Upcoming Connect-Related Events

Hello all,

The Center for Teaching, Learning, and Technology invites you to join in on two great connect-related events happening this Fall.

On September 9th, a day long drop-in will be held for Connect, Copyright, Course Reserves and Camtasia from 9:00am – 4:00pm in Rm 2.22A of the Irving K. Barber Learning Centre. Get one-on-one assistance from specialists in the area of your choice! Click here for more event details.

As well, the next Teaching in a Blended Learning Environment (T-BLE) session will take place on September 24th. The course offers a feel for navigating the blended learning environment and is designed to help instructors who are considering making the shift to this style of teaching. Click here for more information on how you can participate in upcoming courses.

Don’t miss out on these fantastic opportunities, we hope to see you there!

 

First EKM SoTL Journal Club of the term: Monday, September 15th

PLEASE NOTE – THIS EVENT IS NOW RESCHEDULED TO OCTOBER 6th 12:00-13:00

Hello everyone,

Welcome back! We are kicking off another round of Elizabeth Kenny McCann (EKM) Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Journal Clubs this term with the first one to be held on Monday,  September 15th from 12:00-12:50 in room T220. The paper we will discuss has been described as a “Landmark study” by the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning:

Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). , The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A Longitudinal, Randomized, Controlled  Study Replacing Clinical Hours with Simulation in Prelicensure Nursing Education.

Click here to download a pdf of the paper.

Bring your lunch and join the discussion, free cookies will be available as usual. Please RSVP to Erendira if you plan to attend so we can get a sense of numbers.

EKM SoTL Journal Clubs will be held once a month throughout the term. See below for future Journal Club dates:

Monday, September 15th, 12:00-1:00 in room T220
Monday, October 6th, 2014 12:00-1:00 in room T220
Monday, November 3rd, 2014 12:00-1:00 in room T220
Monday, December 1st, 2014 12:00-1:00 in room T220

 

 

 

The Centre for Teaching, Learning, and Technology Summer Institute Aug 25-28

Hello all,

The Centre for Teaching, Learning, and Technology Summer Institute will be held from August 25th to 28th at various locations throughout campus. The Institute provides professional development activities for faculty, staff, and students at UBC such as course design, connect and wordpress training as well as participatory learning techniques and many more. All events are free for the UBC Community and members of the School of Nursing are invited to attend.

Click here to view the schedule and registration details.

See you there!

Teaching Tools Demonstration: Poll Everywhere and Snagit

There will be a short interactive demonstration on how to use the Polleverywhere and Snagit tools facilitated by Lucas Wright from The UBC Centre for Teaching and Learning Technology on Wednesday July 30th from 11-11:30 in Room T 182 at the UBC School of Nursing. These tools are both freely available to teachers at the School of Nursing.

All welcome!

To access Snagit (and Camtasia) go to the “Resources” tab once logged into Connect. You will be provided a link to download the product(s), as well as a license key. If the software is upgraded, the new license key will be available in the same location.

For PollEverywhere all faculty and instructors were sent an invite to use the School account last year. Accepting the invitation gives you the login details. If you would like to use and don’t have access to that email please do send me an email to get a fresh invitation sent.

Regards

Bernie

EKM Journal Club Summary: The enduring appeal of learning styles

Thank you to everyone who joined our discussion on Monday, June 2nd, as we explored the topic of learning styles in contemporary education. The following paper was reviewed:

Scott, C. (2010) The Enduring Appeal of ‘Learning Styles’ Australian Journal of Education 2010 54: 5 DOI: 10.1177/000494411005400102

Catherine Scott critically examined the popular theory of ‘learning styles,’ which until now remains entrenched in a wide variety of institutions, such as schools, government departments, businesses and even churches. While many educators continually strive to tailor their teaching strategies to match the individual attributes of their learners and accommodate ‘learning styles’ in which they acquire information best, the literature actually deems this a counterproductive approach.

