Unit Three Blog

For unit three, I made the first draft of my formal report which included conducting interviews, sending a survey, conducting research and actually writing the draft. I also peer reviewed Jenny’s draft of her formal report and got feedback from Jenny on my report.

I found that writing the draft of my formal report was easier than I thought. I think that this was because I had already done some background research on the Science Undergraduate Society for unit two and had already created an outline for my report. Though I had previously never written a report, I have written scientific papers of similar length. The papers that I normally write heavily depend on what I find in literature, so I do not normally create an outline or plan out my work much beforehand. As I start researching, I typically also start writing so this was a new experience for me. Creating an outline and proposal really helped me to think about the design and purpose of my report before writing it, thus making is much easier to write when I actually began writing.

Conducting research for my report was surprisingly smooth since a large part of my information came from the AMS Election website. The data was already organized by organization and year, which made it really easy for me to use and visualize. I also created a survey which I sent to science students. I used Google Forms to make my survey and this made it really easy to use and distribute. I simply copied the link to my survey to online forums for science students and google compiled my results and created graphs for me to use in my report. Overall my survey came back with some interesting feedback and was really helpful in my report. My research also included conducting interviews with members of the Science Undergraduate Society. I was initially intimidated to approach members of the organization, though I found that they were all excited to talk about the organization and suggest ways to improve. The interviews gave me a much better idea of what the organization is currently doing to improve participation rates, and to see where I can make suggestions.

Organizing the report was smooth since the information seemed to logically flow together. First, I would give background information on the organization and then I would talk about the information I collected, and then propose ways to improve. The outline from unit two was really key in preparing this general flow of the report, though the smaller sub-sections and titles were made as I was writing the report according to what made the most sense at the time.

After writing my own report, I then peer reviewed Jenny’s formal report. As I stated in my last reflection on unit two, the peer review process is really helpful to understand what is going through the readers head when they read my report. It was also interesting to see how different students approached the same assignment. I seemed to focus more on the data and what that meant, where Jenny seemed to focus more on the implications of what change might do. I do not think that there is only one right way to write the formal report and reading Jenny’s draft was really helpful to see where I could put more attention in my own report. It was also interesting to see where Jenny and I’s reports were similar. We both used Google Forms to create an anonymous survey to create visuals for our reports. I was glad to see another student using Google Forms as it is a really great tool for collecting data.

Overall, I am happy with the progress that I have made on the formal report, and the feedback that I got from Jenny on it. This unit has taught me a lot about writing with “You-Attitude” and to keep the reader in mind when writing. I look forward to the last unit of the course.

 

Formal Report Draft: 301 Jobina Tamminga Formal Report Draft

 

Unit Two Blog

For unit two, I made a LinkedIn profile and worked on my formal report. This included making a proposal, outline and a progress report for the formal report.

I found the process of making a LinkedIn profile for this course quite surprising. Prior to this course, I had a LinkedIn profile that I was quite happy with. I had received multiple job offers through my profile and had spent a lot of time previously editing it. What surprised me was that the LinkedIn best practices assignment was actually very helpful in recognizing where my own profile could be better. For example, I previously had all of my work experience on my profile including waitressing jobs since I thought that any experience was good experience. I learned that including irrelevant details on my profile made it look disorganized, so I removed all of the unnecessary work experience. This trend was also true for the summary section since I had a lot of unnecessary details in the summary section. I also learned that asking coworkers for recommendations can be very helpful. I had never previously thought to ask coworkers for recommendations since I felt like my profile was good enough.

The peer review from Tom gave me additional feedback on my LinkedIn profile. He pointed out a few grammatical mistakes and also commented on how my writing could be a bit more precise. This comment on my writing has been brought up to me a few times in this course and is something that I am continuously working on.

I like the idea of a professional social media network because it allows you to keep up to date on organizations you are interested in or see what is new in a particular field without being distracted by friends and family. It also allows you to put a professional online image forward to coworkers and potential employers, but still allows you to engage with people that you know.

