So Many Questions… !

For this post I am simply pasting in a email I sent to Dave and my mentor John.
I know, it maybe a bit lazy but it is real life so …

Hi John and Dave,
I hope all is going well.

I thought I would reach out to both of you and maybe you could jumpstart my process on a topic for KIN 530. I knew I was leaving this dangle and I had hoped something would magically land in my sights but nothing yet.

I have now moved back to Calgary and started with the Province as Lead Coach and with Calgary Canoe Club too.  My role has a leadership component and I do want to better myself in this area. However, I am not sure this area is the most straight forward for me to use as a project.

I am perhaps more likely to prefer something of a more technical nature where questions and answers are probably more straight forward. One of my mentors, Dr. Larry Holt passed away recently. Dr. Holt was my honours advisor at Dalhousie and who continued to be a great inspiration and influence. He was the first person in my academics who challenged me in a manner that was encouraging. Dr. Holt was the first to work with me in a way that made me want to know what was weak in my work and make me eager to identify it, so to become a better student. When working on some directed studies at Dalhousie, he would encourage me to simplify the question. One question builds one answer at a time.

So, for this course I am thinking of Dr. Holt and his advice. I want to ensure my topic is direct and targets a question of interest to my coaching practice. Outside of the area of leadership and in the technical realm the ‘new to me’ things  is the information and sessions I have gained from training peaks data. For the past year (nearly) I have collected and watched the training record of one senior athlete. With this process I have realized that although I have a lot of theoretical knowledge, I did not have the information to apply it to programs or to really know how an individual responds to them.

The most simple questions, I realize are not known (openly) in my sport. At least to me and I have a pretty good handle on what the Canadian coaches are doing. I find myself feeling wholly inadequate when reviewing the work coaches in cycling who seem much further along in ‘evidence-based-coaching’. The Canadians coach as though we are writing a theoretical ‘how-to’ coach manual. Everything is sound in theory but very little individualization occurs in the real world and the gap analysis seems to play only a minor role in steering the program away from that for the 50th percentile athlete.

Even in the ’smaller’ senior team groups where the training data could be manageable, it does not seem to be the basis for evaluation or training. There is so much more now for technology to monitor athletes and their response than 10 or 20 years ago. Yet, our coaching remains mostly unchanged. After nearly a year of watching the training peaks data, I find myself wishing I had explored this sooner. A simple example, I was surprised to see that a workout I had been prescribing resulted in twice the workload that I had expected compared to others. Instantly I learned to cut this in half to hav the athlete perform the planned load. Simple things like this, fundamental but straightforward realizations.

Much the the data that is collected raises more questions than answers. I have not found any literature for paddlers but there is so much on cyclists who have been using this information for a couple decades now. The introduction to training with power on the bike has now become the norm and there is a vast amount of data and the elements the lead to top performance, overreacng and under training. I can use this information and generalize to my sport in some cases but in others I done know if the numbers are good or bad.

One athlete I am monitoring has a critical training load (CTL) that has reached about 100 (Training stress score). The CTL is a weighted rolling average of the past 42 days and equates roughly to level of fitness. Last season the max value was about 80 so now is already ~25% higher than last season and a significant increase. Fitness is good, but how much is needed? When is too much? Is there too much? So a simple question, what is a typical world class CTL range for a performer in this sport?  I can read that a Tour de France rider may perform well at a value of 130-150 but is this true for a paddler who races under 2 min? What do I advise this athlete? How do I make comments ‘evidence based’.

This is just one simple example and one simple question that I have no answer for (I have many others). But the answer would be a powerful bit of knowledge for the coach and athlete (– if anyone has an answer, give me a call –).  If I was collecting data on our team for a few years I may learn this. If I collect data on this one athlete for another year I may start to learn this, ‘for this paddler’.

So I wonder, is there a straight forward way to answer just one question relating to all this extra info I am watching and the questions it creates. Would a topic in this more technical area of monitoring be suited for my directed study in KIN 530?

Posted below are some screen grabs of the data I have been watching for the past 10 months. These will open to larger version if clicked on or if you select to open in a separate window.

Hmmmm…. OK, I leave this email at this point and wait to see if you have comments. Basically, just looking to engage in some conversation that will help me set a direction and get going on a project.

   

Interacting with others, creating a growth environment

This is my first blog entry since continuing with the UBC Masters in High-Performance Coaching and Technical Leadership.

It is October, I am in Regina with the warm days of summer behind me. Already my mind is occupied with spring training for March and the logistics of a month in Florida.

Escaping the ice and cold of Canada, paddlers from clubs, provincial and national teams make the southward migration each spring. Looking forward, I imagine hot sun, warm waters and dolphins who share the Florida canals. It is more than the escape from the cold and the chance to get the paddlers back on the water, it is a time for me to interact with my peers. More than just a weekend conference or a competition, I get the chance to partner with coaches and engage in a month-long collaborative environment. For most of the season, coaches travel parallel paths, and they develop their own teams but rarely interact in meaningful ways. A few teams have the size, and the budget for a large coaching staff and these enjoy the benefit from each other on a day to day basis. However, most of us are a one-man/women-driven show that can leave a coach feeling isolated.

I have found the Florida camp is a rare opportunity to gather together and function as a coaching group. The opportunity is there to share best practices and methods, share problems and solutions, and feel you are part of something larger than your own team. Not all coaches and teams work with others in this way, some prefer to train in isolation and only meet at a competition. However, I have always enjoyed pulling people together and creating something we don’t experience the rest of the season.

Initially, it developed from an exchange with a coaching friend, “Where are you holding your camp this year? Cool, we did _____ last year, but that sounds interesting”. So it goes, two coaching friends partner. Over time, others hear about the mixed group and like the sound of it. When word gets out, you are operating a camp that is open to others, more coaches ask to take part.

