Category Archives: Course Reviews

An honest opinion on different UBC science courses!

BIOL 371: Principles of Neurobiology I

This course will have you rethinking about what you know about the nervous system! BIOL 371 is a neurobiology course that focuses on neurons, their corresponding action potentials, and neurohormones.

FORMAT OF THE COURSE

Arghh…. it’s an 8AM class but it is definitely worth waking up for (an early start to the day is always nice). There live lectures are all recorded so one could always sleep in. The non-exam marks are broken down into pre-reading quizzes and literature worksheets all submitted on Canvas. The quizzes are pretty straightforward and all the answers are found in the readings. They usually include a “Have a Guess Question” which is more of a thought exercise and is marked for completion rather than correctness. There were 5 neurobiology papers we had to read and 5 classes dedicated to helping us decipher these papers. The paper lectures were really guided and helpful and the subsequent literature worksheets were only marked for completion!

In terms of exams, there were 2 midterms (20% each) and one final (40%). However, there was a reweighting policy implemented in the middle of the term that reduced the weight of the midterms if we did better on the final. Exam format is a mixture of true/false and open-ended responses. What I really love about this course is that they adjust the marking scheme to accommodate students who come up with a reasonable answer that wasn’t considered in the scheme before. The teaching team was really careful about the exam design and were not shy about taking out unfair questions or allowing more flexibility for ambiguously worded ones.

GPA πŸ™‚ OR πŸ™

I really liked this course so I did really well; however this course is not a GPA booster. However, this course isn’t a GPA killer either even though the content is quite difficult. The content is difficult because the course takes an approach such that we’re looking from the lens of a researcher. We’re tasked to try to prove why a certain fact in the textbook is true by looking at the experiments that were done (eg. how did we know that ion channels were involved in the action potential rather than just simply being told they are involved). The course average was 76 when I took it.

verdict? to take or not to take

A lot of the course is interpreting data from the primary literature, so if you really enjoy reading about research I would definitely take this course! Even, if you struggle with interpreting data-heavy slides, the professor, Dr. Irene Ballagh, is super approachable and always willing to help (one of the best professors I’ve had at UBC).

RUSS 101: Basic Russian I (Review)

Interested in learning a new language, or looking for a chill arts course to fulfill your arts requirement? Consider RUSS 101, a 3-credit course that teaches you the basics of the Russian language.

FORMAT OF THE COURSE

There were daily in-class quizzes, weekly online quizzes, homework questions, and a final. That may sound like a lot to do, but it’s not time-consuming. The quizzes and homework exercises were fairly short and simple to do.

Veta was an easy-going instructor and she created a learning environment that felt safe and non-judgemental, which really helps when students have to practice speaking out loud in a foreign language. For those of us who are more timid: don’t worry, there were no presentations. We simply practiced reading textbook phrases out loud/starting simple conversations with our peers.

GPA πŸ™‚ OR πŸ™

This course was a booster (A+), and it didn’t require a lot of effort – you would still need to review and familiarize yourself with the vocabulary and grammar, but it usually only took me 1-2 hours per week.

Check out the grade distribution below from Winter 2018:

RUSS 101 Grade Distribution (Credits: ubcgrades.com)

VERDICT? TO TAKE OR NOT TO TAKE

If you want to learn a new language but also can’t afford to dedicate a chunk of time to it, I recommend taking RUSS 101. This course should be a breeze for you, especially if you’re good with languages, or have learned French.

For more information on this course, visit theΒ course website.

CHEM 203: Introduction to Organic Chemistry

Most Science students have heard about the dreaded CHEM 233, but did you know that Chemistry/Biochemistry majors actually aren’t allowed to take that course? Meet CHEM 203, the introductory organic chemistry course that is much more difficult and intensive compared to CHEM 233. However, if you’re really interested in organic chemistry, this course will build solid fundamentals for you to utilize in advanced courses.