Scott identified a wide array of evidence that disproves the theory of learning styles and shows its utility in teaching and learning to be negligible. According to the literature, adapting teaching methods to compliment learning styles rarely translates into improved educational outcomes, and can even be harmful to the learning process. Despite this knowledge, a multitude of different learning style (and teaching style) theories and models exist and continue to receive encouragement in contemporary education.

The group discussed the multitude of learning style theories that exist and the difficulties associated with choosing an appropriate one to address. Scott mentions that at least 71 different styles of learning are currently circulating. The group unanimously agreed that this number was astounding, and that many of them also serve as commercial products. Scott goes on to address the commercial concerns associated with learning styles and their economical worth later on in the paper, calling into question whether or not the concept serves as evidenced theory or a fad.

Several of the instructors present admitted to using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (LSI) to measure learning styles in the past. While no one was currently using them, the impact of learning style theories in nursing education was nonetheless illustrated here.

Scott identified several studies that deem this approach, along with others, ineffective in diagnosing learning styles accurately and consistently. Researchers also found that even within one model, the learning styles identified often depended on the instrumentation used, and thus served as an unreliable basis for planning teaching strategies.

Scott also argued that time spent attempting to apply the theory in classrooms and administering unreliable tests to guide instruction was a waste of valuable teaching and learning time. After emphasizing the abundant use of learning style strategies worldwide, she compared the evidence for efficacy to several studies that support use of ‘effective feedback,’ suggesting that “universities are expending disproportionate amounts of time and effort on a worthless strategy to the comparative neglect of arguably a highly effective component of teaching: feedback.”

One problem identified within the concept of learning styles was its conflation with other theories, such as personality types and cognitive theories, which often collide to hinder the predictive validity of learning styles. As well, many group members agreed that the learning styles theory heavily reflected a westernized culture, which assumes that students fall into a fixed range of ability with no room for change or growth with respect to learning and diversification. In the paper, this was referred to as the “entity model of ability,” which is resistant to environmental influences.

Scott suggested that such a model is harmful to students as it predisposes teachers to formulate rigid opinions regarding the student which are out of context and based on snap judgments. This type of thinking is thought to lead to stereotyping and ultimately the manifestation of harmful effects on students. One attendee agreed and added that self-labelling also becomes an issue. She explained that a student may label themselves as a ‘visual learner’ and begin to believe that other areas of learning aren’t achievable. When faced with something like hands-on work, the student may have a predisposed idea that are incompetent in this respect and therefore limit their ability to diversify their learning.

Another member of the group commented that regardless of learning styles, motivation overrides learning styles, and stated that “when you have a particular interest in something, you’re more focused on learning it.” Everyone agreed with this statement, and concluded that the most effective teaching methods incorporate a wide array of elements that change every fifteen minutes or so to keep the class engaged and optimize learning.

After a thorough discussion and analysis of learning style theories, we concluded that a focus on more effective, evidence-based teaching strategies was most likely a better use of the educator’s time and would likely result in better learning outcomes for students.

Below are the presentation slides used throughout the discussion:

EKM JC Slides: Learning Styles

Thank you to all who attended the journal club. The next Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning journal club will be held on Tuesday, June 17th at 12pm in room T182. Cookies will be provided. Please RSVP to Erendira if you plan to attend.

In a related blogpost Bernie discusses learning styles and the persistence of educational neuro-myths here: https://blogs.ubc.ca/realscience/2014/06/07/neuromyths-in-education-why-do-they-persist/

 

Next EKM Journal Club: Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work, June 17th

Greetings,

The EKM Scholarship of Teaching and Learning invites you to join us for our next Journal Club, which will be held on Tuesday June 17th in Room T182. We will be discussing the debate between direct instructional guidance during teaching vs. a minimally guided approach. Which has the largest impact on learning?

The following paper will be explored:

Kirshner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, exponential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

You can find a PDF version here.

All faculty, clinical instructors and students are invited to attend. Please bring your lunch and a beverage, cookies will be provided.

Please RSVP to Erendira Silva if you plan to attend. See you there!