In some cases, they are part of small groups that could not do a project like this on their own. Soon 2 coaches grow to 3,4 and 5 etc. Some coaches have years of experience and others are relatively new, all learn how other coaches work. In this way, all of us share and grow as professionals. It is not always easy and working as a group with athletes from competing teams mixed together can be tricky. If you are a hard-line ‘my way is the best way’ kind of coach, then it is not the place for you. However, if you can loosen the reigns on the program details and are open to collaboration, it can be exciting. Each coach brings their own style and process to the team, and we generally put two coaches in one coach boat that goes with each group of paddlers. Over the 4 week camp, coaches change partners and move between groups, so the athletes, too, get the chance to experience different coaching.

One coach explained to his paddler when they complained about the weird instructions of another coach. “Good, I wanted you to be confused, each time a coach challenges how you think about things you come to me. The result is that we have a conversation about it, figure it out, and in the process, both understand things better. If you hear the same thing over and over and nothing new, you will, we will not grow. We are here to grow”.

This season I have organized my training camp and again look and am looking forward to coaches and paddlers attending from different teams. I do most of the camp organization and try to make it easy for others to join in without a lot of logistics. This may involve booking accommodations, budgeting, transporting equipment and general communication. I call it ‘my camp,’ but in the end, I hope everyone feels it is ‘our camp.’

I like the practice of developing my own leadership and interaction skills to facilitate the group. I want all the coaches to feel they are part of the plan and have the freedom to be themselves. In this kind of camp, ‘robot-coaches’ who simply implement the workout on paper with a stopwatch and start/stop commands are not who we want.

Each coach must feel free, to be creative and make use of opportunities in the moment. The expert is the coach who is with the athlete in the moment, not the print on a paper program created days or weeks before. Each coach adds their flavour and sees something a little different from their ‘coaching-eye.’ This leads to some pretty fantastic follow-up conversations between athlete and coach, coach and coach, and even athlete to athlete.

Interacting with others is something that can be organized and something that can be practiced. Finding opportunities and making the most of this significant growth, skill is a performance accelerator.

Musings of a Long-distance coach

Musings of a Long-distance coach

Last night I put my head down in Oklahoma.  I have my club team here for a late season event.  I am away from most of my home team athletes, however  there is one athlete that my Oklahoma adventure does not impact since we are apart most of the year.  She is a member of the Canadian National Team and therefore training at the National Team Centre.  She is, the one away, making her life and chasing her dreams far from family and her personal coach.  With this athlete, my role has changed, with the distance I take on the role of consultant and someone she can rely on to call when needed.  A coach plays the role that is needed, when needed.

I am sleeping in the home of one of the Oklahoma club members.  They are fantastic! I rarely remember my dreams… Most mornings I awake with no recollection of my dreams, I am sure my mind is active and I hope my thoughts are happy and perhaps even productive.   However, for the most part, any memory of these is lost to the night.  This morning was different, this morning was one of those days I awoke still in the middle of my thoughts, I was problem-solving.  The previous day I received a call from my athlete training as part of the national team.  Although I communicate by text regularly and normally once a week by phone,  I knew as soon as I saw her name on my phone something was up to warrant voice call in the middle of the day.  She was frustrated and struggling with the demands on her time.  She needed to talk it through and gain back as the sense of control.

It is Autumn and early in the general preparation phase that’s typically comprised of increasing longer aerobic sessions and the foundations of strength.  It’s also early in the school year which brings much of the same, higher and higher volume of study time.  Living away from home, grocery shopping and the extensive meal preparation routine to support all the training all add to the demand.  After all, everything takes time and to do anything at a high level takes that much more. Putting a National team training plan and a university education together make for a sizable time-management and stress-management challenge.

Not long ago I sat with her national team coach, who had recently been assigned to this particular group. With us, was his strength and condition specialist and joining us by phone the athlete’s long-time mental skills consultant and her nutritionist.  The goal was to start the new season by introducing the coach to the athletes existing support team and share individual assessments from the experience we had built up with the athlete.  Perhaps we could think of it as an unstructured SWoT analysis to help the new coach get to know her a bit more.

A year earlier, I had a similar meeting but then without the coach, the National team did not have a coach assigned to this group over the past year.  At both meetings, I wrote on the conference room whiteboard three Key requirements for the athlete’s success.  They were in the order of importance: Smiles, Strength, Technique.

A little over a year and a half ago the athlete had nearly left the sport due to stress and an unhappy training environment.  I made sure the coach knew this and stressed the importance of the athlete’s ability to smile and enjoy the sport.  She loves to work hard and generally does well to rationalize the demands of training.  However, when things are uncertain and the path forward is not clear or successful, the joy fades quickly. When the smiles fade the long-term prospects of this athlete reaching her potential fade as well.  Strength and technical skills (allowing quickness) were next on the list, however, without taking care of the smiles, other elements would never be fully developed if the joy was lost.

I suggested two things.  The 1st was to enhance her time management strategies and skills to make more of the time she now has.  “The training centre has recourses you can access, that is why we think the national centre is the best place for you and why you are there, right? Maybe you should reach out and have a conversation to see if someone there can help you”.  After years in the sport I have developed relationships with truly remarkable people working in all areas of athletic support.  If it meant calling in some favours to get one to join her team I am ready.  However, first step is to access someone in the centre where she trains.

I believe strongly, the chances of an athlete reaching his or her full potential relies on a full support team of experts working ‘as a team’.  This is the reason the athlete is where she is now, at a National Training Centre, where she can have a professional, well managed and high performing support network.  Over the career of this athlete we took care to build ‘her’ support team of people who know her well, her history, her personality and performance ability.  This is key, my elevator version of this goes something like:

“If Canada has THE BEST functioning support team of coaches and IST’s, creating a high-level training environment, our athletes will reach their potential more often than countries who don’t do this as well”.

The 2nd was to take some items off her plate.  “If you simply cannot manage the demands you have, maybe you will need to lower them”.  If you are not in a position to lower your academic load, can you change your training load while still meeting your goals”?  If so, it would certainly not be by cutting training in the areas needing the most improvement.  We know one area where she naturally excels and perhaps does not need to devote as much time as others may.  This is the aerobic endurance, we know from years of training and monitoring she maintains a very high aerobic level with very little training.  In the past, we have lowered the aerobic volume to gain extra time for, strength, power, recovery time or even increase social time.  All these have been identified as areas this athlete needs to prioritize.