FORMAT OF THE COURSE

The format of the course is fairly standard for a typical organic chemistry class. There are live lectures where the professor goes over the details of a reaction and its mechanisms. One really needs to brush up on CHEM 123 knowledge as you’ll be swamped with numerous reactions that need to be memorized on as early as the second week. There are also no slides, as this would be hard to do with a drawing-intensive course such as organic chemistry. The professor writes real-time notes as he talks over reactions, which makes for very organized and structured note-taking.

Along with a lecture portion, there is also a lab portion worth 25% of your entire grade. Surprisingly, these labs had less of a workload than the first year labs. However, instead of labs once every two weeks, you have labs once a week. Unlike the first year labs, there are no unreasonable 10 minute quizzes! In fact, you won’t even have to write any lab reports! The workload consists of pre-lab work, the lab, and post-lab work (which is just filling in a report sheet). Pre-lab and post-lab work usually took me 2 hours a week to accomplish, mostly because I get distracted easily. Unfortunately, your technique mark is largely dependent on your TA. Personally, I had a really bad experience with my TA where it got to the point that I would dread every lab and be too afraid to ask questions (as he would take off marks for any questions he deemed “dumb”). This being said, the lab instructor for this course is very considerate, and would give back marks that were not supposed to be lost (interestingly everyone who had my TA was scaled up in the end…).

GPA πŸ™‚ OR πŸ™

This course will tank your GPA unless you have a strong interest in the subject material. There were basically no “free marks” in the course (eg. clickers, participation) as the marks were distributed between two midterms, the lab, and the final exam. All of the examinations were difficult, with averages hovering at mid to high 60s. The final exam average is unknown, but I remember not being able to finish the exam because of length and difficulty. The course was definitely scaled up in the end as I ended up with an A+, despite not being able to finish. The course average for my year ended up being 68.

Credits: ubcgrades.com

verdict? to take or not to take

If you’re not passionate about organic chemistry and you’re not planning on taking any organic chemistry classes in the future I would opt to take the easier CHEM 233 course. If you’re planning on taking more organic chemistry in the future, I 100% recommend taking this course. Even though it is much harder than CHEM 233, you will gain much more solid fundamentals and this will benefit you as your academic career progresses.

BIOL 325: Introduction to Animal Mechanics and Locomotion (Review)

Have you ever looked up to the sky and wondered how birds are able to fly? Or maybe looked out to the ocean wondering how aquatic animals are adapted to move effortlessly under water. BIOL 325 holds the answers to these mysteries as it pushes us to view the biological world through a biomechanical lens. This course teaches the underlying mechanics of swimming, flying and terrestrial locomotion.

format of the course

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, my experiences with this course were all in a virtual setting. This course was partially asynchronous, as all the live lectures were recorded and available to be revisited at anytime. The midterm and final evaluations were synchronous, however the teaching team allowed for students in different time zones to write their exams at a better-suited time. There are also weekly homeworks in the form of canvas quizzes, which were not too tricky, but also not easy. Unfortunately, the homeworks often had typos or grading errors, but the TA in charge of creating these quizzes was very upfront and honest about these mistakes. Apart from a bit of anxiety, the typos and grading errors were usually corrected, resulting in grading of the homework being fair overall.

Even though it is a biology-classified course, it would be more appropriate to think of it as a physics course accompanied by biological examples. As such, the course is very math intensive; however one would not need any mathematical knowledge beyond basic algebra and trigonometry to be successful in this course.

GPA πŸ™‚ or πŸ™

There is alot of material in this course, but I would classify this as a slightly GPA boosting course. Even though the homework (worth 20% of the mark) can take a long time to finish, all the answers are basically in the slides and it is not unreasonable to get full marks for this portion of the grade (lowest two homework gets dropped!). The midterms were closed book, invigilated and worth 20% each. The first midterm was extremely hard and time-constrained. This was due to the fact that it was the first time the teaching team had administered an online exam. Fortunately, they recognized this and implemented a policy where they would only take the score of the highest midterm. The second midterm was much easier, and I suspect this was the midterm score most people kept. The final exam was the same difficulty and format as the second midterm. The average for my class ended up being pretty high; 78!

