Categories
action chambara/chanbara gendai-geki

“The Machine Girl”: Guns, Gore, a Girl and More!

Iguchi Noboru’s The Machine Girl (2008) is a fast-paced action film that defies genre conventions.  The film follows Ami, a college student who exacts revenge on school bullies and their yakuza connections after they kill her brother and cut her arm off. The film’s combination of choreographed fight scenes, excessive gore, and playful humour provides a stark contrast to Japanese filmic tradition. His excessive use of violence is characteristic of Japanese cinema, however, the excessive gore is indicative of how desensitized to violence modern audiences are. The film uses several parodist elements in order to redefine Japanese film, making it self-aware. The juxtaposition of iconic imagery also suggests a change in Japanese film. Iguchi uses excessive violence, parodist elements, and the juxtaposition of iconic imagery to subvert Japanese filmic tradition.

Excessive gore and violence is certainly part of Japanese filmic tradition, however, Iguchi takes this aspect of Japanese film and makes the violence even more over-the-top. Anderson and Richie in their book The Japanese Film: Art and Industry state, “Pointless killing is one of the main features of the Japanese film, whether chambara or modern gangster movie” (318). They go even further explicating that “Japanese films also tend to accentuate the attendant gore” (Anderson 318). Anderson and Richie use the noise of bones breaking as a kid jumps on his chest in Nikkatsu’s Beyond the Green (1955) as an example. This example pales in comparison to the gore and violence in Iguchi’s The Machine Girl.

In one scene, Ami shoots one of the hitmen for the yakuza in the face. As her machine gun goes off we are exposed to the bits of flesh coming off, slowly exposing the facial muscles. The blood spurts everywhere almost like a fountain from the man’s neck. The hitman is still alive, and we are made aware of this through his frantic running and screaming. This attempt to make the gore even more over-the-top is an active attempt to point out how violence is ingrained in modern culture. He suggests that nowadays it is not enough to see a person get shot; to provoke a response, that person must have his flesh slowly blown away as he screams in agony.

The film’s self-reflexivity lends it to be a critique of the way Japanese culture is portrayed in contemporary media. Roland Kelts in his book Japanamerica: How Japanese Pop Culture Has Invaded the U.S explicates how Japanese culture is portrayed in the United States. Kelts argues that the American conception has a lot to with manga and anime, describing it as “playful, colourful, cute, and sometimes crazy” (208). The Machine Girl definitely plays with this conception of culture to convey a sense of irony.

In the film, Ami searches for one of the bullies who killed her brother. After an extended fight with the bully’s parents, the mother dips Ami’s hand in tempura batter before deep frying her arm. Ami slowly reveals her arm which looks like a giant piece of tempura. The scene is cartoon-like, clearly parodying manga and Japanese anime. However, the scene is still brutal as it does depict a young girl getting her arm burnt. The anime-like aspects of the scene are contrasted by the harsh screams of Ami, a character that the audience identifies with. In introducing the brutality into this parody, Iguchi suggests that there is something wrong with this conception of Japanese culture. Although it can be seen as playful, colourful, and sometimes crazy, there is a sense of brutality underlying the superficial conception of Japanese culture.

Iguchi uses contrasting imagery to explicate the state of Japanese cinema, suggesting that it is not immune to the effects of an increasingly globalized culture. The katana, a sword used most often in chambara films, is iconic because it represents a whole genre of Japanese film. Although the katana is used in the film, Ami primarily uses a machine gun. The machine gun is also iconic; it is a product of the 80’s action film in the United States. In the final scene, a bloody Ami walks towards a katana with a machine gun for an arm. The camera slowly revolves around Ami as she lifts the sword upwards; as the camera revolves we are shown more of the machine gun until she strikes her final pose; katana and machine-gun pointing straight at the camera. The scene is the synthesis of American and Japanese filmic tradition. Ami openly accepts both weapons, clearly accepting the globalized nature of film. By combining these iconic images Iguchi seems to be a proponent for the integration of western tropes into Japanese cinema.

Iguchi Noboru’s The Machine Girl is an outlandish film that is entertaining to watch. I would recommend this film due to its originality and over-the-top gore. It’s cartoon-like violence and unrealistic special effects make the gore bearable. Although the film is clearly exploitative in nature, it does have academic value. Iguchi actively subverts Japanese filmic tradition through over-the-top violence, parodist elements, and the juxtaposition of iconic images. The film is a throwback to both American and Japanese film, but in borrowing elements from these filmic traditions Iguchi creates a film that is certainly unique.

Bibliography

Anderson, Joseph L., and Donald Richie. The Japanese Film: Art and Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1982. Print.

Kelts, Roland. Japanamerica: How Japanese Pop Culture Has Invaded the U.S. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Print.

Categories
action extreme

“The Machine Girl”

The Machine Girl is an action film from Nikkatsu Productions, directed by Iguchi Noboru, and stars Minase Yashiro as the main character Hyuga Ami , a high school girl out to avenge the death of her little brother. The movie also stars Sugiura Asami as Sugihara Miki and Ishikawa Yuya as Sugihara Suguru, parents of Ami’s brother’s friend, who help Ami with her revenge. The main antagonist in this movie is played by Shimazu Kentarou, who is Kimura Ryugi, a yakuza leader of a gang that was descended from a ninja clan. This is a simple action B-movie with lots of gore, but I found the draw of the movie lies not in its excuse plot or static and stereotypical revenge-story character behaviour. The draw was in the quirky character designs, which I shall elaborate on later. The movie starts off with a gang of students bullying a boy by practising throwing knives at an apple above his head. They are about to bombard him with knives, but our protagonist, Ami, intervenes. She tells them that their gang killed her brother, and proceeded to cut off one of the bullies’ arms. Then she shows them her missing left arm, which she then attaches a machine gun to, which is the movie’s way of telling us that she’s the titular character. After the bullies are dead, Ami begins a flashback which tells us how she lived before, how her brother died, and how she lost her left arm and gained a machine gun. The movie then shows us Ami’s revenge against those that killed her brother, with some bizarre fight scenes and lots of blood thrown in.

When they are first shown, the good main characters look very ordinary while wearing their everyday clothing. The bizarreness starts when they pull out their weapons. The main antagonists almost always look gaudy. In Ami’s first scene, she pulls out what looks like a kusari-gama, which is a sickle-like weapon for ninjas, and while it’s not a commonly seen weapon, is not very impressive. However, the kicker is her arm-mounted machine gun, which, in its first appearance, Ami spectacularly makes a show of putting it on her arm stump. I’ll admit that I thought that looked really cool, albeit a little cheesy. The mildest example of the villains is Kimura Sho, the person bullying Ami’s brother, who wears a standard boy’s school uniform, but with a clearly expensive leopard fur jacket. Even unnamed characters get a chance at being weird; one of the bullies’ parents look like a typical husband and wife, although more good looking than most couples would be when their son is of teenage age. The father suddenly pulls out a golf club to attack Ami, and then uses two as the fight continues. What I find to be the most ridiculous of the designs is in Kimura Violet, Sho’s mother. She wears a lightly decorated kimono but with its chest area exposed, thus showing her bra, which is typical attire for a sexy villain. However, her bra itself is a different story; it’s a drill, and it functions as her weapon. If this doesn’t get you to go, “Wait, what?” you need to tell me what you’ve been watching as it is clearly more ridiculous than this movie.

The lighting during the scenes is another aspect of the film I’d like to talk about. It’s easy to notice that during the ONE true happy scene in the movie, which is when Ami plays basketball for the first time in the movie, that the lighting is much brighter compared to the rest of the movie. The colours are much more vivid and you can actually see colour in the faces of the characters, which is best seen in the following scene where she jokes around with her brother. The rest of the movie looks like it was filmed through a grey filter to show the grimness of the situation. This is especially evident in the very first scene where Ami saves the student from the bullies, where, except for the blood, it seems like the film is black and white. The second time we see Ami play basketball still has an uplifting mood, but this event is after we find out her brother was being bullied, and the lighting is no longer bright. Then the movie throws a more complicated situation. Ami, when starting her revenge, gave us a happy psychotic smile as she kills the family of one of the bullies, but the lighting is bright, perhaps to suggest that, while the movie is going towards a less depressing tone, it’s not going to return to the innocent tone it had at the beginning.

I’d give this movie a solid 7 out of 10, as I really liked the general weirdness feel of the movie, which most Hollywood action flicks don’t have today. The characters are kind of unlikable, but I don’t think the director wants us to like them, seeing as they’re all morally deficient in some form or another. While some villains can be extremely likeable due to how awesome they are, like Heath Ledger’s Joker in The Dark Knight, none of the characters here, including the protagonists, was able to pull that off. The one thing I really liked about this movie compared to Hollywood is the camerawork during fighting, which, unlike Hollywood, is not shaky and focuses really well on the actions being taken. This serves to highlight the mediocre choreography and emphasizes the gore. So if you’re sick of being unable to see anything during fight scenes in movies, as long as you can handle cheesy special effects and fighting, movies of this genre may be a good place for you to start. This movie is definitely not for the faint of heart, however, especially with all the bizarre tortures and deaths.

Spam prevention powered by Akismet