What to do for the 2nd option?  She will need to bring this up with the national coach.  Any adjustment in training will need to be planned and integrated with to the group training.  She is only one person but depends on others so must behave in a manner so that she and those around her improve.  ‘The strength of all improves the strength of the one.’  If all is working well her training partners support her and she supports them.  She simply cannot just think about herself.  The culture required for excellence must touch everyone.

One of the basic training principles is that of INDIVIDUALIZATION.  This states that every athlete is unique and one cookie cutter approach or plan will not yield the same results for all.  To reach the best results for any individual they will require a training plan designed with this uniqueness in mind.  This does not mean everyone will do things completely different but certainly, some differences will exist.  The athlete is a smart and well-educated person who is studying sports science herself so is very aware of the individualization principle.

Currently, all the women in the training group are on the same training plan.  I have suggested to her this may be the opportunity to sit with the coach and share her concerns.  I expect the coach will welcome the conversation and be happy to make some ‘tweaks’ to the general group plan so that she will be better served.  This is, in fact, the process we know is often employed:  A cookie-cutter plan is given to the group but over time the coach learns how the individual responds and adapts for each.  With repeated adjustments, some plans may become more tailored to each athlete(s) with similar responses are grouped together with the plan ensuring every member of the team improves.

So, this is where we are this morning.  Problem-solving strategies for conversations with the coach, reaching out to the Centre support team for training or advice in time management skills and lacking all the smiles we need.  Next week, I will make a point to follow up with the athlete and if no progress has been made I will offer to step in myself on her behalf.  This is my role while she is away with the team, provide advice, and support where possible. The athlete likes to be responsible for herself with the national coach and her relationships so I respect that.  In one week, we will see what has happened and if there is a need for me to reach out to the coach myself.

This stuff is important!  Important enough, to occupy my dreams.  Important enough, to climb with me out of slumber into the new day.

Personal Text from athlete…. Making smiles

 

Letting Go. The paradox of coaching success.

Some days… it feels like everything is going right and progress is found in each coaching session. The athlete is hungry to learn, they are progressing, we are discovering new, better methods for skills training. The struggle is paying off. In these times, ‘a-ha’ moments are occurring in rapid-fire. I live for these times. I love working with the athlete to search out and find the missing element, to fill the gap between good and great.

Most of the time I work directly with the athlete, but what about the times I need to step back, to give the athlete time to struggle, to self-discover and the ‘just do it’. These are the times I hate. In these times I am not able to contribute, I am not in control, not even a bit. I am forced to watch and wait for the next time I am needed. In the progression these times happen in semi-regular intervals. However, I know the next problem and the next hurdle to overcome is around the next corner. Once the athlete can consolidate and cement the new lesson or ability, we will need to move on to the next. However, in these times where I am forced to step back I am still uneasy.

I know it is the athlete who is in the game, on the start line, in the gym and on the podium but when I am contributing it is like I am in the game too. When I am not, the result and process both are out of my hands. I feel helpless.

Trust is a big word and a important word. Is it that I don’t trust the athlete to do what they need to do on their own. I do trust them, so why is it that I get so anxious while I can’t have my hand or voice in the game in one way or another. The goal of the coach is after all to develop the athlete to the point they no longer need you and they can move forward on their own.

The we have done a great job the coach may become more of a spectator who waits longer and longer between being needed. Eventually perhaps, if all goes well the coach becomes a full time spectator as the athlete performs the magic on the field of play.

Perhaps I don’t want to be a spectator. I want to be a coach. I don’t want to celebrate this great and final coaching success, the success of no longer being needed! I want to struggle in the trenches; I want to solve problems; I want to teach each day and revel in each discovery.

How I do I celebrate letting go of the process I love. This is the paradox of coaching success.

Reply – long enough to be it’s own;-)

I have added this reply as it’s own post since I seem to have gotten carried away when reflecting on Dave’s comment.  Original post at … https://blogs.ubc.ca/coachmike/2017/05/08/the-problem-with-experience-when-seeking-change/

Thanks, Dave.
I need to reflect on this a bit to answer well as it is so infused into how I now do things. Or at least how I think I coach, want to coach.

I can think quickly of a few a-ha moments that come to mind although at the time I don’t know that I realized the impact they would have to ‘free’ me from the same coaching dogma that I was exposed as a developing coach. The first was when I had the fantastic fortune of meeting Dr Larry Holt as my Honours Supervisor at Dalhousie University. I recall sitting at his desk as he reviewed a draft of a research paper I was working on, basically, he was ripping it apart in a big way. I had never been a good student in high school and it left me defensive to criticism and I had some pretty big walls built up. However, on this day I left his office and realized I enjoyed the interaction. Dr Holt had managed to make me want to know what I could do better (rather than what I had done wrong) and this was a first in my academic life. From this point on I began to seek out areas of weakness and rather than consider questions I could not answer as problems I viewed them as untapped potential, and It was my job (a fun one) to seek out the answer. I think it is from this point on I started to share this view with my athletes to promote a un-tapped potential approach to gaps in performance and promote openly conversation on the seeking mindset. This, of course, is a big step in moving my coaching into a partnership where we both worked to ‘find’ solutions. This meant a lot more conversation with the paddlers. I would probe with questions until we came to those we could not answer or defend. When we found them we would say we have now found some potential yet to be utilized, “this is exciting”. So as some other coaches around me were barking out orders and commands I was starting to have discussions.

A friend of mine who coached in my area had one of his athletes make the 2000 Olympics. At that moment we joked that now he was an Olympic level coach and he had reached a new standard. We joked about it because we both understood that as much as anything else the athlete (by making the games) had been the one to make him an Olympic coach. This is still in the back of my mind after all these years and I think has promoted my evolution to my current coaching style. Coaches more often than not are chasing the athlete’s development. We develop coaching ability to meet the level of the athletes we have and when we get a good group or talent we are forced to adjust and improve to stay at their rapidly advancing level. This starts to sound now like the athlete is in a leadership role and at the very least an equal one. Again, this story seeps into my beliefs and my value of the athlete as a driving force in partnership with the coach. Where we often think the athlete asks the questions and the coach provides the answer, as partners and both leaders in the development, the coach and athletes both ask questions. Both are investigators searching for gaps (potential un-yet tapped).

