BC Student Teachers unite! #bcstuteach

Over the past few months Twitter has played a huge role in my development as an educator. Back in January I even felt as inspired as to write a blog post “Twitter – What’s in it for you?” reflecting on my positive experience. In this post, I suppose in a way I unknowingly foreshadowed something to come. I challenged other student teachers to take part in the #bcedchat on the upcoming  topic of Teacher Education. During that chat I connected with @mmehibou and @SMooreBC where we discussed our hopes for having more Student Teachers connecting on Twitter. We had the idea to begin a student teacher focused chat, and with that, @BCStuTeach was born.

We chat every Tuesday from 6-7 PST on topics pertaining to Student Teachers. Our topic during our first week was quite broad, focusing on introductions, teacher education programs, why we want to be teachers, etc. Our second week was a discussion on practicums as different education faculties were in the midst of practicum, preparing for practicum, or receiving practicum placements! You can find storify archives on our BCStuTeach blog.

Besides the Twitter chat, we have also created a Facebook page BC Student Teachers as an alternate social media location.

We would love to have more student teachers joining us for weekly chats, and connecting anytime using the #BCStuTeach hashtag. In-service teachers are always welcome as well; many of us came to Twitter in the search for additional mentors! Join us this Tuesday, March 18th at 6pm PST as we talk about and share resources!

From the mind of an engineer

When thinking about discussing education my mind diverts to going on Twitter or to the staff room or to workshops and speaking with other “educators”. The other day when I logged into my Facebook account, a social media I use primarily for contact with friends and family around the world, I found this post by my friend Mikel Gomes, an engineering student:

“I think we need to stop telling kids to write neatly, especially where math and science are concerned. Exploration is messy. When a pupil is doodling or writing chicken scratch they are exploring the bounds and possibilities of their knowledge truly and honestly and in their own domain. In this chaos is potential; the potential to discover things in a meaningful way to the individual which promotes true understanding. It is when you remove this exhilaration of discovery and exploration that the beauty of the task is diminished. By making a student subscribe to your preconceived notion of what a warehouse packaged correct answer should resemble you extinguish scientific curiosity and if you love science as I do you will understand how heartbreaking that is. It encourages skipping ahead to the preexisting solution. And if perchance you can’t read the writing it is a wonderful opportunity to sit down with the student and discuss what went through their head in the process. I realize this is perhaps impractical… But what if that kid grew up to invent fusion?”

I love these thoughts and the thinking it led me to (as well as the eloquence of his writing!). The other day in my language arts/literacy course we had a discussion along these lines. We weren’t necessarily looking at the issue through a science or math subject area lens, but were questioning when we need to expect legible grammatically correct work, and when we can let students simply allow their ideas to flow such as in journal writing, or writing a story.

In my reflection to both this post, and our class discussion, I think it is so crucial to allow kids (or anyone!) to express themselves and their ideas in a variety of ways. For some, doodles or models may make more sense than written output. I feel like there is a current movement in education towards making, maker faire for example, and applying concepts. To me, it is exciting and I am optimistic in the sense that we are working towards giving students more freedom of expression and opportunity to explore. I do believe students need to learn a variety of skills, including clear written communication, but throughout this learning process I think they need the time for messy dabbling with concepts. From here they are discoverers and creators. How they disseminate their understanding or knowledge is simply another 21st century skill they need to be equipped with.

Many others commented on this post, touching on points from the time it would take but what it could be worth, the importance of legible handwritten communication in engineering firms, the constraints on imagination, discovery, and curiosity by putting pen to paper, and the skills of organizing, synthesizing and communicating.

The questioning and reflecting for me is continual, and it is approaching me frequently in more and more forms.. Just a first thought above! Thanks for reading and I would love to hear your opinion in the comments below.

Twitter – What’s in it for you?

If one were to look back at my Twitter you would see it was created years ago. I didn’t use it much until the fall when the use of Twitter by students at the Inspiring Educators Series Launch fell flat. The idea had been that students would tweet their questions to the three presenting superintendents, however, not many students took part. After this, I began to wonder if I could use Twitter as a networking/professional development tool…

I felt really confused and awkward on Twitter at first. Did anyone care what I would say? Can I just join a conversation? Would anyone follow me? How do I use a hashtag? All legitimate concerns! But as many have told me in the field of education, “fake it ’til you make it”! So, I did, and six months later I’m hooked on Twitter. And, to other student teachers, I think you should give it a try, you might like it. I didn’t think I would, but I love it! It has led me to meet so many passionate educators and policy makers (on-line and in-person), allowing me to begin to create my personal learning network. It has given me ideas for in the classroom, and caused me to further question things, respond and reflect (on my own accord as opposed to a class “quick write”!). It has also notified me of many different opportunities and workshops.

For those of you already on Twitter, do you take part in any education chats? (See an extensive list here, and believe me, there has got to be something that interests you!) Every Sunday at 7pm is @bcedchat #bcedchat. This upcoming Sunday is on the topic of Teacher Education, and the challenge is out between the various education faculties in BC to have pre-service teachers taking part! 

If you’re not already on Twitter and interested in trying it out, here are my ideas and advice:

  • Find some people to follow! Start by searching within your subject interest, school district (past, present, or anticipated future), faculty members, fellow teacher candidates, organizations, etc.
  • Share your thoughts on something you’re passionate about or a hot topic like the grades debate or the new curriculum. Thank a presenter or workshop leader. Once you have some followers ask an opinion question.

Please comment why you like to use Twitter, add your recommendations on using it, people to follow and your Twitter handle (@). Have fun!

Edcamp Delta – Education Unconference

Today was my first Edcamp (Edcamp Delta), and it was fantastic! I tried to figure out ahead of time what it would be like, but like Tintamarre (a post for another time), it is one of those that can’t really be explained, but needs to be experienced. !

Above you can see the Wordsalad I created (similar to Wordle but an app). The words I included were mainly the types of participants and the types of discussions going on. I included participant terms like students, teachers, superintendents, etc., but you’ll see even larger the term “nonhierarchical”. When I arrived at the unconference one of the things I was told repetitively as a newcomer was that it is nonhierarchical. There were high school students that have attended in the past, and had come back again, saying because it is a time when adults and educators listen to them. I think this is one of the things that made this event so successful – the fact that there was open sharing by everyone, and that everyone’s voices were equally valued.

I really enjoyed the interactive spontaneity of the “things that suck” session by @MsVictoriaOlson. Essentially a topic was put up on the board for with a five minute time limit for discussion/debate, and participants moved to either the “sucks” or “rocks” side of the room depending on their opinion. (Check out her blog post for a further explanation.) I found the variety of participants made this session so interesting. For example, “student teachers” – suck or rock? We had students speaking on experiences with having student teachers, teacher advisors speaking on mentoring teachers, thoughts from parents, student teachers asking how else could we possibly learn? As you can imagine there are a lot of points that can be made for and against.

Other sessions I went to involved:

  • a discussion on what do students really need to know
  • a chance to speak with student trustees @MayaTreuheit and @NickMilum, from SD46 and VSB respectively
  • a huge group on the implementation and assessment of the new curriculum
  • ideas on how to best help students with learning disabilities which was well-attended by students with a lot to share

I got to meet so many people at Edcamp – twitter “friends” and new people. Thank you to all the organizers, volunteers, and participants! April 12th is an Edcamp in Langley – Edcamp35. Register now because it’s going to be great – see you there!