Reflection of Team Assignments in Comm 296

Back in September, I was invited by my friend to join a group for our assignments in class. Although I didn’t know most people in my group, I quickly came to realize how amazing our group is. Everyone had such great work ethic, and most importantly we had a very interesting group dynamic. We all had very distinct personalities and skillsets, which I believe contributed a lot to the advantage of our team.

The video assignment in particular was my favourite part of the assignment. The first assignment scared us all, and we all spent a significant amount of time trying to research for superficial facts about our company, lululemon atheltica. We found a lot about the company’s background and yoga industry in general to create a SWOT analysis. After the first assignment, we all became quite familiar with the topic of yoga and active lifestyle of North American women. By then we were able to make intelligent assumptions to come up with our STP. The reason why I was personally excited about the last assignment was because throughout the process of all our assignments, it was genuinely interesting to have developed personal opinions about the company. How we, as a group, think lululemon could increase their marketing initiatives through media, or to continue targeting North America instead of expanding.

It’s one thing to learn concepts and memorize marketing related terms on the textbook, but for us to actually spend time critically thinking what we can recommend to a company from a marketing consultant’s position was one of the most exciting parts of the course. Honestly speaking, we were all thinking “oh no, not another SWOT analysis” in the beginning. But near the end, the fact that we were able to apply our knowledge and intuition to simulate a consultant’s role made me realize how much we have all learned compared to the beginning of Comm 296 in September.

RE: Selling Through YouTube Fashion & Beauty Gurus: OK Or Not OK?

A fellow classmate Min Young wrote a blog post on so called “YouTube Stars” using their YouTube channels to sell products which they are sponsored by, or even their own line of products.

As Min Young mentioned in her post, one example would be Michelle Phan. She has her own line of cosmetics launched called EM Cosmetics. Now in most of her videos she tries to find a way to “sell” her product line. Before this, she used to be a Lancome makeup artist, so she only used Lancome products in her videos. Personally, I don’t think there is anything wrong with it.

First off, fame can be an asset. There are many YouTube stars who promote their own business through their videos to their subscribers. If their subscribers are unhappy, then they can unsubscribe. In most cases, they don’t unsubscribe. Usually a loyal fan will support their favourite YouTube star with their business. For some, YouTube is their “job” and main source of income for some YouTube stars. There are many famous singers nowadays who started off their career by making videos of songs on YouTube, and sold sound tracks through their channels.

People like Michelle Phan can use her “fame” to start a business for her own good. Alternatively, there are people like Clara C, a YouTube musician, who promotes World Vision to her subscribers just as Michelle Phan promotes her own brand. These two have different intentions in their marketing : one wants to make money, the other just wants to spread the word for a good cause. Either way, they have one purpose and that is to be a YouTube content generator and to continuously maintain their fame.

Here, Clara C sings “Nayelli”, as song she wrote about her World Vision sponsor child from Honduras.

Ultimately, although we may not notice in our day to day activities, we are exposed to similar types of marketing. Embedded Marketing, also known as PPL or product placement, is very common in any sort of media we come across. For example, American Idol slaps the audience in the face with Coca Cola by having the logo in the cup obviously visible. That can of Coke isn’t there by a mistake : it’s all there so audience will want to buy the product due to exposure.

Outlet Stores : Is it a benefit?

Who doesn’t love items on discount? 

Nowadays, there are malls dedicated for these ‘discount stores’ called outlets or outlet malls. The general idea is that there are stores with same items from the same brand, but at a cheaper, discounted price. Upside to having outlet stores is that a brand can increase their sales. Their products become more ‘accessible’ and affordable to the consumers who otherwise could not afford it.

However, the reason why these outlet stores exist is due to the fact that the prices are just relatively high for a certain brand, for example, Coach. Now that the same products are available for same price, the consumers with higher income sees less value in their products when they see consumers with lower income, such as teenagers, using the same products.