Only a few years after the 2000 games I was again fortunate to have a master coach (and sports psychologist) agree to come mentor me for a week with my team. He has produced many world champions and many of these are now head coaches in many countries. I knew his record and admired his ‘educator-like’ approach. He had been an instructor at a level 3 coaching course I attended and I wanted more of what he was preaching. So he came, I watched, I was dumbfounded! After a week of him working with my paddlers and me mostly observing they had made progress that would have taken me a full season. The amazing thing about it was that I could not pinpoint a single lesson or correction he had made in that time. I had wanted so badly to jump in and tell the athlete what to fix but he did not. He seemed not even to notice the obvious problems. He simply described a drill or a sensation and asked the athlete to try it. He followed up with things like “wonderful, wonderful, yes and how did it feel…, yes very good now try this one…”. The training sessions would go by and I watched the athlete open up and become reflective; the athlete feedback was growing deeper and richer. Above all else they were smiling more and more, they loved the conversations. At first, of course, the feedback was not as deep but it came quickly. So, I was amazed. I had viewed a week of the most dramatic improvement and there seemed to be no error-detection, no corrections, no stop doing this and do that. But the results were there, and the smiles and motivation were there too.

Over the years I have spent time with my mentor when I can. I have taken my most talented athletes to experience his magic directly and the result is always the same. Big smiles and big improvements. Like Dr Holt he had found a way to make the athlete want to investigate and find gaps and connections, to enjoy the self-analysis and the search for things they can modify. You see, each time the athlete was asked “and how did it feel” they became the teacher. Now I realize the role had been flipped. The coach can not feel what the athlete can feel. We only know what we see on the surface and this is shallow at best. For the coach to learn with the athlete both must share. Sometimes with my talented athletes I listen and think to myself: I really can not follow this at all, it is outside what I know but I am excited to understand. I let them talk on describing to me how they feel and what they think about and I struggle to integrate this into my knowledge.

In my post I talk about ‘opening’ the athlete and really what I mean is taking down the walls of a fixed mindset. However, this is not only for the athlete, the coach must be open as well. The coach is a performer as much as the athlete and a fixed mindset in the coach is just as much a roadblock as it is for the athlete. From time to time I observe coaches receive feedback they do not understand and rather than identifying it as potential they shift the conversation immediately back to a command based interaction where the coach is safe behind his walls.

I constantly struggle to be the coach I want to be and to interact with my athlete to create the smiles of discovery that I witness my mentor create so easily. I now take pride in no longer having certain ‘direct command’ style instructions that once were common for me. In a previous post I mentioned, “Questions lead to confusion, Confusion leads to Discussions and Discussion leads to solutions”. I have found the smiles in this process are a measure of each small a-ha moment the athlete is experiencing. In fact only now reflecting on this do I realize this. Each smile is a small a-ha moment in the process. I have for sometimes said that Smiles are a Key Performance Indicator. With this smile=ah-ha now I can see the connection and why those smiles are so infused into the coaching interactions I strive to have each day. In fact, it works both ways; for each a-ha moment I have in the interaction I smile as well. So now the athlete and coach both with their own a-ha moments frequently occurring create a great interaction and excitement.

I will end my reply and musing here but I will continue with this in my mind and muse more. In writing this reply I have at lease one more a-ha and one more smile to put in my coaching bank.

I am not 100% sure this answers your question in the 2nd part, experience after you need it, but I think we go into each new experience unprepared, it is new after all. The best we can do is hope that the previous lesson has prepared us enough to become better after each new challenge. I am currently preparing my athletes for National Team Selections this weekend (only days away now) and as we have for some time, we are talking about the ‘struggle’. The ‘struggle is the search for a new ah-ha moment and new smile in the event. Struggling to make the event one we improve from. This struggle is hopefully what we have trained ourselves to enjoy. After the event, we will talk about the search and the struggle and look for the a-ha’s.

Cheers,
Mike

The problem with experience when seeking change.

We all know the value of having a good foundation of training. The athlete development aims to build skills and abilities in sequence so that one is well developed and able to support the next. If each step is done well, the athlete progresses to each next stage with a strong platform for future skills and training. Training abilities and habits are established and strengthened. In this way, step-by-step, the athlete moves up the performance ladder.

The athlete is not alone on the journey, the athlete may have the same coach and team may be the entire way or move from one stage to the next changing environments and experiencing new coaches and team members at each step.

In either case, experience and expertise are built and a foundation of experience is developed. This is the plan. But when does experience become a hindrance rather than an aid? If all goes well it never should, but this is not always the reality.

Every athlete and coach have the experience of working to undo or change, correct or strengthen elements that should have been perfected in previous stages. It could be that the athlete was advanced too quickly to the next stage without perfecting and cementing previously developed abilities. It could be that steps were skipped altogether. It could also be the case that previously developed skills were simply not maintained and have faded.

When starting from scratch with a new, inexperienced, athlete every skill and sport specific lesson is welcomed. The athlete is likely wide open to try new things and has few preconceptions of what is right or wrong; what is the way to do things and what is not; what feels right and what feels wrong. However, this is not the case with the experienced athlete. With the experienced athlete, they will have an existing level of expertise that cannot simply be ignored.

Unlike the new athlete that can be thought of as a blank slate, wide open to take suggestions and accept the superior expertise of the coach, the experienced athlete will have a set of fixed concepts and habits in place. This may be in the form of training interactions with team members, understanding of the mechanics of a skill or belief in the best competition strategy.

Where the new athlete may be considered ‘open’, the experienced athlete may be somewhat ‘closed’ or set in their ways. In this case, it may be considered that experience is a hindrance rather than an aid to develop or make changes to the athlete’s performance. ‘Opening’ the athlete again must be done with respect for the expertise and experience that has been developed with much investment along their journey.