The formal report proposal was more difficult than I originally thought because it took me a long time to figure out what I wanted to do my report on. Choosing a topic that I thought would have enough content for me to write a report on was not easy for me. I eventually chose to write my report on participation rates for the Science Undergraduate Society at UBC because it is an organization that I have had experience with in the past and has a lot of online primary data. The peer review from Amy of my proposal was very helpful as she highlighted sections that she thought were well done and pointed out areas for me to improve such as adding more examples to my recommendations and creating an anonymous survey.

The peer review process was also helpful in looking at my own writing from someone else’s perspective. Reading and commenting on Amy’s proposal showed me what stood out to a reader and how much detail is necessary. It was really interesting to read the other proposals on my team forum and see what others were doing their projects on. This project highlights the diversity of the interests and hobbies of my group members, which is really cool to see.

I feel as though I have made good progress on my so far, especially after completing the outline since this is when everything felt like it really came together. Deciding on how many sections to have, and what would go in each section made the project feel much more organized. The outline was a great steppingstone to completing the progress report since I had already laid out exactly what I would need and how I would complete each step of the report. My final recommendations will depend on the results of my survey and interviews, though I feel confident in the research and information about participation rates that I have collected already.

 

Revised Report Proposal: 301 Jobina Tamminga Formal Report Proposal

Peer Review: https://blogs.ubc.ca/engl301-99a-2019wa/2019/10/16/2-1-peer-review-of-formal-report-proposal-2/

Unit One Blog

I thought that this unit taught me how to write for a variety of audiences. The three definitions assignment specifically helped me to write a constructive letter to a peer. I chose to write about the term “cache memory” since it is not a well-known term outside of computer science, but it is based on a concept that most people are familiar with. I thought that choosing a term that relates to a well-known concept would make it easier to explain it to an audience that is unfamiliar with the term. I also chose to include operating principle, history, visual, and comparison/contrast sections in the expanded definition section. I started with the operating principle section because I thought that it was best to first explain what the principle of the term was about before explaining anything else. After that I thought that the history of cache memory should go next because by understanding why cache memory was invented, it would be easier to understand its role within computers. After that I chose to have a visual because I thought that it would bring ideas together from both the history and the operating principles. Lastly, I included a compare and contrast section because I needed to explain the differences between main memory and cache memory. I used a well-known concept to help describe the term earlier in the assignment, but it is also important to explain the differences as well. I actually really enjoyed this assignment and getting to learn about so many other terms that I did not know about before.

When I got to peer review another student’s assignment, I learned that there are many different ways to approach an assignment. I peer reviewed Jenny Zhu’s assignment on cystic fibrosis and I was impressed by her creativity on choosing which sections to include in her expanded definition. I thought that she chose the sections that best fit her topic, rather than trying to make a pre-defined list of sections fit with her topic. I noticed that her use of visuals was particularly helpful and helped to further explain her topic. I found that reviewing another student’s assignment helped me to reflect on my own assignment, and to think about what a reader might be thinking when they read my assignment.

The feedback that I got on my assignment focused mostly on the bigger questions of my definition. While I was good at explaining the details of the concept, I did not always relate it to the bigger picture. Using Jenny’s advice, I elaborated on what an optimal strategy might be for cache memory and hinted at how modern computers actually solve the problem. I also elaborated more on the history of cache memory since the transition to using cache memory was not explicitly clear. I also added a longer description for the visual as Jenny suggested, which explained some of the components of the diagram. There were a few terms in the photo that I did not originally describe which was pointed out to me by Jenny. Lastly, Jenny also pointed out that my compare/contrast section did not look ahead into the future as whether computers could only use cache memory or not. I chose not to change this section because I already explained why we do not currently use only cache memory in computers. I actually do not know whether this will happen in the future or not since technology changes so fast.

In summary, I learned many ways in which I can make my writing better. I also learned that I do not always need to change every detail that is suggested about my writing. This process helped me to see the point of view of the reader, and to use this to fix weak spots in my own writing.

