overwhelming after a couple.

 

Beer #7: Parallel 49 Filthy Dirty IPA 7% ABV 70 IBU
Rated: 7 out of 10

I’m a little torn about this beer; I can’t quite decide if I think it is a good beer or just an average IPA. Perhaps it can be both? In any case, this is not really your standard IPA, being heavier on the fruit and lighter on the bitter than most. Which is somewhat surprising given that it clocks in at 70 IBUs. It also holds head very well for a north american beer, which is a positive in my books. It’s certainly a decent beer, but there are at least a few other north west style IPAs that get the nod ahead of this one.

 

Beer #8: Central City “The Fabulator” Rauch Bock 6.5% ABV
Rated: 6 out of 10

Rauchbier is German for smoked beer, and a bock is a strong lager. Naturally, this beer is a smoked, higher alcohol lager. This is the second Rauchbier that I’ve had, and it is by far the best of the two. But I’m not a fan of the style. The smokey flavours completely overwhelm the nose of the beer. For this particular beer, the initial taste is of a smooth well-built lager, but the after taste is a bit smoke heavy for my tastes and leaves a bit of an unfinished feel to the beer.

The effect of taxes and information on the demand for smoking

Sir Richard Blundell, a very well renowned British economist (as you might guess from the Sir in front of his name), is visiting UBC this week. During his time here is giving a series of advanced lectures; today’s lecture was on the theory and applications of revealed preference theory. Here I am going to give an outline of one piece of his work that he discussed: a paper that looks at the changes in demand for cigarettes in Britain during the 1980s and 1990s. This paper is particularly important because it simultaneously advances economic theory and contributes to a very important policy debate. The paper in question is (somewhat blandly) called Prices versus Preference: Taste Change and Revealed Preferences, and is co-authored with Abi Adams, Martin Browning and Ian Crawford.

This post is reasonably technical, but should (I hope) be readable for most. If you manage to stick through the economics at the beginning then you will see some remarkable insights at the end regarding the effects of taxes and health information on the behaviour of smokers. To summarize, health information has very little effects on lower educated, heavy smokers but a much greater effect on higher educated, lighter smokers. However, increases in cigarette taxes do have an effect on lower educated, heavy smokers.  [Aside: what do you think the welfare implications of these results are?]

Continue reading

Identifying high-order rationality

Identifying high-order rationality is a forthcoming paper in Econometrica from my favourite behavioural game theorist, Terri Kneeland. For those of you who are not familiar with the inside baseball, Econometrica is one of the top two journals in economics and good economists can go their entire careers without publishing a paper in Econometrica. Getting your first paper published in Econometrica, as Kneeland has, is a pretty awesome achievement.

So what makes Kneeland’s paper so good? Well, it is a simple (yet novel) idea that was implemented in a very clean fashion.[1] Economic models of strategic interactions rely on the notion of rationality, where an agent is defined to be rational if they make optimal decisions given their available information.[3] This definition is actually rather weak and, as Kneeland demonstrates, most people satisfy rationality in simple environments. In some cases, however, economic models require a much stricter notion known as common knowledge of rationality. An agent is called first-order rational if they are rational. They are second-order rational if they are first-order rational and they believe that others are first-order rational. They are third-order rational if they are second-order rational and believe that others are also second-order rational. Common knowledge of rationality is the state where all agents are infinite-order rational.

The innovation in Kneeland’s paper is that she implemented a new experimental design that, with minimal assumptions, can identify a subject’s order of rationality. The process that Kneeland developed is as follows. Suppose that you are standing in a circle with a large number of other people. Everyone in the circle must choose a between A, B and C. You will receive an amount of money that depends on your choice and the choice of the person standing to your left. You are given a table outlining how much money you will receive in each situation. Consider the following table as an example. In this example, you will choose a row, the person to your left will choose a column, and you will receive the amount shown in the corresponding box. Which option would you choose?

A B C
A 12 16 14
B 8 12 10
C 6 10 8

You might have noticed that the option A will give you your best outcome, irrespective of what the person to your left chooses. An economist would call option A a dominant strategy. A first-order rational person will always choose their dominant strategy, if they have one.

 

Next, consider the following table. (Again, you choose a row, and the person to your left chooses a column).

 

A B C
A 20 14 8
B 16 2 18
C 0 16 16

In this case your choice is harder, because there are no dominant strategies for you. If you think that the person to your left will choose A then you should also choose A. But if you think the person to your left will choose C then you should choose B. How should you decide what to do?

In Kneeland’s experiment, you could also see the payoff tables for everyone else in the circle. So to decide what you should do, you should probably look at the payoff table for the person standing to your left. If they have a dominant strategy, then perhaps you think they will choose their dominant strategy and you may then respond accordingly. If you were to behave in this fashion then you would be displaying second-order rationality.

In other, more complicated, situations perhaps the person to your left doesn’t have a dominant strategy either but the person to their left does (that is, they person two spots to your left has a dominant strategy). Perhaps you think that the person to your left will notice that the person to their left has a dominant strategy, and that you could use this to predict the behaviour of the person directly to your left. Then, you can make your choice taking all of this information into account. If you do this then you are third-order rational.

This logical reasoning process can be traced back further to identify people of even higher orders of rationality[2]. This special circular structure (called a ring game) is exactly what Kneeland used to identify the order of rationality of her experimental subjects.

So what were the results? Kneeland finds that 93 of her subjects are first-order rational, 71 percent are second-order rational, 44 percent are third-order rational and only 22 percent are fourth-order rational. Kneeland is very cautious about over-interpreting her results, but in a blog post I need not be so careful. The results indicate, to me, that the standard assumption of rationality is not too far off being correct in simple environments.  However, the results also indicate that at most 22 percent of subjects could possibly satisfy the common knowledge of rationality assumption even in a relatively simple environment, indicating that common knowledge of rationality is not the most realistic of assumptions in many environments.

