Papi: from the eyes of a child

The book this week was quite a change a pace compared to the other reads in this course. The narration from the child’s perspective is quite a unique one compared to other books with a youthful and innocent narrator; there are a lot of nice stylistic touches that reminded me of my own childhood as well. In particular, the narrator created a list (I’m not quite sure what the point of it was) that detailed how the world is broken up into 3 places, or types of “spells” such as yawning and “attacks”. I don’t know where the childhood fixation on creating weird lists of things comes from, but I think the effect of the text was very strong. It certainly reminded me of all the goofy things I was up to as a child, and really brought me back to how you view life when you are younger. Perhaps that is a child’s own way to figure out and establish some control for the world around them, as if to say “I was here, and I experienced all of this, and I want you to know that I figured all this out”.

One thing I didn’t expect from this book was for the focus to not be solely on how parental roles influence the way our lives play out, or to outline the different ways different parents and their actions influence the way children grow up (basically, some form of trauma dump). Obviously the focus of the book is the relationship between these characters within this family, but the personal relationship (or emotional development, better put) between the narrator and Papi are quite distant at times, speaking from seeing a choppy focus of her emotional journey with these parental figures through all these tumultuous events. I think a better example/ piece of evidence would be how Mami is portrayed throughout this story, and how her significance to the narrator is not really conveyed, as if they way they live together isn’t moulding who she is as a person. They merely appear as “figures”. To some effect, the distance does highlight that gap between her and Papi, in that he is often not there when he says he will be or shows up when it wasn’t expected of him to. This probably reveals a message about distant fathers and the fascination and admiration that comes with such an enigmatic figure.  But I think another reason for this portrayal is to convey a broader message that isn’t limited to the theme of “family” or “parental figures”, as Jon said in the lecture video, maybe it is to convey other effects such as the portrayal of the macho cacique archetype, or some broader societal meaning.

To end with a question, how did you feel about the narrator’s childlike storytelling; did it remind you of anything, or was there anything especially notable to you about it? Why so?

Mama Blanca’s Memoirs

My first and foremost thought after fishing reading this novel was: “Why in the world does her memoir almost completely focus on her time spent as a child?”. I guess I had understood memoirs as something that captures memorable experiences throughout a persons entire life, and I think in some ways Mama Blanca’s (yes I will be referring to her as such because I somehow feel compelled to do so as the book commented on) childhood was so defining for her, to the extent that she views life through this prism that was crafted by her experiences as a child.

Regardless of whatever the answer to my first question may be, I suspect that it would reveal a lot about the exact kind of character Mama Blanca was. Reading this novel reminded me a lot about the way I saw things through my own eyes when I was a child (Not suggesting that I grew up on a sugar plantation, I quite literally did not). I think there was something very noteworthy in her description of the way she viewed the adults such as her parents; it seemed to be tinged with a sense of mysteriousness and thus mystic authority, or the way she perceived other characters such as Vincente or Cousin Juancho, or Evelyn. It seemed as if their actions around her, or these stories about them that Mama Blanca would tell would always have a sense of distance to her, as if these people around her are much like a part of cosmic nature, where things happen and maybe she doesn’t fully understand them in the way a grown adult would, but the impact of it is still fully felt, in the way a child would feel. In her recount of this childhood of hers, I was brought back to my own too unknowingly, and even started to question myself since when have I stopped perceiving the things around me in that way. To be honest, I haven’t really noticed this change in myself, and I think this perception of things is a marker of the kind of wonder and innocence that Mama Blanca still holds even well into her later years.

Another thing that really stuck with me was this sentence in the foreword questioning “what would life be worth without the grace of forgiveness and tolerance?”. I think the idea encapsulated in this sentence follows in line with Mama Blanca’s  thoughts about having the Beast from Beauty and the Beast change back to a human at the end defeating the story’s purpose. As if “sinning” or “ugly things” (Sorry, Beast) need to exist, because then the “nobleness” of belle, as Mama Blanca puts it herself, or the grace of forgiveness, will be able to shine. Otherwise what is the story’s, and I guess by extension, life’s purpose?

To end this post with a question: Why do you think Mama Blanca included the story of cousin Juancho, or Vincente, or the man that milked the cows specifically?

Spam prevention powered by Akismet