Decision of not airing an ad

The ABC network defended itself by not allowing an ad to run during the Oscars, a very popular event. This ad consisted of promoting paper products sold by Quill and marketed under the fictional brand “Dunder Mifflin”. The problem is that the show where Dunder Mifflin appears on is called The Office and runs on NBC. It might be wrong for them to have such a strict policy to such a situation but they might not want to mislead their viewers into thinking they’re endorsing a competitor’s TV show. Furthermore, the ad mentions the fact that The Office runs on NBC every Thursday, directly affecting ABC’s prime time shows.

The blog post I’m commenting on does specify that a similar ad ran during the Super Bowl, which was televised by the CBS network. The fact that this network allowed the ad to air during such an important event brings to question why ABC decided not to do so. CBS also has many TV shows that they don’t want to hinder by allowing such advertisements. However, they might have found that not allowing the ad to air could potentially cause more problems than it’s worth (possible criticisms or lawsuits). Airing an ad that mostly promotes paper products that are branded under an imaginary company (might not be known to everyone) might not affect the potential viewer preference.

It is evident that the add featuring the NBC logo at the end could discourage any other network to actually air the ad, especially during such a popular event. Even more, these events are exclusive to the network that airs them (The Oscars are exclusively aired by ABC) and therefore the network might want to promote their own shows instead. Each network decided to look at the opportunity cost of airing the ad during these important events.

.

Based on this blog post.

The Super Bowl ads’ target audience

The biggest event of the year on television in the United States is the Super Bowl. It attracts the largest audience for any program during the year; Super Bowl XLVII attracted 108.96 million viewers in the United Sates according to Nielsen. The size of the audience creates a challenge for companies to be able to advertise something that’s relevant for most viewers. Therefore, companies have to use segmentation bases to appeal to different aspects of the audience. For example, Chrysler featured two advertisements that were using the psychographic base in terms of giving a message about something most viewers could relate to. One saluted the armed forces, appealing to nationalism and the value of family and friends, and the second ad made a tribute to framers using family values and featuring their lifestyle. These commercials were meant to touch on the emotional side of viewers, making it easier to promote the brand. 

There were other advertisements that were humorous, making them much more enticing to watch. Commercials like ones shown buy Oreos or Doritos tend to be much more relaxed to effectively communicate their brand image. Furthermore, these ads use humor at a  basic level, allowing for anyone to understand them and relate them to the brand; the product logo was prominently displayed. The fact that a huge audience is available to a company should make it consider whether the product they are tying to sell is actually targeting most of that audience, if it isn’t then the company might think that promoting their brand at the Super Bowl will have a long term effect, potentially gaining new customers in the future. Having such high airing costs a company will do thorough analysis before deciding whether to air an ad during the Super Bowl.

Nielsen source on Super Bowl viewers
Article that encouraged me to write this blog post, from the NYT