Next EKM Journal Club Monday June 2: The Enduring Appeal of Learning Styles

Hello all,

The next EKM Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Journal Club on will be on Monday 2nd June in Room T182. We will be examining the value of learning styles in contemporary education. Following recent discussions it is clear that learning styles (and teaching) are still a popular topic amongst educators, but what is their real value in modern nursing education? We will be exploring the following paper, which takes a counter perspective:

Scott, C. (2010) The Enduring Appeal of ‘Learning Styles’ Australian Journal of Education 2010 54: 5 DOI: 10.1177/000494411005400102

You can find the online version here:

http://aed.sagepub.com/content/54/1/5.full.pdf+html

Please bring your lunch and join us for some lively discussion, cookies will be provided.

Please RSVP to Erendira Silva. Hope to see you there!

 

EKM Workshop Materials for Monday May 26

Hi everyone.

The following are some supplemental materials for next week’s Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning workshop on Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories:

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Smith, M. K., Jones, F. H. M., Gilbert, S. L., & Wieman, C. E. (2013). The classroom observation protocol for undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618-627.

Wragg, E. C. (2012). An introduction to classroom observation. New York: Routledge.

We hope to see you there on Monday May 26th at noon in room T206.

Next EKM Workshop: Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories

The next event for the Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is a workshop that will explore Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories.

Would you like to know more about how to use teaching observation and inventories to evaluate teaching and how to use these tools in educational research activities? Join us for an informative session on Monday May 26th at noon in room T206. Bring your lunch and cookies will be provided!

Be sure to RSVP Erendira if you plan to attend.

Journal Club: Absence Monitoring to Reduce Nursing Student Attrition

This week’s EKM Journal Club explored the following paper:

Developing a national computerised absence monitoring and management system to reduce nursing student attrition: Evaluation of staff and student perspectives Currie K., McCallum J., Murray J., Scott J., Strachan E., Yates L., Wright M. (2014)  Nurse Education Today,  34  (5) , pp. 738-743. 

The study by Currie et al. surveyed large nursing cohorts in Scotland and described their work examining students and faculty perspectives on recording attendance. The study looked at a computerized system to monitor attendance. It is a mandatory requirement for hours to be recorded in the UK. Before indulging into the details of the study, those present at the journal club were asked about their thoughts regarding mandatory attendance and their experience within their own schooling. One member with experience in Nova Scotia mentioned that she had the same requirement of mandatory class hours and her attendance was recorded along with clinical hours. Others had mandatory clinical hours they had to accumulate, but did not remember a requirement to be in class at all times.

The paper explored that non-attendance is linked to attrition. Attrition rates were reported at generally around 20 – 25% in bachalaureatte nursing programs. Within the journal club, similar attrition rates across Canada were discussed for a four year degree programs, although advanced standing programs (such as our own) often have far lower rates of attrition. As a result, the authors wanted to identify students that were more likely to drop out and the researchers suggested that monitoring attendance could help identify those students earlier. The study also aimed to see if the intervention of monitoring attendance would help decrease attrition rates.

Many within the group questioned why students were not attending class and were more concerned about the reasons behind the absence rather than monitoring the absence itself. Some issues for non-attendance brought forward were health including self-care, family and the reality that school does not meet students’ expectations or needs. If we are trying to prevent attrition, it might be more beneficial to assess the reason for attrition rather than monitoring absence.

Those present also discussed the topic of support for students in areas other than academic excellence such as financial support, family support and counselling. It was mentioned that the pastoral support available where the study took place may be different from support commonly available here. In the study, one advisor was allocated to a small group of 10-15 students, rather than one advisor for every 120 students as it is the case in the UBC BSN program, and with many other programs in Canada.

Students’ attendance in the study was tracked and logged within a system that would send colour coded email messages to students at the end of each week. Green indicated good attendance with no issues, orange meant caution and that attendance was not perfect, while pink indicated poor attendance and the student was asked to contact a tutor. The system was not perfect and occasionally had glitches giving wrong colour coded messages to students.