Socrates is credited with a method of debate designed to develop critical thinking that uncovers and challenges existing assumptions. This is referred to as the ‘Socratic Method’ and is comprised of probing questions leading to the analysis of previously accepted hypothesis. In a practical sense, this is a process of asking the athlete to explain what they believe and challenging them to justify the underlying premise.

 

To ‘open’ the athlete we must engage in a discussion around the existing assumptions. The key to the Socratic method is to have the athlete realize gaps in what they think they know for certain, allowing for consideration of alternate approaches. In practice, it does not take long to realize how much we blindly accept as fact without proper scrutiny.

When working with the experienced athlete, Socratic discussions play an important first step for the athlete to ‘buy-in’ to the need for change in how they currently perform. Improvement by definition requires change; the athlete must be willing and invested in making the change. The coach cannot use brute force to dictate the athlete’s actions and beliefs.

Once the athlete and coach realize the gap in training behaviour, ability, skill or another performance element they enter a system of problem-solving. Where former premises existed, now they are questioned, new possibilities are explored and tested. This stage is one of searching for a better way to replace the old. In this stage, a heuristic method of teaching and learning may be adopted. The word heuristic has at its base the meaning to find and to seek. New or old, athletes benefit from a shift to a more heuristic mindset where improvements are constantly sought.

Once ‘open’ the experienced athlete is much like the ‘new’. They are both motivated and ready to learn and discover.

Creativity, going against the grain and fighting the status quo

Recently I have been reading some work by Susanna Rahkamo. Susanna is a former competitive ice dancer who, with her partner Petri Kokko, achieved the 1995 European Championship Gold and the 1995 World Silver Medal honours, along with strong olympic competition results. Susanna has a very interesting perspective on sport. I came across her work by chance and am happy that I have. She has served as the Finnish Figure Skating Association President and is now the Vice President of the Finnish Olympic Committee as well as working as a Leadership Consultant.

I was very happy when she agreed to share her 2016 doctoral dissertation titled, ‘The Road to Exceptional Expertise and Success’. Susanna’s interest is in the role of creativity as an element of expertise. To be good or even match the best previous performances, one need only to replicate what others have done before. However, to surpass previous achievements, a novel achievement is needed. When striving to surpass best ever performances, an element of creativity is required which extends the current state of knowledge, performance and expertise.

I am still in the middle of reading her interesting work but the creative approach taken by Susanna and Petri is inspiring and it puts creativity on my list of key performance elements.

In her own sports career, she and her partner were faced with the reality of competing against the established Russian Ice dance system that dominated the sport. By Susanna’s account, Finland lacked such a strong organizational system and culture of excellence. They soon realized that trying to beat the best in the world at their own game would be futile. With the realization that the pair would need to find their own way to capture the judges attention, they embarked on a spectacular and innovative career, unlocking the ridged culture of the ice dancing world. Working to show expertise rather then replicate it, the pair reached the top of the world stage and to iconic status in their home country. In reviewing Susanna’s story, I am struck by the courage required to discard the status quo and forge a new path while all the ‘experts’ promoted the proven pathway.

Reflecting on Susanna’s journey and my own experiance in coaching, I realize key turning points in my teams and even my personal development occurred when I had the willingness to fight the status quo and go against the grain. Although I don’t pretend to have changed the sport, my role as a coach is to transform an existing team culture in order to surpass the previous best. The role of coach is the same as performer as they both require the same level of creativity in order to excel and go beyond the normal coaching development pathways. I have chosen to be a life long learner in the field of sports science and have sought out partnerships and mentors with unique approaches and philosophies. At each step away from the tried and true path, personal coaching advances have been achieved.

In my sport of Sprint Canoe & Kayak, the majority of athletes are found in eastern Canada. Lake Banook, in Dartmouth Nova Scotia, is the home to three of the largest Canoe/Kayak clubs and is the site of a National High Performance training centre. Within this small region there are nine teams. Together this represents one of the more densely populated regions for sprint canoe in the world. In this region I was developed, first as an athlete then as a coach. In contrast, western Canada clubs are isolated with sometimes more then a full days drive to the next team. These clubs have considerably smaller membership numbers. The disparity between depth of performance and expertise across these regions is extreme.

Although there may be very different environments between Canoe Kayak Teams in each Canadian region, as there was between Susanna’s Finland and the dominant Russian Team of the time, there is no creativity in how Sprint Canoe Kayak events are scored. It is simply a first-past-the-post event and the fastest athletes over the set distance are the champions. Therefore, creativity in my sport is largely limited to the process teams develop to out-perform the rest.

I’ve coached in Nova Scotia, Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan, so I am familiar with the big and the small, the rich and the poor, the clubs with long history and culture and the new start-ups. Regardless the current state, when taking on a new club or team I often hear the same message, we are not like ‘they’ are and what works there won’t work here. Yet the reality remains, what is the normal way of doing things if this new team is not producing the desired performances. Change is needed.

It is natural to look at successful neighbours and to world leaders for a model. So often the question is asked: what do they do? Perhaps some of these practices can be adopted yet others are specific to the individual context. Regardless, new actions must be taken since simply doing the same thing leads to a variation on the unacceptable status quo. For things to change, things must change. Change is welcome by some and always resisted by others. Creativity is change and creativity takes courage. It is a step into the unknown and onto a new path.

When I took on a new team in Ontario, one early change was to strengthen the sense of ‘team’ among the athletes and staff. To do so, we broke away from participation in a major provincial team spring camp initiative. Politically, it took courage, however, my athletes were so often integrated with our partner clubs, it was hurting our own ability to function as a team. Pulling our group together for our own 4-week spring camp was an opportunity that started us down the road that lead to a National Championship 5 years later.

In contrast, the opposite approach was needed with a western team. The Western team was geographically isolated from the bulk of the paddlers in the country and only interacted perhaps once a year at the Canadian Championships. In this case, the action taken was to move our teams’ spring camp to a location near the national team and most of the stronger eastern clubs. The move made it possible to gain exposure to and interact with larger groups. This was a big change from what was the ‘norm’ at the time. To further this agenda, we took a 4-week van tour across Canada taking part in major events. We visited as many clubs as possible and joined in on their training sessions. This was a big eye opener for the team who had only known their local sport environment. Six years later, these same athletes were regulars on top of the Canadian Podium and representing Canada in international events. These two decisions to deviate from the normal way of doing things were the foundation of future successes.