Credits: ubcgrades.com

VERDICT? TO TAKE OR NOT TO TAKE

I would take this course if you’re a physics/math-oriented individual. Personally, this was one of the favorite biology classes that I have taken. One of the main reasons being that the grading is extremely fair, owing to the fact the answers are mostly quantitative and not prone to subjectivity. If you do end up taking this course, I guarantee that you will amusingly start viewing the world more like a biomechanic (eg. I can’t stop visualizing the lift and drag vectors of an airplane wings whenever I see a plane fly overhead).

CHEM 208: Coordination Chemistry (Review)

Almost everyone has heard about the infamous organic chemistry, but did you know of its counterpart? CHEM 208 is an inorganic chemistry course that covers teaches you the concepts necessary for advancing further into the world of inorganic chemistry.

format of the course

I took this course in 2020, thus everything was done online. This course was asynchronous in that all the lectures were recorded so that they could be revisited at your convenience (even the midterms were asynchronous). The lectures were also live so that those who wanted to adhere to a schedule could also attend synchronously. There were optional tutorials led by the teaching assistants, where they go through tutorial worksheets and the rational behind each answer. Although being her first term at UBC, Professor Nichols has been by far one of my favorite professors during my four years here. She is always willing to stay late during office hours and also hold numerous individual meetings with students. She also never makes you feel dumb for asking simple questions, and doesn’t mind repeating things.

GPA πŸ™‚ or πŸ™

This course is HARD. I spent more time studying for this course than my 4th and 3rd year courses. The assessments were 6 homework sets, two midterms, and a final exam, all of which felt much more challenging than the material presented in class. The homework averages were usually 70-80, as discussion among peers were encouraged and Professor Nichols gave many hints during office hours. The midterm averages were around 50-65 even though they were open book, and the difficulty level was around that of the homework. The final exam still gives me nightmares and was scaled up 14%. Even with the scale, the class average ending up being a 70%.

Credits: ubcgrades.com

verdict? to take or not to take

If you’re in a chemistry-related major, this course is most likely required. If you found CHEM 121 interesting, this course is for you! Even though it’s challenging, the topics are fascinating and things become rewarding once they begin to make sense. If you don’t want to increase your workload or you’re looking to boost your GPA, this course would not be what you’re looking for.

BIOL 336: Fundamentals of Evolutionary Biology

If you’re interested in how life on Earth came to be, take BIOL336! Through this course you’ll be able to solidify your understanding of how evolution works.

FORMAT OF THE COURSE

There is a lecture and tutorial component to the course. Each lecture was filled with detail, and we were also asked to memorize phylogenetic trees for the exams.

Wayne and Jeannette were nice and approachable profs who always answered our questions. Wayne gave each lecture as if he was telling a story, which was enjoyable and entertaining.

During our weekly tutorials, we went over important concepts taught in lecture, and worked on in-class worksheets to be submitted for grading by the end of each tutorial. There were also pre-tutorial and post-tutorial assignments related to the assigned weekly literature.

All this practice with the literature prepared us for the SOP (short opinion paper) that was due at the end of the term.

GPA πŸ™‚ OR πŸ™

At first, BIOL336 felt daunting with all the tutorial assignments; however, as I got more used to the rhythm of the course, everything felt more doable.

I was worried that my tutorials, which were marked more harshly, would severely impact my final grade. Thankfully, the tutorial mark only counted for a portion of the final grade.

The lecture content was quite easy to follow, and the midterm was on the easier side while the final was trickier.

