Category Archives: Weekly Reflections

Tackling the Tragedy of the Commons in mining

Lotus Ruan, MAAPPS // Jan 25, 2015

While the call for a cleaner environment and greener alternative energy is on the rise around the globe since years ago, mining, which often leads to erosion, formation of sinkholes, loss of biodiversity, and contamination of soil, groundwater, surface water by chemical during the mining process, is still an important economic activity in many countries.

Mining takes place in half of the countries in the world; among them, 50 were considered by the World Bank as “mining countries” because such industry stood as one of the backbones for the country’s exports, domestic markets, or for employment. It is estimated that the formal mining sectors provides over 3.7 million employment, with more than 20 million workers involved in artisanal and small-scale mining . Statistics, though not the most up-to-date, reported that in 2010 there were 1.5 million people employed in the mining sector in developed countries, the figure being 2.2 million in developing ones. 

However, whereas the development and sustenance of the world economy requires exponential amounts of energy, most of it is non-sustainable natural resource. With the increasing population and more and more industrialized societies, how to better utilize and sustain the use of energy—and in our project in particular, it ranges from metals, coals, oil shale and other geological materials to non-renewable resource such as petroleum an natural gas—has become a an unnegligible concern, if not a priority, for local communities, environmental groups, and governments.

Such concern or the dilemma between economic development and environmental preservation , seen from a policy studies student’s perspective such as myself, can and should be explained through the concept of “the tragedy of the commons”. “Commons” often refers to shared resources that are not formally regulated. Coined by economist Garrett Hardin in his famous paper published on Science in 1968, this is perhaps one of the most commonly-shared concerns among policy-makers. The tragedy of the commons concept can be briefly explained as  individuals acting independently and rationally according to each’s self-interest, behave contrary to the best interests of the whole group, by depleting some common resource. It is often cited in connection with sustainable development, meshing economic growth and environmental protection.

Hardin pessimistically predicted that “the population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality.” Perhaps this is where the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and other local, domestic, or international monitoring organizations jump in in the field of mining. In essence, EITI, with the aim of increasing transparency in transactions between governments and companies within extractive industries, is hoping to establish a set of “morality” that helps regulate the mining industry.

The aim is encompassing and promising. However, regulations are not a cure-all. At the end of the way, it all boils down to whether local government, civil society, and mining companies themselves carry out and abide by these regulations or not. In fact, most mining countries have existing laws that require mining companies to follow stringent environmental and rehabilitation codes in order to minimize environmental impact and avoid impacting human health. The reality is, however, that relevant government or international regulations work out in some places but not others.

Why is that? What can we do to ensure the success of enforcement of regulations? IN the case of EITI regulations in particular, how can advance the transparency level in certain country and how is that related to its mineral resource development? These are some of the issues that I am concerned about in our project. Unfortunately, I don’t have any prior knowledge of mining or EITI and only little understanding of Mongolia and other EITI member countries. So my goal here is to learn as much as I can from my peers, instructors, published reports, and through interactions with local office, people, stakeholders that are actually involved in either EITI actives or the mining industry. Hopefully by the end of the project, I will be able to not only make sense of such economic activity but also produce policy recommendations to the tackle the tragedy of the commons problem in this resource-constrained industry.

10 Questions Every Mongolian Should Ask

Alex Wang and Bayanzul Davaasuren // March 31st 2014

Over the past week our working groups have analyzed sections of the 2011 Mongolia EITI Reconciliation document.  While a dense and data extensive document, a few key points emerged as critical questions everyone in Mongolia should be asking about mining and transparency as reported in  EITI efforts.

 

1. Who are the participants and stakeholders of the EITI report and what sort of working relationship do they have with each other?

 

2. How many exploitation licenses were issued/revoked and where were they located?

 

3. How much and in which ways does the government receive payments from companies in exploitation industry?

 

4. How do extractive companies function and complete a mandated responsibility of environmental protection and reclamation?

 

5. How many revenue discrepancies  are found in a single fiscal year and how does accounting work to adjust for these differences?

 

6. Which paths exist for local Mongolians exist to influence the implementation of EITI report and multi-stakeholder working group? At  Sum Level? Sub Council Level?

 

7. Why should citizens care about the EITI report and how they can benefit from and use it?

 

8. What is performance of local administrations and companies in reporting? Did they really treat EITI report seriously?

 

9. What recommendations and implementations were given in previous EITI reports and which recommendations are still difficult to execute?

 

10. Which kind of the mechanism(legal or otherwise) already exists to encourage EITI participation of companies and local administrations in Mongolia?

 

Corporate Social Responsibility and Mining in Mongolia

Alexandre Bastien // March 25th 2014

The number of donation by the mining companies in Mongolia is an amazing issue. The Boroo Gold LLC is the second biggest donor despite the fact that this foreign own company remains a marginal player in the Mongolian context. This is indeed an inspiring example of the commitment of a foreign company to share the benefits of its mining exploitation with the local population. This kind of behavior should be emulated by order companies since it creates a good basis to convince the population that the mining industry could improve their life.

