Categories
Uncategorized

Sexy or Savvy? The Employer’s Nightmare….

Saturday’s edition of The Globe and Mail featured a very realistic and relatable article from Leah Eichler titled Playing the sex card to get ahead, discussing how both women and men (but mostly women) are enhancing their appearances to propel themselves farther up a company hierarchy. Eichler makes reference to the controversial book Honey Money: The Power of Erotic Capital by Catherine Hakim, where Hakim says that people are valuing their “erotic capital” (sex appeal coupled with strong self presentation) to be just as important as education! Maybe I should have bought a gym membership rather than enrolling in business school! However, is it ethical if an employer hires a fashion queen sans brains, and lets an ordinary woman or man with a university education walk right out the door? Absolutely not!

But here’s where the debate gets interesting: In an article written by Dyana Hepburn in helium.com, she claims that a study proves that attractive women who apply for a job which seems “masculine” (such as a finance director) are at a large disadvantage, while attractive men were “always at an advantage”. Obviously employers these days cannot look past a woman’s beauty and realize that she also has a brain, but it seems that men have this skill of balancing beauty and brains down pat. Put yourself in an employers shoes…what would you do?

Categories
Uncategorized

Product Placement…Isn’t it Obvious?

The TV and film industry thrives off of corporate advertising and sponsorship; this simply occurs when TV shows and movies feature a certain company’s products through product placement. Some product placements are painfully obvious (when Bentley is featured in the film 2012 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qARA0SqlSE ), and some are very subtle and quite effective. However, does the average viewer even understand how much money the film industry receives from these mere “mentions” viewed by millions around the world? Apparently not… InjusticeFacts is a public blog where people let the world know, literally, about facts that are shocking, scary, and simply unjust, and they also have a very popular Twitter page featuring approximately 75,000 followers, which is where I came across a couple of pretty interesting and eye-opening earlier tonight. According to their Twitter page, “85% of television and film viewers do not know what product placements are, making product placements extremely deceptive”. Additionally, they claim that Steven Spielberg’s film Minority Report “had 15 brands (product placements) appear in the film; advertisers paid $25 million for these placements”. The fact that really caught my attention (being a massive Seinfeld fan) is that “98% of Seinfeld fans had no idea that Junior Mints paid the show millions of dollars to feature it on episode #417”. If more viewers actually knew about these lucrative product placements, would they still be enthusiastic about watching? Or would they feel somewhat betrayed? If more people were aware of these product placements, would this devastate the entertainment industry? If you’d like to view the twitter page of InjusticeFacts (where all of the posted quotes are from) follow the link provided (http://twitter.com/#!/InjusticeFacts). I look forward to hearing your comments about product placement and the entertainment industry in general! Thanks

Categories
Marketing

Under Armour: Ugly Jerseys, Brilliant Marketing

I recently read quite an interesting article in macleans.ca about the well known athletic apparel company Under Armour, and how they designed very extravagant and unusual uniforms for the University of Maryland football team. Owner of Under Armour Apparel, Kevin Planks, is a former University of Maryland graduate who saw a vision to use the Maryland players as “human billboards”, and proceeded to design multiple versions of these extremely odd, multi-coloured uniforms which he knew would create an enormous buzz for the University of Maryland, but ultimately, would place Under Armour in the spotlight. Many critics claimed that these jerseys were ugly and painful to look at, but does that really matter in the big picture for Under Armour? Maryland and UA Apparel both knew that these jerseys would be a rather hideous sight, but that was the best way to create a buzz for their respective companies. Celebrity figures like LeBron James even took the time to tweet about how ugly these jerseys were, and the people of Under Armour were undoubtedly jumping for joy when they realized that their brilliant marketing scheme had been successful. I guess any publicity is good publicity… I look forward to hearing your thoughts and opinions.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet