Next Workshop – Monday October 7th

Hello,

Our next EKM hands-on workshop will be on Monday 7th October 12:00-12:50 in room T206 of the School of Nursing where we will be looking at how to use the live synchronous classroom tools within UBC Connect (Blackboard Collaborate).

Bring a laptop if you wish to participate in the hands on exploration of these tools, or you are welcome to just follow along. Faculty, instructors and teaching assistants are welcome and no prior experience is required. If you have not already done so, please RSVP to Allana to confirm your attendance.

Also, if you have yet to RSVP for the Nursing Education Forum on October 16th please register here. Lunch will be provided at the newly renovated SAGE bistro!
See you there!

EKM Journal Club September 16, 2013: Cultural Competence and Safety Within Canadian Schools of Nursing

Thank you for making the first Journal Club of this academic year a great success with insightful discussion generated from a representation of not only faculty, but also both student cohorts! Interesting discussion was generated on the topic of Cultural Competence and Safety Within Canadian Schools of Nursing. The chose article for discussion was:

Rowan, M. S., Rukholm, E., Bourque-Bearskin, L., Baker, C., Voyageur, E., & Robitaille, A. (2013). Cultural competence and cultural safety in Canadian schools of nursing: a mixed methods study. International journal of nursing education scholarship, 10, 43.

It can be downloaded here within UBC or here using EXProxy outside the University. A copy of the PowerPoint slides can be downloaded here.

The discussion began with a quick Poll Everywhere survey revealing that 60% of participants weren’t really sure they understood the difference between cultural competence and cultural safety. The concept of cultural competence was discussed as a continuum of cultural sensitivity and competence in providing care that is focused on being respectful of the clients culture and providing care that meets their cultural needs. Cultural safety appears less well-defined and involves a specific postmodern theoretical framework that considers the client on terms of an (oppressed) minority whose cultural needs have not been met by the healthcare system. This involves the notion that members of minorities (particularly aboriginal peoples) may feel threatened or “unsafe” within the dominant cultural healthcare system. See the attached handout of slides from the session for more details of both).

Cultural Competence (CC)

It was agreed in the group that cultural competence was more universally accepted and defined, and for educators much easier to incorporate into curriculum than cultural safety. Although the group felt cultural competence was a universal concept, several cases were brought to light that showed there were still issues with the cultural competence of nurses in Canada. A couple of cases of culturally inappropriate care with Sikh patients were discussed. Unfortunately, populations of Aboriginal and Muslim descent appear to bare the brunt of discrimination and biases with the Canadian health care system.

Cultural Safety (CS)

It was suggested that on a macro scale the principles of cultural safety can be used as an explanatory framework quite well, and represent an ideal to strive for in nursing care. However, the complexities of applying the principles on the day-to-day nursing care level in a public healthcare system were seen as more difficult. The following issues with the conceptual framework and practical complexities were further discussed:

  • Does CS apply to all cultural groups, or just those minorities whose needs have been marginalized in some way?
  • How does one cater to every minority group’s health care demands in a public funded multicultural system, and what determines which demands are met and which not, as the service cannot meet every cultural demand (e.g. a request for FGM)?
  • As nurses we should always respect the personal and cultural choices and needs of individuals, but how do we provide a culturally safe environment when the cultural norms are not evidence-based practices available in the system?
  • Is it really possible to make everyone feel culturally “safe” in a national multicultural health care system that is in itself a sub-culture?
  • Does the current concept of cultural safety promote a divisive (oppressed/oppressor) view of people, and promote “victimary thinking?”
  • How does the theory of culturally safety incorporate the dynamic nature of cultures?

Discussion of the Paper

Many felt that the article (or underlying theory of CS as it currently stands) did not adequately address some of these more challenging issues. The paper appeared to simply conflate theories of CC and CS without question, and failed to explore the subtle differences in any depth. Nevertheless, some members of the group also felt that CS could be practically applied in public health care to make all clients feel culturally safe, so there were different views within the group. The authors seemed to make an assumption that CS was universally well defined, understood and accepted in Canada, when this does not appear to be the case; as was evident even within our small discussion group.