Take a look at the grade distribution below from Winter 2018:

BIOL 336 Grade Distribution (Credits: ubcgrades.com)

VERDICT? TO TAKE OR NOT TO TAKE

I wouldn’t take this course as an elective as quite a bit of effort is needed for the tutorials. But even if BIOL 336 is a requirement for you (like it was for me), the content isn’t too difficult to grasp, so it is still a decent and manageable course!

CHEM 205: Physical Chemistry

A potentially fun course ruined by poor administration and lack of communication. CHEM 205 focuses on the fundamentals of thermodynamics, kinetics, and spectroscopy useful for life science students.

format of the course

Lectures consisted of a professor going through a slide deck, as well as in-class practice problems. Conceptually the material was quite interesting, however the derivations for different equations can be quite dry to listen to. There were homework questions which weren’t incredibly challenging, but doing the math can become quite tedious.

gpa πŸ™‚ or πŸ™

This is a GPA booster if you’re good at math, otherwise it’s pretty GPA neutral. Personally, I found the evaluations to be ridiculously unfair. For the final exam, it was an EXACT (WORD FOR WORD) copy of a past 2013 final exam. Although this final exam was not released formally, the solutions could be found on CourseHero. Basically, if you had access to this exam beforehand you were getting an A+.

What’s more off-putting is that several individuals on Piazza actually defended viewing the exam beforehand. Their reasoning being that everyone who didn’t have access were all idiots for not taking advantage of all their resources (we now know in these COVID times – Chegg and coursehero is tantamount to academic dishonesty).

Unfortunately, even before the final exam – these same individuals were stirring trouble within the class. After a particularly difficult midterm, they were taunting others telling them that “you wont make medical school if you didn’t get 100 on this midterm” – really living up to the toxic premed stereotype (funny thing being that noone brought up the subject of medical school either … how they correlated performance in a physical chemistry course to medical school admissions is beyond me).

CHEM 205 grade distribution. Credits: ubcgrades.com

verdict? to take or not to take

Considering my toxic experience with my course I cannot recommend this to anyone. In fact, I don’t think things have gotten any better.

BIOL 260: Fundamentals of Physiology (Review)

Are you keen on learning more about plants and animals? If so, BIOL 260 is the course for you! BIOL 260 is a physiology course that focuses on mammalian and plant physiology.

format of the course

This course is run pretty much the same as most courses. There are live lectures, pre-reading quizzes, and clickers. However, the course is designed in a way that encourages success and the professors (Trish and Abel) really do care about their students. The two midterms were optional and could only increase your final mark – giving you plenty of opportunity to succeed. Almost every single question on the piazza discussion board was answered by the professors or a TA, which is really rare in most classes.

gpa πŸ™‚ or πŸ™

It is definitely not a GPA booster, but also on the easier end of the spectrum in terms of biology courses. My only gripe is that they were excessively picky with wording on the exams (I had a question marked wrong for saying bicarbonate increased pH, but not explicitly stating it was a base … but this may have seen super obvious to me given my chemistry background). The two midterms and final exams are a TIME CRUNCH, all the questions are written response so you really have to think and write at the same time. They also really stress on concept application instead of memorization (thus you get a cheat sheet).Β  Here is the grade distribution for winter 2018:

BIOL 260 grade distribution. Credits: ubcgrades.com

verdict? to take or not to take

It was one of the more enjoyable classes of my third year. I would definitely take it as I found it quite stress-free and interesting!

CHEM 315/335: Chemistry Integrated Laboratory I and II (Review)

Want exposure to all different types of chemistry and their associated lab techniques? If yes, this is the course for you! CHEM 315/335 are courses where you learn the laboratory fundamentals of inorganic, organic, physical, and analytical chemistry!

format of the course

CHEM 315/335 is a course where you have lots of freedom in that you can choose the types of labs you want to do. The lab is a weekly 4-hour block, however I usually found myself leaving on average at the 3 hour mark. The reason I’m discussing both 315 and 335 at the same time, is because these are the exact same courses, with 335 being the continuation of 315 (you still choose from the same set of experiments – just the ones you haven’t done yet).

how to choose your experiments

As I mentioned earlier, there is four types of chemistry experiments you can choose from. CHOOSE THEM WISELY!

