Category Archives: Reflections

My Final Reflection – The Peak

145 - W8XLajh

“We’re finally at the peak.” I thought to myself.

I am truly thankful that English 301 is a requirement by the Computer Science department. Why? Because I witnessed great improvement in my writing. I joined the course with little confidence in my technical writing capabilities outside the Life-Sciences field. I initially considered my experience in writing scientific reports as a weakness. However, because of English 301, I also realized that my biggest weakness was also my biggest strength. I was able to refer to the concepts found in both English 301 and scientific wring and apply them to our writing assignments and my own business documents.

Throughout my entire university experience, the only university-level writing I’ve taken was English 112. I was excluded from taking English 110 due to my credits from the International Baccalaureate (I.B.) program in high school. I thought that taking this course was sufficient for my degree. Thus, I did not pursue other writing courses after English 112. As I went on with my degree, I continued to expose myself to scientific literature. With this in mind, we were required to create reports that were structured after scientific journals found in academia – especially in my 400-level courses in Biochemistry. Concurrently, I received training in creating resumes, cover letters, and reference letters in the UBC Science Co-op Program for Life-Sciences. Therefore, I felt very confident that my writing skills fulfilled the standards of any job application and research paper. I was wrong. As a result, I struggled to create resumes and cover letters that stood out to employers. Overall, I knew that I would continue to struggle if I did take any effort to improve my technical writing skills.

Due to job instability in Life-Sciences, I decided to change my career into Computer Science because it offered more opportunities for growth and stability. I thought this would be a perfect opportunity to relearn how to write and create application packages through the Co-op program. As a result, I applied to UBC’s Bachelor of Computer Science Second Degree Program (also known as B.C.S.). After being admitted into the program, they gave me a list of requirements which included finishing a ‘Communications’ course. In this case, I chose to take English 301 as my ‘Communications’ course.

While taking English 301, I realized that the assignments in the course were both challenging and rewarding. The most challenging aspect of English 301 was overcoming my perceived difficulties in writing non-scientific reports. However, I also realized that I needed the overcome this challenge in order to prepare myself for opportunities in Computer Science. This is was also emphasized by the Co-op program; wherein, most opportunities in Computer Science are found in industry (in comparison to academia and research). Therefore, they encouraged acquiring solid technical writing skills because these were paramount in creating reports and communicating with colleagues in Computer Science.

In one assignment, the course gave us the task of creating a formal report based on our chosen topic. I chose to write about improving the online marketability of my small wedding photography business. It is important to note that I limited my role in the decisions made by the company during my research. My justification for this move was to mitigate any biases in my report, and gather data objectively. With that decision, I realized that I’ve applied what I thought was my weakness in this course – scientific writing – as a strength. Specifically, neutrality and objectivity was my primary principles when I was conducting the study. Unfortunately, I did not achieve all of the goals of my report outline, such as conducting Client surveys after the company implements the study’s recommendations. However, I realized that the true value in the outline was to keep coherence in my formal report. Thus, I’ve adjusted the outline multiple times to correlate with my current findings. I realized that I would have been overwhelmed with the major changes I’ve made in my report if I did not have an outline that I could adjust.

The most rewarding part of the course was the “You-Attitude” assignment. This assignment emphasized the importance of professionalism in communication. Interestingly, my blog post suggested that this assignment should be done at the beginning of the course. I reasoned out that our correspondence between our teammates and the English 301 staff would have greatly benefited with these concepts. However, Dr. Paterson’s blog post explained why this was assignment was done later on: to learn from our mistakes. It reaffirmed my personal views of making mistakes as a learning experience. Overall, I know that this assignment will have the biggest impact with my Computer Science career and photography business.

Overall, the course has been one of the most rewarding experiences I’ve had in UBC. It elevated my technical writing skills beyond the scope of Life-Sciences. Not only do I feel more confident writing application packages, but I feel more encouraged to integrate creative freedom in my technical writing. If you are considering reading this and have not taken the course: I highly encourage that you do!