Members of the journal club brought forward the issue that there was no gaurantee that students would not register attendance for peers that did not actually attend class (either by use of magnetic swipe card or signing in). Another attendee would like to explore further the correlation between attendance and academic performance; just because a student is sitting in class, does not necessarily mean that he or she is paying attention.

A poll was taken to determine what level of mandatory attendance should be implemented? Majority of the group said 80 – 90% with some grace towards illness. Many people within the group agreed that the paper did not have a productive approach in terms of attrition rates. The paper was quite simplistic in its approach when the issue is more complex.

Someone mentioned changing the word “mandatory” to “expectations” and providing students with a clear outline of appropriate guidelines. Another participant discussed the need to look at patterns of absences, as freqquent absnces on certain weekdays might indicate a pattern. For example, looking at the thread courses involved in the UBC SoN program and the difference in attendance rates at different times of the year, such as just before an exam or paper is due, or when there is an expected guest. If faculty can figure out why certain patterns occur, it can influence actions towards solving the problem and working with students in the process.

Other discussions threaded throughout the session included the question of professionalism in attending class as with being present for clinical work; is it really any different? Professional programs expect a certain level of commitment and attendance is more crucial than any other general undergraduate degree. Many thought that this should not be regarded in the same way as other adult education programs, where attendance requirments are more flexible.

It was noted there could be many valid reasons why someone would not attend class. What if someone is already well versed in a particular area, is it necessary for students to attend class when they already know the material? Do they have a right to skip the class or should they have an obligation to their peers in contributing their expertise and helping those with questions who are having trouble with the subject matter?

Another journal club member brought up the issue of students with consistently poor attendance and relying on other students for notes and information on what they missed. Is this fair to the students that make the effort to be present for class?

Lastly, within several nursing programs especially the UBC SoN program, students are mature adults. Some attendees believed it would be a waste of time to be tracking attendance since students are capable of making their own decisions and ultimately will do what they believe is in their best interest. This was contrasted with the alternative view that as students are entering a vocational program they should be expected to be present whenever possible to demonstrate commitment, responsibility, engender a sense of professional integrity.

Overall, the study in the paper indicated that recording attendance might help identify students at risk earlier (although this was not gauranteed) but there were issues in adopting an automated sytem, and it could be perceived as punative, and would not necessarily alter attrition.

Below are the presentation slides and polls taken during the session:

EKM Journal Club Slides May 10

Thank you to all who attended the journal club, it was quite a controversial debate!

The next event for the Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning will be a workshop exploring using Classroom Observation and Teaching Practice Inventories. The workshop will take place on Tuesday May 22 at noon in room T182. Erendira will send out a reminder and of course cookies with be provided!

Please RSVP to Erendira by email if you plan to attend.

 

EKM Journal Club May 5th: Absence Monitoring to Reduce Nursing Student Attrition

Greetings all,

Next week we will be exploring the topic of student absence monitoring at the next Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Journal Club. The session will be held on Monday, May 5th from 1200-1300 in Room T182. Below is a link to the paper we will be reviewing:

Developing a national computerised absence monitoring and management system to reduce nursing student attrition: Evaluation of staff and student perspectives Currie K., McCallum J., Murray J., Scott J., Strachan E., Yates L., Wright M. (2014)  Nurse Education Today,  34  (5) , pp. 738-743. 

Please join us for an exciting discussion related to absence monitoring and nursing student attrition from both staff and student perspectives. We would like to welcome faculty, clinical instructors, as well as students to attend. Bring your lunch and a beverage, cookies will be provided.

Please RSVP to Erendira if you plan to attend.

See you there!

 

Journal Club: Grading of Group Assignments from Nursing Students’ Perspectives

This week’s EKM Journal Club explored the following paper: Understanding nursing students’ perspectives on the grading of group work assessments Smith M. & Rogers J. (2014) Nurse Education in Practice, 14(2) 112-116

The study by Smith and Rogers sought the perspectives of two large nursing cohorts (475 and 275 students) regarding group work itself as well as the grading process involved. Before indulging into the details of the study, those present at the journal club were asked the reasons for which they valued group work.