My favorite type of experiments by far were the inorganic ones. The pre-lab quizzes were super easy (and worth 1/4 of your lab mark)! They took 5 minutes to complete and consisted of 5 multiple choice questions testing you on oxidation numbers and chemical disposal. The labs are interesting and the most stress-free. In fact, I managed to finish the inorganic labs 1.5-2 hours almost every time.

The organic chemistry labs were my second favorite. The pre-lab quizzes were long, but most of the concepts were stuff from second year organic chemistry (around 30 mins-1 hour of pre-lab prep was suffice). I found these labs to be more stressful, because you are expected to know almost everything that is going on upon reading the lab instructions. This isn’t entirely unfair, as CHEM 203/245 (prerequisites) were both organic labs – so you are expected to have the fundamentals down. I’ve never finished early for these labs.

The analytical chemistry labs weren’t hard, but they were INTENSELY stressful. The pre-lab quizzes were much harder than the organic and inorganic ones – I often spent 2-3 hours just trying to understand the lab instructions. Half of your laboratory mark hinges on the accuracy of your results, so there’s absolutely no room for error in terms of technique. Your results also will vary on the helpfulness of your TA, especially for the experiments where you’ve never operated the lab equipment before.

The physical chemistry labs were the WORST. The pre-lab quizzes were unnecessarily difficult, it took me many hours to prepare for those. The lab instructions felt like they were written in another language (telling us to self-learn difficult concepts with no prior exposure and then performing an experiment that applies these concepts is asking a bit too much). In my opinion, these labs need a do-over to make them more student-friendly for those that aren’t familiar with physical chemistry. Avoid these labs at all cost!

GPA πŸ™‚ or πŸ™

This course is more of a GPA equalizer. There’s a high average, but the standard deviation is tight and it’s only worth 1 credit. Your GPA in the course is also largely dependent on your experiment selection. General rule of thumb: Avoid labs with lab reports AND AVOID THE PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LABS (I would rather do a lab with a lab report than these). There’s also no final exam/midterms. Here’s the grade distribution from 2018 winter.

CHEM 335 grade distribution. Credits: ubcgrades.com

Verdict: To take or not to take

If you want to gain more lab skills, definitely take this course. It’s not very time consuming and will only take up 5-6 hours of your week πŸ˜€

CHEM 121: Structure and Bonding in Chemistry (Review)

This will probably be the first university chemistry course many of you will take! CHEM 121 is a first-year chemistry course that introduces the basics of chemical bonding theories.

format of the course

The course is very much similar to CHEM 123. There are canvas quizzes, midterms, and final exams. The teaching style of the lecturer will vary (mine used a chalkboard). Sometimes the concepts they teach are sort of abstract, this was one of the courses where I often sat in the lecture not knowing what was going on. However, the textbook for the course is really well designed and will simplify many of the difficult concepts presented in class

There is also a lab portion for this course (I’m a TA for this portion :D). This just consists of biweekly experiments, which is not that stressful. However, the 10 minute quiz at the start of each lab is an unnecessary pain in the butt.

gpa πŸ™‚ or πŸ™

This course will probably have a neutral effect on your GPA. It’s not extremely difficult. The exams consist of multiple choice and written answers, and as with most first-year science courses, the multiple choice will drop you a significant amount of percentage points with each wrong answer. If you follow the textbook very closely, you can do well! The average for my class was 71. Here is the distribution for winter 2018:

CHEM 121 grade distribution. Credits: ubcgrades.com

verdict? to take or not to take

If you’re into chemistry, I would take the course, as this is a prerequisite to many higher level chemistry courses. If not, I probably wouldn’t take this course.