In relation to the title of this post, ‘The Peak’, I would like to share a timelapse photography video that inspired me to be adventurous in my life and career: The Mountains.

As a photographer, business owner, and a Computer Science student – I look forward to the next peak.

Web Folio Reflection – Clarity

Sunset W10

Creating this Web Folio truly summarized my achievements and experiences in the course. When I look back, I was worried that I may not have enough content that would contribute to my Web Folio. However, I am amazed at the amount of work that has been done in order to transform my blog into an actual Web Folio. This assignment truly showcased one of the goals set by the course: to present our achievements, the challenges we’ve encountered, and professionalism using technology.

Dr. Paterson’s guidelines on story-boarding allowed me to create this Web Folio that is informative and visually appealing. It made the task straightforward, and engaging. Interestingly, even though I am a photographer, I still have difficulties in creating my own website. In fact, my business website was made by one of my staff members. Because of this, I actually had a good laugh while finalizing my Web Folio and writing this reflection! Thanks to this experience, I feel that I can improve my business website through better organization.

To me, the most important part of this assignment was the process of re-editing my blog posts, documents and web content (such as my LinkedIn profile) based on feedback given by my peers, Dr. Paterson, and Jasmine. I was intrigued at my new-found perspective while making these edits. For example, I added more detail to my ideas, and shortened some sentences to make them easier to read. I was amazed at how these changes improved my assignments and web content. I wish that I had these skill-sets after I graduated with my first degree! Overall, I am proud of what I have achieved in this assignment – thus, I would love to invite everyone to explore my Web Folio!

Unit Two Reflection: An Uphill Battle

The pier at Derwentwater on a still calm winters day at sunrise.

Unit 2 required us to create a formal report proposal with a corresponding outline and progress report. We were also required to create a professional LinkedIn profile using our own research on ‘best practices’. Moreover, we also conducted additional peer-review activities for most of the assignments in Unit 2. I have found this very helpful, because I am learning different methods of expressing ideas by reading the works of other classmates. Overall, I found Unit 2 more challenging, since I am still familiarizing myself with the peer-review process and the composition of non-scientific formal reports. With this in mind, Dr. Paterson’s emphasis made me aware of my readers.

We started the unit by writing a formal report proposal using concepts from our textbook. The biggest challenge for me was shifting thought process towards a non-scientific mindset. This was highlighted with the topic of my report, which was focused on improving the online marketability of a wedding photography business. Generally, I would start scientific reports by writing an ‘abstract’ that summarizes the entire experiment. However, this is not the case, and I would have to carefully consider my audience by defining marketing terminology and simplifying my data by using simple figures (such as bar charts). As a result, I found myself pausing more often, since the I had to spend more time thinking about my audience’s understanding of the given topic. Regardless of the challenges, the assignment taught me how to create a report proposal, which would be applicable to my career path in Computer Science.

Subsequently, we have also conducted peer-reviews for our classmates. I enjoyed this process, since I am able to read other people’s work which exposes me to unique writing styles. More importantly, any mistakes that are committed by my classmates made me more aware of my own errors. I was surprised of errors that have easily gone unnoticed from my own self-reviews. Thus, having my own work peer-reviewed, in conjunction with this awareness, has allowed me to write more consciously and carefully. I aim to improve my own peer-review skills, in order to provide better feedback to my classmates and to increase my own awareness towards my writing skills.