Many agreed that group work allows for an easier grading process compared to administering individual assignments. Additionally, journal club members believed that group assignments facilitate team work and relationship building among peers. Some disadvantages associated with group work were also identified. Teachers found that students sometimes felt they were penalized when the dynamic was not favorable, and when others in the group were perceived to be putting in less work than required.

Those present also discussed situations where students did a poor job presenting the material in a class group-presentation and the need for instructors to re-teach it as a consequence, creating additional stress for both parties involved. Finding time to get together to work on group assignments was also presented as an issue, as was the debate of students picking their own group vs. being put into groups by the instructor.

The study reported in the paper was a creative mixture between a cross-sectional and longitudinal design. Two groups of students were examined by survey on their attitudes to group-work and grading (particularly same-mark for the whole group vs. peer weighted marking for part of the grade). One cohort was a group of new students, and a the second a group of senior students, who were surveyed before and after a group assignment.  The surveys were reviewed by experts with no association to the study and were also piloted by 6 student volunteers, and modifications were made accordingly.

While all students valued team working skills in the context of nursing and agreed that group assignments encouraged these competencies, many did not enjoy the assessment aspect of group work. Overall, students believed that group work penalized good students and that it was not as reliable as individual assessments. Students’ opinions changed minimally throughout the course of the study: while the majority of students indicated not having a preference for either grading method before the assignment, 37% reported feeling more comfortable with the weighted approach after having completed the assignment.

Responses from those present at the journal club were varied when asked their opinions on considering student preferences (as only about 45% of students actually liked group-assignments in the study). After much discussion, most agreed that student preferences should be considered to some extent in assessment design, but should nort be the presiding factor in selecting an assessment strategy.

The pros and cons associated with weighted marking were discussed, and while some found it important to engage students in evaluating their peers, issues surrounding grade negotiation amongst students were brought forward. Additionally, students’ inexperience in grading and lack of knowledge in what to look for in an assignment as well as their tendencies to mark more emotionally compared to instructors was also considered. Good clear marking rubrics were agreed as an essential component for the process to work effectively. It was also noted that with small groups (such as 2 or 3 students) peer review and grading might not be an approriate strategy to use in group work, and simply awarding a shared grade might be simpler to manage.

Overall, it was found that the study was well designed, however, the methods section could have been presented more clearly. While the authors addressed the quality of the questionnaires, only face validity was considered. However, there was a good attempt to establish this. Most agreed with the author’s recommendations and valued the suggestion to build teaching strategies into the course that allow students to reflect on team processes and the skills required for positive outcomes.

The presentation slides used throughout our discussion can be found here:

Group Assignment Journal Club Slides

 

 

Next EKM Journal Club: April 8, Grading of Group Work Assessments

Hello all,

Our next Elizabeth Kenny McCann Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Journal Club will be held Tuesday April 8th at 12:00-13:00 in Room T182. We will be exploring the following paper:

Understanding nursing students’ perspectives on the grading of group work assessments Smith M. & Rogers J. (2014) Nurse Education in Practice, 14(2) 112-116

Come along and enjoy a lively discussion with your colleagues about the issues raised in this paper. All faculty, clinical instructors and students are welcome. Bring your lunch and a beverage, cookies and coffee will be provided.

Please RSVP to Erendira if you plan to attend.

See you there!

Journal Club: Academic Cheating Among Nursing Students

In this weeks EKM Journal Club we explored the paper:

Park, E.-J., Park, S., & Jang, I.-S. (2013). Academic cheating among nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33(4), 346–52.