Unfortunately, to take on these projects meant also breaking away from the existing sport way of doing things and upsetting our partners. In the later case, the 4-week tour meant we would not be attending local events and therefore wearing our region’s events in the short term. It also meant the bulk of our club members would not have the head coach or their training partners at the club since we could not take everyone. Although at the time I did not see these decisions as being creative, I did understand that we were doing things differently. The willingness to break from the norm was needed for a shift in performance. Going against the grain always builds resistance.

As an athlete and then a coach in a strong region, I never questioned how ‘we’ did things. I assumed what others were doing was the ‘best approach’.
I assumed it was the right way as I had lots of top performing athletes, coaches and teams to study and learn from. I used the language they used and adopted their methods and teaching tricks without hesitation. It was not until I took over an isolated western team that these influences were removed.
Separating myself from the well established culture allowed me to develop my own methods and those specifically matched to the context. I was forced to get creative. The willingness to challenge the status quo is the key to creativity, for if not, how can a new course of action be found? Rather than copying those around me, I had to search for better ways to coach and advance my athletes. It allowed me to question previous assumptions and break away from the same methods that others were using. Reflecting back now, I see this as a key spark in my creative coaching. Where I would look for answers before, now I searched for relevant questions.

More then ever my coaching began to model the scientific method. The scientific method is basically a process of developing a theory, taking action, assessment and based on results, modifying the action. The scientific method is a tool for exploration into the unknown. It is also a tool to assess novel and creative endeavours. It can be used by coaches and athletes to lead to a collaborative style of teaching technical skills. After a discussion with athletes on what outcomes are needed, I enjoy a Socratic form of questioning to challenge their assumptions and lead them to ask questions of their own. This ultimately leads to a deeper understanding of the required skill. Often, and it is my hope, the athletes then turn the process around and teach me a new and very personalized approach to mastering the task. As a result, my athletes and I will seem to talk in a kind of secret code that no other coach can identify. Each personalized method and drill is named by the athlete and contains a deep meaning. It is fantastic fun!

Prior to reading Susanna’s work, I did not consider creativity as one of my key performance elements in achieving excellence. However, in reflection of my personal coaching experiences, I now see that each of the small and large steps away from the well traveled path have made my coaching style unique and has empowered me with the willingness to be creative and go against the grain.

BE CREATIVE!

Leading with questions.

Coach Mike’s Discovery Motto: QUESTIONS lead to Confusion, CONFUSION leads to discussion, DISCUSSION leads to understanding, UNDERSTANDING leads to Solutions.

At birth and through life we all grow and develop as individuals.   We all interpret the world and ourselves uniquely, we link the colour blue to an image in our mind, we hear the sound of a dog bark, we feel the warmth of the sun.  We assume that everyone else perceives these things the same as we do but how do we know.  Just because we perceive the colour blue as a specific image in our mind does not mean others do.  The signal we receive as a specific light wavelength is the same for us all but we may have a unique perception of it.  How do we know what blue is to others?  We may presume too much, we are only external observers.  We are only…

As the observer, as a coach, we see what is happening outside the athlete and can perhaps rightfully describe the environment.   However, only the athlete senses directly that environment.  Only they can ‘feel’ what forces they exert, what forces are created within their joints and muscles.  As coaches, we can only see the effect of their actions, we can make assumptions, we can make educated guesses to what they feel and how they create the outcome.  However, we can not feel it.

So I ask, who has the best information?  The coach, as the observer, who only sees the symptom and effects of the athlete’s efforts.  No, it is the athlete who has this knowledge plus the benefit of their full sensory system and supercomputer who has the potential to be the true expert.  If we accept the brain is the most advanced computer on earth and has access to the full and advanced array of sensors throughout the human body, should we not value the information it can gather and it’s decision-making ability?  I believe so, however, we often find the observer simply dictates instructions, treating the athlete like a puppet on the string.  The role of the coach is not to create a puppet, it is to develop the expert.

When we struggle to solve a problem or discover a solution we often seek out an expert in the field.   When the coach and athlete set out to perfect a movement or effort they must do the same.   Often this means video recording a performance and they breaking down each action in slow motion.  It may in some cases mean analyzing force data collected from advanced technology such as gyroscopes, acceleration and velocity sensors.   With all the information we have, we seek to identify and isolate action to eliminate, correct, or strengthen athletic motions.

In my sport of sprint kayaking and canoeing, I have the ability to follow my athletes from a motorized boat and constantly study their actions and the actions of the boat gaining insight to better provide guidance.   I am the expert the athlete looks to.  They often will ask a question like “how was that coach” or “how did that look” or even “was that better”.   I have spent years studying how great paddlers move, what positions they create at specific moments in the stroke and the effects that correspond with them so yes, I can give pretty good advice but this advice is always based on assumptions of information I don’t have.  Often it is information the athlete does.  It at best it is with information from the external sensors mentioned above.  However, the bodies built-in accelerometers, pressure sensors etc are much better than any technology I can instrument the system with.

So, why oh why are they asking me?   After all, I can not feel what they feel, I can not feel what they are doing to the boat.  Sure, I can see what they look like when they create a specific position, action or outcome but the reality is that all the top paddlers in the world look a little different.  Each person is unique and only they are the expert in their own body and only they have spent their lifetime perfecting its use.  Given that each athlete has a unique set of equipment and only they are the expert it is understandable why all the top paddlers have their own unique style. So it there a right way to look?  How could I alone give the correct answer when the ask “how was it, how did it look?  OK, OK…. it is not like I can not give a good opinion and I think I may even give the right one more often than not.  However, if the athlete has the supercomputer and the vast array of sensors that provide far more and far better information than I do why are they asking me?

Reflecting on this I have come to the following basic statement of purpose for coaches and athletes when developing technique.