Les Wexner, CEO of Limited Brands, says “the outlet business is easy money, [but] discounting yourself is the beginning of the end…it’s hard to have a dual identity. Outlet doesn’t build a brand.” I couldn’t agree more with his statement.  The reason why this is so true relates to my previous argument. Coach was initially launched as a mid-luxury brand. And as with any sort of luxury brand, most consumers purchase luxury brand items to get social validation from peers, and also to portray that they are from a different social status. Making those items at a lower price defeats its entire purpose. At the end of the day, loyal Coach customers will continue purchasing the products but ultimately, Coach depreciates its name value and place in the luxury brand industry by increasing their outlet stores.

Forever 21: Secrets Behind their Success

Founded in 1984, Forever 21 has quickly became an iconic retail store for teenagers within the past few years. Although their items appeal to their target segment, there are plenty of other retail stores that offers extremely similar items. Why is it that Forever 21 became such a big retailer not only in North America, but throughout Asia, Europe and other parts of the world?

Presentation of the store

Forever 21, although the products are offered at a relatively low-mid price range, has consistent store fixtures with all their locations. These include marble floors, luxurious ceramic dishes with jewelries, and white chandeliers.

Supply Chain

Teenagers have the need to always follow the trends of their role models, peers, and celebrities : their taste is continuously changing. Because of this, Forever 21’s supply chain challenges themselves to have fast and efficient product delivery. This means having new items every week, and putting necessary “out of season” items on sale so they can get rid of old items fast, and promote the new items.

Merchandising

This store does not only offer “casual clothing”. It is a one-stop shop for any occasion that a customer needs. Forever 21 stores offer diverse range of product line, from formal dresses, casual wear, to activewear and tech accessories. This gives the customers an opportunity to match more products with their initial purpose, which ,as a result, increases sales.

Branding

It’s probably safe to say majority of teenagers in North America alone recognize a Forever 21 store even if it didn’t have the sign in front of the store. Their yellow shopping bag has been used since the initial launch of the company, which created a unique way to recognize their brand.

There are so many more other factors that leads to Forever 21’s success. It comes as no surprise that this store increased its sales by 82% from 2007 to 2011 according to Reuters, while other retailers are having difficulty expanding their sales.

RE: 7 Reasons Marketing & Customer Service Need to Work Together

Marketing and Customer Service.
Customer Service and Marketing. 

For some odd reason, these two are inseparable, and go in hand in hand. As Pamela Vaughan mentions in her blog post, these two “should go together like milk and cookies”

She outlined 7 reasons they these two MUST go together as such:

1) For Better Social Media Support

2) For Content Creation Ideas

3) For a Deeper Understanding of Buyer Personas

4) For Setting Customer Expectations

5) For Unified Messaging & Communications

6) For PR/Marketing Promotion of Customer Success & Happiness

7) For Informing Product Marketing Initiatives

These reasons without explaining further, sounds pretty basic and self-explanatory. Personally, the points that stuck out to me the most was “Deeper Understanding of Buyer Personas” and “Setting Customer Expectations”.

As a person who has worked in a retail store, I have experience with being the first hand direct contact with the customers. If I learned anything from my experience in retail is that understanding and listening to the customers is crucial to the success of any business. For example, I can be very knowledgeable about the products I’m selling, but if I don’t know what the customer’s need is there is no use. The ability to connect and understand a customer’s need is so crucial that even if I do not have the best knowledge about the products I’m trying sell, the customer will leave with a positive attitude.

Similarly, setting customer expectations also means I am creating a lifetime customer. Even if today or next week a customer might not purchase a product, giving her the best experience and customer service will encourage her to make a purchase sometime in the future.

Although my experience in retail gives a very limited perspective on the operations of the corporation side of a business, I believe a lot of the marketing done is no use without excellent customer service.

Kony 2012 : failure or success?

