David Morris's Blog

https://goo.gl/images/fEFJED 

In recent years the smartphone industry has been dominated by companies such as; Samsung, Apple, LG, and HTC. However, Google looks to be taking another big leap into producing more Smartphones, a year after releasing their first set of Google Pixel smartphones, after their $1.1 Billion investment into Smartphone company HTC.

With this investment, Google has made an agreement with HTC to acquire a team to work exclusively on Google’s hardware, and a non-exclusive license for HTC intellectual property. The team that Google acquired from HTC have some familiarity with Google, after working with them last year in order to produce the first smartphone from Google, the Pixel. With this investment, Google is surely capable of being able to produce better mobile products and even surpassing their competition at Apple, and their line of iPhones.

https://goo.gl/images/rAZnau

One of the problems I have with this investment, is how it will affect Google’s relationship with other companies such as; Samsung, LG, and Sony, who all rely on Google’s Android Operating System when designing their smartphones. News of this acquisition could create tension between Google, and other independent companies that utilize Android Software. For example,  Samsung, which creates a wide majority of the devices that use Android OS, could partner with other companies to create a new operating system, or they could follow a similar path as Google and Apple and design their own operating system. Furthermore, Google’s investment into HTC could send mixed messages to other companies that utilize Android OS, and could lead to these companies trying to become more independent and distance themselves from Google.

Overall, I believe that although Google’s investment into HTC may hinder their relationships with companies that currently use the Android OS, this investment will help progress the company into becoming a leader in the market of technology hardware, as well as Google progressing past the mantra as the company that makes the most utilized smartphone operating system.

Word Count: 326

References

https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/technology/tech-news/google-bites-off-big-piece-of-htc-in-bet-on-devices/article36322089/

http://www.androidauthority.com/what-google-buying-htc-means-for-the-mobile-industry-802120/

https://www.blog.google/topics/hardware/google-signs-agreement-htc-continuing-our-big-bet-hardware/

Recently, Canadian airlines company, Air Canada has been making headlines due to their treatment of a young traveler which has prompted me to question the ethics of Air Canada’s unaccompanied minor program. In an article by CBC News, fourteen-year-old Timea Vajda was forced to share a room with complete strangers after a mechanical issue caused her connected flight from Budapest to Saskatoon to delay until the following day. During this delay, Air Canada failed to inform the teenager’s parents of their daughter’s flight delay and location until Timea contacted her parents over wifi. When the parents then asked Air Canada why their daughter was unsupervised, the company explained it was because they never paid the optional fee to place her in their unaccompanied minor program, even though her ticket said unaccompanied minor on it.

Personally, I believe that the way Air Canada dealt with this situation was inappropriate and is a problem that has been caused mainly due to their unethical unaccompanied minor program. After researching on the airline’s website, I have come to realize how confusing this program can appear to potential minors and their families who are looking to invest in plane tickets. This program is available to all children between the age of 8 to 17, however, it is only free to those in the 8 to 11-year old range. That means for a majority of the ages, parents would have to pay an additional fee for their children to be placed in their program, which I believe is unethical as they are monopolizing on a portion of their customers that are expecting to be treated with due care due to their youth and vulnerability.

This situation in the article is a result of Air Canada’s policies not allowing Timea to be considered important enough to call her parents or, to take more responsibility and ownership over her. This can be related to Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory, as Air Canada seems to be focusing more on profiting from their twelve to seventeen-year-old stakeholders, than to actually uphold some Corporate Social Responsibility and protect their youthful minority.

https://goo.gl/images/ADSwk2

Word Count; 355

News Article: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/girl-stranded-1.4278323