It was suggested that the paper provided for a very general oversight, of the issues and was limited since it only sampled Anglophone populations in Canada. Although there were interesting findings, and many good points made about the need for CC training in the undergraduate curriculum, the paper did not really foster discussion on how to address the practical issues of providing CS care in practice, or provide any insight into the complexities that were brought up for reflection during our discussion.

It was suggested that these complex multi-factoral issues cannot be solved with simple fixes and changes in curricula that just expect change to happen in practice. The practice of CC should not just be limited to the healthcare workplace but also must take place in the whole community.

Reframing our thinking – a discussion arose that shifting focus from thinking that we ought to be doing something more in the nursing curriculum to promote CS, to actively thinking about how we can attend to achieving a more tolerant and less divisive society as a whole would be a good way forward. This was suggested as a more practical approach.

The need to make CC a normative in nursing practice was agreed by the whole group and it was felt this would ultimately lead to evolving conversations that can then focus on patient outcomes, that will shape policy, competencies, and standards of practice.

The following article was recommended by a member of faculty to those looking for more about cultural competence:

The unbearable whiteness of being (in nursing)

We hope to see you all in November for cookies and another great discussion! Check back here for the next article.

Powerpoint Presentation from the Journal Club: EKM Journal Club 5 Slides

How-to: Turning Teaching into Scholarship and Preparing SoTL Articles for Publication

Two interesting articles have recently been published on Faculty Focus: Six Steps for Turning Your Teaching into Scholarship and How Do I Prepare a SoTL Article for Publication. More articles similar to these and others focusing on effective teaching strategies for higher learning classrooms, both face-to-face and online can be found on Faculty Focus. Please also see our Resources page for more links to articles and tools useful to nursing educators.

EKM Journal Club – Monday September 16th: Cultural Competence in Nursing Education

Hello all,

After a well deserved summer break, the Journal Club is back into full swing! This month’s discussion will take place on Monday, September 16th from 12:00pm-12:50pm in T206.

September’s topic focuses on cultural competence and safety within Canadian schools of nursing. Our chosen article for discussion will be:

Rowan, M. S., Rukholm, E., Bourque-Bearskin, L., Baker, C., Voyageur, E., & Robitaille, A. (2013). Cultural competence and cultural safety in Canadian schools of nursing: a mixed methods study. International journal of nursing education scholarship, 10, 43.

It can be downloaded here within UBC or here using EXProxy outside the University.

As usual, please bring your own lunch and coffee and we will provide a delicious treat. Please RSVP to Allana to confirm your attendance.

We look forward to seeing you for a great discussion!

2013 Nursing Education Forum

This year’s annual Nursing Education Forum will take place on Wednesday October 16th from 12:00pm-4:30pm at UBC’s Sage Bistro. Showcased in this interactive forum are innovative pedagogies and pedagogic research, including the latest developments from CTLT and CHES, and practical workshops.

All School of Nursing faculty, instructors, and graduate students with an interest in nursing education are invited to attend this forum. Register by September 20th, as seats are limited and will be allotted on a first come-first served basis. A buffet lunch will be provided.

Registration requires creating a quick CTLT events account, if you don’t already have one. If you have any problems registering simply send a request for registration to Allana.

EKM Journal Club, July 15th – Gender and Sexual Minority Groups in Nursing Education

In our Journal Club this month we discussed education about Gender and Sexual Minority (GSM) groups in the UBC nursing curriculum. After consulting with a person who identifies with the GSM community, we decided to use the term GSM for simplicity instead of LGBTI as used in the article. The paper considered was:

Brennan, A. M. W., Barnsteiner, J., Siantz, M. L. D. L., Cotter, V. T., & Everett, J. (2012). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, or intersexed content for nursing curricula. Journal of Professional Nursing 28(2), 96–104. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.004

The full-text article is available here or here:

The article is a literature review of healthcare journals exploring the attitudes, knowledge and skills needed by nursing students to build a successful and inclusive nursing practice. The article also provides GSM curriculum content suggestions.