Nearly everyone in North America with access to either a television or the internet (98,477,971 people worldwide to be exact*) have most likely watched or at least heard of “Kony 2012”.


What exactly was Kony 2012? For some it may just be a YouTube video that went viral, but in the context of it’s core objective, it’s considered a guerrilla marketing. Simply put, guerrilla marketing is a marketing strategy of an unconventional method with lower budget, and based  on interactions between people. The specific steps commanded in the video by Invisible Children, a non-profit organization behind the campaign, to a) share the video using Social Media platforms b) participate in a one-day worldwide event to cover the city with Kony 2012 posters and c) purchase an ‘action kit’ which costs $30 (includes a few advertisement items such as sticker, poster, etc).

Although the video created a buzz once it was first released, the whole campaign went downhill when a few scandals arose towards the organization. This resulted in failure of Invisible Children’s goal in capturing Joseph Kony, a military figure who abducts children as soldiers. The initially anticipated Kony 2012 day, (April 21, 2012) ended with barely any participation throughout North America.

Invisible Children not only failed to convince the audience, but also lost its credibility as the outcome.

This whole Kony 2012 at a glance seems like a yet-another-Africa-related-campaign-that-failed. However, there are many reasons why this campaign is still considered a success.
Here are the reasons why:
1) Great understanding of the trend – effective use of Social Media to market an idea with a very factual, and emotionally charging video.
2) Brand Awareness – resulting from point 1, many people (mostly younger generation) recognizes the Kony 2012 poster, and they know what the campaign is all about when they hear “Kony 2012”
3) Audience participation – we are living in a DIY generation. People love to do things on their own and especially ‘do good’. The action plan laid out on the video is very simple, yet they make it sound as if we can ‘save the world’ on our own just by following them.
4) True to its inital intentions – Although the campaign failed to fulfill it’s core purpose, it still managed to create an awareness about child soldiers in Uganda.

All in all, Invisible Children received a lot of criticisms from their lack of accuracy in the videos as well as some of the employees’ irresponsible conduct. Besides the point, their marketing strategy alone was very successful, if you look at how much attention one video brought to the world.

*based on the number of views on “Kony 2012” YouTube video as of 09/10/2013

Hello world!

Welcome to UBC Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Victoria’s Secret “I Love My Body” Campaign, not so Loving.

What comes into your mind when you hear the phrase “I Love My Body“?

I translate that as “loving my body, despite the social standards or however I look.”

Ironically, the Victoria’s Secret’s campaign with the slogan “I Love My Body” includes a poster of “Victoria’s Secret Angels” (models) lined up in their new “Body by Victoria” lingerie collection. These models are about  5’10”, size two, with measurements 34-25-34. That is quite a big discrepancy between the models and the body figures of most women.

Victoria’s Secret vs. Dove

Many people who came across this advertisement expressed their disagreements. Mainly, consumers were uncomfortable at the fact that the models used for the campaign have unattainable bodies. The models also all look very similar, with same hairstyles, same body figures, same facial expressions. By using these so called ‘perfect models’, with the slogan, gives off the wrong message. These models love their bodies, whereas if an average woman compared her body with the models, she wouldn’t be able to find a reason why she should love hers. Similarly, Dove made a campaign where they used various sizes of women ranging from size 4 to 10. Dove got a lot of attention for their campaign for using the images of women we can find around us. In contrast Victoria’s Secret was criticized for using artificially maintained models to portray the idea of beauty.

So despite all the criticisms, why does Victoria’s Secret choose to continue promoting their slender models? It’s simply because it sells.  It’s visually enticing. The company stands in its place as the #1 lingerie store in the world due to their sexy image. As much as consumers are upset at their ‘ideal body figure’, Victoria’s Secret knows that if they used average women as their models, they would not earn nearly as much money as they do now. At the end, the campaign doesn’t seem to celebrate the diversity in women’s body figures; it’s just showing off their sexy models as well as their newly launched lingerie collection.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet