“Show me on the map: discussions on mining in Igloolik”
Nov 5th, 2009 by Coral Norman
Igloolik is an Inuit hamlet in the Qikiqtaaluk Region in Nunavut, northern Canada. It is located on a small island in Foxe-Basin that has been occupied by the Inuit for thousands of years with archeological sites on the island dating back over 4000 years. This video series interviews various members of the Igloolik community on their opinions of the Baffinland Iron Mine Corporation’s Mary River iron mine proposal. The interviews talk about the planning and construction phases of the Mary River mine and the effects that other mines have had on Inuit communities in Nunavut.
The community was consulted during the planning phase but the community feels their opinions and suggestions were not listened to by the planning committee. The Inuit are concerned about the environmental impact, especially of the shipping lane which threatens their traditional walrus hunting grounds. As Madeline Ivalu says “The plan consists of destroying the environment, the wildlife, therefore the Inuit.” Atuat Akkirtiq worries about the affects the mining jobs will have on families and the community. Terry Uyarak is concerned with the pollution the mine will create and that this is only the beginning of future mines and development in the area.
The story told by these community members draws similiar connections to other Canadian mining projects in other countries. As we read about in “The Profits of Extermination” by Francisco Ramírez Cuellar in Colombia the mining corporations are concerned first with capital gain and are seemingly unconcerned with the environmental and human impacts of their mining projects. Canadian laws do not allow for the kind of mass displacement and massacres that are connected to Columbian mining but the Inuit are right to worry about the future loss of their land as more development connected to mining occurs. Even though the proposed shipping lane goes through their traditional hunting grounds, and they voted against the mine they don’t legally own the land and the mine construction is going forward. As Madeline discusses in her interview, it feels like they are planning (if indirectly) to clear the land of Inuit and wildlife so they can mine without resistance.
The voices of the Inuit of Igloolik have been silenced by the mining company. Their knowledge and voices hold less importance in development and mining politics because they have been placed in the position of the subaltern due to a history of oppression and racism starting in colonial times in Canada. The colonial British government and after independence the Canadian government has continued to discriminate against First Nation communities through policies of displacement, segregation and assimilation. These policies were originally tied to notions of barbarism which constructs First Nations cultures as primitive, that is, lacking signs of economic development or modernity. When Western explorers wrote of these primitive cultures they described them as being comparable to early human cultures, and backwards in that they had not progressed. The policies have left First Nations communities outside the Center politically, geographically and socially.
These videos are part of a video blog called “Show me on the map: discussions on mining in Igloolik” by Arnait Video Productions on isuma.tv which hosts mainly Inuit blogs, videos and audio recordings. Igloolik Isuma Productions, Inc. was incorporated in January 1990 as Canada’s first Inuit independent production company. Isuma is 75% Inuit-owned. The company is giving a voice to the Inuit, allowing them to speak to the broader world in their own language on issues of importance to them. There is another series of videos on the site about how Inuit knowledge can be applied to help reduce climate change which may be of interest to readers of this blog.
2 Responses to ““Show me on the map: discussions on mining in Igloolik””
The plight of these communities bring up interesting questions about development. The project that has been introduced into the Inuit hamlet may have come under the guise of new jobs but it is quite obvious that was never the intention of the developers. As Madeline Ivalu says, the ultimate aim of the miners is to damage the ecology of the area to such a degree as to wipe out the Inuit as well. While this may not be their direct intentions, it is quite obvious that the mine is effecting a community that seems to have been able to live remotely enough to have only minor effects imposed on them from capitalism. If their way of life is infringed upon, it may force them to seek other routes and possibly a development scheme in order to survive. It is difficult to imagine having to seek a form of “development” when your community has been living in a state of peace for thousands of years. That is why even the term development, brings with it connotations of our western neoliberalist agenda as we seek change and progress as a sign of prosperous times. This village appears to be beginning the path to descent that it never chose to start. Jobs may come and go but a one industry town will lead to job loss as well as a loss of heritage sending the community into a downward spiral. A few years down the road the hamlet may be in store for a development makeover that is precipitated from the actions taking place right now.
It can be seen as a problem for the inuits because they are not as westernized and can be considered as living the in the subaltern areas. Their place is being invaded by developers looking to start a endless mining company and could potential cause their community to be demolished. As mentioned, racism, oppression and segregation are also restricting them from being heard as well. Being so, it allows the developers to mine freely without resistance.