Park, Park and Jang describe their work examining the magnitude and predictors of cheating in South Korean nursing Schools. They surveyed 650 nursing students from 5 institutions using a  validated survey instrument. Those present were asked if they thought nursing students were as honest as other students or more or less so. The group unanimously thought there was so significant difference.
The five fundamental aspects of academic integrity outlined by Gaberson (1997) were discussed: honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility. These were agreed as a useful set of aspects to define the issue.The researchers also suggested the concern that those who are academically dishonest are likely to repeat these behaviours in practice. However, those present did not feel this was a black and white issue. Most felt that nursing students who cheated academically would not necessarily be likely to engage in deceitful or dishonest practices in clinical practice if patient safety was at stake.
A range of justifications (neutralization or normalization behaviours)for academic dishonesty had been observed by faculty  including the key ones identified in this paper, such as: “everyone does it,” “I don’t have time” and “I need to maintain my GPA”.
The  researchers used four categories for academic dishonesty:
  • Cheating – outroight cheating activities (such as sneaking in notes to an exam)Fabrication – making up results/bibleographies
  • Plagiarism – citing others work unattributed
  • Facilitation – allowing others to cheat
These catagories were found useful, but some felyt that cheating was a rather broad category and did not necessarily discern more detailed aspects such as syndication.
Overall the researchers found that:
  • 50% of students had engaged in one or more exam cheating behaviours,
  • 78% of students had engaged in one or more assignment cheating behaviours.

Those present felt that similar results would likely be found here, although the last Canadian study referenced found a reported 58% of students engaged in academic dishonesty (McCabe, 2009). Overall the group felt this was a well conceived study, although the reporting of results was a little confusing in the paper. They agreed with the authors recomendations that both policing and positive strategies may help reduce academic dishonesty. The key reasons for cheating identified were:

  • Higher GPA
  • Lack of time
  • Need a better job

… and factors that were felt most likely to curtail cheating activities were:

  • A fair response by University (policies and actions)
  • increased surveillance ( exams and in assignments)
  • Altering test environment ( random seating in exams)
  • Balancing assessment strategies to give a reasonable workload
Lastly, the group felt that emphasising the nature of academic dishonesty early in the program and asking students to sign up to a voluntary code of academic conduct (to emphasise the issue) might be helpful. It was noted that in some institutions students have to sign a declaration that their work is their own and they have not engaged in any academic dishonesty in the production of it, when they hand in asignments and examination papers. Whilst these measures probably do not stop cheating, they may decrease it by making students more concious of the issues.
The slides used during the club can be found here: Academic Dishonesty JC Slides.

 

References

Gaberson, K.B., 1997. Academic dishonesty among nursing students. Nursing Forum 32(3), 14

McCabe, D.L., 2009. Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation.Journal of Nursing Education 48 (11), 614

Workshop – Flexible Learning Techniques

We held a productive EKM workshop yesterday to explore some practical techniques for implementing flexible learning practices into courses, and how to evaluate them.

Flexible learning is described as:

  • A way that meets the needs of the learner, aligns with the nature and requirements of the discipline, and uses the expertise of the instructor all to best effect
  • Logistical flexibility – flexibility of location, time, pace of learning, and credentialing
  • Pedagogical flexibility – flexibility of delivery, interaction, and media of instruction

Techniques may include the use of:

The Flipped Classroom

A heuristic pedagogic strategy where students watch lectures or access resources at home online at their own pace, actively communicating with peers and teachers online to explore and develop understanding, and concept development and engagement occurs in the classroom

Image Credit: User Generated Education

Image Credit: User Generated Education

Asynchronous and Synchronous Techniques

Asynchronous

Posting Videos/Podcasts/Audio & follow up – Kaltura
Discussion board activities
Record and post a Pecha Kucha

Synchronous

Webinar – Connect Collaborate
Live Tutorial Chat – Q & A

Social Media Activities

Some of these can be done in a secure Connect environment

Blog Activities –
  • Post a question as a blog post and get students to respond individually or in groups (they must reach a consensus) with a solution
 Wiki Activities –
  • Ask students to collaborate on a wiki post to solve a problem
  • Ask students to create, edit or update a Wikipedia entry

We also explored evaluation methods and the Kirkpatrick evaluation framework we will be using in our Flexible Learning project this coming year.

The slides associated with the workhop can be found at the following link:

Flexible Learning Techniques & Evaluation Strategies