It is the coaches role to communicate the desired outcome.  It is the athlete’s role to then discover how to achieve the outcome and then teach the coach how it is accomplished.   Although the coach may be the expert in what needs to be done, the how and the why it is the athlete who is the expert when it comes to the equipment (the athletes own body) and it is the expert we must consult to discover the best methodology.  For the coach to provide the best advice to the athlete we must gather all the best information.  Much of this will come from the athlete.

So, the coach is an expert and has some of the information, they are the expert of theory and required outcome.  The athlete, on the other hand, has access to the raw information of what is happening within the human system, they are the expert here.  The coach must gain access to what the athlete has in order provide good advice.

Unfortunately, many athletes have little practice in attending to the vast amount of information they have.  It seems many athletes would rather just ask the observer (the coach) what needs to be done differently.  “What does it look like Coach?”.   The wise coach will train and strengthen the athlete’s awareness of the information they literally have at their fingertips.   The coach may respond by asking some probing questions: what is it you were attempting?; how did you go about that?; how did it feel?   Prompting the athlete to critically reflect they become practiced at listening to all the information they have, and only they have.

It is the objective of the coach and athlete to work together and form a strong problem solving, solution finding team.  When we can identify a problem, we have identified potential performance not yet realized.  In this stage, we may both be confused as we struggle to understand the complex elements and their interactions.  Finding these issues may reveal performance gaps that can be narrowed.  This is a joyous thing, finding a performance gap is finding untapped potential, it is an exciting thing!

When coaches assume they are the only expert or when the athlete has little practice paying attention to personal information they are missing what it takes to reach their potential.  The interactions and investigative ability of the athlete-coach team must be practiced and perfected always.

So what is the process to find untold potential?

  • Questions identify gaps that we struggle to understand, we call this confusion.

  • Confusion leads to discussion, hypothesis and experimentation.

  • Discussion and experimentation ultimately lead to understanding.

  • Understanding leads to Solutions.

Without questions, we can have no answers.

———————————–

For more on discovery through questioning, investigate the Socratic Method.

“…Accordingly he asked questions, letting the other man do most of the talking, but keeping the course of the conversation under his control, and so would expose the inadequacy of the proposed definition of courage. The other would fall back on a fresh or modified definition, and so the process would go on, with or without final success” (Schiller, 2008, p. 3).

“The purpose of the Method is to teach, to make known anything that was unknown before and to reorganize and rebuild mistakenly incompletely learned facts and beliefs. The questions of the Socratic method can be provocative but it is not to cause the perplexity but to help people realize the deficiencies in their knowledge” (Boghossian, 2012)

Schiller N. (2008). Finding a Socratic Method for Information Literacy Instruction, College & Undergraduate Libraries, 15:1-2, 39-56.

Boghossian, P. (2012). Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, humiliation, shame and a broken egg. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44:7, 710-720.

Goals – Not so SMART

In my last blog post I mentioned a recent coaching assignment in Seattle.  I mentioned the miserable weather and the great people.  I want to use this post to reflect on one of the sessions I conducted.

I was assigned the ‘blue’ and the ‘yellow’ groups.  These were names given to two of the top speed groups in the camp and made up about 25 paddlers ranging in age from 14-18.  They were from various club training environments and many did not know each other well.  My task was to lead a goal setting session.  I dont know about you but when I think about goal setting the SMART goals check list comes to mind.  SMART always helps to focus the discussion of goals.

  • Specific – Clearly defined that lead you to the destination or outcome.  They need to be workable, functional so you are able to follow them.
  • Measurable – It is fine to say you want to be better but what is better, how do you know when you are better, are you ‘better’ enough to say you have reached your goal? Goals must be measurable
  • Attainable – A goal can be easy to achieve or difficult.  It can be something you know you can accomplish or something you believe you may be able to accomplish.  Stretching your limits is different from the impossible.  Improbable is cool, there is a chance.  Impossible is not.
  • Relavent – Goals should help you achieve your task, mission or dream.  Setting goals that do not do this does not move you forward. There must be some strategic thinking here.  A goal is a tool you use.
  • Time bound – Time is part of the planning process and we must know when we plan to achieve our goal.  We must know when to celebrate.  In the case of milestone or sub-goals we must also make goal part of the plan to evaluate and assess our actions.  Is what we are doing moving us in the right direction to achieve the result we want. If yes, cool… we can stay on the current plan. If not we can modify our strategy and move forward again.  Time provides check points along the way and anchors the final destination making it much more likely we will be successful.

There I was, in a small room holding my hot chocolate to stay warm and with a group of teenage faces staring up. I could only imagine the wide variety of personal goals in this group.  How was I to deal with SMART here.  Add to this, days of training and fatigue were setting in so they had shortening attention spans.  I would need to keep them engaged and active if I was going to hold their attention.  This could not be a lecture! To be honest, I had no plan!

So… What do these people care about? What is a common goal we could discuss?  I made a bold decision.   There would be no talk of SMART goals in this session. No talk of short term, medium term, long term or even dream goals.   We would need to talk about what they care about most, whatever that was.  What do they value, what do they admire and who?  For a group of sprint canoe and kayak athletes I could imagine some general directions they all would agree but I thought we needed to start not at paddlers but as a group of athletes, a group of people.

Not knowing exactly how it would turn out and where the group would lead me I began: “OK, quickly we don’t have much time today, there are some exciting things you need to teach me”, “remember the number I give you.. 1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,……”.  I quickly assigned working groups and we started.  I was ready at the white board and coach Mia was there to help me as well.

STEP 1:  Along the top of the board I wrote: TEAM, ATHLETE and ADMIRE.  “OK gang, I am going to send you out of the room and you will have 5 min then come back. We need to know what qualities you value in your team or in any ‘great’ team you can think of.  You need to do the same for a ‘great’ athlete you know or know of.  Lastly you need to list the qualities you admire in others.

I have a belief that I don’t think anyone would think too far fetched.  It is hard to talk about ourselves but we all seem to find it easy to talk about others.  Generally the things we value or admire in others are qualities we would like to have ourself.  This was not to be a individualized goal session this was to be the start of a conversation around what ‘we’ want to be, what we want to develop into and what we value as a community and as a team.  This was workable, this had a chance of success, was relevant and I had 60min to get it all done.  OK, so my goal was SMART but the goals discussion format and outcome may not be.  To be honest and with their feedback leading the discussion, I didn’t know where it was going.  What I did know is that it was going to be a fun conversation.  It was going to be their conversation.