To continue, the assignments in Unit 2 also involved the creation of a professional LinkedIn profile. It was to my own advantage that I already had an existing account with the required sections. However, I welcomed the prospect of a peer-review to improve my LinkedIn profile. Again, the peer-review process was the most rewarding section, since I was given feedback on how to improve my existing profile. Ying Ying’s peer review contained a well-organized partition of the different components of my LinkedIn profile. Thus, I was able to immediately make the changes because I was able to locate these sections with ease. Moreover, I also found it enjoyable to actually read my classmate’s own experiences. In this case, I’ve conducted a peer-review of Ying Ying’s profile using my ‘best practices’ criteria that segmented into the different sections of a LinkedIn Profile. Her LinkedIn profile was well-done since she provided a sufficient amount of detail of her achievements and projects. Thus, I actually used her LinkedIn profile as another basis of improving my own. Overall, the LinkedIn assignment was an enjoyable activity because it made the reviewer acquaint themselves with their fellow classmate and learn different writing techniques.

Lastly, Unit 2 required us to create a progress report in our formal report, including an outline. I found creating an outline is helpful in organizing our ideas. My report consisted of multiple sections that covered surveys, interviews and website metrics – thus, it was important that I created an outline that would introduce a coherent flow of these different types of data. Interestingly, the progress report was similar to having a reflection blog. It enabled us to summarize our ideas, discuss our current findings and create a timeline for our formal report. While writing my progress report, I realized that I had to create questions that would cater to my intended audiences. In this case, I designed survey questions for Clients, whereas Marketing Consultants and Staff would receive interview questions. However, I am unsure if I have  created proper questions, but I always welcome feedback from Dr. Paterson and her colleagues. Overall, both the outline and progress report gave me a text and visual representation of the entire formal report. I am certain that I will be using these concepts when I create future reports.

Overall, Unit 2 was a great learning tool that pushed me to become a more efficient and considerate writer. Writing peer-reviews, progress reports, and outlines made me feel more confident in proceeding with more challenging concepts in Unit 3. I am aware that I still have flaws in my writing, but the course has made me more conscious and careful of such errors. I will continue to use the new concepts I’ve acquired to develop my technical writing skills.

301 Xavier dela Cruz Formal Report Proposal – Revision

Peer Review of Ray Chang’s Formal Report Proposal

Unit One – Reflection: Learning From Mistakes

2129e47b766c9f595b7730a88f843788

For ‘Assignment 1:3’, I chose to write the definition of a ‘binary tree’ that is aimed towards an audience of Computer Science novices. My process in writing involved the assumption that my target audience have not encountered a binary tree. I was able to work systematically by providing the history of binary trees, some examples and a visual reference. More importantly, I wanted to increase enthusiasm towards binary trees by providing examples of real-world applications and its significance in Computer Science.

Subsequently, the assignment was effective in allowing me to understand my strengths and weaknesses as a writer. Kevin, my partner in this assignment, pointed out my weaknesses in a very constructive and critical manner. I discovered that I have committed mistakes, such as missing auxiliary verbs and nouns. Moreover, he pointed out that I have a tendency to create long, and verbose sentences. This was also pointed out by Dr. Paterson in an email containing her feedback on my writing level. Using this feedback, I have made the appropriate corrections on my assignment. Lastly, they have also emphasized my strengths as a writer, such as staying on topic. As a result, I am able to capitalize on my strengths, while mitigating my weaknesses in future writing assignments.

Concurrently, I have also reviewed Kevin’s own definition assignment. I found that he was able to define ‘recursion’ effectively. His use of a step-by-step example and a visual aid were effective in explaining a difficult concept – especially for his target audience. To further analyze his assignment, I went under the assumption that I did not understand ‘recursion’. As a result, I was able to point out errors such as a contradiction in his use of ‘arbitrary ‘ and ‘large’ in the context of data size. However, other errors that involved syntax and sentence structure, were minor. Overall, he effectively achieved the goal of defining ‘recursion’ to his target audience.

I have learned both my strengths and weaknesses as a writer. Moreover, I have learned to proof-read my drafts in order to mitigate potential mistakes. Overall, this assignment was important in fostering my technical writing skills through the process of receiving and giving feedback.

301 Xavier dela Cruz Definition Assignment (revision)

Peer Review for the Definition of ‘Binary Tree’