Jenny Zhu’s Review of the Original Assignment:

Lesson 1:3 – Peer Review of Definitions (Cache memory)

Edited Three Definitions Assignment: 301 Jobina Tamminga Three Definitions Edited

 

 

Assignment 1.3 – Three Definitions

Introduction

In this assignment I will be giving a parenthetical, sentence, and expanded definition of a relatively complex term in computer science. The term that I have chosen to define is ‘cache memory’. The goal of this assignment is to understand how audience and purpose indicate the need for definitions. It also aims to differentiate between the levels of detail in definitions in different situations, and how this is useful in technical writing.

Term

Cache memory

Parenthetical definition

Cache memory (a type of computer memory)

Sentence definition

Cache memory is smaller, faster, short-term memory in computers used to speed up the computer.

Expanded definition

Operating Principle

Cache memory works by using a smaller but faster memory storage in addition to a larger and slower memory. When the processor needs to search for some data in memory, it first looks to the cache to see if it is there. If it is not there, it looks to the next slower level of memory and this is called a memory miss (Jacob, 2008). There are many varying rules as to which data should be put in the cache (the most recent data or the most used data) since it typically has a small amount space. The idea is to have the data that you need in the highest/fastest cache as much of the time as possible since this is faster than always looking in main memory. There can also be multiple levels of caches as seen in Figure 1, with increasing space and slowness as you get down to main memory.

History

Cache memory was first used in the 80’s when the gap between the speed of the processor and the speed of using main memory grew to a noticeable size (Jacob, 2008). As the speed of processors increased, the time that it took to look up and store data in memory slowed down the entire system (Wu et al., 2018). Cache memory was invented as an intermediate memory between the processor and main memory so that it would take less time to search and store data in memory.

Visual

The following visual shows a memory hierarchy where cache memory is shown to be smaller and faster than main memory.

Figure 1. Diagram of Memory Hierarchy for Computers (Kidd, 2015)

Comparison and contrast

Cache memory and main memory are both forms of computer memory. When compared to each other cache memory is faster and is also more expensive (Przybylski, 1990). This differs from main memory, which is slower, but also cheaper. A computer with all cache memory would be too expensive to make, and a computer with all main memory would be too slow for users to use (Przybylski, 1990). A compromise is implemented where the benefits of both cache and main memory are utilized.

References

Jacob, B., Ng, S., & Wang, D. (2008). Memory systems: cache, DRAM, disk. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Kidd, T., (2015). Advanced Computer Concepts for the (Not So) Common Chef: Memory Hierarchy: Of Registers, Cache & Memory. Intel Software Developer Zone. Retrieved from: https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2015/06/11/advanced-computer-concepts-for-the-not-so-common-chef-memory-hierarchy-of-registers

Przybylski, S.A. (1990). Cache and memory hierarchy design: a performance-directed approach. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Wu, W., Li, M., Wang, K., Huang, H., & Chen, E. (2018). Speed scaling problems with memory/cache consideration. Journal of Scheduling, 21(6), 633-646. doi:10.1007/s10951-018-0565-1.

Prospective Writing Team Member – Part 3

To: jennyszhu@alumni.ubc.ca
From: jobina@live.ca
Date: September 17, 2019
Subject: ENGL 301 Team Formulation
Attachments: 301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter

Dear Jenny,

After reviewing your application letter, I am interested in working together and creating a professional writing team.

I am impressed with the clarity and structure of your application structure and overall blog. I can clearly see that you have strong technical writing skills, and I think that you would make a great team member. I think that your experience with the UBC Red Cross Club and the engineering outreach organization are quite unique and have given you a great understanding of writing for specific audiences, which will be a great skill for ENGL 301. I think that our similar life science background with scientific papers will give our team a strong foundation in technical writing.

I have attached my application letter for your reference. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Jobina Tamminga

301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter

Prospective Writing Team Partners – Part 2

To: vergouwenamy@gmail.com
From: jobina@live.ca
Date: September 17, 2019
Subject: ENGL 301 Team Formulation
Attachments: 301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter

Dear Amy, 

After reviewing your application letter, I am interested in working together and creating a professional writing team.

