Paul Taylor, Normative Discourse

Taylor argues that normative discourse can be distinguished from “scientific, mathematical and historical discourse, and from any other ‘universe’ of discourse in which language is used for purposes other than making and justifying of evaluations and prescriptions.”

Chapter 1 The Process of Evaluation

Chapter 2 Value Judgements

Chapter 3 Justification of Value Judgements

Chapter 4 Value Systems and Points of View

Chapter 7 The Concept of Prescribing

Chapter 8 Prescribing and Evaluating

Chapter 9 Ought and Is

Chapter 10 Wittgenstein’s conception of language

Chapter 11 The concept of a normative language

Assessing What Kids Think About Themselves

There are a plethora of strategies for collecting data from children and youth that provide evidence for evaluation of services and programs. (See a previous post on my new book that focuses on data collection strategies that ensue from a perspective that sees youth as culturally embedded meaning-making social actors.) Often, the focus is psychological and individual–that is, focusing on psychological states and attributes and judging changes in those based on some sort of intervention. A good example of this is a report just released by Child Trends. This report provides an instrument for measuring adolescent’s self-concept. This is standard psychometric fare and could be useful, however, think about the viable alternatives. What if you asked youth to draw a self-portrait, or write a biographical sketch, or create a photo-essay that reflects how they think about themselves, and well you get the idea. Self-concept is, as the report suggests, and important consideration in youth oriented programming and thus in evaluation. So important, that we should be cautious about using simplistic indicators, just because they are there.

Potpourri of streaming videos from Western Michigan’s Evaluation Center

The Evaluation Center’s Evaluation Cafe presentations from last year are online and many can be viewed as streamed video. There is a wide range of topics and many excellent speakers ~ just a few highlights are:

Michael Scriven on causal attribution
Patricia Rogers also on causal attribution
Lois ellin Datta on the appropriateness of RCTs for evaluation