This company has developed over the year a vast CSR program. The different component of this commitment to local communities include participation in the EITI, an environmental management system to deal with the negative externalities produced by their activities, a health and safety code to prevent an tragic event and a community development plan. This latter part of the CSR tries to maximize the benefits for communities by hiring locally, financing schools and other type of public goods. If you want more information on their social involvement in Mongolia or in Kyrgyzstan you can visit their website at

http://www.centerragold.com/corporate-responsibility/community-development

EITI Mongolia Civil Society Participation

Upon further inspection, who are the players in Mongolia’s NGO landscape are how are they involved in EITI transparency?

Solongo Bumtseren and Lauren Galacia // March 22nd 2014

More than 30 non-government organization (NGOs) are involved in the EITI process, including representation on the National Council and Multi-Stakeholders Working Group.

Organizations represented on the National Council include:

Ariun Suvarga, Human Rights and Development Center, Mongolian Association of Environmental Protection, Mongolian Civic Council of Environment, Mongolian Council of Environment, My Mongolia Land, Open Society Forum, Steps without Borders, and Transparency Foundation.

Organizations represented on the Multi-Stakeholders Working Group include:

Baigal Ekhiin Arval San, Mongolian Association of Environmental Protection, Mongolian Council of Environment, My Mongolia Land, Onon Ulz River Residentials, Open Society Forum, Owners of Khuvsgul Lake, Steps without Borders, Transparency Foundation, and  Zorig Foundation.

EITI Mongolia could consider expanding its coalition to include additional groups that may have an interest in natural resource management. For example, working groups in other EITI countries have included members that specialize in youth, gender, and disability, as well as representatives of professional associations such as journalists, lawyers, miners, and engineers.

 

NGO and Sub-National Participation

Revenue Watch International, working with the World Bank, has provided capacity building training for participating NGOs. The Open Society Forum and its partners have completed an assessment of the 2006-2011 EITI reports and have provided policy analysis and recommendations to policymakers.

In 2013, Publish What You Pay monitored the implementation of Government Resolution #222 and provided guidelines for establishing EITI Sub Councils. Sub Councils are regional steering committees consisting of members of regional government, NGOs, and companies that would promote transparency at the aimag and soum levels. Their main responsibilities would be to improve local citizen awareness about EITI, encourage civic participation, and strengthen communication networks. They would provide an annual report that includes disclosure of all licenses issued in the soum and agreements between companies and the local government, and they would organize activities such as an annual open forum for the local people.

No Sub Councils have been established yet because of budgetary issues, however, they have been the subject of ongoing discussions. Some concerns have been raised about Sub Council membership dependency on local government (the number of government members are disproportionate to civil organizations and companies) but there is general agreement that focusing activities towards local levels i.e. establishing Sub Council would contribute to more effective implementation of EITI in the country.

 

Dissemination of Information to the Public

Information from the EITI reports is made available on the EITI Mongolia website and distributed among Working Group members. To raise general awareness, EITI has organized provincial outreach events, presented at trade fairs, and participated in public meetings. There have a number of suggestions of ways that the information in EITI reports could be more accessible and meaningful to the general public. These include: creating summary reports using more simple language, providing information about companies operating in each soum, and providing information about payments by project.   

Media participation related to EITI is comparably weak, with only periodic reporting of EITI on news, radio, and television. EITI’s 2013 Communication Plan included many ideas for improving media participation, such as developing special TV and radio programs about EITI and broadcasting them through central and local channels. Another idea was using social and mobile media to communicate with public regarding reporting process (for example, key messages would be delivered to citizens via their cell phones.) However, none of these ideas have been implemented yet. Media participation in EITI is still in a beginning stage and has not significantly improved over 7 years of EITI implementation in Mongolia.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Week 2 Reflection : Understanding the Stakeholders

Ben Collins // March 16th 2014

After an extensive class discussion and a flurry of emails, we decided that we would focus on trying to improve the communication of the EITI report.  We had a lengthy discussion on what we felt were the most important aspects coming out of the report.

Eventually to help clearly communicate them.  Discussions took place on creating a 2 page summary sheet for each report, again to help highlight the important insights.  The difficult part is that different stakeholder could have different thoughts on which aspects of the report are most important.  We determined that a survey sent to various EITI stakeholders (NGOs, governments and companies), would help us frame the most important aspects to include in a 2 page summary.

We are focussing on finding out the information from the EITI that is most important to the Mongolian people.  Thus, our survey is designed and tailored to NGOs and governmental organizations working with and representing the Mongolian people.

 

Over the last week as a class we were able to brainstorm survey questions and create a draft of our online survey.  The class also divided up into a number of groups: communications, surveying, visual media and report writing.  The next steps are to create a list of who to contact for the survey and to continue to learn and gather information about the EITI report in Mongolia.