 

 


 

[1] Econometrica tends to publish two types of papers. The first is simple and clean papers that are good fun to read. The second is technically complicated, but brilliant, papers that can take days or weeks for experts to understand, and are pretty much incomprehensible to everyone else.

[2] An interesting question is to ask how you should reason when no one in the circle has a dominant strategy. The standard (but not entirely uncontroversial) recommendation would be that you should choose a Nash equilibrium strategy, named after John Nash who was played by Russel Crowe in the movie A Beautiful Mind.

[3] Note that this definition of rationality doesn’t mention anything about selfishness, nor make any assumptions about preferences, nor include any other of the crazy stuff that the anti-economics crowd seem to think economists mean by the word “rational”. At the most basic level you are rational if you make “good” decisions, given your information at the time of the decision, for whatever your personal evaluation of “good” is.

Papers with great names

Apologies for the lack of posting lately. I have a couple of papers that I am planning to cover here shortly, including one by my favourite up-and-coming behavioural theorist (I’m just waiting for the final version of that paper to be made publicly available).

But, for now, we have an entry into the “Best paper title of 2015” competition:

Are we all overconfident in the long run? Evidence from one million marathon participants.

There is just so much going on in there. From the obviously hilarious pun, to the less obvious reference to this classic paper, it’s all happening. Well done Prof. Krawczyk and Prof. Wilamowski.

Advent Calendar of beer part 3

Now, for the final 8 beers in the advent calendar of beers.

Beer #17: Parallel 49 Sahti Claws Finnish Sahti 7.7% ABV 35 IBU
Rated: 4 out of 10
I had never heard of  sahti before, so I looked it up on wikipedia. A sahti is made with juniper berries, and apparently often has a banana flavour that is caused by isopental acetate (which, if memory serves, is a favourite ester of high school science teachers as it smells strongly of bananas). I am not a fan of gin, so I was a little apprehensive of the juniper berries. This beer is certainly not for me. I did hunker down and finish it, and it had grown on me a little by the end but I would certainly not have another.

Beer #18: Red Racer Imperial IPA 9% ABV 90 IBU
Rated: 5 out of 10
I took yesterday off, so there’s two beers for tonight. This is a super strong, super bitter IPA. But it just seems a bit one dimensional. The flavours seem to meld into a single bittery taste, with a side of sweetness, and I can’t get the distinct fruity and bitter tastes that you would expect from a good IPA. On the plus side, it pours with a nice coppery colour.

Click through to see the rest of the beer reviews.

Continue reading

Advent calendar of beer part 2

To keep the posts from getting too long, I am going to split my reviews of the advent calendar of beer into 3 parts. Given that we are up to the 9th beer, it is time to start part 2.

Beer #9: Parallel 49 Hoparazzi Lager 6.0% ABV 43 IBU
Rated: 7 out of 10
This beer combines the hoppiness of a west coast IPA with a lager. One of the consequences of this is that the beer has a vaguely unpleasant nose. It has a nice rich golden colour, but doesn’t hold it’s head very well. The bitterness, although not slight at 43 IBUs, is not overpowering and you still get some nice floral tones and an underlying crispness. It’s a decent beer, but I’m jut not sure when I would drink it. If I want a hoppy beer, I would prefer to go the full hog and have an IPA (like beer #3, the Filthy Dirty IPA), and if I want a lager I would prefer something a bit crisper.

Beer #10: Red Race Extra Special Bitter 5.6% ABV
Rated: 7 out of 10
The initial indications on this beer were all positive. It has a nice nose, and pours with a nice head. On the other hand, the taste profile is somewhat lacking. It has the bitterness profile that you would expect from an English style bitter beer, but the finish feels like it is missing a tone or two. It’s not a bad attempt at an ESB, and the fact that it can pour a nice head is a refreshing change, but it’s not quite there either.

 

Continue reading

Advent Calendar of beer

If there is one thing I have learnt from PJ Healy, it is that a good experimental economist needs to take his or her beer drinking very seriously.

Kiri bought me a beer advent calendar for the celebratory season with 24 different beers, half from the Parallel 49 brewery and half from the Central City Brewers (who make the red racer beers). I figure this provides a good opportunity to follow PJ’s lead and start reviewing some beers. I’ll keep updating this post throughout the month as I enjoy the beers.

Beer #1: Parallel 49 Schwarzwald 9% ABV 22 IBU
Rated: 5 out of 10
This beer is an interesting one. It is flavoured with chocolate and cherries, in the style of black forest cake. I normally really, really dislike flavoured beers, but this one is almost passable. The flavouring is achieved using cacao nibs and sweet dark cherries. The colour is very dark, almost black with a hint of red, and there is almost no head. The alcohol content is probably a bit too high, as it seems to overpower some of the other flavours. The chocolate and cherry flavours are not too overpowering, but not really subtle either. Not bad for a flavoured beer, but not great for a beer.

Beer #2: Red Racer Pilsner 5% ABV
Rated: 7 out of 10
Like all Pilsners this beer is very inoffensive. It is crisp and clean like a Pilsner should be, but the finish is just a little bit on the creamy side compared to what I would expect from a great Pils. It is a very pale yellow, again with very little head (I think this will be trend throughout the entire case). A good beer, that you could just keep on drinking on a hot summer’s day. I almost gave this one an 8, but knocked an extra point for the non-PIlsnery aftertaste.

Click beneath the fold to read the rest of the beer reviews…

Continue reading