Here are the results of Step 1.  The blue is what we first came back with.

img_7604

Looking at the list I was pretty impressed, maybe even inspired.  I view this kind of thing as a snapshot of the kind of community and qualities this group of athletes value and wanted to be a part of.  This is the list of qualities that could be used to give some direction to a set of value statements for the group.  It could be a guiding document or filter which individualized and team performance goals must be in alignment to.

It is hard to say how everyone else saw this but I can tell you how I see it and how it relates to my personal coaching philosophy.  My mental model of how I see participation in sports and life….  People want to be able to be proud of the kind of people they are and not only what they achieve but the kind of things they strive to achieve.  This list, put together very quickly, gave me a good idea of what we could all agree on as the type of people and team we wanted to be.

Step 2:  This would have been enough but we we had 15min to go.  From step one we now had an idea of who we wanted to be.  Now we wanted to know what kind of paddler we wanted to be.  Up to this point I had emphasized the word ‘great’.  Great team, great paddler…. So we already had a sense in the room that we were striving for greatness.  Striving for greatness as paddlers is certainly a goal but it is not very specific.  Each of these young men and women and even coaches or parents in the room with us may have had different ideas of what greatness is, so I chose to give it a bit of direction.  I asked what are the physical or performance qualities/elements we can measure that contribute to great performances or great results?

I think this question leads us back to what is more likely talked about and focused on in the regular training environment.  These are items the paddler could target to enhance and better their performance.  The caveat was that whatever they put on the board had to be measurable.  “Same groups as last time, five minutes go!”.

The red print on the board in the image below is what Step 2 created.   I must say, it did take some work to keep the answers as measurable and specific but with some quick group discussion they tweaked the answers and here they are.  The physical and performance qualities they thought were important.

  • ABC + ROM – agility, balance, coordination + functional range of motion
  • Skill – Technical and in-boat coordination
  • Strength – General and specific
  • Power – General and specific
  • Endurance – General and specific
  • Speed – General and specific

img_7633

I did not know what was going to happen.  This was a coach guided session but it was athlete driven.  What is on the board came from questions designed to pull out a description of the kind of people and environment these athletes value.  On top of this the group was able to list key elements that they believed were important to be successful from a performance standpoint.

Did any individual come away from this session with personalized SMART goals.  No.  Yet, that was not the point.  What did happen was 60min of active and engaged conversation on what they value and what factors they will need to consider when creating their goals.   Did everyone in the room leave with a strong sense of the direction and the kind of people we wish to be.  You betcha!!

Did I have fun.  Definitely!  Watching these kids come to life and express themselves was great. When the athletes lead you it is fantastic.  For me… Success was not directly measurable but still, It was obvious.  I had achieved my goal, to facilitate a session that would help atheltes develop their own SMART and personalized goals moving forward.

BTW.. I was not the only one taking pictures of the white board at the end of the session.  In noticed parents, coaches and paddlers lined up for a pic too.

Kindness makes a difference and word travels fast.

This past weekend I spent 4 cold, rainy and miserable days in Seattle.  It was fantastic.

Nearly a decade ago when I was still coaching at the Calgary Canoe Club and Serving as the Southern Alberta Provincial Coach I ‘mistakenly’ started what is now called the Seattle Frostbite Training Camp. At the time, I was looking for a reason, a carrot, a tool to motivate my atheltes until the end of the fall season but there were no events left to train for. I knew from experience motivation and even attendance at training started to drop around this time. I needed an event. So by partner provincial coach, Joanne Devlin, and I gave the coach in Seattle call. Seattle was just a day’s drive away (16 hours) so just close enough and perhaps even exotic enough to get out group psyched up for a road trip.

Hi Aasim (pronounce Awesome), I know right… ‘Hi there, I’m Awesome (Aasim)’. Anyway, so I called Aasim and asked if he would mind us showing up for a week and mixing in with his training. We could end the week with a fun, yet casual, 10km race. It will be great! So in 1st week of November, Joanne and I with 13 paddlers crammed into a van and towing a trailer full of kayaks headed for the border.

Well, we had a fantastic time! The people at the Seattle Canoe Club are some of the best I have ever met. So kind and giving. They welcomed us, put us up in their homes, organized meals and well…. we loved it. Yes, we did train and even did that 10km race.

The next 4 years we returned with more and more people and each year we found others were wanting to join us. We saw BC paddlers making the trip, Californians, and even paddlers from Georgia and Washington DC on the east coast. Eventually, we even saw Canoe Kayak Canada’s Coach Development Director come see what was going on in this rainy and cold corner of the US. The year after a USA National Team coach made it part of his annual plan.

Why all the buildup, any word that got out was simply word of mouth. Well, it was the people. Despite the bitter chill from being out all day in the cold Seattle rain you just feel great to be around these people. Yes, the training and coaching were good, we made sure of that but it is not what I value most.

Until this year, I have been away from Alberta and 5 or 6 Frostbite camps have gone by.  While in Ottawa, I was not about to load up a van and make that kind of drive, so I have not been back.  Aasim has been gone too and is now in Oklahoma City coaching a team there.

This year, however, I am a little closer and my good friend Jason gave me a call. No van but a flight this time. I was to travel in luxury, 6 hours rather than 16.  The invitation to be a guest coach was one I gladly took up.  Soon I was back in under the grey skies in the cold rain with the warm paddlers of the Seattle Canoe and Kayak Team.  If I can I’ll be back shivering in the rain again next year.

Below are my two super wet, cold and cute athletes, Emma and Zoey, loving it too.

img_7594img_7630

At the end of the camp we had a 2.5 hour drive north to Vancouver where we would catch our flight back to Regina.  What do you think they talked about?  It was how nice their billet family was!

In only a few days of returning I already hearing rumours that more paddlers have heard about the experience from last week and are talking about attending in 2017.  Kindness makes a difference and word travels fast.