It was noted that in 2002 the UBC School of Nursing created a committee to discuss how to best integrate GSM material into the curriculum. At that time it was felt that there was a lack of journal articles exploring GSM patients’ experience and even less about GSM in nursing education. In particular there was very little material on youth and older adults. It was suggested that the curriculum now addresses these matters in a number of ways, but perhaps the UPPC should revisit the literature review to see how our curriculum can be updated and improved.

Faculty identified that currently GSM content is placed primarily in the introductory Relational Practice course (N304). Numerous professors weave GSM health into their particular area of focus but the foundational knowledge is covered in N304.

The paper points to several effective teaching strategies, of which many are employed in the N304 class.

Language and Terminology

The N304 class provides students with common language and key definitions (gender, sexual orientation, transgender, etc) which acts as a foundation for deeper discussions. Students identified this as being key to their comfort in sharing thoughts and feelings with each other.

Common language and definitions was seen as key to learning. The article discussed the effectiveness of panels in nursing education. Students can hear a variety of first-hand experiences within the healthcare system.

A common topic when discussing GSM teaching is the use of pronouns. At least one faculty member has changed all pronouns in exams from ‘he’ and ‘she’ to ‘they’ to reflect a more inclusive approach. In Sweden, the gender pronoun ‘hen’ has been employed instead of him or her, although it was not considered a practical solution to the pronoun issue in higher educations here. Some faculty members brought up that using ‘they’ is not grammatically correct and can be confusing. The rebuttal to this is that when we have a conflict between grammar and inclusivity, inclusivity should trump.

Guest Speakers & Reflective Exercises

In the 304 guest lecturers were seen as among the most fascinating and thought-provoking classes. Faculty members in the journal club acknowledged the need for small group discussions and reflective exercises on this material in the curriculum;  exposition alone being insufficient. It was argued that to become aware of our own positions we must be presented with information and also have a chance to think and write about what it means to us.  As the authors identified “awareness is an essential first step in developing sensitivity and understanding” (97).

Key Issues

The paper also  brings to light some clear example of health issues that nurses should be cognizant of when working with all patients that specifically affect members of the GSM community (for a full discussion of these issues please see the paper).

Role Modelling

The faculty realized that in order for students to develop an inclusive practice they themselves need to be role models of reflection and awareness. As the article explains “the ability to create this environment for learning and exploration is predicated on faculty themselves being open and willing to explore their own values and beliefs.”Journal clubs were seen as a strong place to start.

We encourage continuation of this dialogue and it was recommended that all nurse educators teaching in the undergraduate program should read this paper, as it has many excellent examples.

Students and faculty in the journal club realize that our curriculum doe not have the space to include an in-depth consideration of GSM related issues. However, consideration of the GSM patient’s experiences and GSM nursing education is essential. It was agreed that in this generalist degree students need to be prepared to work with people from all backgrounds and students need a broad base of experiences.

A PDF of the slides and questions used during this Journal Club is available here.

Dates for your Diaries!

Please note that the journal clubs and workshops will be hold for August due to vacations. Our next Journal Club meeting will be September 17 at 12 noon. We will distribute the article for this meeting earlier in September.

Also, please remember that on October 16th from 1200 to 1600 we will be hosting our first annual SoN EKM Nursing Education Forum. We will be sending out more details about this event in the near future, but it will include lunch and afternoon presentations and workshops. We are currently canvasing students for the things they would most like faculty to explore at the forum. In the meantime put the date in your schedule.

 

EKM Journal Club Monday July 15th – LGBTI Issues in Nursing Education

Hello all,

For our next EKM Educational Scholarship Journal Club on Monday July 15th in room T206, we will be looking at the following paper.  All faculty and students are welcome. Please RSVP to allana.hearn@alumni.ubc.ca if you plan to attend so we can arrange cookies!

