Author Archives: joyce kim

Assignment 5 Case Study

Karen is a full-time secondary school teacher and department head at a small independent school in an urban area of Vancouver, British Columbia. There are approximately 350 students in grades 8-12 in the senior school. The school has been using a LMS called Schoology for the past five years. There is a full-time network administrator and one full-time IT support staff member to assist with all IT issues in the senior school. There is also a full-time teacher whose course load includes part-time IT support, and this teacher is often the first point of contact for any user-support for Schoology. Most teachers at the school are comfortable with using Schoology. The most common faculty usage of this LMS is with course or group announcements, uploading course materials and documents, and assignment dropboxes.

Assessment is a hot topic in most BC schools currently, and it is no different at Karen’s school. Karen has been tasked with broaching the subject of assessments and innovation in thinking about assessment with her department members. In her department, all of her teachers have been using Schoology to administer assessments to varying degrees. One teacher, who is comfortable with using technology, uses available tools in Schoology to provide a variety of formative and summative assessments and to provide timely and informative feedback where the “feedback is appropriate, in relation to students’ understanding of what they are supposed to be doing”  (Gibbs & Simpson, 2004, p. 21). The majority of teachers in her department and the school as a whole, however, use the assessment tools available in Schoology as placeholders in the students’ school calendars. Teachers use these placeholder assessments to populate the Schoology tool called the Workload Planner. Teachers are asked to check the Workload Planner to ensure that no more than two major assessments are given on the same day so as not to overload the students.

Sample Workload Planning Page

Karen, though not directly affiliated with the IT department, strives to meet the ISTE Standards for Educators where she can serve as an educational technology leader and collaborator in her school. She aims to “model for colleagues the identification, exploration, evaluation, curation and adoption of new digital resources and tools for learning” and “dedicate planning time to collaborate with colleagues to create authentic learning experiences that leverage technology” (ISTE Standards for Educators, 2017).

The issue for Karen is as follows: How can Karen promote a culture shift in the way her department members, and all teachers in the school, can view the use of LMS systems to promote innovative thinking in assessment practices?

References

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/fast/pdfs/Gibbs%20and%20Simpson%202004-05.pdf

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2017). Standards for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators

Assignment 4 Reflection – Joyce Kim (&Alexis Handford)

Assignment 4 Reflection

To best recognize our extensive work together throughout this project, we wrote a collaborative reflection. When we calculated our working hours together, we realized that we have spent up to four synchronous meeting hours per week to discuss, design, and edit all of the different aspects of Assignments 3 and 4. We will include an individual reflection portion at the end of each of our posts in addition to our collaborative reflection.

Our Course and working in Moodle

When we first met to discuss creating our course module, we knew we wanted to explore an LMS tool and content that would both utilize and challenge our complementary skill sets (Alexis’ experience as an instructional designer and Joyce’s teaching experience). Bates notes to adhere to best practices for online learning design teachers must “[work] closely with instructional designers and media professionals whenever possible” and that “teachers working with instructional designers will need to decide which media they intend to use on pedagogical as well as operational grounds” (Bates, 2015). Implementation of the SECTIONS model means collaboration between multiple stakeholders. We also wanted to work with an LMS with which neither of us had worked extensively. This left us with the two choices of Moodle or Google Classroom as we had interacted as students or administrators for the other LMS options. Our next step was to refer to each of our LMS Evaluation rubrics that we had created in Assignment 2 to assess Moodle and Google Classroom. Though neither LMS platform met all our expectations, we felt that Moodle best fulfilled our criteria for functionality. When referencing the LMS Evaluation Rubric (Cruz et al., 2018), Moodle met or exceeded expectations in the following areas:

  • Fully supports user-intuitive actions, such as WYSIWYG drag-and-drop functionality, instant upload and auto-save, history tracking.
  • Provides a comprehensive range of assessment and evaluation tools: standardized and non-standardized testing methods, assignments, and activities.
  • Allows for a complete range of both synchronous and asynchronous modes of communication.
  • Fully supports instructor-student, student-student, and third-party interaction..
  • Allows for user-unique curation of course content including the integration of external learning tools. 

Continue reading

Assignment 3 Introductory Module Reflection

For this assignment, I partnered with Alexis Handford. Alexis has experience in instructional design at the postsecondary level, and I have experience as an educator at both secondary and postsecondary levels. We wanted the pairing of our experience and skill sets to very closely mimic the professional collaboration that occurs in designing and implementing online learning opportunities at a Canadian postsecondary institution. Additionally, given our experience as students who are immersed in an online educational context, we knew we wanted to take the advantages and benefits of learning we have personally experienced through the MET program and to embed those opportunities in the course for our potential students. Given the number of worldwide users, its overall brand recognizability, and its open source accessibility, we knew we chose Moodle as our learning management system. Overall, we found its usability, intuitive controls, and built-in graphical user interface elements very accessible to a novice user.

I will reflect upon two major elements of our design process: the learning theories that underlie the layout of our course materials and content, and our efforts to enmesh relational and social emotional pedagogy with curricular concerns.

Continue reading

LMS Selection: Evaluation Rubric – Self Reflection

Working to create this rubric deepened my understanding of the complexity of LMS selection for a postsecondary institution. We were tasked with providing an LMS scoring rubric for Athabasca University with the specific intention of expanding the distance-education program at the undergraduate level in the English-speaking South Asian market. An additional consideration was the availability of internet connectivity in remote or underserved areas of the region. A closer look at the Athabasca University mission statement and mandate revealed that the institution is “dedicated to the removal of barriers that restrict access to and success in university-level study and to increasing equality of educational opportunity for adult learners worldwide” (Athabasca University, 2017). Our group adopted this as our foundational understanding in developing the rubric, with accessibility and inclusivity as top priorities. For me, the complexity arose when we tried to articulate which specific rubric design elements were to be included in our final product.

Continue reading

Flight Path for Joyce Kim

A bit about myself and my experience:
I’ve been teaching English language and literature for the last 18 years; I’ve worked in a secondary school setting since 2006. What I enjoy the most about secondary school teaching is the chance to support a student in their growth over a long period of time. There really is never a dull moment as I see a student learn and change from grades 8 through 12. I also love discussing and teaching literature; I love helping the students develop the ability to critically analyze and then communicate the issues and values they learn from the texts we study together. Continue reading