I am impressed with your variety of experience in a professional setting, working both in long term health care and financial analyst assistant. I think that both of our passion’s for learning will be especially helpful for group work this term. Our variety of technical writing backgrounds will also give our team a stronger foundation. I see that we are both in our last year of school, and I think that the previous years of undergrad will add to our writing team for ENGL 301. 

I have attached my application letter for your reference. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards, 

Jobina Tamminga

301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter

Prospective Writing Team Partners – Part 1

To: tom.howey@alumni.ubc.ca
From: jobina@live.ca
Date: September 13, 2019
Subject: ENGL 301 Team Formulation
Attachments: 301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter

Dear Tom, 

After reviewing your application letter, I am interested in working together and creating a professional writing team.

I am impressed with your writing achievements thus far, including research in MURC. I can see that we both have similar biology backgrounds, and we both have a wide variety of technical writing experiences. I think that your teamwork capabilities and interest in pursuing research will be very valuable as a technical writing team member. By combining both of our strengths and experiences, I think that we could make significant contributions to our team throughout the semester. 

I have attached my application letter for your reference. Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards, 

Jobina Tamminga

301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter

An Email Memorandum to My Instructor

MEMORANDUM

To: Erika Paterson, ENGL 301 Instructor
From: Jobina Tamminga, ENGL 301 Student
Date: September 11, 2019
Subject: Letter of Application Post

My letter of application has been completed and posted it on my blog, as laid out in the professional writing team member posting. Attached to this memo please find my letter for your reference.

The attached letter includes:
  ∙ a justification as to why I am applying for the position
  ∙ an overview of my technical writing experience both in school and in a business setting
  ∙ an overview of my strengths and weaknesses in terms of my writing skills
  ∙ my work habits
  ∙ my learning philosophy

Please let me know if you require any further information. Thank you.


Enclosure: Letter of Application

301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter

A Letter of Application

947 E Hastings St
Vancouver, BC V6A 0G7

September 10, 2019

ENGL 301 Technical Writing Class
University of British Columbia
2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4

Dear Technical Writing 301 class:

My name is Jobina Tamminga and I am applying for the role of professional writing team member for a writing team in ENGL 301. I am a 5thyear student studying computer science and biology at UBC. I think that I would be a great professional writing team member because I have experience working with a variety of technical writing styles throughout my degree and in past internships. I also pay attention to detail and put forth my best effort in all assignments. I am comfortable taking a leadership role in group activities, and I make sure that the work gets done.

Studying multiple subjects has given me a wider breadth of experience than most students. I have written technical documents about my own software in both a professional setting and in school. These technical documents were written for both educated and non-educated audiences with the purpose of explaining how the software works and how to use it. In past internships, I have written instructional documents with the purpose of instructing new employees how to set up and run my programs when I left. I also have extensive experience with professional communication within a workplace such as emails and memos. I have experience technical writing within a life science approach as well through scientific papers, research proposals and lab reports in both biology and chemistry. Lastly, I have extensive job application experience applying to many internship positions which includes numerous cover letters, resumes and interviews.

I would say my biggest strength when it comes to technical writing is giving strong reasoning and logical arguments. Since I have a science background, I have been trained to look at problems or requirements and produce solutions that meet all of the requirements. Similarly, I look at the instructions for an assignment, and I make sure that I hit all of the requirements. This can also be a weakness as my writing sometimes lacks the flow that an experienced writer might have. I am also what some would say am a “keener” as I enjoy completing projects as early as I can since leaving things until the last minute is quite stressful for me.

My learning philosophy is that I try to get the most out of every class. I try to get the best result without overworking myself. I think that through organization and effort, any group can have a great outcome.

Please feel free to contact me further if you have more questions about my experience or my learning philosophy at jobina.tamminga@gmail.com. I look forward to hearing from you.

Best,

Jobina Tamminga

301 Jobina Tamminga Application Letter