This month the paper under discussion concerns LGBTI issues in nursing education:

Brennan, A. M. W., Barnsteiner, J., Siantz, M. L. D. L., Cotter, V. T., & Everett, J. (2012). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, or intersexed content for nursing curricula. Journal of professional nursing 28(2), 96–104. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.004

The full-text article is available here or here:

We look forward to seeing you there!

Please note that there will not be a workshop on Monday July due to the holidays.

EKM Journal Club, May 21st – Multiple Mini Interviews

This month our Journal Club group met to discuss Multiple Mini Interviews as the final stage of application assessment into the Bachelor of Science in Nursing program. Due to popular demand and a high number of faculty members who were unable to attend this session, we will be repeating this Journal Club topic at our next meeting on MONDAY June 17th at 12:00. If you would like to attend this meeting, please RSVP to Allana.hearn@alumni.ubc.ca.

The paper under discussion was:

Perkins, A., Burton, L., Dray, B., & Elcock, K. (2013). Evaluation of a multiple-mini-interview protocol used as a selection tool for entry to an undergraduate nursing programme. Nurse Education Today, 33(5), 465–9.

This article is available here.

MMIs at the UBC School of Nursing

In Spring 2008, the UBC School of Nursing replaced traditional panel-style interviews for Mini Multiple Interviews. The UBC School of Nursing application process is extensive and thorough. The first stage includes an official transcript and a supplemental application. Once an applicant’s transcript and supplemental application are assessed, they may be invited for an in-person MMI interview, and final selection is made on the basis of interview performance. Each year the school receives between 400 and 500 applications, interviews 190-200 applicants and admits 120.

In 2009, the School streamlined the MMI process down from ten in 2008 to six interview stations  for practical reasons. Faculty members and other stakeholders such as former patients and patient advocates form the members who conduct the interviews. Since 2009 the process has remained more or less the same with annual amendments to the questions. These questions use scenarios that relate to knowledge of the healthcare system, ethical decision making, critical thinking, evidence-based practice and shared decision makin, effective communication, and empathy and compassion.

Discussion: MMIs – A Worthy Assessment Tool?

A benefit of MMIs is that the candidate is exposed to a variety of interviewers improving validity of assessment. There are six interviewers (instead of just two or three as the UBC School of Nursing used previously). Interviewers independently rank applicants and their scores are tallied at the end of the day. If there is a personality clash between interviewer and interviewee or if an applicant responds to a particular MMI scenario in a way badly, the ranking that results would only count for 1/6 of the applicant’s total ranking. The resulting reduction in bias is of benefit to both the applicants and the School of Nursing. Although MMIs cannot screen all potential red flags, perhaps they are able to do so better than other assessment techniques.

We discussed whether or not the MMI method is able to assess an applicant’s ethical judgement, communication skills and integrity more than other traditional interviews. In the past, the UBC School of Nursing conducted panel interviews asking applicants to describe situations where they used skills such as conflict resolution or leadership skills. Each interview was about 30 minutes and was conducted with two interviewers.

In MMIs we are asking applicants to explain what they would do in these situations, rather than how they have dealt with similar situations. Perhaps these MMIs allow applicants to tell how they would like to react, rather than how they have reacted in the past and therefore likely would react in the future. Nevertheless, some human resource and selection theories suggest that applicants will provide a more authentic answer if you ask them to provide  examples from their own life and experiences (rather than conjecture their own actions in a “what-if” scenario. The former traditional style of interviews may have the benefiit of eliciting these types of answer

The UBC School of Medicine uses ten interviewers. Six interviewer stations are used in the School of Nursing as the interview process can be completed within an hour and it uses 40% fewer resources. It was suggested that perhaps we could keep the number of stations at six, but use the extra time that 4 more stations would have required to assess the applicants in another manner. In the past, an English test was conducted and a math test has also been suggested.However, exploring those options, or adding another form of personality testing would increase the resources required significantly.

In terms of outcomes at the UBC School of Nursing our outcomes are excellent. We have very low attrition rates and very high completion and CRNBC exam pass rates. However, it is hard to say how much of this is due to the MMI process but it seems that in general applicant assessment seems effective in helping us select bright and dedicated student nurses. However, many School’s in Canada do not intrerview at all, and the process is very resource intensive.

Appraisal of the Paper

Perkins et al. evaluated the MMI applicant interviewing process introduced at Kingston University School of Nursing. They administered a basic 3-point questionnaire to both interviewees and interviewers about their perceptions of the MMI experience. We questioned the quality of the research due to this perhaps over simplistic questionnaire. A 3-point attitude continuum is a bit basic. Furthermore, it was unclear how the unsolicited comments were obtained.

In the article the author describes MMIs as being an efficient way to assess applicants on non-cognitive skills like integrity, ethical judgement and empathy. Although we all agreed that MMIs are an efficient way to assess these skills, we found it hard to categorize them as non-cognitive. Yes, they are non-technical nursing skills, but these soft skills often require a high level cognitive processing.

Additional Resources

To access the Powerpoints for this workshop click on the folloeing link: EKM Journal Club 3

 

 

 

 

EKM Education Workshop #2: Interactive Classroom Technologies

On Tuesday May 7th, the second EKM Education Workshop was held focusing on the emerging trend of Interactive Classroom Technologies, in particular we explored Polling Systems.

Nursing students in the current cohort have ranked polling as their top preference in interactive classroom technologies, and a demonstration explored the user-friendliness and capabilities of Polleverywhere and Micropoll.

The use of technology in teaching is being embedded early, with many primary and secondary schools now incorporating interactive technologies such as classroom polling and  whiteboard technology into their lessons.  Students can actually go up and touch the interactive board during their lessons, adding another dimension to their learning.

Poll Everywhere

Currently the SoN uses a stand-alone system called turning point.  Many faculty find this difficult to use and the glitches detracting from their lectures.  Polleverywhere provides a useful free alternative, but has a limitation on class size in the free version. This cell phone or web based system allows the user to set up polls for free providing that no more than 40 people are being surveyed. Although many classes are typically much larger than this, students can work in groups to come up with their best answer and avoid this limitation. For those that are unable to text without an SMS cost, the polls can also be accessed from any web browser, or from Twitter accounts.

Polleverywhere allows for flexibility when asking questions allowing the user to set up multiple choice and open-ended questions. The anonymity provided by real time online polling allows instructors to tackle sensitive or challenging subjects and gear conversations towards students’ viewpoints that may not be voiced under other circumstances. The polls can be readily downloaded as PowerPoint slides, and even come with instruction slides that can be incorporated into lectures. The polls can also be opened in a web browser to avoid any delay that may result from cellphone networks.

In order for Polleverywhere to accommodate the 120 students in a class, a membership must be purchased. Unfortunately the yearly subscription is pricey, although the cost of batteries that must be purchased for the Turning Point clicker system also makes our current system a costly option. Depending on the popularity among faculty and students, the cost could be passed onto students as a lab/course fee of $3.50 per student. This would require using the technology enough that students feel like they got their money worth.

MicroPoll

Micropoll allows users to create web polls fairly effortlessly and for free and then embed them in a web page in Blackboard Connect or post a link to the poll at MicroPoll. A webpolling system may be useful for testing understanding of pre-readings prior to a lecture, or exploring attitudes.. Once the poll is created, a URL is provided that can be pasted as a link on Blackboard Connect. This is also a great way to augment a lecture and generate interactivity with pre or post lecture polling and engage students. An example is given below.

These advances in technology provide for new ways of student engagement during lectures, and polls will be circulated to determine faculty interest. If you were unable to attend this workshop and would be interesting in attending a workshop on this topic please email Allana.

Slides form The session can be downloaded here: EKM Workshop 2 Slides

EKM Journal Club: May 21 Multiple Mini Interviews

Hello all!

Having recently completed the 2013-2015 undergraduate interviews, this month in the EKM Journal Club we will discuss multiple mini interviews (MMIs). This year was the School of Nursing’s sixth year using the MMI system. The school updated the admission process in 2008 from traditional-style interviews to MMIs following a literature review and examination of McMaster University’s trailblazing implementation of MMIs.

This month’s article is:

Perkins, A., Burton, L., Dray, B., & Elcock, K. (2013). Evaluation of a multiple-mini-interview protocol used as a selection tool for entry to an undergraduate nursing programme. Nurse education today, 33(5), 465–9.

This article is available here.

The Journal Club meeting will take place on May 21st at 12:00pm in room T182. As usual, please bring your own lunch and coffee. We will provide a sweet treat. Please RSVP to confirm your attendance.

Thank you to the small group who were able to make it to yesterday’s workshop on interactive technology in the classroom and polleverywhere. We realize that many people who would have liked to participate in this workshop but were unable to attend. We hope to schedule another workshop on this topic if there is sufficient interest. Please let me know if you would be interested in attending. The material will mirror that presented yesterday.

We look forward to seeing you at the May Journal Club.

Best,

Allana

Forthcoming Educational Scholarship Events

Here are a couple of Educational Scholarship Events that you may be interested in attending:

What Does Flexible Learning Look Like? – Wednesday May 8th 10:30am-12:30pm Earth Science Building 1012
Register here:

UBC embarks on the Flexible Learning Initiative from a position of considerable existing strength: a diverse range of strategies to enhance student learning enabled by technology are already in evidence throughout Faculties across the campus.

This session will present perspectives on what Flexible Learning looks like, from UBC’s President, Professor Stephen Toope, students and faculty from a variety of disciplinary contexts across campus.

List of Speakers:

  • Professor Stephen Toope, President
  • Fred Cutler, Associate Professor and Director Undergraduate Program, Political Science
  • Mark Edwards, Assistant Dean, Professional Development and Community Engagement, Faculty of Education
  • Paul Carter, Senior Instructor, Computer Science
  • Paul Cubbon, Lecturer, Marketing, Sauder School of Business
  • Peter Loewen, Assistant Professor and Director, Doctor of Pharmacy Programs, Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Simon Bates, Senior Advisor, Teaching and Learning and Academic Director CTLT

Talk by Dr Eric Mazur: The Tyranny of the Lecture – June 7th 2:00-4:00pm
Victoria Learning Centre, IKBLC
Register here

Most — if not all — of the important skills in our life are acquired outside the traditional classroom setting. Yet we continue to teach using lectures where students passively take down information. Instead, we should really focus on the assimilation of that information and shift the focus from teaching to helping students learn.

Over the past 20 years, instructors world-wide have begun to adopt Peer Instruction to get students to think in class. With the advent of new technology the process can be significantly improved. A new data-analytics driven audience response system does away with multiple choice questions and helps instructors design better questions, manage time and process flow, and optimize the discussions in the classroom.

Presentation by: Dr. Eric Mazur

Eric Mazur is the Balkanski Professor of Physics and Applied Physics at Harvard University and Area Dean of Applied Physics. An internationally recognized scientist and researcher, he leads a vigorous research program in optical physics and physics education. The realization in the early 1990’s that despite, his careful and excellent lectures, his students were actually learning only a small fraction of what he was trying to teach them, led him to develop the instructional methodology known as Peer Instruction. Now widely adopted and utilized across many countries, institutions and disciplines, Peer Instruction is a key technique to enhance student engagement and learning in large classes.

2013 CHES Forthcoming Activities

Here are some forthcoming CHES activities you might be interested in:

CHES Presentation

Dr. Darrell Kirch, President of the AAMC, will give a presentation, titled “The Leadership Imperative for a Healthier Globe”, on June 6, 2013 during his highly-anticipated visit to Vancouver. View the invitation here.

 CHES RESEARCH ROUNDS

CHES hosts a monthly session Research Round on the third Wednesday of each month, from 12:00-1:30 pm, with videoconference access to all distributed sites. Forthcoming sessions include:

May 15, 2013

Dr. Tina Martimianakis

Collaboration, team learning and identity politics

June 19, 2013

Dr. Claudia Ruitenberg

A philosopher walks into a Centre for Health Education Scholarship

For more details vist the CHES site to register: http://ches.med.ubc.ca

Regards

Bernie